RESUMO
The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention.
Assuntos
Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Cardiologia , Doenças Cardiovasculares/tratamento farmacológico , LDL-Colesterol , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Fatores de Risco , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention.
Assuntos
Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Biomarcadores/sangue , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Dislipidemias/sangue , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , Humanos , Prevenção Primária/normas , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Espanha , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention. Full English text available from:www.revespcardiol.org/en.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , LDL-Colesterol/sangue , Dislipidemias/complicações , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Adesão à Medicação , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention.
Assuntos
Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Dislipidemias/terapia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Doenças Cardiovasculares/etiologia , Dislipidemias/complicações , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/uso terapêutico , Hipolipemiantes/administração & dosagem , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Prevenção Primária/métodos , Comportamento de Redução do Risco , Sociedades Médicas , Espanha , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The publication of the 2013 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines on the treatment of high blood cholesterol has had a strong impact due to the paradigm shift in its recommendations. The Spanish Interdisciplinary Committee for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and the Spanish Society of Cardiology reviewed this guideline and compared it with current European guidelines on cardiovascular prevention and dyslipidemia management. The most striking aspect of the American guideline is the elimination of the low-density lipoprotein cholesterol treat-to-target strategy and the adoption of a risk reduction strategy in 4 major statin benefit groups. In patients with established cardiovascular disease, both guidelines recommend a similar therapeutic strategy (high-dose potent statins). However, in primary prevention, the application of the American guidelines would substantially increase the number of persons, particularly older people, receiving statin therapy. The elimination of the cholesterol treat-to-target strategy, so strongly rooted in the scientific community, could have a negative impact on clinical practice, create a certain amount of confusion and uncertainty among professionals, and decrease follow-up and patient adherence. Thus, this article reaffirms the recommendations of the European guidelines. Although both guidelines have positive aspects, doubt remains regarding the concerns outlined above. In addition to using risk charts based on the native population, the messages of the European guideline are more appropriate to the Spanish setting and avoid the possible risk of overtreatment with statins in primary prevention.
Assuntos
Cardiologia/normas , Doenças Cardiovasculares/prevenção & controle , Dislipidemias/tratamento farmacológico , Hipolipemiantes/uso terapêutico , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sociedades Médicas , EspanhaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Aspirin has been routinely prescribed following transcatheter closure of secundum atrial septal defects (ASDs) but its rationale has not been clinically or biologically evaluated; and despite aspirin, thrombotic complications occur following transcatheter ASD closure. We therefore evaluated the presence, degree and timing of the activation of the coagulation and platelet systems following transcatheter closure of ASDs. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fourteen consecutive patients (9 females, mean age 41+/-22 years) who underwent successful transcatheter closure of an ASD defect with the Amplatzer septal occluder were prospectively studied. Measurements of the prothrombin fragment 1+2 (F1+2) levels and the percentage of activated platelets (determined by P-selectin expression detected by flow cytometry) were taken at baseline just before the procedure, and at 1, 7, 30 and 90 days following device implantation. F1+2 levels increased from 0.85+/-0.29 nmol/l at baseline to a maximal value of 1.20+/-0.52 nmol/l at 7 days, gradually returning to the baseline levels at 90 days (0.79+/-0.54 nmol/l) (p<0.001). F1+2 levels at 7 days were also significantly higher than those obtained in a control group of 20 healthy subjects (p=0.016). A greater increase in coagulation activation was observed in cases of residual shunt following ASD closure (r=0.53, p=0.050). No significant variations in the percentage of platelets expressing P-selectin were detected at any time. CONCLUSIONS: Transcatheter closure of ASDs with the Amplatzer septal occluder was associated with a significant increase in F1+2 levels during the first week after device implantation, but there was no detectable effect on platelet system activation. These findings raise the question whether the optimal prophylactic approach following transcatheter ASD closure should be anticoagulant instead of antiplatelet therapy.