[Determinants of time required by medical information technicians for quality control of hospital activity coding, in French medico-administrative system]. / Déterminants du temps nécessaire au contrôle qualité dans le cadre du programme de médicalisation des systèmes d'information (PMSI), dans le champ médecine, chirurgie et obstétrique (MCO) d'un centre hospitalier régional, par les techniciens d'information médicale.

BACKGROUND: Since 2008, in France, hospital funding is determined by the nature of activities provided (activity-based funding). Quality control of hospital activity coding is essential to optimize hospital remuneration. There is a need for reliable tools to allocate human resources wisely in order to improve these controls. METHODS: The main objective of this study was to identify the determinants of time needed by medical information technicians to control hospital activity coding in a Regional Hospital Center. From March 2016 to the beginning of January 2017, medical information technicians reported the time they spent on each quality control, and the time they needed when they had to code the entire stay. Multiple linear regressions were performed to identify the determinants of quality control or coding duration. A split sample validation was used: model was created on one half of the sample and validated on the remaining half. RESULTS: Among the controls, 5431 were included in the analysis of determinants of control duration (2715 kept aside for model validation). Seven determinants have been identified (stay duration, level of complexity, month of control, type of control, medical information technician, rank of classing information, and major diagnostic category). The correlation coefficient between predicted and real control duration was 0.71 (P<10-4); 808 stays were included in the analysis of determinants of coding duration (404 kept aside for model validation). Two determinants have been identified. The correlation coefficient, between predicted and real coding duration, was 0.47 (P<10-3). We performed the same multiple regression, on 2017 activity data, to estimate the weight of each hospital activity pole, regarding quality control of hospital activity coding. CONCLUSION: We succeeded in modeling time needed for quality control of hospital stays. These results helped to estimate human resources required for quality control of each hospital pole. Nevertheless, the second analysis did not give satisfactory results: we failed in modeling time needed to code hospital stays.

Nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture: a clinical practice assessment.

AIM: To prospectively determine the incidence of nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture in an endodontic clinical practice setting. METHODOLOGY: Eleven second year endodontic residents, using four nickel-titanium rotary instrument systems (ProFile, ProTaper, GTRotary and K3Endo) according to the recommendations of the manufacturers, instrumented 3181 canals in 1403 teeth of 1235 patients, in a dental school post-graduate endodontic clinic, in 1 year. The incidence of instrument fracture was determined based on the number of instruments used. When fracture occurred, data were collected concerning the type, size, taper and prior use of the fractured instruments, the length and location of the fragment within the root canal and the curvature of the canal. RESULTS: The overall incidence of instrument fracture was 0.39%. The incidence of fracture for ProFile, ProTaper, GTRotary and K3Endo files was 0.28%, 0.41%, 0.39% and 0.52%, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between instrument systems. The percentage of teeth in which instruments fractured was 1.9% (0.28% for anterior teeth, 1.56% for pre-molars and 2.74% for molars). A total of 26 instruments fractured, of which 23 had tapers of 0.06 or greater. Most of the fragments were located in the apical third of the root canal, and both the median and mode amongst the fragment lengths were 2 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The low incidence of nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture supports the continued use of these instruments in root canal treatment.

Fracture of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a laboratory simulation assessment.

AIM: To determine the incidence of ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instrument fracture in an endodontic laboratory simulation. METHODOLOGY: Three hundred and sixty dental students used 2880 ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments to prepare 1440 simulated root canals in 720 plastic teeth, and another 2880 ProFile nickel-titanium rotary instruments to prepare 1440 natural root canals in 720 extracted teeth. A standardized crown-down rotary instrumentation technique was used, which included measures to prevent fracture. Rotary instrument fracture was monitored during and after completion of the laboratory simulation exercises to determine the incidence of fracture. When fracture occurred, data were collected concerning the size of the instrument, the length of the instrument fragment, the location of the fragment in the canal and the curvature of the canal in which the instrument fractured. RESULTS: The incidence of instrument fracture was 0.41% in plastic simulated canals and 0.31% in natural root canals. The overall incidence of instrument fracture was 0.36%. Of the instruments that fractured 67% were size 25, 0.04 taper; and 81% of the fragments were located in the apical third of the canal. The mean, median and mode of the fragment lengths were all 3 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The low overall incidence of fracture in this study suggests that ProFile rotary instruments are safe for use by dental students in laboratory simulations and that if preventive measures are taken the incidence of instrument fracture can be minimized.