Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 17 de 17
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 12(10)2022 Oct 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36292092

RESUMO

Because absolute changes in outcomes are difficult to interpret and the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is not suitable to address this challenge, a novel method of classifying outcomes by relating changes to baseline values is warranted. We used the "performance score" (T2D), which reflects individual performance, enabling us to consider the functional status at the beginning of rehabilitation without dealing with the problems of mathematical coupling or regression effects, as encountered in ANCOVA. To illustrate the T2D, we retrospectively analyzed changes in the six-minute walking test (6MWT) in COPD patients undergoing outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation and compared the results with absolute differences related to a predetermined MCID. We evaluated a total of 575 COPD patients with a mean age of 61.4 ± 9.2 years. 6MWT improved significantly, with a mean change of 32.3 ± 71.2. A total of 105/311 participants who had reached the MCID were still classified as "below average" by the T2D. Conversely, 76/264 patients who had not reached the MCID were classified as "above average". This new performance measure accounts for the patient's current status and for changes over time, potentially representing a simple and user-friendly tool that can be used to quantify a patient's performance and response to rehabilitation.

2.
Med Care Res Rev ; 79(4): 511-524, 2022 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34622682

RESUMO

Reasons for acquiring insurance outside Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care coverage among VA enrollees are incompletely understood. To assess Veterans' decision-making and acquisition of non-VA health care insurance in the Affordable Care Act era, we used mailed questionnaires and semistructured interviews in a stratified random sample of VA enrollees <65 years in the Midwest. Of the 3,666 survey participants, 32.1% reported non-VA insurance. Frequently reported reasons included wanting coverage for emergency situations or family members. Those without non-VA insurance cited unaffordability as the main obstacle. Analysis of the semistructured interview data revealed similar findings. In multivariable logistic regression analyses, characteristics associated with non-VA insurance included higher income (>$50,000 vs. <$10,000, odds ratio [OR] = 5.95, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.45-10.3, p < .001). As financial barriers exist for acquisition of non-VA insurance and hence community care, it is critically important that VA enrollees' health care needs are met through VA or community providers financed through VA.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Seguro Saúde , Serviços de Saúde para Veteranos Militares/economia , Veteranos , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Entrevistas como Assunto , Meio-Oeste dos Estados Unidos , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos , United States Department of Veterans Affairs
3.
Cancers (Basel) ; 14(1)2021 Dec 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35008247

RESUMO

The aim of cancer rehabilitation is to help patients regain functioning and social participation. In order to evaluate and optimize rehabilitation, it is important to measure its outcomes in a structured way. In this article, we review the different types of clinical outcome assessments (COAs), including Clinician-Reported Outcomes (ClinROs), Observer-Reported Outcomes (ObsROs), Performance Outcomes (PerfOs), and Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs). A special focus is placed on PROs, which are commonly defined as any direct report from the patient about their health condition without any interpretation by a third party. We provide a narrative review of available PRO measures (PROMs) for relevant outcomes, discuss the current state of PRO implementation in cancer rehabilitation, and highlight trends that use PROs to benchmark value-based care. Furthermore, we provide examples of PRO usage, highlight the benefits of electronic PRO (ePRO) collection, and offer advice on how to select, implement, and integrate PROs into the cancer rehabilitation setting to maximize efficiency.

4.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 13(11): 1659-1667, 2018 11 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30337326

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the general population, the quality of the patient experience with their primary care physician may influence health outcomes but this has not been evaluated in CKD. This is relevant for the growing Hispanic CKD population, which potentially faces challenges to the quality of the patient experience related to language or cultural factors. We evaluated the association between the patient experience with their primary care physician and outcomes in Hispanics with CKD. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: This prospective observational study included 252 English- and Spanish-speaking Hispanics with entry eGFR of 20-70 ml/min per 1.73 m2, enrolled in the Hispanic Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study between 2005 and 2008. Patient experience with their primary care physician was assessed by the Ambulatory Care Experiences Survey subscales: communication quality, whole-person orientation, health promotion, interpersonal treatment, and trust. Poisson and proportional hazards models were used to assess the association between the patient experience and outcomes, which included hospitalization, ESKD, and all-cause death. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 56 years, 38% were women, 80% were primary Spanish speakers, and had a mean eGFR of 38 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Over 4.8 years (median) follow-up, there were 619 hospitalizations, 103 ESKD events, and 56 deaths. As compared with higher subscale scores, lower scores on four of the five subscales were associated with a higher adjusted rate ratio (RR) for all-cause hospitalization (communication quality: RR, 1.54; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.25 to 1.90; health promotion: RR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.62; interpersonal treatment: RR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22 to 1.85; and trust: RR, 1.57; 95% CI, 1.27 to 1.93). There was no significant association of subscales with incident ESKD or all-cause death. CONCLUSIONS: Lower perceived quality of the patient experience with their primary care physician was associated with a higher risk of hospitalization.


