Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Clin Pharm Ther ; 39(6): 642-8, 2014 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25164371

RESUMO

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Therapeutic options for the management of glioblastoma (GBM) have greatly evolved over the last decade with the emergence of new regimens combining radiotherapy plus temozolomide and the use of bevacizumab at recurrence. Our aim was to assess the clinical and economic impacts of those novel strategies in our center. METHODS: A single-center retrospective chart review was conducted on patients newly diagnosed with a GBM over two periods (year 2004, group 1 or year 2008, group 2) with limitations to those eligible to radiotherapy after initial diagnosis. The type of medical management was described and compared, as well as overall survival and total costs from diagnosis to death or the last follow-up date. Cost analysis was performed under the French Sickness Fund perspective using tariffs from 2012. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-two patients were selected (49 in group 1 and 73 in group 2) with similar baseline characteristics within the two groups. Patients from group 2 received more frequently temozolomide radiochemotherapy (71% vs. 39%, P < 0·05) as first-line treatment as well as bevacizumab regimen at recurrence (48% vs. 6%, P < 0·05); the median overall survival was increased between the two periods (respectively 17 vs. 10 months, P < 0·05). The mean total cost per patient was 54,388 € in group 1 and 71,148 € in group 2 (P < 0·05). Hospital care represented the largest expenditure (76% and 58% in groups 1 and 2 respectively) followed by chemotherapy drugs costs (11% and 30% respectively). The total cost difference between the two groups was explained by the increasing use of temozolomide and bevacizumab. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was estimated at 54,355 € per life-year gained. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: As far as we know, this is the first study reporting the total cost of GBM management based on the French perspective, as well as the cost-effectiveness of clinical practices in term of cost per life-year gained. Those novel strategies have contributed to improve overall survival while inducing a substantial, but acceptable, increase of total costs.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Dacarbazina/análogos & derivados , Glioblastoma/terapia , Idoso , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/administração & dosagem , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/economia , Antineoplásicos/administração & dosagem , Antineoplásicos/economia , Bevacizumab , Quimiorradioterapia/economia , Quimiorradioterapia/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Análise Custo-Benefício , Dacarbazina/administração & dosagem , Dacarbazina/economia , Dacarbazina/uso terapêutico , Custos de Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , França , Glioblastoma/economia , Glioblastoma/patologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Custos Hospitalares , Hospitais Universitários , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Estudos Retrospectivos , Taxa de Sobrevida , Temozolomida , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA