Polymer-based drug-eluting stent treatment extends the time to reintervention for patients with symptomatic femoropopliteal artery disease: clinical evidence and potential economic value.

Aim: Use long-term follow-up data from the IMPERIAL study to determine whether drug-eluting polymer-based nitinol stent treatment can delay the time to repeat intervention for femoropopliteal artery disease and how such a delay may result in cost savings in a value-based episode of care. Patients & methods: The IMPERIAL randomized controlled trial was an international study of a paclitaxel-eluting polymer-coated stent (Eluvia, Boston Scientific, MA, USA) versus a polymer-free paclitaxel-coated stent (Zilver PTX, Cook Corporation, IN, USA) for treating lesions of the femoropopliteal arterial segment. Study patients (n = 465) had symptomatic lower limb ischemia. Safety and efficacy assessments were performed through 5 years. Mean time to first reintervention was calculated in post-hoc analysis for patients who underwent a clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) through 3 or 5 years following the index procedure. To simulate potential cost savings associated with differential CD-TLR burden over time, a cost-avoidance analysis using input parameters from IMPERIAL and US 100% Medicare standard analytical files was developed. Results: Among patients with a first CD-TLR through 3 years of follow-up, mean time to reintervention was 5.5 months longer (difference 166 days, 95% CI: 51, 282 days; p = 0.0058) for patients treated with Eluvia (n = 56) than for those treated with Zilver PTX (n = 30). Through the 5-year study follow-up period, CD-TLR rates were 29.3% (68/232) for Eluvia and 34.2% (39/114) for Zilver PTX (p = 0.3540) and mean time to first reintervention exceeded 2 years for patients treated with Eluvia at 737 days versus 645 days for the Zilver PTX group (difference 92 days, 95% CI: -85, 269 days; p = 0.3099). Simulated savings considering reinterventions occurring over 1 and 5 years following initial use of Eluvia over Zilver PTX were US $1,395,635 and US $1,531,795, respectively, when IMPERIAL CD-TLR rates were extrapolated to 1000 patients. Conclusion: IMPERIAL data suggest initial treatment with Eluvia extends the time patients spend without undergoing reintervention. This extension may be associated with cost savings in relevant time frames.

Quantitative Techniques of Ultrasonography in the Assessment of Femoropopliteal Atherosclerotic Lesions Using Peak Systolic Velocity Ratio: Results From the TURN-UP Study.

PURPOSE: Duplex ultrasound (DUS)-measured peak systolic velocity ratios (PSVRs) are commonly used to evaluate arterial stenosis in lower extremity artery disease (LEAD). However, these measurement methods have not yet been standardized. This study aimed to reveal the influence of measuring methods on PSVR values. METHODS: A 132 femoropopliteal lesions with PSVR ranging from 1.5 to 3.5 evaluated using method A (angle correction 60°, the direction of blood flow, the no or few atherosclerotic changes closest to the lesion proximal side was defined as the nonstenotic area) were included. The following 4 different methods were then compared with method A: method B, angle correction 45°; method C, angle correction 60° measured along the vessel wall; D, angle correction 60°, with the nonstenotic area the lowest peak systolic velocity area; and E, angle correction 60°, with the reference point fixed at 2 cm proximal to the target lesion area. The difference in PSVR values was analyzed using the Bland-Altman method. RESULTS: The mean PSVR value measured by method A was 2.27±0.51, those measured by methods B, C, D, and E were 2.21±0.55, 2.31±0.66, 2.34±0.63, and 2.11±0.63, respectively. The 95% prediction intervals of the differences in PSVR measurements versus A were -0.64 to +0.53 for method B, -0.59 to +0.68 for method C, -0.77 to +0.91 for method D, and -1.12 to +0.79 for method E. CONCLUSION: PSVR values considerably differed between measuring methods. PSVR values by DUS are largely dependent on the measurement methods, which could considerably affect the judgment of LEAD. CLINICAL IMPACT: Due to differences in several DUS measurement methods, the PSVR results could be changed. Therefore, to need further investigations and unification of measurement method.

Cost Change of Elective Percutaneous Coronary Artery Intervention for Chronic Coronary Syndrome in Japan From 2010 to 2019.

BACKGROUND: Because of revisions to insurance reimbursement costs, medical fees have changed for investigations and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treatment of chronic coronary syndrome (CCS). In this retrospective study, we investigated these changes and their effects on mortality and cardiovascular events.Methods and Results: We included 1,483 patients who underwent elective PCI for CCS between April 2010 and September 2019. The primary outcomes were changes in PCI procedure fees and all included hospitalization fees due to the biennial revisions of reimbursement costs across 5 time periods (~2 years each). Secondary outcomes were rates of survival and freedom from major adverse cerebral and cardiovascular events (MACCE) in each time period. Patient characteristics were generally unchanged over the study period; however, treatment procedures changed significantly, with changes in the approach site (from transfemoral to transradial access; P<0.0001) and final device (from bare-metal stents to drug-eluting stents; P<0.0001), and an increase in the use of imaging modalities (P<0.0001). Medical fee parameters (primary outcomes) decreased significantly from 2010 to 2019 (P<0.001): PCI procedure fees decreased by 25%, whereas all included hospitalization fees decreased by 20%. There were no significant differences in survival or freedom-from-MACCE rates between periods. CONCLUSIONS: Because of revisions to reimbursement prices, there were rapid and significant decreases in PCI procedure and hospitalization fees for CCS. These changes had no effect on mortality or cardiovascular events.

Intravascular ultrasound-based decision tree model for the optimal endovascular treatment strategy selection of femoropopliteal artery disease-results from the ONION Study.

BACKGROUND: The role of catheter-based imaging in peripheral interventions for lower extremity artery disease (LEAD) has increased with percutaneous interventions. To clarify the relation between intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) information and procedure selection strategy for endovascular treatment therapy (EVT) of the femoropopliteal artery in the real-world clinical settings wherein new endovascular technologies (NETs), including drug-coated balloon (DCB), drug-eluting stent (DES), and covered stent-graft (CS). Our retrospective multicenter analysis examined symptomatic 970 patients treated by EVT for de novo femoropopliteal lesions with IVUS guidance. The decision tree analysis was performed retrospectively to determine the association of IVUS and angiography parameters with the strategy selection of endovascular procedures. We divided the study population according to the developed tree, and identified the most popular strategy selection in each subgroup. We finally examined whether the restenosis risk would be different among respective subgroups of the tree. RESULTS: During the study periods, plain old balloon angioplasty, DCB, and bare nitinol stent were most frequently selected (25.3%, 23.9%, and 23.8%, respectively). The drug-eluting stent (DES), covered stent (CS), and spot stent strategies were used in 7.3%, 11.5%, and 8.1%. NETs had the lowest restenosis risk in the overall population. The decision tree had a depth of six branches and divided the patients into 11 subgroups by IVUS and angiography parameters. The restenosis rate was similarly low among these 11 subgroups when the most popular NET in each subgroup was selected (P = 0.94). CONCLUSIONS: The use of IVUS data along with angiography data would standardize the selection of endovascular procedures and can improve patency outcomes if NETs are used properly.

Assessment of Microvasculature After Intervention as a Predictor of Wound Healing in Patients With Tissue Loss.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the correlation between vascular flow reserve (VFR) values and wound healing rate in patients with critical limb ischemia. BACKGROUND: Peripheral VFR may be useful for predicting complete wound healing after endovascular therapy (EVT). However, published reports included small numbers of patients from single centers and long-term outcomes remain unknown. METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter study that consecutively enrolled 104 patients (115 limbs) who received EVT for ischemic ulcerations. All lesions were treated with conventional balloon angioplasty. After EVT, VFR was measured using a pressure/temperature guidewire. The study endpoints were correlation between VFR values and wound healing rate at 3 months and 1 year. RESULTS: The median VFR was 2.9. A total of 110 and 104 limbs completed the 3-month and 1-year follow-up, respectively. The 3-month and 1-year wound healing rates were 49% and 76%, respectively. VFR was significantly associated with the 3-month and 1-year wound healing (p < 0.001 for both). The crude hazard ratios of VFR (per 2-fold increase) for the 3-month and 1-year wound healing were 2.6 (1.7 to 3.9) and 2.9 (2.0 to 4.2), respectively. The estimated median time to wound healing was 5.0 (3.2 to 7.2) months, 3.3 (2.8 to 4.9) months, and 2.5 (2.0 to 3.0) months, when the VFR value was 2.4, 2.9, and 3.9, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Post-procedure VFR is significantly associated with wound healing. VFR, measured in the catheterization laboratory, is useful in clinical risk stratification for patients with critical limb ischemia after EVT. (Predictor of Wound Healing in Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia-Multicenter Prospective Study; UMIN000012746).

IVUS Assessment of the Crossing Pathway of an Intraluminal Reentry Device Used in the Primary Treatment of Infrainguinal Chronic Total Occlusions.

Purpose: To examine with intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) the crossing pathways of the TruePath reentry device during primary antegrade recanalization of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions (CTOs). Methods: Between July 2017 and September 2018, a prospective multicenter study enrolled 143 consecutive patients (mean age 75±9 years; 101 men) with 146 CTOs treated in an antegrade approach using the TruePath reentry device with IVUS assessment of the crossing pathway in successful cases. Outcome measures were complete success (reentry device reached the distal true lumen), assisted success (reentry device use followed by a conventional guidewire to reach the distal true lumen), reentry device crossing route by IVUS assessment, and procedure- and device-related complications. Regression analyses were employed to identify any relevant associations between baseline patient variables and the outcome measures; results are presented as the odds ratio (ORs) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Results: Complete success was achieved in 82 (56.2%) lesions; any success (complete plus assisted) was documented in 117 (80.1%) lesions. Four (3%) perioperative device-related complications were observed. The crossing route was intraplaque for most of the total crossing distance in both complete success cases (95.3%±13.2%) and any success cases (94.8%±14.4%), with relatively short subintimal (3.6%±10.2% and 4.2%±11.2%, respectively) or intramedial (1.2%±5.8% and 1.0%±5.4%, respectively) crossing. CTO length was a significant risk factor for not achieving complete success (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.13 to 2.68, p=0.012), and a history of failed revascularization was associated with not achieving any success (OR 6.40, 95% CI 1.28 to 28.9, p=0.038). Conclusion: The intraplaque route was the primary pathway taken by the TruePath reentry device as it crossed infrainguinal CTOs. Crossing rates were acceptable, with few device-related complications. However, a longer CTO length and a failed revascularization history negatively affected the success rate.

Assessment of macro- and microcirculation in contemporary critical limb ischemia.

OBJECTIVES: A paucity of data exists regarding manifestations of macro- and microcirculation in contemporary critical limb ischemia (CLI). The aim of this study was (1) to evaluate the differences in foot circulation based on angiographic findings, (2) to clarify the relationship between macro- and microcirculation, and (3) to investigate the effects of postural changes on micro as well as macrocirculation between the supine position to the dependent position. METHODS: A total of 40 critically ischemic limbs in 29 patients were included in this study. Noninvasive evaluation of macrocirculation, based on the ankle brachial index (ABI) and ankle pressure, and microcirculation, using skin perfusion pressure (SPP), was performed in both the supine and dependent positions. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in macro- and microcirculations between any angiographical involvements. In the supine position, dorsal SPP correlated significantly with ABI (P = 0.021, r = 0.363) and ankle-pressure (P = 0.001, r = 0.495), whereas plantar SPP failed to correlate with ABI (P = 0.198, r = 0.208) or ankle-pressure (P = 0.185, r = 0.214). In the dependent position, however, SPP showed no significant correlation with ABI and ankle pressure. Postural change from the supine to dependent position yielded a significant increase in SPP (dorsal: 37.2 ± 16.2 to 77.9 ± 17.7 mm Hg, P < 0.001; plantar: 33.6 ± 17.3 to 75.7 ± 18.3 mm Hg, P < 0.001) as well as ABI and ankle-pressure (ABI: 0.70 ± 0.35 to 0.78 ± 0.42, P = 0.003; ankle-pressure; 108 ± 61 to 111 ± 60 mm Hg, P = 0.038). The effect of postural change on SPP showed no difference between patients with and without any clinical and angiographical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Of microcirculation assessed, only dorsal SPP correlated significantly with macrocirculation in the supine position. Furthermore, postural change from the supine to dependent position produced a dramatic improvement in microcirculation due to the effects of gravity.