The Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling - experiences from 10 years of application of a health impact assessment tool in policy and practice.

Introduction: In recent years, walking and cycling have moved into the focus as promising approaches to achieve public health, sustainable transport, climate goals and better urban resilience. However, they are only realistic transport and activity options for a large proportion of the population when they are safe, inclusive and convenient. One way to increase their recognition in transport policy is the inclusion of health impacts of walking and cycling into transport economic appraisals. Methods: The Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling calculates: if x people walk or cycle a distance of y on most days, what is the economic value of impacts on premature mortality, taking into account effects of physical activity, air pollution and road fatalities, as well as effects on carbon emissions. Different data sources were collated to examine how the HEAT in more than 10 years of existence, and to identify lessons learned and challenges. Results: Since its launch in 2009, the HEAT has gained wide recognition as a user friendly, yet robust, evidence-based tool usable by academics, policymakers, and practitioners. Originally designed for use in Europe, it has since been expanded for global use. Discussion: Challenges for a wider uptake of health-impact assessment (HIA) tools including active transport such as HEAT are the promotion and dissemination to local practitioners and policy makers also outside European and English-speaking regions and in low- and middle-income contexts, further increasing usability, and more generally the advancement of systematic data collection and impact quantification related to walking and cycling.

Integrated Impact Assessment of Active Travel: Expanding the Scope of the Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for Walking and Cycling.

The World Health Organization's Health Economic Assessment Tool (HEAT) for walking and cycling is a user-friendly web-based tool to assess the health impacts of active travel. HEAT, developed over 10 years ago, has been used by researchers, planners and policymakers alike in appraisals of walking and cycling policies at both national and more local scales. HEAT has undergone regular upgrades adopting the latest scientific evidence. This article presents the most recent upgrades of the tool. The health impacts of walking and/or cycling in a specified population are quantified in terms of premature deaths avoided (or caused). In addition to the calculation of benefits derived from physical activity, HEAT was recently expanded to include assessments of the burden associated with air pollution exposure and crash risks while walking or cycling. Further, the impacts on carbon emissions from mode shifts to active travel modes can now be assessed. The monetization of impacts using Value of Statistical Life and Social Costs of Carbon now uses country-specific values. As active travel inherently results in often substantial health benefits as well as not always negligible risks, assessments of active travel behavior or policies are incomplete without considering health implications. The recent developments of HEAT make it easier than ever to obtain ballpark estimates of health impacts and carbon emissions related to walking and cycling.

Comparing the lung cancer burden of ambient particulate matter using scenarios of air quality standards versus acceptable risk levels.

OBJECTIVES: Ambient particulate matter (PM) is regulated with science-based air quality standards, whereas carcinogens are regulated with a number of "acceptable" cases. Given that PM is also carcinogenic, we identify differences between approaches. METHODS: We assessed the lung cancer deaths for Switzerland attributable to exposure to PM up to 10 µm (PM10) and to five particle-bound carcinogens. For PM10, we used an epidemiological approach based on relative risks with four exposure scenarios compared to two counterfactual concentrations. For carcinogens, we used a toxicological approach based on unit risks with four exposure scenarios. RESULTS: The lung cancer burden using concentrations from 2010 was 10-14 times larger for PM10 than for the five carcinogens. However, the burden depends on the underlying exposure scenarios, counterfactual concentrations and number of carcinogens. All scenarios of the toxicological approach for five carcinogens result in a lower burden than the epidemiological approach for PM10. CONCLUSIONS: Air quality standards-promoted so far by the WHO Air Quality Guidelines-provide a more appealing framework to guide health risk-oriented clean air policymaking than frameworks based on a number of "acceptable" cases.

Correlates of Walking for Travel in Seven European Cities: The PASTA Project.

BACKGROUND: Although walking for travel can help in reaching the daily recommended levels of physical activity, we know relatively little about the correlates of walking for travel in the European context. OBJECTIVE: Within the framework of the European Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) project, we aimed to explore the correlates of walking for travel in European cities. METHODS: The same protocol was applied in seven European cities. Using a web-based questionnaire, we collected information on total minutes of walking per week, individual characteristics, mobility behavior, and attitude (N=7,875). Characteristics of the built environment (the home and the work/study addresses) were determined with geographic information system (GIS)-based techniques. We conducted negative binomial regression analyses, including city as a random effect. Factor and principal component analyses were also conducted to define profiles of the different variables of interest. RESULTS: Living in high-density residential areas with richness of facilities and density of public transport stations was associated with increased walking for travel, whereas the same characteristics at the work/study area were less strongly associated with the outcome when the residential and work/study environments were entered in the model jointly. A walk-friendly social environment was associated with walking for travel. All three factors describing different opinions about walking (ranging from good to bad) were associated with increased minutes of walking per week, although the importance given to certain criteria to choose a mode of transport provided different results according to the criteria. DISCUSSION: The present study supports findings from previous research regarding the role of the built environment in the promotion of walking for travel and provides new findings to help in achieving sustainable, healthy, livable, and walkable cities. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP4603.

Health impact assessment of cycling network expansions in European cities.

We conducted a health impact assessment (HIA) of cycling network expansions in seven European cities. We modeled the association between cycling network length and cycling mode share and estimated health impacts of the expansion of cycling networks. First, we performed a non-linear least square regression to assess the relationship between cycling network length and cycling mode share for 167 European cities. Second, we conducted a quantitative HIA for the seven cities of different scenarios (S) assessing how an expansion of the cycling network [i.e. 10% (S1); 50% (S2); 100% (S3), and all-streets (S4)] would lead to an increase in cycling mode share and estimated mortality impacts thereof. We quantified mortality impacts for changes in physical activity, air pollution and traffic incidents. Third, we conducted a cost-benefit analysis. The cycling network length was associated with a cycling mode share of up to 24.7% in European cities. The all-streets scenario (S4) produced greatest benefits through increases in cycling for London with 1,210 premature deaths (95% CI: 447-1,972) avoidable annually, followed by Rome (433; 95% CI: 170-695), Barcelona (248; 95% CI: 86-410), Vienna (146; 95% CI: 40-252), Zurich (58; 95% CI: 16-100) and Antwerp (7; 95% CI: 3-11). The largest cost-benefit ratios were found for the 10% increase in cycling networks (S1). If all 167 European cities achieved a cycling mode share of 24.7% over 10,000 premature deaths could be avoided annually. In European cities, expansions of cycling networks were associated with increases in cycling and estimated to provide health and economic benefits.

Gesundheitsökonomisches bewertungsinstrument (HEAT) für gehen und für radfahren: methodik und benutzeranleitung für bewertungen der auswirkungen von körperlicher betätigung, luftverschmutzung, verletzungen und kohlenstoffemissionen

Die Förderung von Radfahren und Zufußgehen zum Zwecke täglicher körperlicher Betätigung kommt nicht nur der Gesundheit zugute, sondern kann sich auch positiv auf die Umwelt auswirken. In dieser Publikation werden die für die Erleichterung einer solchen Umstellung entwickelten Instrumente und Empfehlungen zusammengefasst: die Methodik für die ökonomische Bewertung der Verkehrsinfrastruktur und der Verkehrspolitik in Bezug auf die gesundheitlichen Effekte von Zufußgehen und Radfahren; systematische Sichtungen der ökonomischen und gesundheitsbezogenen Fachliteratur; und Empfehlungen für die Anwendung der gesundheitsökonomischen Bewertungsinstrumente und der ihnen zugrunde liegenden Prinzipien. Es handelt sich hierbei um eine aktualisierte Fassung, in der auch die Gesundheitsfolgen von Straßenverkehrsunfällen, Luftverschmutzung und CO2-Emissionen berücksichtigt werden. Mit dem Instrument lassen sich verschiedene Bewertungen durchführen, wie etwa: das aktuelle Verkehrsaufkommen mit dem Rad oder zu Fuß und der Stellenwert des Radfahrens oder Gehens in einer Stadt oder einem Land; die Veränderungen im Laufe der Zeit durch einen Vergleich von Vorher und Nachher oder von Szenario A mit Szenario B (wie etwa vor und nach einer Maßnahme); und die Auswertung neuer oder laufender Projekte und Bestimmung ihres Kosten-Nutzen-Verhältnisses. HEAT können allein oder gemeinsam mit anderen Instrumenten für eine umfassendere ökonomische Bewertung oder eine Abschätzung der Gesundheitsfolgen herangezogen werden. Dieses Methodik- und Benutzerhandbuch ist von wesentlichem Interesse für Fachkräfte auf nationaler wie kommunaler Ebene, d. h. Verkehrsplaner und Verkehrsingenieure sowie Interessengruppen in den Bereichen Verkehr, Zufußgehen, Radfahren oder Umwelt, aber auch Gesundheitsökonomen und Experten für Bewegung und Gesundheitsförderung.

