Homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance index trajectories in HIV-infected patients treated with different first-line antiretroviral regimens.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the trajectories of the homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) index in a cohort of HIV-1 infected patients during their first-line antiretroviral (ART) regimen. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of naïve patients who started ART from 2007 at the Infectious Diseases Unit of the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. We included patients treated with two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs, tenofovir, abacavir, lamivudine or emtricitabine), and one anchor drug (ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor [PI/r], non-NRTI [NNRTI], or integrase strand transfer inhibitor [InSTI]), and with HOMA-IR assessed both before and after the start of ART. Univariate and multivariate mixed linear models estimated HOMA-IR changes during ART. RESULTS: Among 618 patients included in the study, 218 received InSTI-, 210 PI/r-, and 190 NNRTI-based regimens. Median follow-up was 27.4 (16.3-41.2) months. Adjusted mean change in HOMA-IR index was significantly higher (P = .041) in patients treated with InSTI-based regimens [0.160 (95% CI: 0.003-0.321) units per year] compared with NNRTI-based regimens [-0.005 (95% CI: -0.184-0.074) units per year]; no difference was observed between patients treated with NNRTI- and PI/r-based regimens or between INSTI-based and PI/r-based regimens. CONCLUSION: InSTI-based first-line ARTs were independently associated with greater increases in HOMA-IR index.

Cost analysis of initial highly active antiretroviral therapy regimens for managing human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients according to clinical practice in a hospital setting.

OBJECTIVE: In the study reported here, single-tablet regimen (STR) versus (vs) multi-tablet regimen (MTR) strategies were evaluated through a cost analysis in a large cohort of patients starting their first highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Adult human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) 1-naïve patients, followed at the San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy, starting their first-line regimen from June 2008 to April 2012 were included in the analysis. METHODS: The most frequently used first-line HAART regimens (>10%) were grouped into two classes: 1) STR of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) + emtricitabine (FTC) + efavirenz (EFV) and 2) MTR including TDF + FTC + EFV, TDF + FTC + atazanavir/ritonavir (ATV/r), TDF + FTC + darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r), and TDF + FTC + lopinavir/ritoavir (LPV/r). Data were analyzed from the point of view of the Lombardy Regional Health Service. HAART, hospitalizations, visits, medical examinations, and other concomitant non-HAART drug costs were evaluated and price variations included. Descriptive statistics were calculated for baseline demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics; associations between categorical variables and type of antiretroviral strategy (STR vs MTR) were examined using chi-square or Fisher's exact tests. At multivariate analysis, the generalized linear model was used to identify the predictive factors of the overall costs of the first-line HAART regimens. RESULTS: A total of 474 naïve patients (90% male, mean age 42.2 years, mean baseline HIV-RNA 4.50 log 10 copies/mL, and cluster of differentiation 4 [CD4+] count of 310 cells/µL, with a mean follow-up of 28 months) were included. Patients starting an STR treatment were less frequently antibody-hepatitis C virus positive (4% vs 11%, P=0.040), and had higher mean CD4+ values (351 vs 297 cells/µL, P=0.004) than MTR patients. The mean annual cost per patient in the STR group was €9,213.00 (range: €6,574.71-€33,570.00) and €14,277.00 (range: €5,908.89-€82,310.30) among MTR patients. At multivariate analysis, after adjustment for age, sex, antibody-hepatitis C virus status, HIV risk factors, baseline CD4+, and HIV-RNA, the cost analysis was significantly lower among patients starting an STR treatment than those starting an MTR (adjusted mean: €12,096.00 vs €16,106.00, P=0.0001). CONCLUSION: STR was associated with a lower annual cost per patient than MTR, thus can be considered a cost-saving strategy in the treatment of HIV patients. This analysis is an important tool for policy makers and health care professionals to make short- and long-term cost projections and thus assess the impact of these on available budgets.

Quality of life assessment in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results from a phase III randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: A phase III trial suggested that a PEFG (cisplatin, epirubicin, 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine) regimen might improve the outcome compared to gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. The analysis of treatment impact on quality of life (QOL) is reported. METHOD: Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30 and PAN-26 questionnaires at baseline and every second month of treatment until disease progression. RESULTS: The largest differences between arms favored PEFG. Expressed as improvement > or =10 points from baseline (PEFG/gemcitabine), these were: emotional function (43/18%), fatigue (41/17%), QOL (55/29%), pain (64/41%), and flatulence (50/26%). Only change in sexual function favored gemcitabine (19/42%). Physical function, fatigue, appetite, and satisfaction with healthcare improved in 40-46% of partial responders compared with 0-12% of patients with stable disease. CONCLUSION: Clinically relevant improvement in QOL from baseline was observed more often after PEFG than after gemcitabine, suggesting that the PEFG regimen did not impair QOL, Partial response was associated with improved QOL suggesting that effective treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma may have an important role in these patients.