Area Deprivation and Medicare Spending for Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: Insights From Michigan.

BACKGROUND: Prior work has established that high socioeconomic deprivation is associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes for patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The relationship between socioeconomic status and 90-day episode spending is poorly understood. In this observational cohort analysis, we evaluated whether socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were associated with higher expenditures during 90-day episodes of care after isolated CABG. METHODS: We linked clinical registry data from 8728 isolated CABG procedures from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2018, to Medicare fee-for-service claims data. Our primary exposure variable was patients in the top decile of the Area Deprivation Index. Linear regression was used to compare risk-adjusted, price-standardized 90-day episode spending for deprived against nondeprived patients as well as component spending categories: index hospitalization, professional services, post acute care, and readmissions. RESULTS: A total of 872 patients were categorized as being in the top decile. Mean 90-day episode spending for the 8728 patients in the sample was $55 258 (SD, $26 252). Socioeconomically deprived patients had higher overall 90-day spending compared with nondeprived patients ($61 579 vs $54 557; difference, $3003; P = .001). Spending was higher in socioeconomically deprived patients for index hospitalizations (difference, $1284; P = .005), professional services (difference, $379; P = .002), and readmissions (difference, $1188; P = .008). Inpatient rehabilitation was the only significant difference in post-acute care spending (difference, $469; P = .011). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare spending was higher for socioeconomically deprived CABG in Michigan, indicating systemic disparities over and above patient demographic factors.

High Socioeconomic Deprivation and Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Outcomes: Insights From Michigan.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular outcomes are worse among individuals from areas with limited socioeconomic resources. This study evaluated the relationship between high socioeconomic deprivation and isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) outcomes. METHODS: We linked statewide Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database data to Medicare Fee-for-Service records for 10 423 Michigan residents undergoing isolated CABG between January 2012 and December 2018. High socioeconomic deprivation was defined as residing in the highest decile of the ZIP Code-level area deprivation index (ADI). Multivariable logistic regression estimated the relationship between top ADI decile and major morbidity, in-hospital mortality, and operative mortality. Survival analyses evaluated long-term survival comparing patients in the top vs not in the top ADI decile. RESULTS: A total of 1036 patients were in the top decile of ADI (ADI >82.4), and they were more likely to be female, Black, and have a higher predicted risk of mortality. Patients in the top ADI decile had significantly higher rates of major morbidity (17.4% vs 11.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.04-1.54; P = .021) and in-hospital mortality (3.2% vs 1.3%, adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.18-2.86, P = .007) but not operative mortality. The adjusted hazard of mortality was 16% higher for patients residing in the top ADI decile (95% CI, 1.01-1.33; P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Isolated CABG patients residing in the highest areas of socioeconomic deprivation differed with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics and experienced worse short- and long-term outcomes compared with those not in the top ADI decile.

Evaluating treatment-specific post-discharge quality-of-life and cost-effectiveness of TAVR and SAVR: Current practice & future directions.

BACKGROUND: Aortic stenosis is a prevalent valvular heart disease that is treated primarily by surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), which are common treatments for addressing symptoms secondary to valvular heart disease. This narrative review article focuses on the existing literature comparing recovery and cost-effectiveness for SAVR and TAVR. METHODS: Major databases were searched for relevant literature discussing HRQOL and cost-effectiveness of TAVR and SAVR. We also searched for studies analyzing the use of wearable devices to monitor post-discharge recovery patterns. RESULTS: The literature focusing on quality-of-life following TAVR and SAVR has been limited primarily to single-center observational studies and randomized controlled trials. Studies focused on TAVR report consistent and rapid improvement relative to baseline status. Common HRQOL instruments (SF-36, EQ-5D, KCCQ, MLHFQ) have been used to document that TF-TAVR is advantageous over SAVR at 1-month follow-up, with the benefits leveling off following 1 year. TF-TAVR is economically favorable relative to SAVR, with estimated incremental cost-effectiveness ratio values ranging from $50,000 to $63,000/QALY gained. TA-TAVR has not been reported to be advantageous from an HRQOL or cost-effectiveness perspective. CONCLUSIONS: While real-world experiences are less described, large-scale trials have advanced our understanding of recovery and cost-effectiveness of aortic valve replacement treatment strategies. Future work should focus on scalable wearable device technology, such as smartwatches and heart-rate monitors, to facilitate real-world evaluation of TAVR and SAVR to support clinical decision-making and outcomes ascertainment.