RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Mentoring is important for a successful career in academic medicine. In online matching processes, profile texts are decisive for the mentor-selection. We aimed to qualitatively characterize mentoring-profile-texts, identify differences in form and content and thus elements that promote selection. METHODS: In a mixed method study first, quality of texts in 150 selected mentoring profiles was evaluated (10-point Likert scale; 1 = insufficient to 10 = very good). Second, based on a thematic and content analysis approach of profile texts, categories and subcategories were defined. We compared the presence of the assigned categories between the 25% highest ranked profiles with the 25% lowest ranked ones. Finally, additional predefined categories (hot topics) were labelled on the selected texts and their impact on student evaluation was statistically examined. RESULTS: Students rated the quality of texts with a mean of 5.89 ± 1.45. 5 main thematic categories, 21 categories and a total of 74 subcategories were identified. Ten subcategories were significantly associated with high- and four with low-rated profiles. The presence of three or more hot topics in texts significantly correlated with a positive evaluation. CONCLUSION: The introduced classification system helps to understand how mentoring profile texts are composed and which aspects are important for choosing a suited mentor.
Assuntos
Tutoria , Estudantes de Medicina , Humanos , Mentores , Tutoria/métodos , Docentes de Medicina , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Very early-life conditions are recognized as critical for healthy brain development. This study assesses early-life risk factors for developing dementia. In the absence of historical medical birth records, we leverage an alternative full population approach using demographic characteristics obtained from administrative data to derive proxy indicators for birth complications and unfavorable birth outcomes. We use proxy variables to investigate the impact of early-life risk factors on dementia risk. METHODS: We use administrative individual-level data for full cohorts born 1932-1950 in Sweden with multigenerational linkages. Records on hospitalization and mortality are used to identify dementia cases. We derive 3 birth risk factors based on demographic characteristics: advanced maternal age, narrow sibling spacing, and twin births, and apply survival analysis to evaluate long-term effects on dementia risk. We control for confounding using multiple indicators for socio-economic status (SES), including parental surnames, and by implementing a sibling design. As comparison exposure, we add low education from the 1970 Census. RESULTS: The presence of at least 1 birth risk factor increases dementia risk (HR = 1.059; 95% CI: 1.034, 1.085). The occurrence of twin births poses a particularly heightened risk (HR = 1.166; 95% CI: 1.084, 1.255). DISCUSSION: Improvements to the very early-life environment hold significant potential to mitigate dementia risk. A comparison to the influence of low education on dementia (the largest known modifiable risk factor) suggests that demographic birth characteristics are of relevant effect sizes. Our findings underscore the relevance of providing assistance for births experiencing complications and adverse health outcomes to reduce dementia cases.
Assuntos
Demência , Classe Social , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Análise de Sobrevida , Demência/epidemiologia , Demência/etiologia , Sistema de RegistrosRESUMO
Introduction: Robots have increased productivity, quality, and safety in structured manufacturing environments while lowering production costs. In the last decade, advances in computing and sensing have started to enable robots in unstructured environments such as construction. Objectives: Given this new reality, this research aims to quantify the impacts of existing construction robots. Methods: This study evaluates the Safety, Quality, Schedule, and Cost impacts of ten on-site construction robots for 12 construction projects spanning 11 contractors from Europe, Asia, South America, and the United States. Results: The robots showed the potential to reduce repetitive site work between 25 and 90% and reduce time spent on hazardous tasks by 72% on average. On average, accuracy was improved by 55%, and rework was reduced by over 50%. Robots reduced the schedule on average 2.3 times with a median of 1.4x. The cost was reduced by 13%, with six cases that reduced it but four that increased the total costs. The comparative results also highlight under what project conditions (Product, Organization, and Process) could the robot perform better than the traditional method. Conclusion: Even at this relatively early stage of robot deployment worldwide, the consistent evaluation of ten examples showed how promising the technology already is for a range of robot types, mobility, autonomy, scale, business models, and locations. Future work will expand the number of robot case studies utilizing the same comparison method.
