Prospective Observational Multisite Study of Handover in the Emergency Department: Theory versus Practice.

INTRODUCTION: The handover process in the emergency department (ED) is relevant for patient outcomes and lays the foundation for adequate patient care. The aim of this study was to examine the current prehospital to ED handover practice with regard to content, structure, and scope. METHODS: We carried out a prospective, multicenter observational study using a specifically developed checklist. The steps of the handover process in the ED were documented in relation to qualification of the emergency medical services (EMS) staff, disease severity, injury patterns, and treatment priority. RESULTS: We documented and evaluated 721 handovers based on the checklist. According to ISBAR (Identification, Situation, Background, Assessment, Recommendation), MIST (Mechanism, Injuries, Signs/Symptoms, Treatment), and BAUM (Situation [German: Bestand], Anamnesis, Examination [German: Untersuchung], Measures), almost all handovers showed a deficit in structure and scope (99.4%). The age of the patient was reported 339 times (47.0%) at the time of handover. The time of the emergency onset was reported in 272 cases (37.7%). The following vital signs were transferred more frequently for resuscitation room patients than for treatment room patients: blood pressure (BP)/(all comparisons p < 0.05), heart rate (HR), oxygen saturation (SpO2) and Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS). Physicians transmitted these vital signs more frequently than paramedics BP, HR, SpO2, and GCS. A handover with a complete ABCDE algorithm (Airway, Breathing, Circulation, Disability, Environment/Exposure) took place only 31 times (4.3%). There was a significant difference between the occupational groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Despite many studies on handover standardization, there is a remarkable inconsistency in the transfer of information. A "hand-off bundle" must be created to standardize the handover process, consisting of a uniform mnemonic accompanied by education of staff, training, and an audit process.

CT fatty muscle fraction as a new parameter for muscle quality assessment predicts outcome in venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Impaired skeletal muscle quality is a major risk factor for adverse outcomes in acute respiratory failure. However, conventional methods for skeletal muscle assessment are inapplicable in the critical care setting. This study aimed to determine the prognostic value of computed tomography (CT) fatty muscle fraction (FMF) as a biomarker of muscle quality in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). To calculate FMF, paraspinal skeletal muscle area was obtained from clinical CT and separated into areas of fatty and lean muscle based on densitometric thresholds. The cohort was binarized according to median FMF. Patients with high FMF displayed significantly increased 1-year mortality (72.7% versus 55.8%, P = 0.036) on Kaplan-Meier analysis. A multivariable logistic regression model was built to test the impact of FMF on outcome. FMF was identified as a significant predictor of 1-year mortality (hazard ratio per percent FMF, 1.017 [95% confidence interval, 1.002-1.033]; P = 0.031), independent of anthropometric characteristics, Charlson Comorbidity Index, Simplified Acute Physiology Score, Respiratory Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Survival Prediction Score, and duration of ECMO support. To conclude, FMF predicted 1-year mortality independently of established clinical prognosticators in ECMO patients and may have the potential to become a new muscle quality imaging biomarker, which is available from clinical CT.

MRI Assessment of Chylous and Nonchylous Effusions: Use of Multipoint Dixon Fat Quantification.

Background Diagnosis of chylous effusions normally requires invasive paracentesis. Purpose To assess whether MRI with multipoint Dixon fat quantification allows for noninvasive differentiation of chylous and nonchylous ascites and pleural effusions. Materials and Methods Phantom, ex vivo, and in vivo MRI examinations were performed by using a commercially available multipoint Dixon pulse sequence with a 1.5-T MRI system. Fat fraction values were measured with a region of interest-based approach on reconstructed maps. For phantom evaluation, eight titrated fatty fluid solutions (nonhuman samples) with varying triglyceride content (145-19 000 mg/dL [1.64-214.7 mmol/L]) were examined. For ex vivo evaluation, 15 chylous and five nonchylous study participant fluid samples were examined. In a prospective study performed from June 2016 to February 2018, 29 study participants with known chylous (n = 17) and nonchylous (n = 12) effusions were evaluated with MRI. All clinical samples underwent laboratory testing for triglyceride level, total protein level, white blood cells, and red blood cells. Laboratory values were correlated with fat fraction values; the optimal fat fraction threshold was determined to differentiate chylous and nonchylous fluids. Results Phantom analysis showed that fat fraction values correlated with triglyceride content (r = 0.99, P < .001). In ex vivo studies, multipoint Dixon-derived fat fraction was higher in chylous versus nonchylous fluids (mean, 2.5% ± 1.2 [standard deviation] vs 0.8% ± 0.2; P = .001). Fat fraction was correlated with triglyceride content (r = 0.96, P < .001). For in vivo studies, fat fraction was greater for chylous versus nonchylous fluids (mean, 6.2% ± 4.3 vs 0.6% ± 0.6; P < .001). In vivo fat fraction was correlated with triglyceride content (r = 0.96, P < .001). Use of a fat fraction cutoff value greater than 1.8% yielded a sensitivity of 14 of 17 (82% [95% confidence interval (CI): 57%, 97%]) and a specificity of 12 of 12 (100% [95% CI: 74%, 100%]) for differentiation of chylous and nonchylous effusions. Conclusion MRI can help identify chylous versus nonchylous ascites and pleural effusions through use of multipoint Dixon fat quantification. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Characterization of Severe Arterial Phase Respiratory Motion Artifact on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI - Assessment of Interrater Agreement and Reliability.

