Potency values from the local lymph node assay: application to classification, labelling and risk assessment.

Hundreds of chemicals are contact allergens but there remains a need to identify and characterise accurately skin sensitising hazards. The purpose of this review was fourfold. First, when using the local lymph node assay (LLNA), consider whether an exposure concentration (EC3 value) lower than 100% can be defined and used as a threshold criterion for classification and labelling. Second, is there any reason to revise the recommendation of a previous ECETOC Task Force regarding specific EC3 values used for sub-categorisation of substances based upon potency? Third, what recommendations can be made regarding classification and labelling of preparations under GHS? Finally, consider how to integrate LLNA data into risk assessment and provide a rationale for using concentration responses and corresponding no-effect concentrations. Although skin sensitising chemicals having high EC3 values may represent only relatively low risks to humans, it is not possible currently to define an EC3 value below 100% that would serve as an appropriate threshold for classification and labelling. The conclusion drawn from reviewing the use of distinct categories for characterising contact allergens was that the most appropriate, science-based classification of contact allergens according to potency is one in which four sub-categories are identified: 'extreme', 'strong', 'moderate' and 'weak'. Since draining lymph node cell proliferation is related causally and quantitatively to potency, LLNA EC3 values are recommended for determination of a no expected sensitisation induction level that represents the first step in quantitative risk assessment.

Di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate: a short-term repeated inhalation toxicity study including fertility assessment.

In a study of the 28-day inhalation toxicity of di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) aerosols, 9-wk-old Wistar rats, 27 males (mean weight 226 g) and 17 females (mean weight 155 g) per group, were exposed in head-nose inhalation systems to DEHP aerosols of respirable particle size (mass median aerodynamic diameter < or = 1.2 microns) or air (controls). Exposure for 6 hr per day, 5 days per wk for 4 wk to target concentrations of 0, 0.01, 0.05 and 1.0 mg/litre gave estimated doses of 230, 11 and 2.3 mg/kg/day for the males, and 360, 18 and 3.6 mg/kg/day for females, on the assumption of 100% deposition and absorption. Clinical investigation and blood chemistry parameters did not reveal any treatment-related effects. At the end of exposure a statistically significant (16%) increase in relative lung weights, accompanied by increased foam-cell proliferation and thickening of the alveolar septi, was found in the males of the highest dose group. Absolute liver weights were significantly (8.75%) increased in females and relative liver weights were increased in both sexes in the highest dose group, but there were no corresponding histological effects. All these effects were reversed during the 8-wk post-exposure period. No testicular toxicity was observed histologically and no impact on mating performance and male fertility was detected after two matings of treated males with untreated females, 2 and 6 wk after the end of exposure. Electron microscopic examination of liver samples from two male and two female rats per group at the end of exposure and after the 8-wk post-exposure period did not reveal clear substructural changes that could be attributed to exposure or to peroxisome proliferation. The no-observed-effect level for all exposure-related findings was 0.05 mg/litre under the conditions used.