RESUMO
Introduction: Physicians are increasingly confronted with new requirements in their daily job, which go beyond the mere treatment of patients. The aim of this Mixed-Method-Study is to better understand management as it relates to physicians' daily work, to clarify the physicians' perception of their management role and to examine physician's self-assessed competence in these functions. Methods: We used three different instruments: Semi-structured interviews, a self-assessment survey and direct observations to evaluate managerial activities performed by residents. Both latter were based on instruments established for management research. Results: Interviewed residents were familiar with the term "Management" but had difficulties in defining it. Concerning managerial functions in context of their daily work, we identified three main categories: Self-management, Patient-management and Management of the ward. In this context, physicians named numerous examples of management tasks and for which they felt ill prepared. Eighty-eight residents participated in the self-assessment survey and rated the majority of the management tasks as necessary for the residents' work. Although physicians estimated the proportion of managerial work to comprise only 40.6%, a much higher number of mere management tasks could be identified through direct observations (n = 12). Activities related to management were more often observed than genuine physician tasks. Discussion: This study illustrates the prominent role of management activities in context of the residents' work, while at the same time showing that residents do not feel sufficiently educated, prepared nor competent in management tasks.
RESUMO
The hallmark of medical action in geriatrics is the interprofessional treatment of the patient by a multi-professional team consisting of doctors, nurses and therapists with the aim of treating the patients primarily in a way that preserves their function and thereby enabling them to live as independently as possible. Therefore, at the beginning of every geriatric treatment, there is a multiprofessional geriatric assessment of functional abilities. With regard to successful medical action, this necessarily requires all health professions involved to understand geriatric patients and their limitations. Under ideal circumstances, their competencies overlap. From the point of view of the related disciplines, this means to teach working together with the other professions - interprofessionally - and learning from one another in order to effectively collaborate. After comparing the existing education in geriatrics within the Medical Curriculum Munich (MeCuM) with the European catalog of learning objectives for geriatricians (UEMS-GMS), a deficit with regard to geriatric assessment was recognized in the field of multi-professional training. Therefore, the existing geriatric curriculum of the Ludwig Maximilians University (LMU) in Munich should be expanded to include an interprofessional course on geriatric assessment. This project report aims to show the development and implementation of this course. For this purpose, the model for curriculum development according to Kern was used by the planners to establish an interprofessional briefing. Due to its innovative character, the course received public recognition and is the basis for the expansion of interprofessionalism in the sense of professional cooperation in geriatrics. Establishing interprofessionalism in other disciplines and locations is welcome.
Assuntos
Avaliação Geriátrica , Geriatria , Idoso , Currículo , Geriatria/educação , Ocupações em Saúde , Humanos , Casas de SaúdeRESUMO
COVID-19 has been challenging our society since January 2020. Due to global travel, the new coronavirus has rapidly spread worldwide. This article aims to provide an overview of the challenges in implementing measures in the air and maritime transport sector from the perspective of the German Public Health Service (Öffentlicher Gesundheitsdienst, ÖGD). Significant events and measures for air and maritime transport between January and August 2020 were selected. Lessons learned are discussed.During the COVID-19 pandemic, the ÖGD has been operating in a field of tension between the dynamics of scientific knowledge, political decision-making, social acceptance and consent.There are specific challenges at points of entry such as airports and seaports. These include staff shortages and the need to implement measures with a high organisational effort at very short notice such as health authority passenger checks carried out on aircraft, the establishment of test centres at points of entry and control of compliance with quarantine measures. Aggravating the situation, passenger lists, which are necessary for effective contact tracing, are often not available or incomplete. There is also a lack of digital tools for contact tracing but also, for example, the exchange of personal data within the ÖGD. Further difficulties in outbreak management arise from the cramped conditions on board ships and from the potential psychological stress on crew members and passengers, which have not yet been sufficiently considered.In view of all these challenges, it is paramount to strengthen the German Public Health Service in general and at points of entry and to intensify the exchange between the national, federal state and local levels.