Assuntos
Promoção da Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção Primária à Saúde/normas , Qualidade da Assistência à Saúde , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Barreiras de Comunicação , Competência Cultural , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Idioma , Estudos Longitudinais , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Relações Médico-Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Confiança
5.
BMC Nephrol ; 19(1): 295, 2018 10 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30359229

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Early detection and treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and its risk factors improves outcomes; however, many high-risk individuals lack access to healthcare. The National Kidney Foundation of Illinois (NKFI) developed the KidneyMobile (KM) to conduct community-based screenings, provide disease education, and facilitate follow-up appointments for diabetes, hypertension, and CKD. METHODS: Cross-sectional design. Adults > = 18 years of age participated in NKFI KM screenings across Illinois between 2005 and 2011. Sociodemographic and medical history were self-reported using structured interviews; laboratory data and blood pressure were assessed using standard procedures. RESULTS: Among 20,770 participants, mean age was 53.5 years, 68% were female, 49% were African-American or Hispanic, 21% primarily spoke Spanish, and at least 27% lacked health insurance. Seventy-eight percent of participants with elevated blood pressure (≥ 140/90 mmHg) were aware of having hypertension, 93% of participants with abnormal blood glucose (fasting glucose > 126 mg/dl or a random glucose of > 200 mg/dL) were aware of having diabetes, and 19% of participants with albuminuria (> 30 mg/gm) were aware of having CKD. In participants reporting hypertension, 47% had blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mmHg, and in those reporting diabetes, 56% had blood glucose ≥ 130 mg/dl (fasting) or ≥ 180 mg/dl (random). Among 4937 participants with abnormal screening findings that participated in follow-up interviews, 69% reported having further medical evaluation. CONCLUSIONS: A high-risk disadvantaged population is being reached by the NKFI KidneyMobile and connected with healthcare services. A significant proportion of participants were newly informed of having abnormal results suggestive of diabetes, hypertension, and/or CKD or that their diabetes and hypertension were inadequately controlled.


Assuntos
Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/tendências , Recursos em Saúde/tendências , Programas de Rastreamento/tendências , Unidades Móveis de Saúde/tendências , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/diagnóstico , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Serviços de Saúde Comunitária/métodos , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Fundações/tendências , Humanos , Illinois/epidemiologia , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco
6.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 42: 1-8, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25735489

RESUMO

In the U.S., more than 400,000 individuals with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) require hemodialysis (HD) for renal replacement therapy. ESRD patients experience a high burden of morbidity, mortality, resource utilization, and poor quality of life (QOL). Under current care models, ESRD patients receive fragmented care from multiple providers at multiple locations. The Patient-Centered Medical Home (PCMH) is a team approach, providing coordinated care across the healthcare continuum. While this model has shown some early benefits for complex chronic diseases such as diabetes, it has not been applied to HD patients. This study is a non-randomized quasi-experimental intervention trial implementing a Patient-Centered Medical Home for Kidney Disease (PCMH-KD). The PCMH-KD extends the existing dialysis care team (comprised of a nephrologist, dialysis nurse, dialysis technician, social worker, and dietitian) by adding a general internist, pharmacist, nurse coordinator, and a community health worker, all of whom will see the patients together, and separately, as needed. The primary goal is to implement a comprehensive, multidisciplinary care team to improve care coordination, quality of life, and healthcare use for HD patients. Approximately 240 patients will be recruited from two sites; a non-profit university-affiliated dialysis center and an independent for-profit dialysis center. Outcomes include (i) patient-reported outcomes, including QOL and satisfaction; (ii) clinical outcomes, including blood pressure and diet; (iii) healthcare use, including emergency room visits and hospitalizations; and (iv) staff perceptions. Given the significant burden that patients with ESRD on HD experience, enhanced care coordination provides an opportunity to reduce this burden and improve QOL.


Assuntos
Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Assistência Centrada no Paciente/organização & administração , Melhoria de Qualidade/organização & administração , Diálise Renal/métodos , Pressão Sanguínea , Comorbidade , Dieta , Feminino , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Administração dos Cuidados ao Paciente/organização & administração , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Grupos Raciais , Projetos de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos
7.
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol ; 9(12): 2203-9, 2014 Dec 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25104274

RESUMO

As the importance of providing patient-centered palliative care for patients with advanced illnesses gains attention, standard dialysis delivery may be inconsistent with the goals of care for many patients with ESRD. Many dialysis patients with life expectancy of <1 year may desire a palliative approach to dialysis care, which focuses on aligning patient treatment with patients' informed preferences. This commentary elucidates what comprises a palliative approach to dialysis care and describes its potential and appropriate use. It also reviews the barriers to integrating such an approach into the current clinical paradigm of care and existing infrastructure and outlines system-level changes needed to accommodate such an approach.


Assuntos
Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Preferência do Paciente , Diálise Renal , Assistência Terminal , Comunicação , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/economia , Planejamento de Assistência ao Paciente , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Assistência Centrada no Paciente , Prognóstico , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal/economia , Assistência Terminal/economia
8.
J Am Soc Nephrol ; 25(5): 898-903, 2014 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24652790

RESUMO

Research funding from public and private sources has reached an all-time low. Economic conditions, sequestration, and a trend of low award success rates have created an imbalance between the supply of highly qualified research investigators and the availability of critically necessary research dollars. This grim environment continues to hinder the success of established investigators and deter potential investigators from joining the research workforce. Without action and support of innovative science, the future of the US health care system is in jeopardy, and its leadership role in medical research will decrease. This work discusses the effects of the decline in research funding, the plight of kidney research, and the impact of the American Society of Nephrology Grants Program on scientists. The ASN also calls on the entire nephrology community to rejuvenate the research environment, improve the lives of millions of people with kidney disease, and ultimately, find a cure.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Biomédica/tendências , Organização do Financiamento , Nefrologia/tendências , Pesquisa Biomédica/economia , Pesquisa Biomédica/organização & administração , Humanos , Nefrologia/economia , Nefrologia/organização & administração
9.
Contemp Clin Trials ; 33(6): 1238-44, 2012 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22841929

RESUMO

Despite the large burden of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Hispanics, this population has been underrepresented in research studies. We describe the recruitment strategies employed by the Hispanic Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort Study, which led to the successful enrollment of a large population of Hispanic adults with CKD into a prospective observational cohort study. Recruitment efforts by bilingual staff focused on community clinics with Hispanic providers in high-density Hispanic neighborhoods in Chicago, academic medical centers, and private nephrology practices. Methods of publicizing the study included church meetings, local Hispanic print media, Spanish television and radio stations, and local health fairs. From October 2005 to July 2008, we recruited 327 Hispanics aged 21-74 years with mild-to-moderate CKD as determined by age-specific estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Of 716 individuals completing a screening visit, 49% did not meet eGFR inclusion criteria and 46% completed a baseline visit. The mean age at enrollment was 57.1 and 67.1% of participants were male. Approximately 75% of enrolled individuals were Mexican American, 15% Puerto Rican, and 10% had other Latin American ancestry. Eighty two percent of participants were Spanish-speakers. Community-based and academic primary care clinics yielded the highest percentage of participants screened (45.9% and 22.4%) and enrolled (38.2% and 24.5%). However, academic and community-based specialty clinics achieved the highest enrollment yield from individuals screened (61.9% to 71.4%). A strategy focused on primary care and nephrology clinics and the use of bilingual recruiters allowed us to overcome barriers to the recruitment of Hispanics with CKD.


