Quality and Accessibility of Home Assessment mHealth Apps for Community Living: Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Home assessment is a critical component of successful home modifications, enabling individuals with functional limitations to age in place comfortably. A high-quality home assessment tool should facilitate a valid and reliable assessment involving health care and housing professionals, while also engaging and empowering consumers and their caregivers who may be dealing with multiple functional limitations. Unlike traditional paper-and-pencil assessments, which require extensive training and expert knowledge and can be alienating to consumers, mobile health (mHealth) apps have the potential to engage all parties involved, empowering and activating consumers to take action. However, little is known about which apps contain all the necessary functionality, quality appraisal, and accessibility. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the functionality, overall quality, and accessibility of mHealth home assessment apps. METHODS: mHealth apps enabling home assessment for aging in place were identified through a comprehensive search of scholarly articles, the Apple (iOS) and Google Play (Android) stores in the United States, and fnd.io. The search was conducted between November 2022 and January 2023 following a method adapted from PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Reviewers performed a content analysis of the mobile app features to evaluate their functionality, overall quality, and accessibility. The functionality assessment used a home assessment component matrix specifically developed for this study. For overall quality, the Mobile Application Rating Scale (MARS) was used to determine the apps' effectiveness in engaging and activating consumers and their caregivers. Accessibility was assessed using the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 (A and AA levels). These 3 assessments were synthesized and visualized to provide a comprehensive evaluation. RESULTS: A total of 698 apps were initially identified. After further screening, only 6 apps remained. Our review revealed that none of the apps used thoroughly tested assessment tools, offered all the functionality required for reliable home assessment, achieved the "good" quality threshold as measured by the MARS, or met the accessibility criteria when evaluated against WCAG 2.1. However, DIYModify received the highest scores in both the overall quality and accessibility assessments. The MapIt apps also showed significant potential due to their ability to measure the 3D environment and the inclusion of a desktop version that extends the app's functionality. CONCLUSIONS: Our review revealed that there are very few apps available within the United States that possess the necessary functionality, engaging qualities, and accessibility to effectively activate consumers and their caregivers for successful home modification. Future app development should prioritize the integration of reliable and thoroughly tested assessment tools as the foundation of the development process. Furthermore, efforts should be made to enhance the overall quality and accessibility of these apps to better engage and empower consumers to take necessary actions to age in place.

Evaluating the Acceptability and Appropriateness of the Augmented Reality Home Assessment Tool (ARHAT): Qualitative Descriptive Study.

Background: The Augmented Reality Home Assessment Tool (ARHAT) is a mobile app developed to provide rapid, highly accurate assessments of the home environment. It uses 3D-capture technologies to help people identify and address functional limitations and environmental barriers. Objective: This study was conducted to gain stakeholder feedback on the acceptability and appropriateness of the ARHAT for identifying and addressing barriers within home environments. Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was conducted because it allows for variability when obtaining data and seeks to understand stakeholders' insights on an understudied phenomenon. Each stakeholder group (occupational therapists, housing professionals, and aging adult and caregiver "dyads") participated in a 60-minute, web-based focus group via a secure Zoom platform. Focus group data were analyzed by 2 trained qualitative research team members using a framework method for analysis. Results: A total of 19 stakeholders, aged from 18 to 85+ years, were included in the study. Of the occupational therapists (n=5, 26%), housing professionals (n=3, 16%), and dyads (n=11, 58%), a total of 32% (n=6) were male and 68% (n=13) were female, with most living in the Midwestern United States (n=10, 53%). The focus group data demonstrate the acceptability and appropriateness of the workflow, style, measurement tools, and impact of the ARHAT. All stakeholders stated that they could see the ARHAT being used at many different levels and by any population. Dyads specifically mentioned that the ARHAT would allow them to do forward planning and made them think of home modifications in a new light. Conclusions: Stakeholders found the ARHAT to be acceptable and appropriate for identifying and addressing functional limitations and barriers in the home environment. This study highlights the importance of considering the workflow, style, measurement tools, and potential impact of home assessment technology early in the developmental process.

Adapting and Testing the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool for Use in Dementia Care: Protocol for a 2 Sequential Phase Study.