Assuntos
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Saúde Pública , Quarentena , SARS-CoV-2RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Standardized patients (SPs) have been one of the popular assessment methods in clinical teaching for decades, although they are resource intensive. Nowadays, simulated virtual patients (VPs) are increasingly used because they are permanently available and fully scalable to a large audience. However, empirical studies comparing the differential effects of these assessment methods are lacking. Similarly, the relationships between key variables associated with diagnostic competences (ie, diagnostic accuracy and evidence generation) in these assessment methods still require further research. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare perceived authenticity, cognitive load, and diagnostic competences in performance-based assessment using SPs and VPs. This study also aims to examine the relationships of perceived authenticity, cognitive load, and quality of evidence generation with diagnostic accuracy. METHODS: We conducted an experimental study with 86 medical students (mean 26.03 years, SD 4.71) focusing on history taking in dyspnea cases. Participants solved three cases with SPs and three cases with VPs in this repeated measures study. After each case, students provided a diagnosis and rated perceived authenticity and cognitive load. The provided diagnosis was scored in terms of diagnostic accuracy; the questions asked by the medical students were rated with respect to their quality of evidence generation. In addition to regular null hypothesis testing, this study used equivalence testing to investigate the absence of meaningful effects. RESULTS: Perceived authenticity (1-tailed t81=11.12; P<.001) was higher for SPs than for VPs. The correlation between diagnostic accuracy and perceived authenticity was very small (r=0.05) and neither equivalent (P=.09) nor statistically significant (P=.32). Cognitive load was equivalent in both assessment methods (t82=2.81; P=.003). Intrinsic cognitive load (1-tailed r=-0.30; P=.003) and extraneous load (1-tailed r=-0.29; P=.003) correlated negatively with the combined score for diagnostic accuracy. The quality of evidence generation was positively related to diagnostic accuracy for VPs (1-tailed r=0.38; P<.001); this finding did not hold for SPs (1-tailed r=0.05; P=.32). Comparing both assessment methods with each other, diagnostic accuracy was higher for SPs than for VPs (2-tailed t85=2.49; P=.01). CONCLUSIONS: The results on perceived authenticity demonstrate that learners experience SPs as more authentic than VPs. As higher amounts of intrinsic and extraneous cognitive loads are detrimental to performance, both types of cognitive load must be monitored and manipulated systematically in the assessment. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for SPs than for VPs, which could potentially negatively affect students' grades with VPs. We identify and discuss possible reasons for this performance difference between both assessment methods.
Assuntos
Simulação de Paciente , Estudantes de Medicina , Competência Clínica , Humanos , AnamneseRESUMO
Intervening on modifiable risk factors to prevent dementia is of key importance, since progress-modifying treatments are not currently available. Education is inversely associated with dementia risk, but causality and mechanistic pathways remain unclear. We aimed to examine the causality of this relationship in Sweden using, as a natural experiment, data on a compulsory schooling reform that extended primary education by 1 year for 70% of the population between 1936 and 1949. The reform introduced substantial exogenous variation in education that was unrelated to pupils' characteristics. We followed 18 birth cohorts (n = 1,341,842) from 1985 to 2016 (up to ages 79-96 years) for a dementia diagnosis in the National Inpatient and Cause of Death registers and fitted Cox survival models with stratified baseline hazards at the school-district level, chronological age as the time scale, and cohort indicators. Analyses indicated very small or negligible causal effects of education on dementia risk (main hazard ratio = 1.01, 95% confidence interval: 0.98, 1.04). Multiple sensitivity checks considering only compliers, the pre-/post- design, differences in health-care-seeking behavior, and the impact of exposure misclassification left the results essentially unaltered. The reform had limited effects on further adult socioeconomic outcomes, such as income. Our findings suggest that without mediation through adult socioeconomic position, education cannot be uncritically considered a modifiable risk factor for dementia.
Assuntos
Causalidade , Demência/epidemiologia , Escolaridade , Classe Social , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , Suécia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
The purpose of this study was to provide an overview of entry screening measures applied at airports in response to the COVID-19 epidemic worldwide. Between 24 January and 17 February 2020, 5.2% (95% CI 3.1-8.5) of the 271 total imported COVID-19 cases worldwide (excluding imported cases arriving in China, Macao, and Hong Kong) with known detection location were captured through airport entry screening. The majority of imported COVID-19 cases (210) were identified by the health care system (77.5%). Efforts should focus on health care system preparedness for early case detection, since according to our and previous studies health care facilities are the actual point of entry of imported cases.
RESUMO
Mandates for mask use in public during the recent coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, worsened by global shortage of commercial supplies, have led to widespread use of homemade masks and mask alternatives. It is assumed that wearing such masks reduces the likelihood for an infected person to spread the disease, but many of these mask designs have not been tested in practice. We have demonstrated a simple optical measurement method to evaluate the efficacy of masks to reduce the transmission of respiratory droplets during regular speech. In proof-of-principle studies, we compared a variety of commonly available mask types and observed that some mask types approach the performance of standard surgical masks, while some mask alternatives, such as neck gaiters or bandanas, offer very little protection. Our measurement setup is inexpensive and can be built and operated by nonexperts, allowing for rapid evaluation of mask performance during speech, sneezing, or coughing.
Assuntos
Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Filtração/estatística & dados numéricos , Máscaras/estatística & dados numéricos , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Humanos , Imagem Óptica , Respiração , SARS-CoV-2 , FalaRESUMO
PURPOSE: To objectify effects of an anatomical viewing scheme on the respective correctness of (a) findings, (b) interpretations, and (c) self-assessments of readers in chest radiographs acquired in one plane and the assessment of other influencing factors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In all, 20 radiologists with 3-60 months of full-time radiography experience evaluated 12 chest radiographs of varying difficulty: once with and once without using an anatomical viewing scheme with at least 1 month in between (nâ¯= 480). In consensus of 3 radiological experts (a) and (b) were determined by means of a current computed tomography. The self-assessment (c) of readers was queried. RESULTS: (a) Findings were either missed or not described in 21%. Another 20% were recognized, but incorrectly described, (b) 62% of interpretations and 31% of derived clinical consequences were wrong and (c) in 39% of items the readers overestimated themselves. Experts were faster and better than novices, but for the scheme usage no further significant differences were detected (pâ¯> 0.5, respectively). The most pronounced effect was found in comparison with the routine report produced by the joint evaluation of novices and experts being clearly superior even to the expert study results (a), (b) and (c) alone (pâ¯< 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: Reporting of chest Xrays acquired in one plane was often incomplete or even wrong, and the evaluators overestimated themselves, which was not influenced by the use of the anatomical viewing scheme. Since errors between the evaluators sometimes differed greatly, duplicate evaluation of the radiographs by two different radiologists, which is already the case in many training facilities, may possibly be advisable in general.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica , Radiografia Torácica , Autoavaliação (Psicologia) , Humanos , Radiografia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Raios XRESUMO
AIM OF THE STUDY: There are hardly any concepts on how to impart knowledge about the own health system to students and to clarify the importance and practical relevance of the topic. The case-based approach and the errors described therein should highlight the relevance of the topic to the medical profession. METHODOLOGY: A course concept was developed with focus on the practical relevance of the content to students. This was based on a method mix of game-based learning, case-based and cooperative learning. The seminar describes the path of a cancer patient through health care, an issue which, due to a lack of agreements and other interface problems, is dealt with unsatisfactorily. RESULTS: Analyses showed that students (n=1162) had moderate interest in the topic of the seminar during both survey periods. However, they found the method of case-based learning to be good and rated the relevance of the topic as high. CONCLUSIONS: The relevance of the topic complex GGG for later professional activity was apparently recognized by the students. The low motivation of the students to engage with this topic could be reduced, as confirmed by reports of the lecturers.