Assuntos
Pesquisa Participativa Baseada na Comunidade/organização & administração , Hispânico ou Latino , Marketing de Serviços de Saúde/organização & administração , Seleção de Pessoal/organização & administração , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/etnologia , Adulto , Idoso , Chicago , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Multilinguismo , Estudos Prospectivos
10.
Med Care ; 50(2): 161-70, 2012 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21945972

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Healthcare for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) is intensive, expensive, and provided in both the public and private sector. Using a societal perspective, we examined healthcare costs and health outcomes for Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) ESRD patients comparing those who received hemodialysis care at VA versus private sector facilities. METHODS: Dialysis patients were recruited from 8 VA medical centers from 2001 through 2003 and followed for 12 months in a prospective cohort study. Patient demographics, clinical characteristics, quality of life, healthcare use, and cost data were collected. Healthcare data included utilization (VA), claims (Medicare), and patient self-report. Costs included VA calculated costs, Medicare dialysis facility reports and reimbursement rates, and patient self-report. Multivariable regression was used to compare costs between patients receiving dialysis at VA versus private sector facilities. RESULTS: The cohort comprised 334 patients: 170 patients in the VA dialysis group and 164 patients in the private sector group. The VA dialysis group had more comorbidities at baseline, outpatient and emergency visits, prescriptions, and longer hospital stays; they also had more conservative anemia management and lower baseline urea reduction ratio (67% vs. 72%; P<0.001), although levels were consistent with guidelines (Kt/V≥1.2). In adjusted analysis, the VA dialysis group had $36,431 higher costs than those in the private sector dialysis group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Continued research addressing costs and effectiveness of care across public and private sector settings is critical in informing health policy options for patients with complex chronic illnesses such as ESRD.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Setor Privado/economia , United States Department of Veterans Affairs/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/economia , Hemodiálise no Domicílio/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Diálise Renal/economia , Diálise Renal/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
11.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 58(2): 282-90, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21787982

RESUMO

Hispanics are the fastest growing minority group in the United States, and compared with non-Hispanic whites, they have a higher incidence of end-stage renal disease. Examining novel factors that may explain this disparity in progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in Hispanics is urgently needed. Interpersonal and patient-centered characteristics, including health literacy, acculturation, and social support, have been shown to affect health outcomes in patients with other chronic diseases. However, these characteristics have not been well studied in the context of CKD, particularly in relation to disease knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. In this report, we examine the potential roles of these factors for CKD progression in Hispanics and propose targeted therapeutic interventions.


Assuntos
Aculturação , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Letramento em Saúde , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Hispânico ou Latino , Insuficiência Renal Crônica/epidemiologia , Apoio Social , Progressão da Doença , Humanos
12.
Med Care ; 49(3): 248-56, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21224743

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Access to nephrology care before initiation of chronic dialysis is associated with improved outcomes after initiation. Less is known about the effect of predialysis nephrology care on healthcare costs and utilization. METHODS: We conducted retrospective analyses of elderly patients who initiated dialysis between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2001 and were eligible for services covered by the Department of Veterans Affairs. We used multivariable generalized linear models to compare healthcare costs for patients who received no predialysis nephrology care during the year before dialysis initiation with those who received low- (1-3 nephrology visits), moderate- (4-6 visits), and high-intensity (>6 visits) nephrology care during this time period. RESULTS: There were 8022 patients meeting inclusion criteria: 37% received no predialysis nephrology care, while 24% received low, 16% moderate, and 23% high-intensity predialysis nephrology care. During the year after dialysis initiation, patients in these groups spent an average of 52, 40, 31, and 27 days in the hospital (P < 0.001), respectively, and accounted for an average of $103,772, $96,390, $93,336, and $89,961 in total healthcare costs (P < 0.001), respectively. Greater intensity of predialysis nephrology care was associated with lower costs even among patients whose first predialysis nephrology visit was ≤ 3 months before dialysis initiation. Patients with greater predialysis nephrology care also had lower mortality rates during the year after dialysis initiation (43%, 38%, 28%, and 25%, respectively, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Greater intensity of predialysis nephrology care was associated with fewer hospital days and lower total healthcare costs during the year after dialysis initiation, even though patients survived longer.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Falência Renal Crônica/economia , Nefrologia/economia , Diálise Renal/economia , Idoso , Atenção à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Hospitais de Veteranos/economia , Hospitais de Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/mortalidade , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Masculino , Diálise Renal/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos
13.
Am J Nephrol ; 33(1): 60-9, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21178335