Outil d’évaluation économique des effets sanitaires (HEAT) liés à la pratique du vélo et de la marche : méthodologie et guide de l’utilisateur sur l’évaluation de l’activité physique, de la pollution atmosphérique, des traumatismes et de l’impact carbone

La promotion de la pratique du vélo et de la marche dans le cadre de l’activité physique quotidienne n’est pas seulement favorable à la santé, mais peut aussi s’avérer bénéfique pour l’environnement. Cette publication résume les outils élaborés afin de faciliter l’adoption de ces pratiques ainsi que les orientations dans ce domaine : méthodologie d’évaluation économique des infrastructures et politiques de transport en termes d’effets sanitaires de la bicyclette et de la marche ; revues systématiques de la littérature économique et sanitaire ; et conseils pour l’application des outils d’évaluation économique des effets sanitaires et principes à l’appui. Elle a été mise à jour afin de tenir compte des effets sanitaires des accidents de la route et de la pollution de l’air, ainsi que de l’impact sur les émissions de carbone. L’outil peut être utilisé pour plusieurs types d’évaluation, par exemple : l’évaluation des niveaux actuels (ou passés) de pratique du vélo ou de la marche, par exemple en montrant l’importance du vélo et de la marche dans une ville ou un pays donnés ; l’évaluation des changements au fil du temps, notamment en comparant les situations avant et après, ou le scénario A par rapport au scénario B (avec ou sans prise de mesures, par exemple) ; l’évaluation de projets nouveaux ou existants, notamment le calcul du rapport coûts-avantages. L’outil HEAT peut être utilisé de manière autonome, voire s’inscrire dans le cadre d’exercices plus complets d’évaluation économique ou d’une analyse prospective de l’impact sanitaire. Cette méthodologie et ce guide de l’utilisateur intéresseront principalement les professionnels aux niveaux national et local : les planificateurs des transports, les ingénieurs de la circulation, et les groupes d’intérêt spéciaux œuvrant dans le domaine du transport, de la marche, de la pratique du vélo ou de l’environnement, ainsi que les économistes de la santé et les experts en activité physique et en promotion de la santé.

Towards a Comprehensive Conceptual Framework of Active Travel Behavior: a Review and Synthesis of Published Frameworks.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews the use of conceptual frameworks in research on active travel, such as walking and cycling. Generic framework features and a wide range of contents are identified and synthesized into a comprehensive framework of active travel behavior, as part of the Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches project (PASTA). PASTA is a European multinational, interdisciplinary research project on active travel and health. RECENT FINDINGS: Along with an exponential growth in active travel research, a growing number of conceptual frameworks has been published since the early 2000s. Earlier frameworks are simpler and emphasize the distinction of environmental vs. individual factors, while more recently several studies have integrated travel behavior theories more thoroughly. Based on the reviewed frameworks and various behavioral theories, we propose the comprehensive PASTA conceptual framework of active travel behavior. We discuss how it can guide future research, such as data collection, data analysis, and modeling of active travel behavior, and present some examples from the PASTA project.

Health benefits of a reduction of PM10 and NO2 exposure after implementing a clean air plan in the Agglomeration Lausanne-Morges.

Exposure to urban air pollution has been associated with adverse effects on cardio-vascular and respiratory health, both short and long term. Consequently, governments have applied policies to reduce air pollution. Quantitative health impact assessments of hypothetic changes in air pollution have been conducted at national and global level, but assessments of observed air pollution changes associated with specific clean air policies at a local or regional scale remain scarce. This study estimates health impacts attributable to a decrease in PM10 and NO2 exposure in the Agglomeration of Lausanne-Morges (ALM), Switzerland, between 2005 and 2015, corresponding to the implementation period of a supra-municipal plan of measures to reduce air pollution in different sectors such as transport, energy, and industry (called Plan OPair 05). The health impact assessment compares health effects attributed to air pollution exposure levels in 2015 (reference case) with those in 2005 (counterfactual scenario), using 2015 as baseline for all other input data. In the ALM, the modeled PM10 exposure reduction of 3.3µg/m3 from 2005 to 2015 prevents 26 premature deaths (equivalent to around 290 years of life lost), 215 hospitalization days due to cardio-vascular and respiratory diseases as well as approximately 47,000 restricted activity days annually. Monetized health impacts of the reduction of PM10 exposure are valued at approximately CHF 36 million annually. Immaterial costs, mainly related to the economic valuation of years of life lost, dominate the monetized health impacts (90% of total value), while savings at the workplace (net loss in production and reoccupation costs) amount to about CHF 1.9 million, and savings in health care costs to about CHF 0.5 million. The assessment is sensitive to the value assigned to immaterial costs and to uncertainties in the relative risk estimates, whereas variations in the baseline year (i.e. using 2005 data instead of 2015 data) affect results to a much lower degree. The alternative calculation based on NO2 exposure, which dropped by 5.6µg/m3, suggests the prevention of 51 premature deaths (equivalent to around 550 years of life lost) overall impacts valued at CHF 49 million. All in all, the reduction in mortality due to the air quality improvements accounts for (depending on the considered pollutant) about 1% to 2% of total all-cause annual mortality in the ALM population or 4-8 times larger than the annual traffic fatalities in the ALM.

