Patient emergency assessment following deliberate self-poisoning with benzodiazepines: Can cognitive markers predict recall of the psychiatric interview? A pilot study.

STUDY HYPOTHESIS: In cases of deliberate self-poisoning (DSP), patients often ingest benzodiazepines (BZDs), known to alter memory. Experts recommend recovery of the patient's cognitive capacity before psychiatric assessment. Unfortunately, there is no validated tool in common practice to assess whether sufficient cognitive recovery has occurred after DSP with BZDs to ensure patient memory of the assessment. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to identify cognitive functions and markers which predict preserved memory of the mental health care plan proposed at the emergency department after DSP. METHODS: We recruited patients admitted for DSP with BZDs and control patients. At the time of the psychiatric assessment, we performed cognitive tests and we studied the relationship between these tests and the scores of a memory test performed 24 h after. RESULTS: In comparison with the control group, we found memory impairment in the BZD group. We found significant impairment on the Trail Making Test A (TMT A) in the BZD group in comparison with the control group, while TMT A and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS) Coding test scores were significantly correlated with memory scores. CONCLUSIONS: Attentional functions tested by WAIS Coding test and TMT A were correlated with memory score. It could be profitable to assess it in clinical practice prior to a psychiatric interview.

[The anaesthetist's liability and bullfights]. / Responsabilité de l'anesthésiste et corrida.

Whether you are an aficionado or completely uninitiated, everyone has an opinion on bull-fighting. The bull-fighter is in constant risk of injury. A medical team made up of surgeons, anesthetists, emergency physicians and nurses remains present throughout the show. For the anaesthetist and surgeon, a wounded bullfighter is an emergency because the vital and functional prognosis are engaged. The team must act in conformity with normal practice and the Code of Medical Ethics because any lack of coordination between the practitioners is punishable by law in the same way as technical fault. Several specific aspects of this type of medical procedure should be highlighted: firstly, the legal restrictions within the corrida, and secondly, the nature of the medical team, which may be comprised of doctors normally based within a public health institution and others who practice in a private health establishment. The particularity of the situation reveals differences in the system of liability, and civil liability must be distinguished from administrative liability: both of these allow the victim to obtain compensation for harm caused, but the consequences of each are different according to doctor status. The fact that the anaesthetists frequently work on a voluntary and benevolent basis does not exonerate them from liability. Lastly, a question frequently addressed is whether or not the doctor is covered by his professional insurance when he is on ringside duty.