Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.

Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of evidence that has led to major recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region based on updated information in the field that including both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 1 of the whole consensus document, which describes the general concept of coronary physiology, as well as practical information on the clinical application of physiologic indices and novel image-based physiologic assessment.

Integrated Assessment of Computational Coronary Physiology From a Single Angiographic View in Patients Undergoing TAVI.

BACKGROUND: Angiography-derived computational physiology is an appealing alternative to pressure-wire coronary physiology assessment. However, little is known about its reliability in the setting of severe aortic stenosis. This study sought to provide an integrated assessment of epicardial and microvascular coronary circulation by means of single-view angiography-derived physiology in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). METHODS: Pre-TAVI angiographic projections of 198 stenotic coronary arteries (123 patients) were analyzed by means of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio and angiography microvascular resistance. Wire-based reference measurements were available for comparison: fractional flow reserve (FFR) in all cases, instantaneous wave-free ratio in 148, and index of microvascular resistance in 42 arteries. RESULTS: No difference in terms of the number of ischemia-causing stenoses was detected between FFR ≤0.80 and Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 (19.7% versus 19.2%; P=0.899), while this was significantly higher when instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (44.6%; P=0.001) was used. The accuracy of Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio ≤0.80 in predicting pre-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 was significantly higher than the accuracy of instantaneous wave-free ratio ≤0.89 (93.4% versus 77.0%; P=0.001), driven by a higher positive predictive value (86.9% versus 50%). Similar findings were observed when considering post-TAVI FFR ≤0.80 as reference. In 82 cases with post-TAVI angiographic projections, Murray's law-based quantitative flow ratio values remained stable, with a low rate of reclassification of stenosis significance (9.9%), similar to FFR and instantaneous wave-free ratio. Angiography microvascular resistance demonstrated a significant correlation (Rho=0.458; P=0.002) with index of microvascular resistance, showing an area under the curve of 0.887 (95% CI, 0.752-0.964) in predicting index of microvascular resistance ≥25. CONCLUSIONS: Angiography-derived physiology provides a valid, reliable, and systematic assessment of the coronary circulation in a complex scenario, such as severe aortic stenosis.

Two birds with one stone: integrated assessment of coronary physiology and plaque vulnerability from a single angiographic view-a case report.

Background: Physiology-guided coronary revascularization was shown to improve clinical outcomes in multiple patient subsets, whilst in those presenting with acute coronary syndromes, it seems to be associated with an excess of cardiovascular events. One of the major drawbacks in this setting is the potential deferral of non-flow-limiting but 'vulnerable' coronary plaques. Case summary: A 40-year-old patient presented with a myocardial infarction without ST-segment elevation (NSTEMI). At the invasive coronary angiography (ICA) a sub-occlusive stenosis on his left circumflex artery was detected and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The treatment of a concomitant intermediate eccentric focal stenosis on the right coronary artery (RCA) was deferred after a negative pressure wire-based physiological assessment. The patient was re-admitted 9 months later due to a recurrent NSTEMI, and a severe progression of the deferred RCA lesion was found at the ICA. In retrospect, an angiography-based assessment of physiological severity and plaque vulnerability of the non-culprit RCA stenosis by means of Murray's law-based QFR (µQFR) and radial wall strain (RWS) was performed. At baseline, µQFR value (0.90) corroborated the non-ischaemic findings of wire-based assessment. However, RWS analysis showed a marked hotspot (maximum RWS value 27.7%), indicating the presence of a vulnerable plaque. Discussion: Radial wall strain is a novel biomechanical deformation index derived from coronary angiography. Segments with high RWS are associated with lipid-rich plaques that are prone to progression and plaque rupture. Therefore, the identification of RWS hotspots might potentially improve the risk stratification of non-culprit lesions and empower secondary prevention strategies.

Dynamic assessment of the left main-left circumflex bending angle: Implications for ostial left circumflex artery in-stent restenosis after successful two-stent PCI.

BACKGROUND: Two-stent techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) on left main (LM) bifurcation (LMB) lesions are associated with an increased risk of in-stent restenosis (ISR) at left circumflex artery (LCx) ostium but the underlying mechanisms are incompletely understood. This study sought to investigate the association between cyclic change of LM-LCx bending angle (BALM-LCx) and the risk of ostial LCx ISR following two-stent techniques. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort of patients undergoing two-stent PCI for LMB lesions, BALM-LCx and distal bifurcation angle (DBA) were computed with 3-dimensional angiographic reconstruction. The analysis was performed both at end-diastole and end-systole, and the angulation change throughout the cardiac cycle was defined as the cardiac motion-induced angulation change (∆CAngle). RESULTS: A total of 101 patients were included. The mean pre-procedural BALM-LCx was 66.8 ± 16.1° at end-diastole and 54.1 ± 13.3° at end-systole with a range of 13.0 ± 7.7°. Pre-procedural ∆CBALM-LCx > 16.4° was the most relevant predictor of ostial LCx ISR (adjusted OR 11.58, 95% CI 4.04-33.19; p < 0.001). Post-procedural ∆CBALM-LCx > 9.8° and stent-induced diastolic BALM-LCx change > 11.6° were also related with ostial LCx ISR. DBA was positively correlated with BALM-LCx and showed a weaker association of pre-procedural ∆CDBA > 14.5° with ostial LCx ISR (adjusted OR 6.87, 95% CI 2.57-18.37; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Three-dimensional angiographic bending angle is a feasible and reproducible novel method for LMB angulation measurement. A large pre-procedural cyclic change of BALM-LCx was associated with an increased risk of ostial LCx ISR following two-stent techniques.

When Aortic Stenosis Is Not Alone: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis and Management in Mixed and Combined Valvular Disease.

Aortic stenosis (AS) may present frequently combined with other valvular diseases or mixed with aortic regurgitation, with peculiar physio-pathological and clinical implications. The hemodynamic interactions between AS in mixed or combined valve disease depend on the specific combination of valve lesions and may result in diagnostic pitfalls at echocardiography; other imaging modalities may be helpful. Indeed, diagnosis is challenging because several echocardiographic methods commonly used to assess stenosis or regurgitation have been validated only in patients with the single-valve disease. Moreover, in the developed world, patients with multiple valve diseases tend to be older and more fragile over time; also, when more than one valvular lesion needs to address the surgical risk rises together with the long-term risk of morbidity and mortality associated with multiple valve prostheses, and the likelihood and risk of reoperation. Therefore, when AS presents mixed or combined valve disease, the heart valve team must integrate various parameters into the diagnosis and management strategy, including suitability for single or multiple transcatheter valve procedures. This review aims to summarize the most critical pathophysiological mechanisms underlying AS when associated with mitral regurgitation, mitral stenosis, aortic regurgitation, and tricuspid regurgitation. We will focus on echocardiography, clinical implications, and the most important treatment strategies.