Health economic assessment tool (HEAT) for walking and for cycling: methods and user guide on physical activity, air pollution, injuries and carbon impact assessments

The promotion of cycling and walking for everyday physical activity not only promotes health but can also have positive effects on the environment. This publication summarizes the tools and guidance developed to facilitate this shift: the methodology for the economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies in relation to the health effects of walking and cycling; systematic reviews of the economic and health literature; and guidance on applying the health economic assessment tools and the principles underlying it. It has been updated to consider the health effects of road crashes and air pollution and the effects on carbon emissions. The tool can be used for several types of assessment, for example: assessing current (or past) levels of cycling or walking, such as showing the value of cycling or walking in a city or country; assessing changes over time, such as comparing before-and-after situations or scenario A versus scenario B (such as with or without measures taken); and evaluating new or existing projects, including calculating benefit–cost ratios. HEAT can be used as a stand-alone tool or to provide input into more comprehensive economic appraisal exercises or prospective health impact assessment.

Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA): protocol for a multi-centre, longitudinal study.

BACKGROUND: Physical inactivity is one of the leading risk factors for non-communicable diseases, yet many are not sufficiently active. The Physical Activity through Sustainable Transport Approaches (PASTA) study aims to better understand active mobility (walking and cycling for transport solely or in combination with public transport) as an innovative approach to integrate physical activity into individuals' everyday lives. The PASTA study will collect data of multiple cities in a longitudinal cohort design to study correlates of active mobility, its effect on overall physical activity, crash risk and exposure to traffic-related air pollution. METHODS/DESIGN: A set of online questionnaires incorporating gold standard approaches from the physical activity and transport fields have been developed, piloted and are now being deployed in a longitudinal study in seven European cities (Antwerp, Barcelona, London, Oerebro, Rome, Vienna, Zurich). In total, 14000 adults are being recruited (2000 in each city). A first questionnaire collects baseline information; follow-up questionnaires sent every 13 days collect prospective data on travel behaviour, levels of physical activity and traffic safety incidents. Self-reported data will be validated with objective data in subsamples using conventional and novel methods. Accelerometers, GPS and tracking apps record routes and activity. Air pollution and physical activity are measured to study their combined effects on health biomarkers. Exposure-adjusted crash risks will be calculated for active modes, and crash location audits are performed to study the role of the built environment. Ethics committees in all seven cities have given independent approval for the study. DISCUSSION: The PASTA study collects a wealth of subjective and objective data on active mobility and physical activity. This will allow the investigation of numerous correlates of active mobility and physical activity using a data set that advances previous efforts in its richness, geographical coverage and comprehensiveness. Results will inform new health impact assessment models and support efforts to promote and facilitate active mobility in cities.

Health impact assessment of active transportation: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Walking and cycling for transportation (i.e. active transportation, AT), provide substantial health benefits from increased physical activity (PA). However, risks of injury from exposure to motorized traffic and their emissions (i.e. air pollution) exist. The objective was to systematically review studies conducting health impact assessment (HIA) of a mode shift to AT on grounds of associated health benefits and risks. METHODS: Systematic database searches of MEDLINE, Web of Science and Transportation Research International Documentation were performed by two independent researchers, augmented by bibliographic review, internet searches and expert consultation to identify peer-reviewed studies from inception to December 2014. RESULTS: Thirty studies were included, originating predominantly from Europe, but also the United States, Australia and New Zealand. They compromised of mostly HIA approaches of comparative risk assessment and cost-benefit analysis. Estimated health benefit-risk or benefit-cost ratios of a mode shift to AT ranged between -2 and 360 (median=9). Effects of increased PA contributed the most to estimated health benefits, which strongly outweighed detrimental effects of traffic incidents and air pollution exposure on health. CONCLUSION: Despite different HIA methodologies being applied with distinctive assumptions on key parameters, AT can provide substantial net health benefits, irrespective of geographical context.

Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling: methodology and user guide: economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies

The promotion of cycling and walking for everyday physical activity not only promotes health but can also have positive effects on the environment. This booklet summarizes the tools and guidance developed to facilitate this shift: the methodology for the economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies in relation to the health effects of walking and cycling; systematic reviews of the economic and health literature; and guidance on applying the health economic assessment tools and the principles underlying it. This methodology and user guide will be of key interest to professionals at both national and local levels: transport planners, traffic engineers, and special interest groups working on transport, walking, cycling or the environment, as well as health economists, physical activity experts and health promotion experts.

