Redefining postmastectomy radiation contouring in the era of immediate breast reconstruction: An accurate assessment of local recurrence risk.

INTRODUCTION: Most studies report post-mastectomy local recurrences as chest wall recurrences without clarifying whether the recurrence is in the subcutaneous tissue, muscle or underlying rib. Post-mastectomy chest wall radiation is recommended in patients at increased risk of locoregional recurrence. Chest wall radiation-related fibrosis has become an important clinical consideration in the era of immediate implant-based breast reconstruction. In patients with commonly performed subpectoral implant-based reconstruction, the pectoralis major becomes relocated anterior to the implant and just deep to skin, therefore raising the question of value in radiating deep chest wall structures. This study assessed the rate of recurrence in each anatomical region of chest wall in post-mastectomy patients. METHODS: A comprehensive breast cancer database of 4287 patients at a single regional cancer center from 2006 to 2018 was retrospectively analyzed to identify 1571 mastectomy patients. Recurrences were classified as local skin/subcutaneous, pectoralis muscle (pectoralis major), deep chest wall (pectoralis minor, intercostal muscle or rib) or regional axillary recurrence. RESULTS: A total of 26 patients with locoregional recurrence were identified. Most recurrences were in the skin/subcutaneous level. Of 1571 mastectomy patients, only one patient developed a local recurrence posterior to pectoralis major. Our literature search and meta-analysis revealed that local recurrences post-mastectomy are much more likely to be in subcutaneous tissues/pectoralis major versus deeper chest wall. CONCLUSION: A reduced clinical target volume which encompasses skin/subcutaneous and pectoralis muscle layers without treating deep chest wall may be more appropriate to reduce radiation-associated toxicity since avoiding circumferential radiation of an implant may prevent capsular contracture without compromising treatment benefit.

Estimating child mortality associated with maternal mortality from breast and cervical cancer.

BACKGROUND: Large-scale population studies demonstrate an association between mothers' deaths and child mortality in both lower and higher income countries. The authors estimated children's deaths in association with mothers' deaths from breast or cervical cancer, 2 common cancers in low-income and middle-income countries affecting women of reproductive age, to develop a comprehensive assessment of the death burden of these cancers. METHODS: A Monte Carlo simulation model was devised whereby women were at risk of dying from breast cancer, cervical cancer, or another cause. Compared with children who have living mothers, children of women who die before they reached age 10 years have an elevated risk of death from all causes. Therefore, simulations were conducted, and the impact of mothers' deaths from cervical and breast cancer on associated child mortality was quantified for Bangladesh, Burkina Faso, and Denmark (benchmark analysis), then the analyses were extended to all African countries. RESULTS: Benchmark estimates of child deaths associated with mothers' deaths from breast and cervical cancer resulted in an increment in cancer-related mortality of approximately 2% in Bangladesh, 14% in Burkina Faso, and less than 1% in Denmark. The model predicted an increment in comprehensive cancer deaths when including child death estimates by as high as 30% in certain African countries. CONCLUSIONS: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to estimate the impact of a mother's death from cancer on child mortality. The model's estimates call for further investigation into this correlation and underscore the relevance of adequate access to prevention and treatment among women of childbearing age.

Qualitative Assessment of Academic Radiation Oncology Department Chairs' Insights on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion: Progress, Challenges, and Future Aspirations.

PURPOSE: A lack of diversity has been observed in radiation oncology (RO), with women and certain racial/ethnic groups underrepresented as trainees, faculty, and practicing physicians. We sought to gain a nuanced understanding of how to best promote diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) based on the insights of RO department chairs, with particular attention given to the experiences of the few women and underrepresented minorities (URMs) in these influential positions. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From March to June 2016, we conducted telephone interviews with 24 RO department chairs (of 27 invited). Purposive sampling was used to invite all chairs who were women (n = 13) or URMs (n = 3) and 11 male chairs who were not URMs. Multiple analysts coded the verbatim transcripts. RESULTS: Five themes were identified: (1) commitment to DEI promotes quality health care and innovation; (2) gaps remain despite some progress with promoting diversity in RO; (3) women and URM faculty continue to experience challenges in various career domains; (4) solutions to DEI issues would be facilitated by acknowledging realities of gender and race; and (5) expansion of the career pipeline is needed. CONCLUSIONS: The chairs' insights had policy-relevant implications. Bias training should broach tokenism, blindness, and intersectionality. Efforts to recruit and support diverse talent should be deliberate and proactive. Bridge programs could engage students before their application to medical school.

Hypofractionated radiation therapy for early stage breast cancer: outcomes, toxicities, and cost analysis.

A French prospective randomized trial comparing whole breast radiotherapy with 45 Gy in 25 fractions versus 23 Gy in four fractions demonstrated equivalent 5-year local control and survival. On the basis of this data, we offer the hypofractionated regimen to women who refuse to undergo standard radiotherapy. We report our outcomes and a cost analysis. Between 2000 and 2012, 84 patients participated in this IRB-approved study and underwent whole breast radiation to 23 Gy in four fractions. Local control and survival were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acute toxicities and overall long-term cosmetic results were assessed. Costs were estimated from 2012 Medicare reimbursement data and compared to costs from standard courses of 25 and 16 fractions. All 84 patients are included in this report. Median age was 83 (range 42-98). Most patients had stage I (80%), hormone receptor positive (90%) breast cancer. Fifty-eight patients (69%) were treated prone and 26 (31%) supine. At a median follow-up of 3 years, one local recurrence has occurred, of ductal carcinoma in situ histology. Among the 13 patients deceased, two died of metastatic breast cancer. Five-year actuarial local control is 99%, breast cancer-specific survival is 98%, and overall survival is 79%. Toxicities were limited to grade 1 dermatitis in 32 patients (38%) and grade 2 fatigue in three (4%). Sixty-three patients (75%) reported good or excellent cosmetic outcome at their last follow-up. Collected Medicare reimbursement was $4,798 for the hypofractionated course. Compared to the projected reimbursement of standard regimens, $10,372 for 25 fractions and $8,382 for 16 fractions, it resulted in a difference of $5,574 and $3,584, respectively. At a follow-up of 3 years, this hypofractionated regimen appears to be a promising approach, primarily for elderly women who are unable to undergo longer treatment courses but have indications for whole breast radiotherapy.

Burnout in United States academic chairs of radiation oncology programs.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine the self-reported prevalence of burnout in chairs of academic radiation oncology departments, to identify factors contributing to burnout, and to compare the prevalence of burnout with that seen in other academic chair groups. METHODS AND MATERIALS: An anonymous online survey was administered to the membership of the Society of Chairs of Academic Radiation Oncology Programs (SCAROP). Burnout was measured with the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Human Services Survey (MBI-HSS). RESULTS: Questionnaires were returned from 66 of 87 chairs (76% response rate). Seventy-nine percent of respondents reported satisfaction with their current positions. Common major stressors were budget deficits and human resource issues. One-quarter of chairs reported that it was at least moderately likely that they would step down in the next 1 to 2 years; these individuals demonstrated significantly higher emotional exhaustion. Twenty-five percent of respondents met the MBI-HSS criteria for low burnout, 75% for moderate burnout, and none for high burnout. Group MBI-HSS subscale scores demonstrated a pattern of moderate emotional exhaustion, low depersonalization, and moderate personal accomplishment, comparing favorably with other specialties. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study of burnout in radiation oncology chairs with a high response rate and using a validated psychometric tool. Radiation oncology chairs share similar major stressors to other chair groups, but they demonstrate relatively high job satisfaction and lower burnout. Emotional exhaustion may contribute to the anticipated turnover in coming years. Further efforts addressing individual and institutional factors associated with burnout may improve the relationship with work of chairs and other department members.

Current status and recommendations for the future of research, teaching, and testing in the biological sciences of radiation oncology: report of the American Society for Radiation Oncology Cancer Biology/Radiation Biology Task Force, executive summary.

In early 2011, a dialogue was initiated within the Board of Directors (BOD) of the American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) regarding the future of the basic sciences of the specialty, primarily focused on the current state and potential future direction of basic research within radiation oncology. After consideration of the complexity of the issues involved and the precise nature of the undertaking, in August 2011, the BOD empanelled a Cancer Biology/Radiation Biology Task Force (TF). The TF was charged with developing an accurate snapshot of the current state of basic (preclinical) research in radiation oncology from the perspective of relevance to the modern clinical practice of radiation oncology as well as the education of our trainees and attending physicians in the biological sciences. The TF was further charged with making suggestions as to critical areas of biological basic research investigation that might be most likely to maintain and build further the scientific foundation and vitality of radiation oncology as an independent and vibrant medical specialty. It was not within the scope of service of the TF to consider the quality of ongoing research efforts within the broader radiation oncology space, to presume to consider their future potential, or to discourage in any way the investigators committed to areas of interest other than those targeted. The TF charge specifically precluded consideration of research issues related to technology, physics, or clinical investigations. This document represents an Executive Summary of the Task Force report.

Prospective assessment of optimal individual position (prone versus supine) for breast radiotherapy: volumetric and dosimetric correlations in 100 patients.

PURPOSE: Damage to heart and lung from breast radiotherapy is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality and lung cancer development. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate which position is best to spare lung and heart from radiotherapy exposure. METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred consecutive Stage 0-IIA breast cancer patients consented to participate in a research trial that required two computed tomography simulation scans for planning both supine and prone positions. The optimal position was defined as that which best covered the contoured breast and tumor bed while it minimized critical organ irradiation, as quantified by the in-field heart and lung volume. The trial was designed to plan the first 100 patients in each position to study correlations between in-field volumes of organs at risk and dose. RESULTS: Fifty-three left and 47 right breast cancer patients were consecutively accrued to the trial. In all patients, the prone position was optimal for sparing lung volume compared to the supine setup (mean lung volume reduction was 93.5 cc for right and 103.6 cc for left breast cancer patients). In 46/53 (87%) left breast cancer patients best treated prone, in-field heart volume was reduced by a mean of 12 cc and by 1.8 cc for the other 7/53 (13%) patients best treated supine. As predicted, supine-prone differences in in-field volume and mean dose of heart and lung were highly correlated (Spearman's correlation coefficient for left breast cancer patients was 0.90 for heart and 0.94 for lung and 0.92 for right breast cancer patients for lung). CONCLUSIONS: Prone setup reduced the amount of irradiated lung in all patients and reduced the amount of heart volume irradiated in 87% of left breast cancer patients. In-field organ volume is a valid surrogate for predicting dose; the trial continued to the planned target of 400.