The effect of low-intensity whole-body vibration with or without high-intensity resistance and impact training on risk factors for proximal femur fragility fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: study protocol for the VIBMOR randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The prevailing medical opinion is that medication is the primary (some might argue, only) effective intervention for osteoporosis. It is nevertheless recognized that osteoporosis medications are not universally effective, tolerated, or acceptable to patients. Mechanical loading, such as vibration and exercise, can also be osteogenic but the degree, relative efficacy, and combined effect is unknown. The purpose of the VIBMOR trial is to determine the efficacy of low-intensity whole-body vibration (LIV), bone-targeted, high-intensity resistance and impact training (HiRIT), or the combination of LIV and HiRIT on risk factors for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with osteopenia and osteoporosis. METHODS: Postmenopausal women with low areal bone mineral density (aBMD) at the proximal femur and/or lumbar spine, with or without a history of fragility fracture, and either on or off osteoporosis medications will be recruited. Eligible participants will be randomly allocated to one of four trial arms for 9 months: LIV, HiRIT, LIV + HiRIT, or control (low-intensity, home-based exercise). Allocation will be block-randomized, stratified by use of osteoporosis medications. Testing will be performed at three time points: baseline (T0), post-intervention (T1; 9 months), and 1 year thereafter (T2; 21 months) to examine detraining effects. The primary outcome measure will be total hip aBMD determined by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Secondary outcomes will include aBMD at other regions, anthropometrics, and other indices of bone strength, body composition, physical function, kyphosis, muscle strength and power, balance, falls, and intervention compliance. Exploratory outcomes include bone turnover markers, pelvic floor health, quality of life, physical activity enjoyment, adverse events, and fracture. An economic evaluation will also be conducted. DISCUSSION: No previous studies have compared the effect of LIV alone or in combination with bone-targeted HiRIT (with or without osteoporosis medications) on risk factors for hip fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone mass. Should either, both, or combined mechanical interventions be safe and efficacious, alternative therapeutic avenues will be available to individuals at elevated risk of fragility fracture who are unresponsive to or unwilling or unable to take osteoporosis medications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (www. anzctr.org.au ) (Trial number ANZCTR12615000848505, https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id = 368962 ); date of registration 14/08/2015 (prospectively registered). Universal Trial Number: U1111-1172-3652.

Assessment of romosozumab efficacy in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis: Results from a mechanistic PK-PD mechanostat model of bone remodeling.

This paper introduces a theoretical framework for the study of the efficacy of romosozumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting sclerostin for the treatment of osteoporosis. We developed a comprehensive mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) model of the effect of drug treatment on bone remodeling in postmenopausal osteoporosis (PMO). We utilized a one-compartment PK model to represent subcutaneous injections of romosozumab and subsequent absorption into serum. The PD model is based on a recently-developed bone cell population model describing the bone remodeling process at the tissue scale. The latter accounts for mechanical feedback by incorporating nitric oxide (NO) and sclerostin (Scl) as biochemical feedback molecules. Utilizing a competitive binding model, where Wnt and Scl compete for binding to LRP5/6, allows to regulate anabolic bone remodeling responses. Here, we extended this model with respect to romosozumab binding to sclerostin. For the currently approved monthly injections of 210 mg, the model predicted a 6.59%, 10.38% and 15.25% increase in BMD at the lumbar spine after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. These results are in good agreement with the data reported in the literature. Our model is also able to distinguish the bone-site specific drug effects. For instance, at the femoral neck, our model predicts a BMD increase of 3.85% after 12 months of 210 mg injections, which is consistent with literature observations. Finally, our simulations indicate rapid bone loss after treatment discontinuation, indicating that some additional interventions such as use of bisphosphonates are required to maintain bone mass.