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the adverse health outcomes with late nephrology referral for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), little is known about the underlying mechanisms and reasons for late referral patterns. METHODS: We conducted a Medline search for peer-reviewed articles focused on nephrology referral among adults with CKD. We critically reviewed this literature in regard to late nephrology referral, highlighted its shortcomings, and provided a theoretically based framework for future research. RESULTS: Late referral has been attributed to three key types of factors: primary care provider (PCP), patient, and healthcare system factors. Limited empirical research has pointed to knowledge deficits, perceptions, and preferences by PCPs as well as to knowledge deficits, psychological concerns, and economic concerns by patients. The existing literature is severely limited by retrospective designs, closed-ended surveys, and the absence of a theoretically driven conceptual framework to fully evaluate root causes of this ongoing problem. Social Cognitive Theory may be a particularly well-suited conceptual model for late nephrology referral because important PCP and patient factors correspond to key constructs of this theory. CONCLUSION: Future research is needed to delineate pathways underlying reasons for PCPs' late referral patterns and CKD patients' referral nonadherence. Interventions are urgently needed to reduce late referrals and improve the health of patients with CKD.


Assuntos
Nefropatias/terapia , Nefrologia/métodos , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Canadá , Cognição , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Humanos , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , MEDLINE , Medicaid , Cooperação do Paciente , Atenção Primária à Saúde/organização & administração , Fatores de Tempo , Estados Unidos
14.
J Rehabil Res Dev ; 47(8): 751-62, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21110249

RESUMO

Data from Medicare's End-Stage Renal Disease Medical Evidence Report (Form 2728) suggest that underuse of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) may be contributing to anemia in predialysis patients. However, the data quality of Form 2728 is not known. ESA prescription records were confirmed in Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) data sets and/or ESA claims in Medicare files and compared with data collected on Form 2728 among 8,033 veterans who initiated dialysis in 2000 and 2001 and were eligible for both VA and Medicare coverage in the 12 months preceding dialysis initiation. Among the cohort, predialysis ESA use was found in 4% (n = 323) more veterans by VA/Medicare data sets (n = 2,810) than by Form 2728 (n = 2,487). With the use of VA/Medicare data sets (gold standard), the accuracy of Form 2728 for predialysis ESA use was sensitivity 57.0%, specificity 83.1%, positive predictive value 64.5%, negative predictive value 78.2%, and kappa coefficient 0.41. Sensitivity for reported predialysis ESA use on Form 2728 was lowest among veterans who were female and nonwhite, of low socioeconomic status, and with anemia or other comorbid illnesses. The poor sensitivity and specificity of predialysis ESA use data on Form 2728 raise concerns about the validity of previous reports and study findings. Investigators should recognize these shortcomings and the introduction of possible bias in future research and reports.


Assuntos
Eritropoetina/uso terapêutico , Hematínicos/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Veteranos/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Feminino , Controle de Formulários e Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Diálise Renal , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Distribuição por Sexo , Estados Unidos
15.
Kidney Int ; 77(11): 1010-9, 2010 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20200503

RESUMO

Depression is common in end-stage renal disease and is associated with poor quality of life and higher mortality; however, little is known about depressive affect in earlier stages of chronic kidney disease. To measure this in a risk group burdened with hypertension and kidney disease, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of individuals at enrollment in the African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension Cohort Study. Depressive affect was assessed by the Beck Depression Inventory II and quality of life by the Medical Outcomes Study-Short Form and the Satisfaction with Life Scale. Beck Depression scores over 14 were deemed consistent with an increased depressive affect and linear regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with these scores. Among 628 subjects, 166 had scores over 14 but only 34 were prescribed antidepressants. The mean Beck Depression score of 11.0 varied with the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) from 10.7 (eGFR 50-60) to 16.0 (eGFR stage 5); however, there was no significant independent association between these. Unemployment, low income, and lower quality and satisfaction with life scale scores were independently and significantly associated with a higher Beck Depression score. Thus, our study shows that an increased depressive affect is highly prevalent in African Americans with chronic kidney disease, is infrequently treated with antidepressants, and is associated with poorer quality of life. Sociodemographic factors have especially strong associations with this increased depressive affect. Because this study was conducted in an African-American cohort, its findings may not be generalized to other ethnic groups.


