Radiological assessment of dementia: the Italian inter-society consensus for a practical and clinically oriented guide to image acquisition, evaluation, and reporting.

BACKGROUND: Radiological evaluation of dementia is expected to increase more and more in routine practice due to both the primary role of neuroimaging in the diagnostic pathway and the increasing incidence of the disease. Despite this, radiologists often do not follow a disease-oriented approach to image interpretation, for several reasons, leading to reports of limited value to clinicians. In our work, through an intersocietal consensus on the main mandatory knowledge about dementia, we proposed a disease-oriented protocol to optimize and standardize the acquisition/evaluation/interpretation and reporting of radiological images. Our main purpose is to provide a practical guideline for the radiologist to help increase the effectiveness of interdisciplinary dialogue and diagnostic accuracy in daily practice. RESULTS: We defined key clinical and imaging features of the dementias (A), recommended MRI protocol (B), proposed a disease-oriented imaging evaluation and interpretation (C) and report (D) with a glimpse to future avenues (E). The proposed radiological practice is to systematically evaluate and score atrophy, white matter changes, microbleeds, small vessel disease, consider the use of quantitative measures using commercial software tools critically, and adopt a structured disease-oriented report. In the expanding field of cognitive disorders, the only effective assessment approach is the standardized disease-oriented one, which includes a multidisciplinary integration of the clinical picture, MRI, CSF and blood biomarkers and nuclear medicine.

What about the caregiver? A journey into Parkinson's disease following the burden tracks.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate caregivers and patients characteristics related to different dimensions of burden in Parkinson's disease (PD). METHODS: 55 pairs of PD patients and caregivers were recruited. The burden was evaluated with the Caregiver Burden Inventory (CBI). Multivariate analysis was applied to evaluate the impact of caregivers' and patients' characteristics on the varying aspects of burden. RESULTS: ADL score was the dominant predictor for the total score and all dimensions of CBI, except for the social burden, which is strongly predicted by the motor severity of PD. As one can easily imagine, the Total CBI decreases as the ADL score increases. DISCUSSION: An increased appreciation for characteristics of caregiver burden is a fundamental aspect of the patient's global evaluation. Clinicians may need to directly probe for these factors in the caregiver as they may not be elicited routinely.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment in older adults with cancer: Recommendations by the Italian Society of Geriatrics and Gerontology (SIGG).

INTRODUCTION: Optimizing the approach to older adults with cancer is now a priority given the increasing frequency of new cancer diagnoses that are made in the older population. The comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) represents the gold-standard for (1) defining prognosis and ability to withstand cancer treatments, (2) exploring the multiple aspects that define the complexity of frail older persons, and (3) designing person-tailored interventions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this document, based on a comprehensive revision of the literature, the Italian Society for Geriatrics and Gerontology proposes a CGA model (ONCOGER CGA) to be adopted by oncology centers for their routine approach to older patients with cancer. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A widespread use of this standardized CGA format will facilitate comparisons across institutions, promote studies based on a multidimensional patient assessment, and foster the inclusion of geriatric endpoints in oncological clinical trials. Furthermore, we predict that the use of a standardized CGA approach will increase the integration of geriatricians into oncology care teams with the final result of improving therapeutic choices and clinical outcomes.

Comorbidity assessment to determine prognosis in older adult patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

The clinical management of older adult patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) remains a major challenge. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of comorbidity assessment according to a standardized approach, the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS), on prognosis in patients with classical HL aged 60 years and older. We studied 76 consecutive older adult patients with HL (median age 69 y, range 60-84) who had been treated in our institution between 1999 and 2018. Comorbidity was assessed at diagnosis according to CIRS. Anthracycline-containing chemotherapy with curative intent was administered in 59 (78%) patients. We identified 41 (54%) patients with at least one severe comorbidity rated on CIRS grade ≥ 3. Patients with severe comorbidity were more likely to have advanced-stage disease (P = .003), to have an International Prognostic Score (IPS) > 3 (P = .03), and to not receive anthracycline-containing chemotherapy (P = .008). The probability of overall survival (OS) at 3 years was 88% (95% CI, 71%-95%) in patients without severe comorbidities, while it was only 46% (95% CI, 29%-62%) in patients with a comorbidity CIRS grade ≥ 3 (P = .0001). The impact of comorbidity on prognosis was also evident when restricting the analysis to patients treated with anthracycline-containing therapy. The 3-year OS was 93% (95% CI, 76%-98%) (P = .004) in patients without severe comorbidity and 72% (95% CI, 47%-87%) in patients with severe comorbidity (P = .004). In a multivariate analysis, presence of comorbidity, but not age, was a significant factor for OS. Therefore, we conclude that a significant proportion of older adult patients with HL has severe comorbidity on the CIRS scale, which impacts more importantly than age on prognosis.

Preoperative assessment and risk factors in the surgical treatment of lung cancer: the role of age.

The incidence of lung cancer in the elderly is increasing in Western countries. This disease represents the second leading cause of cancer death in this age group and it is also responsible for a substantial increment in morbidity and health care costs. Several studies suggested that age per se should not be considered a risk factor for surgical mortality and morbidity in lung cancer patients and access to surgical treatment should not be denied only on the basis of age. Indeed, advanced age may represent an indicator of several factors such as comorbidity or poor physical performance which in turn can increase surgical risk and dramatically reduce life expectancy. Therefore, a careful preoperative assessment of these factors, with particular regard to comorbid conditions (such as cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases or secondary malignancy) is necessary in older adults. In consideration of the need of a multidisciplinary assessment to identify comorbidities and operative risk a close collaboration between pneumologists, radiologists, oncologists, thoracic surgeons, anesthesiologists, cardiologists, geriatric specialists, physical therapists is highly recommended.