BACKGROUND: Research and policy demonstrate the value of and need for systematically identifying and preparing care partners for their caregiving responsibilities while their family member or friend living with dementia is hospitalized. The Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) has undergone content and face validation and has been endorsed as appropriate by clinicians to facilitate the timely identification and preparation of care partners of older adult patients during their hospitalization. However, the CHAT has not yet been adapted or prospectively evaluated for use with care partners of hospitalized people living with dementia. Adapting and testing the CHAT via a pilot study will provide the necessary evidence to optimize feasibility and enable future efficacy trials. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this paper is to describe the study protocol for the adaptation and testing of the CHAT for use among care partners of hospitalized people living with dementia to better prepare them for their caregiving responsibilities after hospital discharge. METHODS: Our protocol is based on the National Institutes of Health Stage Model and consists of 2 sequential phases, including formative research and the main trial. In phase 1, we will use a participatory human-centered design process that incorporates people living with dementia and their care partners, health care administrators, and clinicians to adapt the CHAT for dementia care (ie, the Dementia CHAT [D-CHAT]; stage IA). In phase 2, we will partner with a large academic medical system to complete a pilot randomized controlled trial to examine the feasibility and estimate the size of the effect of the D-CHAT on care partners' preparedness for caregiving (stage IB). We anticipate this study to take approximately 60 months to complete, from study start-up procedures to dissemination. The 2 phases will take place between December 1, 2022, and November 30, 2027. RESULTS: The study protocol will yield (1) a converged-upon, ready-for-feasibility testing D-CHAT; (2) descriptive and feasibility characteristics of delivering the D-CHAT; and (3) effect size estimates of the D-CHAT on care partner preparedness. We anticipate that the resultant D-CHAT will provide clinicians with guidance on how to identify and better prepare care partners for hospitalized people living with dementia. In turn, care partners will feel equipped to fulfill caregiving roles for their family members or friends living with dementia. CONCLUSIONS: The expected results of this study are to favorably impact hospital-based care processes and outcomes for people living with dementia and their care partners and to elucidate the essential caregiving role that so many care partners of people living with dementia assume. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05592366; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05592366. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/46808.

Evaluation of Face Validity and Acceptability of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool.

Background and Objectives: Care partners of hospitalized older adults report their caregiving needs are not being addressed. The Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) is a feasible and appropriate tool for practitioners' use with care partners in the hospital setting. This article explores the face validity and acceptability of the CHAT among care partners of hospitalized older adults. Research Design and Methods: A qualitative descriptive study was used to identify common themes among care partners' responses from semistructured interviews. The CHAT was administered to care partners of older adults admitted to a medical-surgical unit in an academic medical center in Madison, WI, from October 2021 to January 2022. A semistructured, follow-up interview was completed by the same care partners after discharge. Interviews were transcribed and coded for themes to capture overall impressions of the CHAT. Care partners addressed the usefulness, comfort, content, and complexity of the CHAT. Results: Twelve care partners participated in the study. Care partners reported that the CHAT was easy to understand and complete, was judged to be useful to both the care partner and older adult, and helped identify care partner needs. Care partners suggested ways to improve the tool including administration, additional content areas to include, and modes of delivery. Discussion and Implications: The results establish the face validity of the CHAT and support the acceptability of the tool for use with care partners of hospitalized older adults.

Relationship between health care interactions and care partner burden.

INTRODUCTION: Older adults often rely on care partners, such as family and friends, to assist with their health-related needs associated with aging. Care partner burden is associated with higher rehospitalization rates and poorer health outcomes for older adults. This study examines the relationship between 3 types of health care interactions and care partner burden. METHOD: Secondary data analyses using cross-sectional data from the 2017 National Study of Caregiving were conducted. A total of 2,313 care partners (representing approximately 21.2 million) of living Medicare beneficiaries age 65 and older were included in the analyses. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to determine the relationship between health care interactions and care partner burden. RESULTS: Care partners with burden were significantly more likely to be female (p = .049); white (p = .011); and a spouse, adult child, or grandchild of the older adult (p < .001). Logistic regression analyses showed that making medical appointments (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.13-2.07) and coordinating care between providers (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI: 1.27-2.32) were significantly associated with care partner burden. DISCUSSION: Care partners of older adults who helped make medical appointments or coordinated care between providers were significantly more likely to report burden compared to those who did not assist with these health care interactions. It is essential that health care systems and providers determine ways to make health care interactions less burdensome for care partners. Care delivery approaches that align with family systems thinking may help reduce care partner burden by strengthening health care interactions. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Occupational Therapy Practice Guidelines for Adults With Chronic Conditions.

IMPORTANCE: Demand is increasing for occupational therapy practitioners to help the growing population of adults with chronic conditions manage their conditions. OBJECTIVE: This Practice Guideline, which is informed by systematic reviews of the literature on the use of self-management interventions, is meant to guide occupational therapy practitioners' clinical decision making when working with community-dwelling adults with chronic conditions. The chronic conditions included heart disease, chronic lung conditions, diabetes, and kidney disease. The self-management interventions addressed ADLs and sleep and rest; IADLs; education, work, volunteering, leisure, and social participation; and the caregiver role. METHOD: We reviewed, discussed, and integrated the clinical recommendations developed from four systematic reviews, supporting literature, and expert opinion to provide recommendations for practice. RESULTS: A total of 102 articles were included in the systematic reviews, which served as the primary basis for the practice recommendations. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Strong to moderate evidence supports clinical recommendations for the use of self-management interventions when working with clients with chronic conditions. We recommend the use of a multimodal approach that includes three components-education, goal setting, and problem solving-over an extended period to assist clients in establishing self-management habits and routines. On the basis of emerging evidence and expert opinion, we recommend that occupational therapy practitioners consider using a prevention approach, helping clients establish habits and routines, and emphasizing shared goal setting when addressing clients' self-management of chronic conditions. What This Article Adds: This Practice Guideline provides a summary of strong to moderate evidence that supports clinical recommendations for the use of self-management interventions with clients with chronic conditions. When guided by this evidence, occupational therapy practitioners are better able to help clients meet their occupational challenges.

Occupational Therapy Practice Guidelines for Adults With Chronic Conditions.

IMPORTANCE: Demand is increasing for occupational therapy practitioners to help the growing population of adults with chronic conditions manage their conditions. OBJECTIVE: This Practice Guideline, which is informed by systematic reviews of the literature on the use of self-management interventions, is meant to guide occupational therapy practitioners' clinical decision making when working with community-dwelling adults with chronic conditions. The chronic conditions included heart disease, chronic lung conditions, diabetes, and kidney disease. The self-management interventions addressed ADLs and sleep and rest; IADLs; education, work, volunteering, leisure, and social participation; and the caregiver role. METHOD: We reviewed, discussed, and integrated the clinical recommendations developed from four systematic reviews, supporting literature, and expert opinion to provide recommendations for practice. RESULTS: A total of 102 articles were included in the systematic reviews, which served as the primary basis for the practice recommendations. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Strong to moderate evidence supports clinical recommendations for the use of self-management interventions when working with clients with chronic conditions. We recommend the use of a multimodal approach that includes three components-education, goal setting, and problem solving-over an extended period to assist clients in establishing self-management habits and routines. On the basis of emerging evidence and expert opinion, we recommend that occupational therapy practitioners consider using a prevention approach, helping clients establish habits and routines, and emphasizing shared goal setting when addressing clients' self-management of chronic conditions. What This Article Adds: This Practice Guideline provides a summary of strong to moderate evidence that supports clinical recommendations for the use of self-management interventions with clients with chronic conditions. When guided by this evidence, occupational therapy practitioners are better able to help clients meet their occupational challenges.

Learning Health Systems Can Promote and Sustain High-Value Occupational Therapy.

