When the political is professional: Civil disobedience in psychology.

Activists use civil disobedience as a means of putting social justice into practice. Psychologists can engage in civil disobedience to enact psychology's ethical principles, support marginalized communities, promote social welfare, and contest injustice. Drawing from the work of minoritized scholars within and outside of psychology, the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code, social constructionism, intersectionality, and social justice movements, our article aims to empower psychologists to understand and use civil disobedience and advocates for expanding civil disobedience in the profession. Because psychologists' identities and contexts will inform their own civil disobedience, we utilize a social justice issue germane to our own work supporting transgender people as an exemplar where our ethical principles would conflict with law; thus, warranting civil disobedience. This example concerns Ohio House Bill 658, which, if enacted, would have mandated that psychologists "immediately notify, in writing, each of [a] child's parents if the child shows symptoms of gender dysphoria or otherwise demonstrates a desire to be treated in a manner opposite of the child's biological sex." We return to Ohio HB 658 and explore other contemporary social justice issues throughout to reveal how psychologists can conceptualize and enact civil disobedience in pursuit of transformative change. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

Insurance- and medical provider-related barriers and facilitators to staying on PrEP: results from a qualitative study.

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is a highly effective biobehavioral strategy for preventing HIV acquisition. Although PrEP uptake has increased steadily, discontinuation rates are high among members of key populations like gay and bisexual men (GBM). Understanding the challenges that arise for PrEP users is key to better PrEP implementation and sustained use over time. We report on barriers that arose for PrEP-using GBM, as well as facilitating factors that aided PrEP persistence, with the goal of informing PrEP implementation efforts. In 2015-2016, 103 PrEP-using GBM in NYC completed qualitative interviews about their engagement with PrEP, including their experiences navigating PrEP-related medical care. Interviews were transcribed verbatim, coded, and analyzed thematically. Over half of participants (53%) received their PrEP-related care from their primary care provider (PCP), one-third (33%) from a community-based health clinic, and 13% from multiple medical providers. Emergent themes regarding the barriers and facilitators to PrEP persistence fell into two categories: insurance- and medical appointment-related barriers and facilitators to continued PrEP use. The experiences of PrEP-using GBM can provide useful insights for providers, program developers, and policymakers aiming to improve the implementation of PrEP. To support PrEP persistence, reliable insurance coverage, cost-assistance, and easy appointment scheduling are key to maintenance. Removing insurance- and appointment-related barriers to persistence may prove essential for sustaining use among GBM.

Cost-Related Underuse of Medicines for Asthma-Opportunities for Improving Adherence.

BACKGROUND: In asthma, underuse of cost-effective preventive treatments increases morbidity and mortality. The cost of medicines contributes to underuse ("nonadherence"), but the extent to which people with asthma skip or reduce doses or let prescriptions go unfilled when faced with cost pressures is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the extent of cost-related underuse behaviors and associated factors. METHODS: Using previously validated summary indicators, we conducted an online cross-sectional survey of adults and parents of children 5 to 17 years with asthma in Australia (a high-income country) and developed logistic regression models for adults and children with asthma, controlling for key clinical and demographic factors. RESULTS: The survey was completed by n = 792 adults (mean age, 47 [standard deviation, 17] years, male 47%, concession 60%) and n = 609 parents of children (5-10 years 51%, male 60%, concession 59%) with asthma. Cost-related underuse was reported by 52.9% adults and 34.3% parents, predominantly decreasing or skipping doses to make medicines last longer. Higher odds of cost-related underuse were observed with younger adults (adults: odds ratio [OR]: 1.19; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12, 1.27), males (adults: OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.08), having concerns about medicines (adults: OR: 3.12; 95% CI: 2.17, 4.35; parents: OR: 2.63; 95% CI: 1.56, 4.55), less comfortable talking to prescribers about cost (parents: OR: 1.22; 95% CI: 1.12, 1.33) or changing medicines (adults: OR: 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03, 1.22), feeling less engaged with prescribers about medicine decisions (parents: OR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.23), and with poorer asthma control (adults, poor control: OR: 1.87; 95% CI: 1.13, 3.09; parents, poor control: OR: 3.87; 95% CI: 1.99, 7.54), and requiring specialist (parents: OR: 1.83; 95% CI: 1.16, 2.87) or urgent health care visits (adults: OR: 1.54; 95% CI: 1.06, 2.23). Income and concession card status were not associated with cost-related underuse. CONCLUSIONS: Adults and parents of children with asthma indicate high rates of cost-related underuse of asthma medicines, even in the context of national medicines subsidies. Urgent targeting of interventions to promote discussion of medicines and costs between doctor and patients, particularly young adult males, is needed.