Rapid dynamic bedside assessment of pulmonary perfusion defect by electrical impedance tomography in a patient with acute massive pulmonary embolism.

Several animal studies have shown that regional lung perfusion could be effectively estimated by the hypertonic saline contrast electrical impedance tomography method. Here, we reported an application of this method to dynamically assess regional pulmonary perfusion defect in a patient with acute massive pulmonary embolism. A 68-year-old man experienced sudden dyspnea and cardiac arrest during out-of-bed physical activity on the first day after partial mediastinal tumor resection. Acute pulmonary embolism was suspected due to acute enlargement of right heart and fixed inferior venous cava measured with bedside ultrasound. The computed tomography pulmonary angiography further confirmed large embolism in both left and right main pulmonary arteries and branches. The regional time impedance curves, which were obtained by a bolus of 10 ml 10% NaCl through the central venous catheter, were then analyzed to quantitatively assess regional perfusion. Normal ventilation distribution with massive defects in regional perfusion in both lungs was observed, leading to a ventilation-perfusion mismatch and low oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2 = 86 mmHg) at the first day of pulmonary embolism. The anticoagulation was performed with heparin, and the patient's condition (such as shock, dyspnea, hypoxemia, etc.), regional lung perfusion defect, and ventilation-perfusion mismatch continuously improved in the following days. In conclusion, this case implies that electrical impedance tomography might have the potential to assess and monitor regional perfusion for rapid diagnosis of fatal pulmonary embolism in clinical practice.

Qualitative and quantitative assessment of pendelluft: a simple method based on electrical impedance tomography.

BACKGROUND: Pendelluft, defined as asynchronous alveolar ventilation, is caused by different regional time constants or dynamic pleural pressure variations. The aim of the present study was to propose a simple method to evaluate pendelluft based on electrical impedance tomography (EIT). The efficacy of this method was demonstrated in well-known pendelluft scenarios in 6 patients. METHODS: Two patients with flail chest after accidents, two patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and two patients with acutely exacerbated obstructive lung disease were prospectively included. EIT measurements were performed before and after surgery (in patients with flail chest, who had video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with ribs fixation), or at two different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP; ARDS patients), or two different time points (obstructive lung disease). Pendelluft was assessed by regional phase shift (defined as time difference between global and regional impedance-time curves) and amplitude differences (defined as the impedance difference between sum of all regional tidal variation and the global tidal variation). RESULTS: In patients with flail chest, pendelluft diminished several days after surgery (pendelluft amplitude normalized to tidal impedance variation reduced from 88% to 2% in one patient, 12% to 2% in the other). Increased PEEP reduced the amplitude of pendelluft (from 3% to 0% in one patient, 20% to 2% in the other) but not necessarily the phase shifts (average time differences were <0.1 second for both patients for both ins- and expiration) in ARDS patients. Pendelluft assessment in obstructive lung diseases reflected the change in airway resistance (from 5% to 1% in one patient after broncholytic medication administration, as airway resistance fell from 15 to 11 cmH2O/L/s; from 9% to 35% in the other patient with acute exacerbation, the corresponding airway resistance increased from 15 to 22 cmH2O/L/s). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed EIT-based method can be used to evaluate the degree of pendelluft in dimension of phase shift and amplitude difference.

Performance of new spirometry reference values in preoperative assessment of lung function.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary function is not routinely assessed in patients without respiratory disease and symptoms before surgery, even if they are smokers. We aimed to check whether the new spirometric reference values of the worldwide Global Lung Initiative (GLI) affected the preoperative assessment of lung function in allegedly lung-healthy patients compared with the still commonly used old predicted values. METHODS: Two hundred nineteen allegedly lung-healthy non-smokers, past and current smokers were examined by spirometry before elective surgery. The obtained values of forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1 ), forced vital capacity (FVC) and FEV1 /FVC were transformed into z-scores according to the GLI guidelines. A comparison between the new and old reference values was performed. FEV1 was used for the grading of airway obstruction. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-three subjects performed the ventilation manoeuvre according to the GLI recommendations and were analysed. Most non-smokers and past smokers met the new references ranges for spirometric values. Only z-scores of FEV1 /FVC distinguished among all three patient groups, FEV1 between smokers and the other two groups and FVC did not discriminate the groups, irrespective of the reference values used. Airway obstruction was identified in 24% of asymptomatic smokers by z-scores of FEV1 /FVC but in only 14% by the old predicted values. In elderly smokers (>60 years), the corresponding values rose to 50% and 30%. Old predicted values of FEV1 underestimated the degree of airway obstruction mainly in middle-aged smokers. CONCLUSION: Allegedly lung-healthy current smokers showed a higher proportion of preoperatively reduced lung function when z-scores were used, especially in elderly subjects.

Assessment of Lung Recruitment by Electrical Impedance Tomography and Oxygenation in ARDS Patients.

We hypothesized that not all patients with appreciably recruited lung tissue during a recruitment maneuver (RM) show significant improvement of oxygenation. In the present study, we combined electrical impedance tomography (EIT) with oxygenation measurements to examine the discrepancies of lung ventilation and perfusion versus oxygenation after RM.A 2-minute RM (20 cm H2O positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] + 20 cm H2O pressure control) was prospectively conducted in 20 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients from January 2014 to December 2014. A decremental PEEP trial was performed to select the PEEP level after RM. A positive response to RM was identified as PaO2 + PaCO2 ≥400 mm Hg. Relative differences in the distribution of ventilation and perfusion in the most dependent region of interest (ROI4) were monitored with EIT and denoted as the ventilation-perfusion index.Ten patients were found to be responders and 10 patients to be nonresponders. No significant difference in baseline PaO2/FiO2 was observed between nonresponders and responders. A significantly higher PaO2/FiO2 ratio during RM and higher PEEP set after PEEP titration were recorded in responders. In both responders and nonresponders, the proportion of ventilation distributed in ROI4 compared with the global value was lower than the cardiac-related activity before RM, but this situation was reversed after RM (P < 0.01 in each group). Six out of 10 nonresponders exhibited a remarkable increase in ventilation in ROI4. A significant difference in the relative ventilation-perfusion index was found between the patients with remarkable and insufficient lung tissue reopening in the nonresponder group (P < 0.01).A discrepancy between lung tissue reopening and oxygenation improvement after RM was observed. EIT has the potential to evaluate the efficacy of RM by combining oxygenation measurements.

Assessment of respiratory system compliance with electrical impedance tomography using a positive end-expiratory pressure wave maneuver during pressure support ventilation: a pilot clinical study.

INTRODUCTION: Assessment of respiratory system compliance (Crs) can be used for individual optimization of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). However, in patients with spontaneous breathing activity, the conventional methods for Crs measurement are inaccurate because of the variable muscular pressure of the patient. We hypothesized that a PEEP wave maneuver, analyzed with electrical impedance tomography (EIT), might be suitable for global and regional assessment of Crs during assisted spontaneous breathing. METHODS: After approval of the local ethics committee, we performed a pilot clinical study in 18 mechanically ventilated patients (61 ± 16 years (mean ± standard deviation)) who were suitable for weaning with pressure support ventilation (PSV). For the PEEP wave, PEEP was elevated by 1 cmH2O after every fifth breath during PSV. This was repeated five times, until a total PEEP increase of 5 cmH2O was reached. Subsequently, PEEP was reduced in steps of 1 cmH2O in the same manner until the original PEEP level was reached. Crs was calculated using EIT from the global, ventral and dorsal lung regions of interest. For reference measurements, all patients were also examined during controlled mechanical ventilation (CMV) with a low-flow pressure-volume maneuver. Global and regional Crs(low-flow) was calculated as the slope of the pressure-volume loop between the pressure that corresponded to the selected PEEP and PEEP +5 cmH2O. For additional reference, Crs during CMV (Crs(CMV)) was calculated as expired tidal volume divided by the difference between airway plateau pressure and PEEP. RESULTS: Respiratory system compliance calculated from the PEEP wave (Crs(PEEP wave)) correlated closely with both reference measurements (r = 0.79 for Crs(low-flow) and r = 0.71 for Crs(CMV)). No significant difference was observed between the mean Crs(PEEP wave) and the mean Crs(low-flow). However, a significant bias of +17.1 ml/cmH2O was observed between Crs(PEEP wave) and Crs(CMV). CONCLUSION: Analyzing a PEEP wave maneuver with EIT allows calculation of global and regional Crs during assisted spontaneous breathing. In mechanically ventilated patients with spontaneous breathing activity, this method might be used for assessment of the global and regional mechanical properties of the respiratory system.

Assessment of changes in distribution of lung perfusion by electrical impedance tomography.

BACKGROUND: Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is able to detect variations in regional lung electrical impedance associated with changes in both air and blood content and potentially capable of assessing regional ventilation-perfusion relationships. However, regional lung perfusion is difficult to determine because the impedance changes synchronous with the heart rate are of very small amplitude. OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to determine the redistribution of lung perfusion elicited by one-lung ventilation using EIT with a novel region-of-interest analysis. METHODS: Ten patients (65 +/- 9 years, mean age +/- SD) scheduled for elective chest surgery were studied after intubation with a double-lumen endotracheal tube during bilateral and unilateral ventilation of the right and left lungs. EIT data were acquired at a rate of 25 scans/s. Relative impedance changes synchronous with the heart rate were evaluated in the right and left lung regions. RESULTS: During bilateral ventilation, the mean right-to-left lung ratio of the sum of heart rate-related impedance changes was 1.12 +/- 0.20, but the ratio significantly changed (0.81 +/- 0.16 and 1.48 +/- 0.37) during unilateral left- and right-lung ventilation with reduced perfusion of the non-ventilated lung. Increased perfusion most likely occurred in the ventilated lung because the impedance values summed over both regions did not change (0.62 +/- 0.23 vs. 0.58 +/- 0.22) compared with bilateral ventilation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that redistribution of regional lung perfusion can be assessed by EIT during one-lung ventilation. The performance of EIT in detecting changes in lung perfusion in even smaller lung regions remains to be established.

Effectiveness of an intravascular cooling method compared with a conventional cooling technique in neurologic patients.

Fever is common among neurologic patients and is usually treated by antipyretic drugs and external cooling. An alternative method for temperature management may be an intravascular approach. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness and the therapeutic costs of this new method with conventional treatment in neurologic patients. Twenty-six patients who suffered from subarachnoid hemorrhage or traumatic brain injury with febrile episodes were included the study and were randomized into 2 different groups. In the "Conventional" group, fever was treated with antipyretic drugs and/or surface cooling techniques to achieve a body core temperature of 36.5 degrees C. In the "CoolGard" group, patients were treated with an intravascular cooling catheter (Coolgard, Alsius, CA). We compared the effectiveness of these 2 approaches by calculating the mean deviation from 36.5 degrees C during a 48-hour period (fever burden). We found a significant difference in the fever burden [CoolGard: -0.49 to 1.22 (median -0.06) degrees C vs. Conventional: 1.05-2.34 (median 1.41) degrees C, P<0.05]. Costs varied significantly between the CoolGard and the Conventional groups, with markedly higher daily costs in the CoolGard group [CoolGard: 15 to 140 US dollars (USD) (median 39 USD) vs. Conventional: 1 to 9 USD (median 5 USD), P<0.05]. The effectiveness of the intravascular cooling catheter is excellent compared with conventional cooling therapies.