Plaque assessment by coronary CT angiography may predict cardiac events in high risk and very high risk diabetic patients: A long-term follow-up study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The aim of the present study is to evaluate whether advanced coronary atherosclerosis analysis by CCTA may improve prognostic stratification among diabetic patients at high cardiovascular risk (CV risk). METHODS AND RESULTS: The study population consisted of 265 consecutive diabetic patients at high CV risk who underwent CCTA for suspected CAD between January 2011 and December 2016. For every patients both traditional and advanced, qualitative and quantitative coronary plaque analysis were performed. The occurrence of cardiac death, ACS, and non-urgent revascularization were recorded at follow-up. Among the 265 patients enrolled, 21 were lost to follow-up, whereas 244 (92%) had a complete follow-up (mean 45 ± 22 months) and were classified at high (n = 67) or very high cardiovascular risk (n = 177), according to ESC Guidelines. A total of 63 events were recorded (3 Cardiac Death, 3 NSTEMI, 8 unstable angina, 36 late non-urgent revascularization and 13 non-cardiac death) in 57 different patients. Elevated fibro-fatty plaque volume was the only predictor of events over age, gender and traditional risk factor when ACS and MACE were considered as end-points [HR (95% CI) 6.01 (1.65-21.87), p = 0.006 and 3.46 (2.00-5.97); p < 0.001]. CONCLUSION: The present study confirms the prognostic role of advance coronary atherosclerosis evaluation beyond risk factors and stenosis severity, even in diabetics. Despite the very high cardiovascular risk of study population, a not negligible portion (23%) of patients exhibited totally normal coronaries.

Reliability of single breath hold three-dimensional cine kat-ARC for the assessment of biventricular dimensions and function.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy and reproducibility of 3D-cine k-adaptative-t-autocalibrating reconstruction for cartesian sampling (3D cine kat-ARC) for quantification of biventricular volumes, ejection fraction and LV mass in clinical practice. METHOD: 74 patients underwent cardiac magnetic resonance for clinical indications. In the whole population 3D cine kat-ARC and 2D cine bSSFP images were acquired on short axis view. Subsequently, the population was divided in three subgroups (dilated, hypetrophic, other phenotypes). Two experienced observers performed analysis of volumes, biventricular function and left ventricular mass in the overall population and subgroups using an off-line workstation. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test, linear regression and Bland-Altman plot, correlation coefficient η2 and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A cut-off value of p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Biventricular volumes, function and left ventricular mass evaluated with 3D cine kat-ARC sequences did not show any significant difference compared to 2D bSSFP sequences in the overall population (p > 0.05). Bland-Altman analysis showed limited bias and narrow limits of the agreement for all measurements in overall population. Subgroup analysis showed a statistically significant difference (p = 0.04) for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with a dilated phenotype; showing a minimum overestimation tendency for 3D cine kat ARC (2D cine bSSFP LVEF = 46.44 ± 15.83% vs 3D cine kat-ARC LVEF = 48.36 ± 16.50 %). CONCLUSIONS: 3D cine kat-ARC 3D sequences allow an accurate evaluation of biventricular volumes and function in a single breath hold.

Technological Advancements in Echocardiographic Assessment of Thoracic Aortic Dilatation: Head to Head Comparison Among Multidetector Computed Tomography, 2-Dimensional, and 3-Dimensional Echocardiography Measurements.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of 2-dimensional (2D) and 3-dimensional (3D) transthoracic echocardiography (2DTTE, 3DTTE) versus multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients with ascending aortic (AA) dilation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients with AA dilation were evaluated by 2DTTE, X-plane (XP) 3DTTE, and MDCT. Aorta diameters were measured at aortic annulus, aortic root (SIN), sinotubular junction, AA, aortic arch before the prebrachiocephalic artery (PRE), and before left subclavian artery (INTRA). Leading edge-to-leading edge (L-L) and inner-to-inner (I-I) measurements were compared with MDCT data. RESULTS: Feasibility, quality of imaging, and accuracy was high with all echocardiographic methods. Specifically for MDCT maximum SIN diameter, the best correlation and agreement was obtained using XP maximum diameter at 3DTTE (MDCT: 44.8±7.4 mm vs. XP: 44.4±7.4 mm; r=0.975; bias=-0.4 mm). The same was true for AA maximum diameter at MDCT (MDCT: 46.6±8.1 mm vs. XP: 47.5±8.1 mm; r=0.991; bias=0.1 mm). For aortic arch the best correlation and agreement with MDCT were as follows: 2DTTE L-L diameter for arch PRE (MDCT: 37.9±5.3 mm vs. TTE: 36.6±4.5 mm; r=0.927; bias=-0.9 mm) and MDCT minimum diameter with XP minimum diameter for arch INTRA (MDCT: 28.2±5.0 mm vs. TTE 28.8±4.7 mm; r=0.939; bias=-0.3 mm). CONCLUSION: In patients with aortic dilatation or aneurysm, new techniques (mainly 2D-3D probes allowing XP views) facilitate accuracy of aortic measurements at different sites of the vessel and allow standardization of analysis to better compare with MDCT.

The STRATEGY Study (Stress Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Versus Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography for the Management of Symptomatic Revascularized Patients): Resources and Outcomes Impact.

BACKGROUND: Computed tomography coronary angiography (cTCA) and stress cardiac magnetic resonance (stress-CMR) are suitable tools for diagnosing obstructive coronary artery disease in symptomatic patients with previous history of revascularization. However, performance appraisal of noninvasive tests must take in account the consequent diagnostic testing, invasive procedures, clinical outcomes, radiation exposure, and cumulative costs rather than their diagnostic accuracy only. We aimed to compare an anatomic (cTCA) versus a functional (stress-CMR) strategy in symptomatic patients with previous myocardial revascularization procedures. METHODS AND RESULTS: Six hundred patients with chest pain and previous revascularization included in a prospective observational registry and evaluated by clinically indicated cTCA (n=300, mean age 68.2±9.7 years, male 255) or stress-CMR (n=300, mean age 67.6±9.7 years, male 263) were enrolled and followed-up in terms of subsequent noninvasive tests, invasive coronary angiography, revascularization procedures, cumulative effective radiation dose, major adverse cardiac events, defined as a composite end point of nonfatal myocardial infarction and cardiac death, and medical costs. The mean follow-up for cTCA and stress-CMR groups was similar (773.6±345 versus 752.8±291 days; P=0.21). Compared with stress-CMR, cTCA was associated with a higher rate of subsequent noninvasive tests (28% versus 17%; P=0.0009), invasive coronary angiography (31% versus 20%; P=0.0009), and revascularization procedures (24% versus 16%; P=0.007). Stress-CMR strategy was associated with a significant reduction of radiation exposure and cumulative costs (59% and 24%, respectively; P<0.001). Finally, patients undergoing stress-CMR showed a lower rate of major adverse cardiac events (5% versus 10%; P<0.010) and cost-effectiveness ratio (119.98±250.92 versus 218.12±298.45 Euro/y; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with cTCA, stress-CMR is more cost-effective in symptomatic revascularized patients.

Comparison of accuracy of aortic root annulus assessment with cardiac magnetic resonance versus echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

The evaluation of the aortic root in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation is crucial. The aim of the present study was to compare the accuracy of cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) evaluation of the aortic annulus (AoA) with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients referred for transcatheter aortic valve implantation. In 50 patients, maximum diameter, minimum diameter and AoA, length of the left coronary, right coronary, and noncoronary aortic leaflets, degree (grades 1 to 4) of aortic leaflet calcification, and distance between AoA and coronary artery ostia were assessed. AoA maximum diameter, minimum diameter, and area by CMR were 26.4 ± 2.8 mm, 20.6 ± 2.3 mm, 449.8 ± 86.2 mm(2), respectively. The length of left coronary, right coronary, and noncoronary leaflets by CMR were 13.9 ± 2.2, 13.3 ± 2.1, and 13.4 ± 1.8 mm, respectively, whereas the score of aortic leaflet calcifications was 2.9 ± 0.8. Finally, the distances between AoA and left main and right coronary artery ostia were 16.1 ± 2.8 and 16.1 ± 4.4 mm, respectively. Regarding AoA area, transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography showed an underestimation (p <0.01), with a moderate agreement (r: 0.5 and 0.6, respectively, p <0.01) compared with CMR. No differences and excellent correlation were observed between CMR and MDCT for all parameters (r: 0.9, p <0.01), except for aortic leaflet calcifications that were underestimated by CMR. In conclusion, aortic root assessment with CMR including AoA size, aortic leaflet length, and coronary artery ostia height is accurate compared with MDCT. CMR may be a valid imaging alternative in patients unsuitable for MDCT.

