[Reproducibility study of the "400 Points assessment", a measurement of the hand's functional ability]. / Étude de reproductibilité de la cotation du « Bilan 400 points ¼, une mesure de capacité fonctionnelle de la main.

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate the inter-rater and test-retest reproducibility of the "400 Points assessment", a measurement of the functional ability of the hand. The scale included four tests: function of the hand, prehension strengths, handling and displacement of things, and function with both hands. METHODS: Thirty patients with hand injuries were participated. The inter-rate agreements were examinated between three occupational therapists. The First rater was an experienced user of this instrument (observer 1), the second one was a novice user (observer 2), the last rater is a student who had never used it before (observer 3). Subjects were tested twice by the same raters independently, with 30 minutes intervals between tests. Statistical analysis was done by calculating average differences and intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: (i) The difference between the three raters agreements was small for the two measurements, except for function with both hands in the second period. Every intraclass correlation coefficient was higher than 0.95. (ii) Difference between the two measurements was small for every observer. These differences are not significant except for function with both hands. Intraclass correlation coefficients are all higher than 0.82 even than 0.90 for the total score. The difference between the two periods for the overall test is small, from 5% to 10% for seven patients and from 10 to 15% for two patients. Differences at two times had the same agreement for the three observers. CONCLUSION: "400 Points assessment" is reproducible (inter-rater and test-retest reproductibility). The test "function with both hands" requires more experience of the assessment.

The cost effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination strategies.

Pneumonia and influenza, combined, are the sixth leading causes of death in the US. The age-adjusted mortality rate for these diseases increased by 20% between 1979 and 1993, perhaps as a result of the emergence of multi-drug-resistant and penicillin-resistant strains of bacteria that cause pneumonia. Of the approximately $US23 billion annual cost of community-acquired pneumonia, pneumococcal pneumonia is currently estimated to account for up to $US18 billion. Considering the clinical and economic consequences of pneumococcal disease, vaccination appears to be a valuable preventive strategy. However, despite Medicare coverage and the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP), only 28% of elderly and high-risk patients received the pneumococcal vaccine in 1993. This article reviews the epidemiology and economic factors that determine the cost effectiveness of pneumococcal vaccination strategies. The strategies are taken from a review of 10 published economic analyses of the pneumococcal vaccine. Cost savings and favourable cost-effectiveness ratios are associated with key factors that increase vaccination programme benefits by maximising averted direct medical costs as well as reducing vaccination programme costs, such as through public vaccination campaigns.

Costs of HIV+/AIDS at CD4+ counts disease stages based on treatment protocols.

We report treatment protocols for HIV+/AIDS patients by CD4+ counts (T-lymphocyte cells/mm3: > or = 500, 499-200, 199-50, and < 50) as a tool to provide better definition and to project annual costs (total charges for services) and lifetimes costs for HIV+/AIDS. The treatment protocols, derived from the literature and an HIV+/AIDS Physician Panel, defined the resource use associated with antiretroviral therapy and opportunistic disease prophylaxis and treatment. Resource use costs were derived from the published literature, insurance database, Medicare fee schedules, surveys, and the Physician Panel. At CD4+ counts, the rates of opportunistic diseases were derived from the Physician Panel experience; the mean occupancy times were derived from the literature. The sensitivity analysis indicated stability of the lifetime costs to variation in mean occupancy times, rates of opportunistic diseases, rates of adverse events (AE), and costs. The total annual costs (1995 dollars) of HIV+/AIDS patients ranged from $1,934 (> or = 500), $6,015 (200-499), and $9,031 (50-199), to $25,239 ( < 50). The annual costs of opportunistic diseases are esophageal candidiasis (EC) ($2,194), tuberculosis (TB) ($2,924), cryptococcal meningitis (CM) ($17,264), toxoplasmosis ($17,631), Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) (+20,153), Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) ($22,329), wasting syndrome ($26,676), central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma ($27,333), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP) [mild ($3,545), moderate ($4,889), and severe ($32,609)], Kaposi' sarcoma (KS) [mild/moderate ($5,902), and severe ($10,744)], and cytomegalovirus (CMV) retinitis ($100,337). The projected lifetime costs of HIV+/AIDS are $94,726 (annual costs $7,645). Our lower lifetime costs as compared with recent estimates may be due to including resources only for HIV+/AIDS-related treatment and not for non-HIV+/AIDS conditions, as well as reduced resource use resulting from more efficient diagnostic and therapeutic techniques and earlier prophylaxis provided by experienced HIV+/AIDS physicians. Nonetheless, our estimates are consistent with decreasing costs of HIV+/AIDS due to a reduction in the average length of stay and frequency of hospitalizations as well as to replacement of inpatient care by outpatient services.

Pneumococcal vaccine. Efficacy and associated cost savings.

We evaluated the efficacy and cost savings of the pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine in a retrospective cohort study of 762 vaccinated and 1161 randomly selected unvaccinated age-sex matched persons in Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Minnesota using medical and pharmaceutical claims. The pneumonia incidence and the ratio of incidence in the postvaccination to prevaccination periods (rate ratio) were examined in the vaccine group by sex and risk factors. Vaccination significantly reduced pneumonia incidence, with overall efficacy of 69% and higher efficacy in women (86%) than in men (33%). We assigned persons to risk categories based on disease conditions as recorded in the claims by the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification) diagnostic codes. In the risk categories, efficacy varied from 50% to 75% and was confounded by sex. Immunocompromised and immunocompetent women had high efficacy (83% to 88%), while immunocompetent and immunocompromised men had lower efficacy (33%). Persons with a precondition of pneumonia exhibited similar vaccine efficacy to the overall cohort relative to the comparison group. Projected costs of pneumonia cases are 3.6 times the observed costs of vaccination and postvaccination pneumonia costs. We conclude that the pneumococcal pneumonia vaccine is efficacious in persons having had pneumonia, persons "at risk" of developing pneumonia, or persons over 50 years of age, and it corresponds to overall savings of $141 per person.