Rectal Prolapse Following Repair of Anorectal Malformation: Incidence, Risk Factors, and Management.

BACKGROUND: The incidence and optimal management of rectal prolapse following repair of an anorectal malformation (ARM) has not been well-defined. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed utilizing data from the Pediatric Colorectal and Pelvic Learning Consortium registry. All children with a history of ARM repair were included. Our primary outcome was rectal prolapse. Secondary outcomes included operative management of prolapse and anoplasty stricture following operative management of prolapse. Univariate analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with our primary and secondary outcomes. A multivariable logistic regression was developed to assess the association between laparoscopic ARM repair and rectal prolapse. RESULTS: A total of 1140 patients met inclusion criteria; 163 (14.3%) developed rectal prolapse. On univariate analysis, prolapse was significantly associated with male sex, sacral abnormalities, ARM type, ARM complexity, and laparoscopic ARM repairs (p < 0.001). ARM types with the highest rates of prolapse included rectourethral-prostatic fistula (29.2%), rectovesical/bladder neck fistula (28.8%), and cloaca (25.0%). Of those who developed prolapse, 110 (67.5%) underwent operative management. Anoplasty strictures developed in 27 (24.5%) patients after prolapse repair. After controlling for ARM type and hospital, laparoscopic ARM repair was not significantly associated with prolapse (adjusted odds ratio (95% CI): 1.50 (0.84, 2.66), p = 0.17). CONCLUSION: Rectal prolapse develops in a significant subset of patients following ARM repair. Risk factors for prolapse include male sex, complex ARM type, and sacral abnormalities. Further research investigating the indications for operative management of prolapse and operative techniques for prolapse repair are needed to define optimal treatment. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective cohort study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Initial development and validation of a fecal incontinence-specific quality of life measure.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Fecal incontinence is a prevalent pediatric condition with psychosocial impacts on both children and their caregivers. We sought to develop and validate the Cincinnati Fecal Incontinence Scale (CINCY-FIS) as a psychometrically valid measure to assess the quality of life and caregiver impacts of pediatric fecal incontinence. METHODS: Items were generated through review of previous measures, expert consensus, and pilot testing with feedback from 8 families. Initial study measures were completed by 222 caregivers. Following item reduction, 18 items were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis. Convergent and criterion validity were assessed using correlation. Reliability was established using internal consistency statistics and test-retest reliability at baseline and 2-week follow-up. RESULTS: A five factor first-order structure with two higher-order factors demonstrated acceptable fit to the data, was consistent with a priori hypotheses, and was more parsimonious than the alternative model. Convergent validity and criterion-related validity were established for all of the CINCY-FIS scales. Reliability was high and consistent across both measurement occasions. CONCLUSIONS: The CINCY-FIS is a reliable and valid assessment of pediatric fecal incontinence-specific quality of life and parenting stress. The score is highly sensitive to patient changes making it suitable for both clinical and research purposes. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective observational. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Study of Diagnostic Test Level II.