Pre-operative CT coronary angiography in patients with mitral valve prolapse referred for surgical repair: comparison of accuracy, radiation dose and cost versus invasive coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study are to evaluate the accuracy of low dose multidetector computed tomography coronary angiography (MDCT) versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in ruling out CAD in patients with mitral valve prolapse and severe mitral regurgitation (MVP) before cardiac surgery and to compare the overall effective radiation dose (ED) and cost of a diagnostic approach in which conventional ICA should be performed only in patients with significant CAD as detected by MDCT. METHODS: Eighty patients with MVP and without history of CAD were randomized to MDCT (Group 1) or ICA (Group 2) to rule out CAD before surgery. However, ICA was also performed as gold standard reference in Group 1 to test the diagnostic accuracy of MDCT. A diagnostic work-up A in whom all patients underwent low-dose MDCT as initial diagnostic test and those with positive findings were referred for ICA was compared with work-up B in which all patients were referred for ICA according to the standard of care in terms of ED and cost. RESULTS: The two groups were homogeneous in terms of gender, age and body mass index. The overall feasibility and accuracy in a patient-based model were 99% and 93%, respectively. The overall ED and costs were significantly lower in diagnostic work-up A compared to diagnostic work-up B. CONCLUSIONS: The accuracy of low dose MDCT for ruling out the presence of significant CAD in patients undergoing elective valve surgery for mitral valve prolapse is excellent with a reduction of overall radiation dose exposure and costs.

Aortic annulus area assessment by multidetector computed tomography for predicting paravalvular regurgitation in patients undergoing balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comparison with transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is a valid alternative to surgery in high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis. Aortic annulus (AoA) sizing is crucial for TAVI success. The aim of the study was to compare AoA dimensions measured by multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) vs those obtained with transthoracic (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) for predicting paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PVR) after TAVI. METHODS: Aortic annulus maximum diameter, minimum diameter, and area were assessed using MDCT and compared with TTE and TEE diameter and area for predicting PVR after TAVI in 151 patients (45 men, age 81.2 ± 6.4 years). RESULTS: Aortic annulus maximum, minimum diameter, and area detected by MDCT were 25.04 ± 2.39 mm, 21.27 ± 2.10 mm, and 420.87 ± 76.10 mm(2), respectively. Aortic annulus diameter and area measured by TTE and TEE were 21.14 ± 1.94 mm and 353.82 ± 64.57 mm(2) and 22.04 ± 1.94 mm and 384.33 ± 67.30 mm(2), respectively. A good correlation was found between AoA diameters and area evaluated by MDCT vs TTE and TEE (0.61, 0.65, and 0.69 and 0.61, 0.65, and 0.70, respectively), with a mean difference of 3.90 ± 1.98 mm, 0.13 ± 1.67 mm, and 67.05 ± 55.87 mm(2) and 3.0 ± 2.0 mm, 0.77 ± 1.70 mm, and 36.54 ± 56.43 mm(2), respectively. Grade ≥2 PVR occurred in 46 patients and was related to male gender, higher body mass index, preprocedural aortic regurgitation, and lower mismatch between the nominal area of the implanted prosthesis and AoA area detected by MDCT. CONCLUSIONS: Mismatch between prosthesis area and AoA area detected by MDCT is a better predictor of PVR as compared with echocardiography mismatch. Specific MDCT-based sizing recommendations should be developed.