PURPOSE: To assess the interrater agreement and reliability of experienced abdominal radiologists in the characterization and grading of arterial phase gadoxetate disodium-related respiratory motion artifact on liver MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective multicenter study was initiated by the working group for abdominal imaging within the German Roentgen Society (DRG), and approved by the local IRB of each participating center. 11 board-certified radiologists independently reviewed 40 gadoxetate disodium-enhanced liver MRI datasets. Motion artifacts in the arterial phase were assessed on a 5-point scale. Interrater agreement and reliability were calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Kendall coefficient of concordance (W), with p < 0.05 deemed significant. RESULTS: The ICC for interrater agreement and reliability were 0.983 (CI 0.973 - 0.990) and 0.985 (CI 0.978 - 0.991), respectively (both p < 0.0001), indicating excellent agreement and reliability. Kendall's W for interrater agreement was 0.865. A severe motion artifact, defined as a mean motion score ≥ 4 in the arterial phase was observed in 12 patients. In these specific cases, a motion score ≥ 4 was assigned by all readers in 75 % (n = 9/12 cases). CONCLUSION: Differentiation and grading of arterial phase respiratory motion artifact is possible with a high level of inter-/intrarater agreement and interrater reliability, which is crucial for assessing the incidence of this phenomenon in larger multicenter studies. KEY POINTS: · Inter- and intrarater agreement for motion artifact scoring is excellent among experienced readers.. · Interrater reliability for motion artifact scoring is excellent among experienced readers.. · Characterization of severe motion artifacts proved feasible in this multicenter study.. CITATION FORMAT: · Ringe KI, Luetkens JA, Fimmers R et al. Characterization of Severe Arterial Phase Respiratory Motion Artifact on Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI - Assessment of Interrater Agreement and Reliability. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2017; 190: 341 - 347.

Meningioma assessment: Kinetic parameters in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI appear independent from microvascular anatomy and VEGF expression.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Kinetic parameters of T1-weighted dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) are considered to be influenced by microvessel environment. This study was performed to explore the extent of this association for meningiomas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DCE-MRI kinetic parameters (contrast agent transfer constants Ktrans and kep, volume fractions vp and ve) were determined in pre-operative 3T MRI of meningioma patients for later biopsy sites (19 patients; 15 WHO Io, no previous radiation, and 4 WHO IIIo pre-radiated recurrent tumors). Sixty-three navigated biopsies were consecutively retrieved. Biopsies were immunohistochemically investigated with endothelial marker CD34 and VEGF antibodies, stratified in a total of 4383 analysis units and computationally assessed for VEGF expression and vascular parameters (vessel density, vessel quantity, vascular fraction within tissue [vascular area ratio], vessel wall thickness). Derivability of kinetic parameters from VEGF expression or microvascularization was determined by mixed linear regression analysis. Tissue kinetic and microvascular parameters were tested for their capacity to identify the radiation status in a subanalysis. RESULTS: Kinetic parameters were neither significantly related to the corresponding microvascular parameters nor to tissue VEGF expression. There was no significant association between microvessel density and its presumed correlate vp (P=0.07). The subgroup analysis of high-grade radiated meningiomas showed a significantly reduced microvascular density (AUC 0.91; P<0.0001) and smaller total vascular fraction (AUC 0.73; P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In meningioma, DCE-MRI kinetic parameters neither allow for a reliable prediction of tumor microvascularization, nor for a prediction of VEGF expression. Kinetic parameters seem to be determined from different independent factors.

Validity of the Manchester Triage System in patients with sepsis presenting at the ED: a first assessment.

BACKGROUND: The Manchester Triage System (MTS) does not have a specific presentational flow chart for sepsis. The goal of this investigation was to determine adequacy of acuity assignment for patients with sepsis presenting at the ED and triaged using the MTS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective analysis included patients >16 presenting to an ED in Bonn, Germany, on the first 12 days of each month between June 2012 and March 2014. Patients were classified into one of three septic groups, or no sepsis. For those with sepsis, adequacy of acuity assignment was based on the criteria of the first consensus conference of the American College of Chest Physicians and Society of Critical Care Medicine, first published in 1992. Adequacy of prioritisation is expressed as sensitivity and likelihood ratio (LR-). RESULTS: Among 20 836 patients evaluated, 801 (3.8%) were septic; of these, 581 (72.5%) had sepsis, 194 (24.2%) had severe sepsis and 26 (3.2%) had severe sepsis with circulation dysfunction. Patients who met the criteria for sepsis were correctly prioritised with a sensitivity of 70.4% (95% CI 66.5 to 74.0). The LR- was 0.628 (95% CI 0.564 to 0.698). Patients with severe sepsis were appropriately prioritised with a sensitivity of 84.5% (95% CI 78.1 to 89.4), and LR- was 0.330 (95% CI 0.243 to 0.450). In the group with severe sepsis and circulation dysfunction, sensitivity of MTS was 61.5% (95% CI 39.3 to 79.8), and LR- was 0.466 (95% CI 0.286 to 0.757). CONCLUSIONS: The MTS has some weaknesses regarding priority levels in emergency patients with septic illness. Overall, target key symptoms (discriminators) which aim at identifying systemic infection and ascertaining vital parameters are insufficiently considered.

The German Version of the Manchester Triage System and its quality criteria--first assessment of validity and reliability.

BACKGROUND: The German Version of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) has found widespread use in EDs across German-speaking Europe. Studies about the quality criteria validity and reliability of the MTS currently only exist for the English-language version. Most importantly, the content of the German version differs from the English version with respect to presentation diagrams and change indicators, which have a significant impact on the category assigned. This investigation offers a preliminary assessment in terms of validity and inter-rater reliability of the German MTS. METHODS: Construct validity of assigned MTS level was assessed based on comparisons to hospitalization (general / intensive care), mortality, ED and hospital length of stay, level of prehospital care and number of invasive diagnostics. A sample of 45,469 patients was used. Inter-rater agreement between an expert and triage nurses (reliability) was calculated separately for a subset group of 167 emergency patients. RESULTS: For general hospital admission the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic was 0.749; for admission to ICU it was 0.871. An examination of MTS-level and number of deceased patients showed that the higher the priority derived from MTS, the higher the number of deaths (p<0.0001 / χ² Test). There was a substantial difference in the 30-day survival among the 5 MTS categories (p<0.0001 / log-rank test).The AUC for the predict 30-day mortality was 0.613. Categories orange and red had the highest numbers of heart catheter and endoscopy. Category red and orange were mostly accompanied by an emergency physician, whereas categories blue and green were walk-in patients. Inter-rater agreement between expert triage nurses was almost perfect (κ = 0.954). CONCLUSION: The German version of the MTS is a reliable and valid instrument for a first assessment of emergency patients in the emergency department.

Prevalence and causes of registered blindness in the largest federal state of Germany.

AIM: As no current estimates for the prevalence and causes of blindness in Germany are available, the database of Germany's largest welfare institution (covering 9.5 million people in the federal state of Northrhine) assessing eligibility for an allowance payable to blind people was used to investigate the prevalence and the specific causes of blindness and visual impairment. METHODS: Data from a representative sample of 5100 cases out of 20 365 cases were extracted, entered into an electronic database and statistically analysed. Blindness and severe vision impairment were defined as visual acuity equal to or below 20/1000 and 20/400, respectively, in the better-seeing eye. RESULTS: The mean age of the overall sample was 72±22 years and the mean visual acuity of the better seeing eye was 20/800. The prevalence of blindness and severe vision impairment in Northrhine was estimated to be 47.91 per 25,000 [corrected] persons. Most registered visual impairment was due to age-related macular degeneration (AMD; 41%), followed by glaucoma (15%) and diabetic eye disease (10%). Sixty-five per cent of registered blind people were women, 56% of them over the age of 80 years. Registered children and teenagers had the relative worst visual acuity (hand movement) and patients with retinal dystrophies had the relative best visual acuity (20/200) within the whole cohort (p<0.001). Standardised prevalence of blindness and severe visual impairment for Germany is estimated to be 44.4/100.000 (57.94 for women and 30.78 for men). CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of blindness and severe vision impairment for Germany compare well to other European countries. AMD is the most prevalent cause of registered blindness and severe vision impairment, and prevalence in women is higher. Generally, prevalence increases with age. Provision of support and welfare services need to be organised accordingly.