Gesundheitsökonomische Bewertungsinstrumente (HEAT) für Gehen und für Radfahren: Methodik und Benutzerhandbuch: ökonomische Bewertung von Verkehrsinfrastruktur und Verkehrspolitik

Die Förderung von Radfahren und Zufußgehen zum Zwecke täglicher körperlicher Betätigung kommt nicht nur der Gesundheit zugute, sondern kann sich auch positiv auf die Umwelt auswirken. In dieser Broschüre werden die für die Erleichterung einer solchen Umstellung entwickelten Instrumente und Empfehlungen zusammengefasst: die Methodik für die ökonomische Bewertung der Verkehrsinfrastruktur und der Verkehrspolitik in Bezug auf die gesundheitlichen Effekte von Zufußgehen und Radfahren; systematische Sichtungen der ökonomischen und gesundheitsbezogenen Fachliteratur; und Empfehlungen für die Anwendung der gesundheitsökonomischen Bewertungsinstrumente und der ihnen zugrunde liegenden Prinzipien. Die Methodik und das Benutzerhandbuch sind von wesentlichem Interesse für Fachkräfte auf nationaler wie kommunaler Ebene, d. h. Verkehrsplaner und Verkehrsingenieure sowie Interessengruppen in den Bereichen Verkehr, Zufußgehen, Radfahren oder Umwelt, aber auch Gesundheitsökonomen und Experten für Bewegung und Gesundheitsförderung.

Outil d’évaluation économique des effets sanitaires (HEAT) liés à la pratique du vélo et à la marche : méthodologie et guide de l’utilisateur : évaluation économique des infrastructures et politiques de transport

La promotion de la pratique du vélo et de la marche dans le cadre de l’activité physique quotidienne n’est pas seulement favorable à la santé, mais peut aussi s’avérer bénéfique pour l’environnement. Cette publication résume les outils élaborés afin de faciliter l’adoption de ces pratiques ainsi que les orientations dans ce domaine : méthodologie d’évaluation économique des infrastructures et politiques de transport en termes d’effets sanitaires de la bicyclette et de la marche ; revues systématiques de la littérature économique et sanitaire ; et conseils pour l’application des outils d’évaluation économique des effets sanitaires et principes à l’appui. Cette méthodologie et ce guide de l’utilisateur intéresseront principalement les professionnels aux niveaux national et local : les planificateurs des transports, les ingénieurs de la circulation, et les groupes d’intérêt spéciaux œuvrant dans le domaine du transport, de la marche, de la pratique du vélo ou de l’environnement, ainsi que les économistes de la santé et les experts en activité physique et en promotion de la santé.

Costs and benefits of bicycling investments in Portland, Oregon.

BACKGROUND: Promoting bicycling has great potential to increase overall physical activity; however, significant uncertainty exists with regard to the amount and effectiveness of investment needed for infrastructure. The objective of this study is to assess how costs of Portland's past and planned investments in bicycling relate to health and other benefits. METHODS: Costs of investment plans are compared with 2 types of monetized health benefits, health care cost savings and value of statistical life savings. Levels of bicycling are estimated using past trends, future mode share goals, and a traffic demand model. RESULTS: By 2040, investments in the range of $138 to $605 million will result in health care cost savings of $388 to $594 million, fuel savings of $143 to $218 million, and savings in value of statistical lives of $7 to $12 billion. The benefit-cost ratios for health care and fuel savings are between 3.8 and 1.2 to 1, and an order of magnitude larger when value of statistical lives is used. CONCLUSIONS: This first of its kind cost-benefit analysis of investments in bicycling in a US city shows that such efforts are cost-effective, even when only a limited selection of benefits is considered.

Health economic assessment tools (HEAT) for walking and for cycling: methodology and user guide: economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies

The promotion of cycling and walking for everyday physical activity not only promotes health but can also have positive effects on the environment. This booklet summarizes the tools and guidance developed to facilitate this shift: the methodology for the economic assessment of transport infrastructure and policies in relation to the health effects of walking and cycling; systematic reviews of the economic and health literature; and guidance on applying the health economic assessment tools and the principles underlying it. This methodology and user guide will be of key interest to professionals at both national and local levels: transport planners, traffic engineers, and special interest groups working on transport, walking, cycling or the environment, as well as health economists, physical activity experts and health promotion experts.