An antibiotic stewardship program in a French teaching hospital.

OBJECTIVES: An antibiotic stewardship program was implemented in our teaching hospital in 1999, and strengthened in 2005. We report its organization and impact on antibiotic use. METHODS: This observational study was conducted during a 10-year period (2002-2011). RESULTS: Many interventions were implemented: Infectious Diseases Specialists (IDS) led systematic ward rounds in several departments (1999); nominative antibiotic order form (2005); documentation of IDS advice in the patient's electronic medical record (2007); IDS advice triggered by the pharmacist (formulary restriction, 2007) or because of positive blood cultures (2009); automated weekly extraction of advice given into a database (2011). Seven thousand two hundred and five pieces of advice were recorded between 2007 and 2011: 63% following physician request, 26% triggered by the pharmacist and 9% because of positive blood cultures. Advice was provided by IDS in 95% of cases (63% by phone). The number of antibiotic prescriptions remained stable since 2005 at around 400 defined daily doses (DDD)/1000 patient-days. Documenting, sharing, and choice of action were improved due to the database. CONCLUSIONS: Our antibiotic stewardship program is well accepted by physicians and allows controlling antibiotic use in our hospital.

[Systematic infection consultation in the intensive care unit. Impact of short-term antibiotic use]. / Consultation systématique d'infectiologie en réanimation médicale. Impact à court terme sur la consommation antibiotique.

OBJECTIVES: Multiresistant bacteria are regularly isolated in nosocomial infections occurring in intensive care units due to wide use of antibiotics. We evaluated the impact of systematic infectiology consultations on the quality of antibiotic prescriptions in an intensive care unit. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Infectiology consultations (3 per week) were initiated mid February 1999. The infectiologist gave oral advice to be implemented (or not) by the intensive care unit according to ongoing therapeutic options. The hospital pharmacy recorded antibiotic use for March and April 1999 for comparison with use recorded in 1998 for a similar period. We retrospectively reviewed the files of patients hospitalized during these periods and who had received antibiotics to determine the modalities of antibiotic use. The 4 antibiotics used for the longest period for each patient were recorded. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients in 1999 and 30 in 1998 were given antibiotics. The SAPS score was similar for the two groups. Mean duration of antibiotic treatment was lower during the March-April 1999 period than during the corresponding period in 1998: 13 +/- 9 days/patient versus 23 +/- 21 days/patient respectively, p = 0.037. In 1998, there were 596 antibiotic-days and in 1999 there were 455 (-24%). The cost of antibiotic therapy in 1998 was 70,342 FrF compared with 56,804 FrF in 1999 (-19%). CONCLUSION: Infectiology consultation, in association with the opinion of the intensive care physician, is a simple way to limit antibiotic use.