In the current policy context, the occupational therapy profession must act to promote and sustain high-value care. Stakeholders have delineated efforts, such as defining and measuring high-quality care processes or promoting the adoption of evidence into practice, that can enhance the value of occupational therapy services. There is a growing recognition, however, that low-value care is the product of deficiencies within health care systems and is therefore most amenable to system-level solutions. To date, the specific nature of system-level changes capable of identifying and rectifying low-value occupational therapy has yet to be elucidated. In this "The Issue Is. . ." column, we introduce occupational therapy to the Learning Health System concept and its essential functions. Moreover, we discuss action steps for occupational therapy stakeholders to lay the foundation for Learning Health Systems in their own professional contexts. What This Article Adds: This article is the first to outline concrete action steps needed to transform occupational therapy practice contexts into Learning Health Systems. Such a transformation would represent a system-level change capable of fostering the delivery of high-value occupational therapy services to clients in a variety of practice settings.

The Development and Content Validation of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: When aging adults are hospitalized due to a major health event, they often turn to care partners ('family members or friends') for support. Assessment of care partners' needs during hospital care may be important to inform and target information and skills training that will equip them to fulfill caregiving tasks for the aging adults. The objectives of this study were to develop and complete content validation of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT). METHODS: Based on standard instrumentation methodology and an assessment framework recommended by the National Center on Caregiving at the Family Caregiving Alliance, three steps were followed to develop and validate CHAT: (1) generation of a 24-item tool grouped into three content domains (background, plans and preferences, skills and supports), and a survey by a multidisciplinary team, (2) administration of an online survey of care partners and experts, and (3) assessment of item and scale-content validity indices (I-CVI and S-CVI). RESULTS: A total of four care partners that provide unpaid care to a family member or friend age 65 years or older with a chronic illness or disability either before or after a hospitalization, and 19 leading experts in gerontology, caregiving, and health services completed an online survey in English. Twenty-two items were accepted by having an I-CVI at or above the acceptable 78% cut point; the S-CVI for the tool was 85%. Most revisions to the tool were associated with modifying or clarifying language within each item. For example, participants shared the following open-ended suggestions for revising CHAT: (1) change the "do you prefer" sentence stem to "do you want" (n = 12), define "training" (n = 6), and (2) allow care partners to provide an unsure response (n = 5). CONCLUSION: CHAT may be a promising way to increase health care practitioner's understanding of care partners' backgrounds, preferences and plans, and potential information or training needs during a patient's hospital stay. Initial evaluation of CHAT reveals strong conceptual development and content validity.

Evaluating the Appropriateness and Feasibility of the Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT).

Hospital practitioners rely on care partners of older adults to provide complex care without identifying and addressing their needs. The Care Partner Hospital Assessment Tool (CHAT) was developed to identify the education skill training needs of care partners of hospitalized older adults. This two-phased mixed-method study evaluated the appropriateness and feasibility of the CHAT. The phase 1 quantitative survey with caregiving experts indicated 70-100% agreement for the length and helpfulness of the CHAT (n = 23). These results were supported by phase 2 qualitative interviews with hospital administrators and practitioners, which revealed the following themes: (1) intuitive and clear design worth sustaining and (2) concerns and proposed solutions for implementation. Findings suggest the CHAT is an appropriate and feasible tool for hospital practitioners to tailor their education and skills training to address care partners' needs. Identifying care partners' needs is an important step in ensuring they are prepared to complete their caregiving responsibilities.

A Multisite Case Study of Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable Act Implementation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania passed the Caregiver Advise, Record, Enable (CARE) Act on April 20, 2016. We designed a study to explore early implementation at a large, integrated delivery financing system. Our goal was to assess the effects of system-level decisions on unit implementation and the incorporation of the CARE Act's three components into routine care delivery. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a multisite, ethnographic case study at three different hospitals' medical-surgical units. We conducted observations and semi-structured interview to understand the implementation process and the approach to caregiver identification, notification, and education. We used thematic analysis to code interviews and observations and linked findings to the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services framework. RESULTS: Organizational context and electronic health record capability were instrumental to the CARE Act implementation and integration into workflow. The implementation team used a decentralized strategy and a variety of communication modes, relying on local hospital units to train staff and make the changes. We found that the system facilitated the CARE Act implementation by placing emphasis on the documentation and charting to demonstrate compliance with the legal requirements. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: General acute hospitals will be making or have made similar decisions on how to operationalize the regulatory components and demonstrate compliance with the CARE Act. This study can help to inform others as they design and improve their compliance and implementation strategies.