Cost-benefit Analysis of Cochlear Implants: A Societal Perspective.

OBJECTIVES: While the costs and outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) have been widely assessed, most of these analyses were solely performed from the perspective of healthcare costs. This study assesses the costs and benefits of CI in the Netherlands from a broader societal perspective, including health outcomes, healthcare cost, educational cost, and productivity losses and gains. DESIGN: The cost and benefits of CI were analyzed in this cost-benefit analysis, in which a monetary value is put on both the resources needed and the outcomes of CI. The costs and benefits were analyzed by prototypical instances of three groups, representing the majority of cochlear implant patients: prelingually deaf children implanted at the age of 1, adults with progressive profound hearing loss implanted at the age of 40 and seniors implanted at the age of 70 with progressive profound hearing loss. Costs and benefits were estimated over the expected lifetimes of the members of each group, using a Markov state transition model. Model parameters and assumptions were based on published literature. Probabilistic and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: In all three patient groups, the total benefits of CI exceeded the total cost, leading to a net benefit of CI. Prelingually deaf children with a bilateral CI had a lifetime positive outcome net benefit of €433,000. Adults and seniors with progressive profound hearing loss and a unilateral CI had a total net benefit of €275,000 and €76,000, respectively. These results ensue from health outcomes expressed in monetary terms, reduced educational cost, and increased productivity. CONCLUSIONS: Based on estimates from modeling, the increased healthcare costs due to CI were more than compensated by the value of the health benefits and by savings in educational and productivity costs. In particular, for children and working adults, the societal benefit was positive even without taking health benefits into account. Therefore, CI generates an advantage for both patients and society.

Quality of life of children with hearing loss in special and mainstream education: A longitudinal study.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the quality of life (QoL) of children with hearing loss (HL) and children with normal hearing (NH) and to examine how the QoL of children with HL changes over time, considering language skills, type of hearing device, degree of HL, and type of education. METHODS AND MATERIALS: This longitudinal study included 62 children with HL and their parents. Developmental outcome data were collected at two time points, when the mean ages of the children were 4 and 11 years. The Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL™) questionnaire, which includes assessments of Physical, Emotional, Social, and School functioning, was completed by parents at both time points and by the children with HL at the second time point. Receptive and expressive language skills at 4 years were assessed by the Reynell Developmental Language Scale. Results were compared with a Dutch normative sample. RESULTS: The QoL of children with HL was similar to that of children with NH at both time points on two of the four QoL scales, Emotional and Physical functioning. On the other two scales, Social and School functioning, children with HL who attended special education and children who switched to mainstream education showed lower scores than children with HL who were consistently in mainstream education and lower scores than children with NH. The School QoL of children with HL decreased over time, as did the School QoL of children with NH. Social QoL of children with cochlear implants decreased over time, but this was not the case in children with hearing aids. Language skills and the degree of HL did not clinically improve the QoL over time of preschool children with HL. CONCLUSIONS: The QoL of children with HL in mainstream education and the Physical and Emotional QoL of all children with HL were satisfactory. It is essential to develop specific guidance regarding school activities for children with HL in special education and for children with HL who switch to mainstream education in order to increase their social QoL.

Cost-Utility of Bilateral Versus Unilateral Cochlear Implantation in Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

OBJECTIVE: To study the cost-utility of simultaneous bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) versus unilateral CI. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial (RCT). SETTING: Five tertiary referral centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-eight postlingually deafened adults eligible for cochlear implantation. INTERVENTIONS: A cost-utility analysis was performed from a health insurance perspective. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Utility was assessed using the HUI3, TTO, VAS on hearing, VAS on general health and EQ-5D. We modeled the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) of unilateral versus bilateral CI over periods of 2, 5, 10, 25 years, and actual life-expectancy. RESULTS: Direct costs for unilateral and bilateral CI were €43,883 ±â€Š€11,513(SD) and €87,765 ±â€Š€23,027(SD) respectively. Annual costs from the second year onward were €3,435 ±â€Š€1,085(SD) and €6,871 ±â€Š€2,169(SD), respectively. A cost-utility analysis revealed that a second implant became cost-effective after a 5- to 10-year period, based on the HUI3, TTO, and VAS on hearing. CONCLUSION: This is the first study that describes a cost-utility analysis to compare unilateral with simultaneous bilateral CI in postlingually deafened adults, using a multicenter RCT. Compared with accepted societal willingness-to-pay thresholds, simultaneous bilateral CI is a cost-effective treatment for patients with a life expectancy of 5-10 years or longer.

Clinical relevance of quality of life outcome in cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits of cochlear implantation in postlingually deafened adults and estimate the clinical relevance of these benefits. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective intervention study. SETTING: Tertiary referral hospital. PATIENTS: Forty-four postlingually deafened adults. INTERVENTIONS: Cochlear implantation with a Clarion CII HiFocus 1 or HiRes 90K. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The Health Utility Index Mark II (HUI2) and Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire were administered to quantify health-related QoL (HRQoL); utilities were obtained from the HUI2 and time trade-off instrument. Speech perception scores were analyzed. Patient factors were correlated with postimplant HRQoL and speech perception scores. Clinical significant benefit was estimated using the minimal clinically significant difference (MID) and effect size (ES). RESULTS: The results show a significant improvement in HRQoL and speech perception (p < 0.001). The improvement in HRQoL is mainly obtained in the first months after implantation and is largest in the categories concerning physical functioning (hearing). A shorter duration of deafness (p = 0.003) and higher educational level (p = 0.015) were significant predictors of better speech perception. Cochlear implantation proved to be a cost-effective procedure. By using the MID and ES, we found important clinical improvements on 6 health domains of the Nijmegen Cochlear Implant Questionnaire and on the sensation domain of the HUI2 in most patients; all but 1 of the ESs were large. CONCLUSION: Cochlear implants have a large and significant positive impact on HRQoL and speech perception and are cost-effective. These improvements are clinically relevant as measured by the MID.

Psychophysical assessment of spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with single and dual electrode contact maskers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate psychophysically the spatial spread of excitation in electrical hearing with a new dual contact masker and to investigate under which conditions it is possible to stimulate fibers in the immediate neighborhood of an electrode contact, which were not excited by neighboring electrode contacts. DESIGN: In this study a psychophysical forward masking paradigm with a dual contact masker was used to avoid off-site listening, the electrical analogue of off-frequency listening. The masker stimulus (300 msec) is presented nonsimultaneously on two electrode contacts, one on the apical side and another on the basal side of the probe contact, followed by a probe stimulus of 20 msec.Unmasked probe thresholds were compared with masked ones at a number of masker-probe distances, whereas growth of masking curves were measured for a fixed masker contact pair. Standard selectivity measurements (single contact masking) and the recovery of forward masking with one masker contact were included for comparison with existing methods. All experiments were carried out with six participants who use the Clarion CII device with a HiFocus I electrode array. RESULTS: For dual contact masking the amount of masking was significantly greater than for single contact masking and the width of the masking patterns was on average 1.1 mm broader than for single contact masking, resulting in a broad region of excitation, with masker-probe overlap for distances greater than 3 mm. Masking widths for dual and single contact masking were highly correlated. Growth of masking curves were highly nonlinear. They showed a strong elevation of the slope that starts for most subjects around the middle of the dynamic range or above. For 4 out of 6 subjects, no probe threshold was found above a masker amplitude of about 400-500 microA. The ratio of the maximum measurable masked probe thresholds and unmasked probe threshold ranged from 1.7 to 2.6 (S4 excluded). Recovery of masking functions follow an exponential decay. Time constants tau for the recovery process ranged from 21.6 msec to 114.9 msec. CONCLUSIONS: With a dual contact masker (1) off-site listening can be avoided, leading to larger estimates of the width of excitation patterns than in single contact masking, (2) it can be estimated for which stimulation level there is complete overlap of excitation patterns of adjacent electrode contacts, (3) it can be shown that stimulation of nerve fibers in the immediate neighborhood of an electrode contact which were not excited by neighboring electrode contacts is only possible if the probe stimulation amplitude is sufficiently high in comparison with amplitudes on neighboring contacts.

Multisection CT as a valuable tool in the postoperative assessment of cochlear implant patients.

A data acquisition protocol for postoperative imaging of cochlear implants by using multisection CT (MSCT) is described. The improved image quality of MSCT allows assessment of the precise intracochlear position of the electrode array and visualization of individual electrode contacts. Such images can aid in fitting the speech processor, especially in difficult cases.