Assuntos
Currículo , Educação Médica , Saúde Pública , Estudantes de Medicina , Alemanha , Humanos , Saúde Pública/educação , Inquéritos e QuestionáriosRESUMO
Introduction: Specialist medical assessments fulfil the task of ensuring that physicians have the clinical competence to independently represent their field and provide the best possible care to patients, taking into account the current state of knowledge. To date, there are no comprehensive reports on the status of specialist assessments in the German-speaking countries (DACH). For that reason, the assessment methods used in the DACH region are compiled and critically evaluated in this article, and recommendations for further development are described. Methods: The websites of the following institutions were searched for information regarding testing methods used and the organisation of specialist examinations: Homepage of the Swiss Institute for Medical Continuing Education (SIWF), Homepage of the Academy of Physicians (Austria) and Homepage of the German Federal Medical Association (BAEK). Further links were considered and the results were presented in tabular form. The assessment methods used in the specialist assessments are critically examined with regard to established quality criteria and recommendations for the further development of the specialist assessments are derived from these. Results: The following assessment methods are already used in Switzerland and Austria: written examinations with multiple choice and short answer questions, structured oral examinations, the Script Concordance Test (SCT) and the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE). In some cases, these assessment methods are combined (triangulation). In Germany, on the other hand, the oral examination has so far been conducted in an unstructured manner in the form of a 'collegial content discussion'. In order to test knowledge, practical and communicative competences equally, it is recommended to implement a triangulation of methods and follow the further recommendations described in this article. Conclusion: While there are already accepted approaches for quality-assured and competence-based specialist assessments in Switzerland and Austria at present, there is still a long way to go in Germany. Following the recommendations presented in this article, a contribution could be made to improving the specialist assessments in the DACH region according to the specialist assessments objectives.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Educação Médica/métodos , Avaliação Educacional/normas , Medicina/normas , Áustria , Alemanha , Humanos , Medicina/classificação , Especialização/normas , SuíçaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Delayed study progress in medical school is a challenging issue for the tax paying community, the faculty and the medical students themselves. Reasons for a delay might be different from known risk factors for academic difficulties. METHODS: An online survey regarding delays in the study progress and including a personality test (BFI-10) was presented to medical students from four German medical schools after completion of their 3rd year of study. RESULTS: Of 617 students, 51.2% reported a mean delay of 2.1 ± 1.5 semesters. Frequent risk factors were secondary employment (69.5%, odds ratio (OR) 1.7, p = 0.004), female gender (69.8%, OR 1.6, p = 0.007), work or study abroad (35.9%, OR 1.5, p = 0.02), a late graduation (5.9%, OR 2.4, p = 0.02), as well as support through scholarship or mentoring (19.9%, OR 1.8, p = 0.004). "Working on doctoral thesis" (11.3%, OR 1.9, p = 0.03) and structural curricular issues (36.6%, OR 0.9, p = 0.7) were frequently identified as obstacles. "Support by friends/family" was considered helpful by 24.1% (OR 1.4, p = 0.09), as well as a high intrinsic motivation (19.1%, OR 0.5, p = 0.01). In the BFI-10, students with study delay were more prone to openness and agreeableness. CONCLUSIONS: Risk factors for delay are not identical to those for academic difficulties. To decrease the risk for delays, firm curricular structures should be identified and alleviated. Intrinsic motivation is a strong impetus of study progress and additionally might be strengthened by curricular changes.
Assuntos
Educação Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Faculdades de Medicina/estatística & dados numéricos , Emprego/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Intercâmbio Educacional Internacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Personalidade , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Sexuais , Apoio Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the past decades, various frameworks, methods, indicators, and tools have been developed to assess the needs as well as to monitor and evaluate (needs assessment, monitoring and evaluation; "NaME") health research capacity development (HRCD) activities. This systematic review gives an overview on NaME activities at the individual and organizational level in the past 10 years with a specific focus on methods, tools and instruments. Insight from this review might support researchers and stakeholders in systemizing future efforts in the HRCD field. METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed and Google Scholar. Additionally, the personal bibliographies of the authors were scanned. Two researchers independently reviewed the identified abstracts for inclusion according to previously defined eligibility criteria. The included articles were analysed with a focus on both different HRCD activities as well as NaME efforts. RESULTS: Initially, the search revealed 700 records in PubMed, two additional records in Google Scholar, and 10 abstracts from the personal bibliographies of the authors. Finally, 42 studies were included and analysed in depth. Findings show that the NaME efforts in the field of HRCD are as complex and manifold as the concept of HRCD itself. NaME is predominately focused on outcome evaluation and mainly refers to the individual and team levels. CONCLUSION: A substantial need for a coherent and transparent taxonomy of HRCD activities to maximize the benefits of future studies in the field was identified. A coherent overview of the tools used to monitor and evaluate HRCD activities is provided to inform further research in the field.
Assuntos
Fortalecimento Institucional/normas , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/normas , Avaliação das Necessidades/normas , Fortalecimento Institucional/métodos , Fortalecimento Institucional/organização & administração , Países Desenvolvidos , Países em Desenvolvimento , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/métodos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Avaliação das Necessidades/organização & administração , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/métodos , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde/normasRESUMO
The lack of DNA sequence information for most non-model organisms impairs the design of primers that are universally applicable for the study of molecular polymorphisms in nuclear markers. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques nowadays provide a powerful approach to overcome this limitation. We present a flexible and inexpensive method to identify large numbers of nuclear primer pairs that amplify in most Brassicaceae species. We first obtained and mapped NGS transcriptome sequencing reads from two of the distantly related Brassicaceae species, Cardamine hirsuta and Arabis alpina, onto the Arabidopsis thaliana reference genome, and then identified short conserved sequence motifs among the three species bioinformatically. From these, primer pairs to amplify coding regions (nuclear protein coding loci, NPCL) and exon-primed intron-crossing sequences (EPIC) were developed. We identified 2,334 universally applicable primer pairs, targeting 1,164 genes, which provide a large pool of markers as readily usable genomic resource that will help addressing novel questions in the Brassicaceae family. Testing a subset of the newly designed nuclear primer pairs revealed that a great majority yielded a single amplicon in all of the 30 investigated Brassicaceae taxa. Sequence analysis and phylogenetic reconstruction with a subset of these markers on different levels of phylogenetic divergence in the mustard family were compared with previous studies. The results corroborate the usefulness of the newly developed primer pairs, e.g., for phylogenetic analyses or population genetic studies. Thus, our method provides a cost-effective approach for designing nuclear loci across a broad range of taxa and is compatible with current NGS technologies.
Assuntos
Brassicaceae/genética , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Marcadores Genéticos/genética , Análise de Sequência de RNA/métodos , Brassicaceae/classificação , Núcleo Celular/genética , Biologia Computacional/métodos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/economia , Loci Gênicos , Filogenia , Proteínas de Plantas/genética , Análise de Sequência de RNA/economiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Simulation-based teamwork trainings are considered a powerful training method to advance teamwork, which becomes more relevant in medical education. The measurement of teamwork is of high importance and several instruments have been developed for various medical domains to meet this need. To our knowledge, no theoretically-based and easy-to-use measurement instrument has been published nor developed specifically for simulation-based teamwork trainings of medical students. Internist ward-rounds function as an important example of teamwork in medicine. PURPOSES: The purpose of this study was to provide a validated, theoretically-based instrument that is easy-to-use. Furthermore, this study aimed to identify if and when rater scores relate to performance. METHODS: Based on a theoretical framework for teamwork behaviour, items regarding four teamwork components (Team Coordination, Team Cooperation, Information Exchange, Team Adjustment Behaviours) were developed. In study one, three ward-round scenarios, simulated by 69 students, were videotaped and rated independently by four trained raters. The instrument was tested for the embedded psychometric properties and factorial structure. In study two, the instrument was tested for construct validity with an external criterion with a second set of 100 students and four raters. RESULTS: In study one, the factorial structure matched the theoretical components but was unable to separate Information Exchange and Team Cooperation. The preliminary version showed adequate psychometric properties (Cronbach's α=.75). In study two, the instrument showed physician rater scores were more reliable in measurement than those of student raters. Furthermore, a close correlation between the scale and clinical performance as an external criteria was shown (r=.64) and the sufficient psychometric properties were replicated (Cronbach's α=.78). CONCLUSIONS: The validation allows for use of the simulated teamwork assessment scale in undergraduate medical ward-round trainings to reliably measure teamwork by physicians. Further studies are needed to verify the applicability of the instrument.
Assuntos
Competência Clínica/normas , Comunicação , Comportamento Cooperativo , Educação de Graduação em Medicina/normas , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/normas , Garantia da Qualidade dos Cuidados de Saúde/normas , Visitas de Preceptoria/normas , Currículo/normas , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Masculino , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Psicometria/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Adulto JovemRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Errors in medicine and patient safety are topics with growing scientific and public attention. In undergraduate medical education, these issues are little investigated so far. The aim of this study was to collect data regarding attitudes and needs of medical students. METHODS: In a sample of 269 German medical students, data were collected using an anonymous online questionnaire. It consisted of three parts: (1) international validated questionnaire, (2) questions about the German medical education system and (3) demographic data. Data were analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. RESULTS: One-hundred sixty-seven data sets were analysed (completion rate 62%). Twenty-five percent of the respondents stated that they already had committed a medical error. Almost half of the participants reported that they had been assigned tasks they had not been qualified for (47%), or where medical errors could have happened easily (50%). Final year students showed less confidence in error disclosure compared to younger students (p < 0.001). The majority of respondents (64%) wished for more education on the issues. DISCUSSION: With regard to future curricular developments, a consideration of attitudes and needs of medical students regarding the topics of medical errors and patient safety seems necessary. A goal-directed undergraduate education can promote an open culture and can lead to safety and satisfaction for both patients and medical professionals.
Assuntos
Educação de Graduação em Medicina/organização & administração , Erros Médicos/prevenção & controle , Erros Médicos/psicologia , Segurança do Paciente , Estudantes de Medicina/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Competência Clínica , Currículo , Documentação , Alemanha , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Erros Médicos/classificação , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
External quality assessment is a standard procedure for many medical laboratories, especially those accredited according to ISO 15189. INSTAND has developed web-based quality control surveys (WQ) with integrated case-based learning in collaboration with the Institute for Teaching and Educational Research in Health Sciences (IDBG), University of Witten/Herdecke. The WQs were presented via a weblink using the learning management system CASUS. Laboratories registered with INSTAND for conventional EQAs covering the same topic were invited to participate in the WQs. Statistics were calculated with the INSTAND EQA-evaluation program and with the "Statistical Program for Social Sciences" (SPSS Version 20). While the two pilot surveys (hemostaseology) were designed for laboratory technicians, WQ III (urine sediment) addressed the whole laboratory team. From the invited laboratories more than 80% participated successfully and the evaluations showed that, in general, more than half the participants solved the tasks as a team. The web-based EQAs were well accepted by the users, with some technical problems in WQ III and moderate criticism on the images and relevance for daily practice in the evaluation sheets. Well above 80% would like to participate in further WQs and would recommend them to other laboratories. Thus web-based quality control surveys can emerge as an important supplement to conventional EQAs.