Diagnostic performance of two types of low radiation exposure protocol for prospective ECG-triggering multidetector computed tomography angiography in assessment of coronary artery bypass graft.

BACKGROUND: Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) is useful in evaluation of coronary artery bypass graft (CABG). However, radiation exposure is a reason for concern. We compared diagnostic performance and effective dose of a new dedicated post-processing reconstruction algorithm with BMI-adapted scanning protocol (MDCT-XTe) vs. standard prospective ECG-triggering protocol (MDCT-XT) and retrospective ECG-triggering (MDCT-Helical), compared to invasive coronary angiography (ICA), in the assessment of grafts and nongrafted or distal runoff coronary arteries. METHODS: One hundred and nineteen patients with 277 grafts were randomized to Group 1 based on BMI-adapted scanning protocol with prospective ECG-triggering (40 patients), Group 2 with prospective ECG-triggering (39 patients) and Group 3 (40 patients) with retrospective ECG-triggering. Data were acquired using 64-slice MDCT. RESULTS: MDCT correctly assessed the patency of all CABG in 3 groups. After comparison with ICA, MDCT was able to correctly detect the occlusion or stenosis of CABG in all groups, with the exception of one case of Group 3. In Group 3 sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of CABG evaluation were 100%, 98.4%, 96.7%, 100% and 98.9%, respectively. In Groups 1 and 2 the diagnostic accuracy of CABG evaluation was 100%. Effective radiation dose was 3.5±1.4mSv in Group 1 vs. 7.4±2.6mSv in Group 2 vs. 27.8±9.4mSv in Group 3. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that MDCT-XTe and MDCT-XT have a diagnostic performance in the evaluation of CABG similar to MDCT-Helical, with a significant reduction of radiation exposure, specially for MDCT-XTe.

High diagnostic accuracy of prospective ECG-gating 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography for the detection of in-stent restenosis: in-stent restenosis assessment by low-dose MDCT.

OBJECTIVES: The accuracy of computed tomography (CT) for assessment of coronary stents is as yet unproven and radiation exposure has been a concern. The aim of our study is to compare radiation dose and diagnostic performance of CT with prospective ECG-triggering versus retrospective ECG-triggering for the detection of in-stent restenosis (ISR). METHODS: We enrolled 168 consecutive patients with suspected ISR, 83 studied using CT with prospective ECG-triggering (group 1) and 85 using retrospective ECG-triggering (group 2). RESULTS: Prevalence of ISR according to catheter angiography was 24% in both groups. The overall evaluability was similar (93% in group 1 vs 95% in group 2). Artefact sub-analysis showed a significantly lower number of blooming and higher number of slice misalignment in group 1 vs group 2. In the stent-based analysis using only evaluable stents, specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were significantly higher in group 1 (100%, 100% and 99%, respectively) than in group 2 (97%, 91% and 95%, respectively, p < 0.05). Group 1 was exposed to a lower radiation dose compared with group 2 (4.3 ± 1.4 mSv vs 18.5 ± 5.5 mSv, p < 00.1). CONCLUSIONS: CT with prospective ECG-triggering can improve diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive imaging of coronary stents with a significant reduction in radiation exposure.

Preoperative assessment of thymoma: evaluation of mediastinal arterial anatomy by cardiac multidetector computed tomography.

We describe the clinical case of a thymoma, surgically removed after diagnosis, staging, and preoperative assessment performed by means of cardiac electrocardiogram-gated multidetector computed tomography. This technique allowed a very accurate assessment of the mass, proving superior to conventional computed tomography thanks to the possibility of identifying the relationships of the mass with the mediastinal structures, including the large vessels and coronary arteries. It also established the origin of the arterial vascularization from a tributary branch of the left internal mammary artery, visualizing the pathway and the relationship of the vessel with the mass and the point where it is penetrated. Finally, we analyzed the anatomy and patency of the coronary arteries, essential data in this patient with a high risk of coronary artery disease.