Mental Health Conditions and Health Care Payments for Children with Chronic Medical Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate additional payments associated with co-existing mental health or substance use disorders (MH/SUDs) among commercially insured children and youth with chronic medical conditions (CMCs) and to determine whether children's MH/SUDs have similar associations with parental health care payments. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of a national database of paid commercial insurance claims for 2012-2013. Participants were children and youth ages 0 to 26 years covered as dependents on parents' health insurance and categorized by the presence or absence of any of 11 chronic medical conditions and MH/SUDs. We determined the numbers of children and youth with CMCs and paid health care claims categorized as hospital, professional, and pharmacy services and as medical or behavioral. We compared paid claims for children and youth with CMCs with and without co-occurring MH/SUDs and for their parents. RESULTS: The sample included almost 6.6 million children and youth and 5.8 million parents. Compared to children without CMCs, children with CMCs had higher costs, even higher for children with CMCs who also had MH/SUDs. Children with CMCs and co-occurring MH/SUDs had 2.4 times the annual payments of those with chronic conditions alone, especially for medical expenses. Estimated additional annual payments associated with MH/SUDs in children with CMCs were $8.8 billion. Parents of children with CMCs and associated MH/SUDs had payments 59% higher than those for parents of children with CMCs alone. CONCLUSIONS: MH/SUDs in children and youth with CMCs are associated with higher total health care payments for both patients and their parents, suggesting potential benefits from preventing or reducing the impact of MH/SUDs among children and youth with CMCs.

Sleep Hygiene and Sleep Outcomes in a Sample of Urban Children With and Without Asthma.

Objective: To assess sleep hygiene and the sleep environment of urban children with and without asthma, and examine the associations among urban stressors, sleep hygiene, and sleep outcomes. Methods: Urban children, 7-9 years old, with (N = 216) and without (N = 130) asthma from African American, Latino, or non-Latino White backgrounds were included. Level of neighborhood risk was used to describe urban stress. Parent-reported sleep hygiene and daytime sleepiness data were collected using questionnaires. Sleep duration and efficiency were assessed via actigraphy. Results: Higher neighborhood risk, not asthma status, was associated with poorer sleep hygiene. Controlling for neighborhood risk, sleep hygiene was related to daytime sleepiness. Asthma status, not sleep hygiene, was related to sleep efficiency. In children with asthma, poorer sleep hygiene was associated with shorter sleep duration. Conclusion: Considering urban stressors when treating pediatric populations is important, as factors related to urban stress may influence sleep hygiene practices and sleep outcomes.

Issues and methods in disparities research: the Rhode Island-Puerto Rico asthma center.

BACKGROUND: Epidemiologic studies have documented higher rates of asthma prevalence and morbidity in minority children compared to non-Latino white (NLW) children. Few studies focus on the mechanisms involved in explaining this disparity, and fewer still on the methodological challenges involved in rigorous disparities research. OBJECTIVES AND METHODS: This article provides an overview of challenges and potential solutions to research design for studies of health disparities. The methodological issues described in this article were framed on an empirical model of asthma health disparities that views disparities as resulting from several factors related to the healthcare system and the individual/community system. The methods used in the Rhode Island-Puerto Rico Asthma Center are provided as examples, illustrating the challenges in executing disparities research. RESULTS: Several methods are described: distinguishing ethnic/racial differences from methodological artifacts, identifying and adapting culturally sensitive measures to explain disparities, and addressing the challenges involved in determining asthma and its severity in Latino and other minority children. The measures employed are framed within each of the components of the conceptual model presented. CONCLUSIONS: Understanding ethnic and/or cultural disparities in asthma morbidity is a complicated process. Methodologic approaches to studying the problem must reflect this complexity, allowing us to move from documenting disparities to understanding them, and ultimately to reducing them.

Beliefs and barriers to medication use in parents of Latino children with asthma.

OBJECTIVE: Disparities in asthma outcomes exist between Latino and non-Latino white (NLW) children. We examined rates of medication use, medication beliefs, and perceived barriers to obtaining medication in US and island Puerto Rican parents of children with asthma. HYPOTHESES: Island PR parents would report the lowest rates of controller medication use, followed by RI Latino and RI NLW parents; Latino parents would report more medication concerns than NLW parents; and Island PR parents would report the most barriers to medication use. STUDY DESIGN: Five hundred thirty families of children with persistent asthma participated, including 231 Island PR, 111 RI NLW, and 188 RI Latino. Parents completed survey measures. RESULTS: Group differences were found on reported use of ICS (X(2) = 50.96, P < 0.001), any controller medication (X(2) = 56.49, P < 0.001), and oral steroids (X(2) = 10.87, P < 0.01). Island PR parents reported a greater frequency of barriers to medication use than the other two groups (X(2) = 61.13, P < 0.001). Latino parents in both sites expressed more medication concerns than NLW parents (F = 20.18, P < 0.001). Medication necessity was associated with ICS use in all three groups (all P's < 0.01). Medication concerns were positively associated with ICS use in PR only (OR = 1.64, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Differences in medication beliefs and the ability to obtain medications may explain the reported disparity in controller medication use. Further studies are needed to evaluate these obstacles to medication use.

Symptom perception in pediatric asthma: resistive loading and in vivo assessment compared.

BACKGROUND: Inaccurate symptom perception contributes to asthma morbidity and mortality in children and adults. Various methods have been used to quantify perceptual accuracy, including psychophysical (resistive loading) approaches, ratings of dyspnea during induced bronchoconstriction, and in vivo monitoring, but it is unclear whether the different methods identify the same individuals as good or poor perceivers. The objectives of the study were as follows: (1) to compare in the same asthmatic children two methods of quantifying perceptual ability: threshold detection of added resistive loads and in vivo symptom perception; and (2) to determine which method best predicts asthma morbidity. METHODS: Seventy-eight asthmatic children 7 to 16 years of age completed two threshold detection protocols in the laboratory and recorded their subjective estimates of lung function prior to spirometry at home twice daily for 5 to 6 weeks. Summary measures from both methods were compared to each other and to asthma morbidity (as measured with the Rosier asthma functional severity scale). RESULTS: Symptom perception ability, as summarized by either method, varied greatly from child to child. Neither of the resistive load detection thresholds were significantly related to any of the three in vivo perception scores, nor were they related to asthma morbidity. The three in vivo scores did show a significant or marginal relationship with morbidity (p < 0.01, p < 0.06, and p < 0.07, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Resistive loading techniques may not be useful in assessing symptom perception ability in children. Measuring estimates of symptoms in relation to naturally occurring asthma can identify children at risk for greater asthma morbidity.