Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
PLoS One ; 13(11): e0207099, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30462677

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Small bowel obstruction (SBO) is usually caused by postoperative adhesions and malignant disease, and decompression is effective for SBO. Our previous case report suggested that a new transnasal ileus tube insertion method, the anterior balloon method (ABM), could achieve decompression for adhesive SBO. AIMS: The study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of a new method for inserting transnasal ileus tubes in patients with SBO. METHODS: Altogether, 134 patients with small bowel obstruction treated from January 2011 to December 2017 were reviewed. The patients were categorized into two groups: those with the new method that inserts an anterior balloon (ABM group: 52 patients, 2014-2017) versus those with the ordinary insertion method (OIM group: 82 patients, 2011-2014). RESULTS: The patients' characteristics and symptoms on admission were similar in the ABM and OIM groups. Adhesions were the main cause of ileus in the two groups. The insertion time duration was significantly shorter in the ABM group than in OIM group (28.4 ± 9.1 vs. 33.5 ± 13.0 min; p = 0.01). The ABM group also had significantly longer tubes than OIM group (222.4 ± 32.2 vs. 157.4 ± 31.7 cm; p < 0.001), which resulted in a significantly shorter time until clinical symptoms were relieved in ABM group. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The ABM group had shorter insertion duration and longer tubes than those of OIM group. The ABM might become a preferred therapeutic choice to achieve decompression in patients with SBO.


Assuntos
Descompressão Cirúrgica/instrumentação , Descompressão Cirúrgica/métodos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/métodos , Idoso , Descompressão Cirúrgica/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Obstrução Intestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Obstrução Intestinal/etiologia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Cavidade Nasal , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/economia , Cirurgia Endoscópica por Orifício Natural/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Aderências Teciduais/complicações , Aderências Teciduais/diagnóstico por imagem , Aderências Teciduais/cirurgia , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Intern Med ; 57(15): 2115-2122, 2018 Aug 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29607956

RESUMO

Objective The aim of this study was to clarify the safety of colorectal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) during the era of health insurance coverage starting from April 2012 in Japan. Methods Between April 2012 and May 2016, ESD was applied to 398 lesions in 373 patients. Risk factors for serious complications of colorectal ESD, perforation and post-ESD bleeding, were evaluated focusing on the resected specimen size, location, growth pattern, invasion depth, histopathology, postoperative clipping, and procedure time. In addition, the relationship between serious complications and patients' background characteristics was analyzed. Results Among 373 patients, perforation occurred in 12 patients and post-ESD bleeding in 19 patients. A univariate analysis showed that the risk factors for perforation were the lesion size, the resected specimen size, and a long operation time. A multivariate analysis showed that a long operation time was a risk factor for perforation during colorectal ESD. A univariate analysis indicated that significant risk factors for postoperative bleeding were a long operation time, rectal lesion, and cancer. All patients with serious complications were treated by an endoscopic procedure without blood transfusion or the need to convert to open surgery. Conclusion The present study suggests that colorectal ESD may be accepted with relative safety in Japan as a common therapeutic approach for early colorectal cancer.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Perfuração Intestinal/epidemiologia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Endoscopia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Revisão da Utilização de Seguros , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Invasividade Neoplásica , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Fatores de Tempo , Carga Tumoral
3.
Digestion ; 96(2): 76-80, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28723691

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bleeding from a colonic diverticulum is serious in aged patients. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for high-cost hospitalization of colonic diverticular bleeding using the diagnosis procedure combination (DPC) data. METHODS: From January 2009 to December 2015, 78 patients with colonic diverticular bleeding were identified by DPC data in Saga Medical School Hospital. All patients underwent colonic endoscopy within 3 days. The patients were divided into 2 groups: the low-cost group (DPC cost of <500,000 yen) and the high-cost group (DPC cost of >500,000 yen). RESULTS: Univariate analysis revealed that aging, hypertension, rebleeding, a low hemoglobin concentration at admission, and blood transfusion were risk factors for high hospitalization cost. Multivariate analysis revealed that rebleeding (OR 5.3; 95% CI 1.3-21.3; p = 0.017) and blood transfusion (OR 3.8; 95% CI 1.01-14.2; p = 0.048) were definite risk factors for high hospitalization cost. CONCLUSION: Rebleeding and blood transfusion were related to high hospitalization cost for colonic diverticular bleeding.


Assuntos
Colonoscopia/economia , Divertículo do Colo/economia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/economia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Transfusão de Sangue/economia , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Colo/diagnóstico por imagem , Colo/patologia , Colonoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Divertículo do Colo/complicações , Divertículo do Colo/diagnóstico , Divertículo do Colo/terapia , Feminino , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/terapia , Hemoglobinas/análise , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
4.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 24(4): 633-8, 2009 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19220681

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We compared endoscopic findings of the frequency scale for the symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (FSSG), a written questionnaire developed in Japan, to that for the questionnaire for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis (QUEST) for the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. METHODS: We registered 475 patients with untreated symptoms of upper abdominal pain (male/female: 252/223, average age 52.4 +/- 17.8 years). Subjects were assessed first with the FSSG and QUEST questionnaires, then by endoscopy, before allocation to a gastric ulcer (GU), duodenal ulcer (DU), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) or functional dyspepsia (FD) group. RESULTS: On the basis of the endoscopic findings the diagnoses for the 475 subjects were as follows: FD 52.2%, DU 7.6%, GU 7.8%, and GERD 32.4% (Grade M 10.1%, Grade A + B 20.2%, Grade C + D 2.3%). There was no difference between the FSSG and QUEST in sensitivity, specificity or accuracy for any condition. The FSSG score rose with increasing endoscopic severity of GERD, but there was no correlation between the QUEST score and endoscopic severity. The FSSG total score was inferior to QUEST in terms of distinguishing GERD from other conditions, but when only the questions relating to reflux symptoms were used, the FSSG was able to distinguish GERD from other conditions as well as QUEST. CONCLUSIONS: The FSSG score reflects the severity of the endoscopic findings of GERD.


Assuntos
Úlcera Duodenal/diagnóstico , Dispepsia/diagnóstico , Endoscopia do Sistema Digestório , Esofagite Péptica/diagnóstico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/diagnóstico , Úlcera Gástrica/diagnóstico , Dor Abdominal/etiologia , Dor Abdominal/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Úlcera Duodenal/complicações , Úlcera Duodenal/patologia , Dispepsia/complicações , Dispepsia/patologia , Esofagite Péptica/complicações , Esofagite Péptica/patologia , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/patologia , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Úlcera Gástrica/complicações , Úlcera Gástrica/patologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA