Lean Mass Dynamics in Hibernating Bats and Implications for Energy and Water Budgets.

AbstractHibernation requires balancing energy and water demands over several months. Many studies have noted the importance of fat for hibernation energy budgets, but protein catabolism in hibernation has received less attention, and whole-animal changes in lean mass have not previously been considered. We used quantitative magnetic resonance body composition analysis to measure deposition of fat and lean mass of cave myotis (Myotis velifer) during the prehibernation period and decreases in fat and lean mass of Townsend's big-eared bats (Corynorhinus townsendii) during hibernation. For cave myotis, lean mass represented 25% and 38% (female and male, respectively) of prehibernation mass gain. In hibernating Townsend's big-eared bats, lean mass decrease was similar for females and males. We used values for Townsend's big-eared bats to explore the functional implications of lean mass change for water and energy budgets. Lean mass accounted for a substantial proportion of mass change during hibernation (female: 18%, male: 35%), and although not accounting for a large proportion of the energy budget (female: 3%, male: 7%), lean mass catabolism represented an important contribution to water production (female: 14%, male: 29%). Although most mammals cannot rely on protein catabolism for metabolic water production because of the water cost of excreting urea, we propose a variation of the protein-for-water strategy whereby hibernators could temporally compartmentalize the benefits of protein catabolism to periods of torpor and the water cost to periodic arousals when free drinking water is typically available. Combined, our analyses demonstrate the importance of considering changes in lean mass during hibernation.

Bats are not squirrels: Revisiting the cost of cooling in hibernating mammals.

Many species use stored energy to hibernate through periods of resource limitation. Hibernation, a physiological state characterized by depressed metabolism and body temperature, is critical to winter survival and reproduction, and therefore has been extensively quantified and modeled. Hibernation consists of alternating phases of extended periods of torpor (low body temperature, low metabolic rate), and energetically costly periodic arousals to normal body temperature. Arousals consist of multiple phases: warming, euthermia, and cooling. Warming and euthermic costs are regularly included in energetic models, but although cooling to torpid body temperature is an important phase of the torpor-arousal cycle, it is often overlooked in energetic models. When included, cooling cost is assumed to be 67% of warming cost, an assumption originally derived from a single study that measured cooling cost in ground squirrels. Since this study, the same proportional value has been assumed across a variety of hibernating species. However, no additional values have been derived. We derived a model of cooling cost from first principles and validated the model with empirical energetic measurements. We compared the assumed 67% proportional cooling cost with our model-predicted cooling cost for 53 hibernating mammals. Our results indicate that using 67% of warming cost only adequately represents cooling cost in ground squirrel-sized mammals. In smaller species, this value overestimates cooling cost and in larger species, the value underestimates cooling cost. Our model allows for the generalization of energetic costs for multiple species using species-specific physiological and morphometric parameters, and for predictions over variable environmental conditions.