Assuntos
Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Depressão/etnologia , Nefropatias/etnologia , Nefropatias/psicologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Idoso , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Doença Crônica , Comorbidade , Estudos Transversais , Depressão/diagnóstico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Prescrições de Medicamentos , Emprego , Feminino , Taxa de Filtração Glomerular , Humanos , Renda , Rim/fisiopatologia , Nefropatias/fisiopatologia , Modelos Lineares , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Satisfação Pessoal , Prevalência , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
16.
Am J Manag Care ; 16(2): e57-66, 2010 Feb 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20148611

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of exclusive and dual use of Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and Medicare healthcare systems on outpatient predialysis nephrology care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Receipt, timeliness, and intensity of predialysis nephrology care were evaluated among 8033 veterans who initiated dialysis in 2000 and 2001 and were eligible for both VA and Medicare coverage in the 12 months preceding dialysis initiation. Propensity scores were incorporated into analyses to minimize potential selection bias from nonrandom veteran allocation to healthcare systems. RESULTS: Among the cohort, 17.4% were users of VA services only (VA-only users), 38.5% were users of Medicare-covered services only (Medicare-only users), and 44.1% were users of both VA and Medicare-covered services (dual users). Sixty-six percent of VA-only and dual users and 58.1% of Medicare-only users received predialysis nephrology care. Compared with Medicare-only users, dual users were more likely (risk ratio [RR], 1.12; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.07-1.17) and VA-only users were as likely (RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.88-1.08) to have received predialysis nephrology care. Compared with Medicare-only use, VA-only use (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50-0.81) and dual use (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.70-0.88) were associated with a lower likelihood of late nephrology care (<3 months before dialysis initiation). CONCLUSIONS: More than one-third of older veterans initiating dialysis do not receive nephrology care beforehand. Dual use of VA and Medicare-covered services was associated with greater receipt and favorable timeliness of predialysis nephrology care, while use of only Medicare-covered services was associated with late predialysis nephrology care. Further studies to identify reasons for system-level variations in access to predialysis nephrology care may assist in identifying opportunities for improvement.


Assuntos
Cobertura do Seguro , Falência Renal Crônica/terapia , Medicare , Nefrologia , Veteranos , Idoso , Assistência Ambulatorial , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
17.
Am J Kidney Dis ; 46(6): 1049-57, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16310570

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although acute renal failure (ARF) complicating nonrenal organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit is associated with significant mortality and hospital costs, hospital resource utilization attributed to uncomplicated ARF is not well known. The goal of this study is to characterize the costs and lengths of stay (LOSs) incurred by hospitalized patients with uncomplicated ARF and their important determining factors. METHODS: We obtained hospital case-mix data sets from 23 Massachusetts hospitals for a 2-year period (1999 to 2000) from the Massachusetts Division of Health Care Finance and Policy. A total of 2,252 records of patients hospitalized with uncomplicated ARF were identified. Patient records of other common medical diagnoses were studied for comparison. RESULTS: Patients hospitalized with uncomplicated ARF incurred median direct hospital costs of 2,600 dollars, median hospital LOS of 5 days, and mortality of 8%. Dialysis was independently associated with significantly greater hospital costs and LOSs for patients with uncomplicated ARF (P < 0.05). Male sex and nonwhite race were associated with significantly lower hospital costs and LOSs, whereas type of hospital had opposing effects on these 2 resource utilization outcomes (P < 0.05). Unadjusted aggregate resource utilization associated with uncomplicated ARF exceeded that of many other common illnesses. CONCLUSION: Demographic and hospital factors, as well as dialysis therapy, are significant determinants of hospital resource utilization for patients with uncomplicated ARF. Uncomplicated ARF appears to incur greater hospital costs and longer LOSs compared with other common medical conditions. Greater focus should be directed toward further understanding of the factors influencing resource utilization for ARF.


Assuntos
Injúria Renal Aguda/economia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/economia , Injúria Renal Aguda/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Grupos Diagnósticos Relacionados , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Recursos em Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Masculino , Massachusetts/epidemiologia , Medicare/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA