Is There Something Else Beyond Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for Public Health Decision Making?

Healthcare costs are a concern for the sustainability of health systems in both rich and poor countries. Achieving a balance between the aspirations of payers and the manufacturers of new technologies is a challenge for democratic societies. Evidence about the efficacy and effectiveness of a new intervention is a fundamental aspect for its inclusion, but additional information about organization, implementation, and feasibility is required. Economic evaluations, especially cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA), help inform the choice of a particular health intervention, but they are not the only input for decision making (DM). Use of CEA is relatively recent but has quickly become widespread. CEA techniques have evolved into increasingly complex and sophisticated methods intended to reflect reality closely but, at the same time, their results have become more difficult to verify and validate. In developed countries, CEA results have generated intense debates, but in developing countries, these reflections are still weak due to lack of technical capacity. Competing perspectives on CEAs exist and can heavily influence the DM process. The use of CEAs and the interpretation of their results requires critical analysis, especially when public funds are to be invested. Here, we present a perspective on the use of CEAs for DM that arises from our experience of its use in developing countries and requires the consideration of other rationalities, in addition to the economic one, for DM.

Costo efectividad de las pruebas para estratificar riesgo en el tratamiento de la leucemia mieloide aguda (LMA) en población pediátrica / Cost-effectiveness of risk stratification tests for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in pediatric patients

RESUMEN Objetivo Estimar la razón de costo-efectividad de las pruebas para estratificación del riesgo en pacientes pediátricos con Leucemia Mieloide Aguda (LMA). Métodos Se construyó un árbol de decisión con años de vida ganados como medida de efectividad. Los costos fueron estimados desde la perspectiva del sistema de salud colombiano. En los costos de la estratificación se incluyeron los costos del tratamiento consecuente con ella. Los precios de medicamentos fueron tomados del SISMED 2008 y el valor monetario de los procedimientos se extrajo del manual tarifario del ISS 2001 adicionando el 30 %. Todos los costos se expresaron en pesos colombianos del 2010 y el producto interno per-cápita de ese año fue empleado como umbral de costo efectividad. Se condujeron análisis de sensibilidad univariados y probabilísticos. Resultados La razón de costo-efectividad incremental de las pruebas de estratificación a todos los pacientes, fue de $8 559 944. Los resultados son sensibles a las probabilidades de recaída, supervivencia al trasplante y efectos secundarios. Conclusión Las pruebas para estratificación del riesgo en LMA son costo-efectivas dentro del sistema de salud colombiano.(AU)

ABSTRACT Objective To estimate the cost-effectiveness of risk-stratification tests for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pediatric patients. Methods A decision-tree model was built using Life Years Gained as a measure of effectiveness. Costs were estimated considering the perspective of the Colombian health system. Stratification costs included treatment costs based on said stratification. Drug prices were taken from SISMED (Drug Price Information System) 2008 and the monetary value of the procedures was extracted from the ISS 2001 rate manual, plus 30%. All costs were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 and the gross domestic product per capita of the same year was used as a cost-effective threshold. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes were performed. Results Risk stratification tests have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of COP 8,559,944. These results are sensitive to changes in probabilities of relapse, transplant survival and side effects. Conclusion Risk stratification tests for AML treatment in pediatric patients are cost-effective in the context of the Colombian health care system.(AU)

Anchoring bias in face-to-face Time-Trade-Off valuations of health states / Sesgo de anclaje en valoraciones de estados de salud por Time Trade-Off

ABSTRACT Objective To test whether anchoring (a cognitive bias) occurs during face-to-face interviews to value health states by Time-Trade-Off. Methods 147 Colombian subjects (111 males, 36 females) valued five EQ-5D health states better than death during a face-to-face interview. Subjects were randomly assigned to two different starting points. Results Shapiro-Wilk test discarded normality, while non-parametric tests, including Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, showed that anchoring was significant in four out of five health states. A higher starting point increased the elicited value by 15 %-188 %. The size of the anchoring effect was not uniform among health states. Conclusion Anchoring effects may bias face-to-face Time Trade-Off valuations. The size of the anchoring effect is relevant enough for health policy.(AU)

RESUMEN Objetivos Comprobar si se presenta anclaje (un sesgo cognitivo) en las valoraciones de estados de salud por Time-Trade-Off realizadas en entrevistas en persona. Métodos 147 sujetos colombianos (111 hombres, 36 mujeres) valoraron five estados de salud EQ-5D mejores que la muerte en una entrevista personal. Los sujetos se asignaron aleatoriamente a dos puntos de partida distintos. Resultados El test de Shapiro-Wilk descartó normalidad de las distribuciones. Las pruebas no paramétricas de Kolmogorov-Smirnov y Wilconson-Mann-Whitney mostraron que el anclaje era significativo en cuatro de los cinco estados de salud. Un punto de partida más alto aumentaba el valor obtenido en un 15 %-188 %. El tamaño del anclaje no era uniforme en los distintos estados de salud. Conclusiones El anclaje puede sesgar las valoraciones por Time Trade-Off realizadas en entrevistas. El efecto es lo suficientemente alto como para hacerlo relevante en términos de política.(AU)

[Cost-effectiveness of risk stratification tests for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia in pediatric patients]. / Costo efectividad de las pruebas para estratificar riesgo en el tratamiento de la leucemia mieloide aguda (LMA) en población pediátrica.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of risk-stratification tests for the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pediatric patients. METHODS: A decision-tree model was built using Life Years Gained as a measure of effectiveness. Costs were estimated considering the perspective of the Colombian health system. Stratification costs included treatment costs based on said stratification. Drug prices were taken from SISMED (Drug Price Information System) 2008 and the monetary value of the procedures was extracted from the ISS 2001 rate manual, plus 30%. All costs were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 and the gross domestic product per capita of the same year was used as a cost-effective threshold. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyzes were performed. RESULTS: Risk stratification tests have an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of COP 8,559,944. These results are sensitive to changes in probabilities of relapse, transplant survival and side effects. CONCLUSION: Risk stratification tests for AML treatment in pediatric patients are cost-effective in the context of the Colombian health care system.

OBJETIVO: Estimar la razón de costo-efectividad de las pruebas para estratificación del riesgo en pacientes pediátricos con Leucemia Mieloide Aguda (LMA). MÉTODOS: Se construyó un árbol de decisión con años de vida ganados como medida de efectividad. Los costos fueron estimados desde la perspectiva del sistema de salud colombiano. En los costos de la estratificación se incluyeron los costos del tratamiento consecuente con ella. Los precios de medicamentos fueron tomados del SISMED 2008 y el valor monetario de los procedimientos se extrajo del manual tarifario del ISS 2001 adicionando el 30 %. Todos los costos se expresaron en pesos colombianos del 2010 y el producto interno per-cápita de ese año fue empleado como umbral de costo efectividad. Se condujeron análisis de sensibilidad univariados y probabilísticos. RESULTADOS: La razón de costo-efectividad incremental de las pruebas de estratificación a todos los pacientes, fue de $8 559 944. Los resultados son sensibles a las probabilidades de recaída, supervivencia al trasplante y efectos secundarios. CONCLUSIÓN: Las pruebas para estratificación del riesgo en LMA son costo-efectivas dentro del sistema de salud colombiano.

Anchoring bias in face-to-face Time-Trade-Off valuations of health states.

OBJECTIVE: To test whether anchoring (a cognitive bias) occurs during face-to-face interviews to value health states by Time-Trade-Off. METHODS: 147 Colombian subjects (111 males, 36 females) valued five EQ-5D health states better than death during a face-to-face interview. Subjects were randomly assigned to two different starting points. RESULTS: Shapiro-Wilk test discarded normality, while non-parametric tests, including Kolmogorov-Smirnov and Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney, showed that anchoring was significant in four out of five health states. A higher starting point increased the elicited value by 15 %-188 %. The size of the anchoring effect was not uniform among health states. CONCLUSION: Anchoring effects may bias face-to-face Time Trade-Off valuations. The size of the anchoring effect is relevant enough for health policy.

Costo efectividad del suplemento de calcio para reducir la mortalidad materna asociada a preeclampsia en Colombia / Cost effectiveness of calcium supplement in reducing preeclampsia-related maternal mortality in Colombia

Objetivo Estimar el costo-efectividad de la administración de calcio (1 200 mg diarios) a partir de la semana 14 de gestación a todas las gestantes, comparada con no administrarlo, para reducir la incidencia de preeclampsia. Métodos Se construyó un árbol de decisión en TreeAge® con desenlace en años de vida ganados (AVG). Los costos se incluyeron desde la perspectiva del sistema de salud colombiano, en pesos (COP) de 2014. La tasa de descuento fue de 0%. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad univariados y probabilísticos para costos y efectividad. Resultados El suplemento de calcio es una alternativa dominante frente a la no intervención. Si la incidencia de preeclampsia es menor a 51,7 por 1 000 gestantes o el costo por tableta de calcio de 600 mg es mayor a COP$ 507,85, el suplemento de calcio deja de ser una alternativa costo-efectiva en Colombia para un umbral de 3 veces el PIB per cápita de 2013 (COP$ 45 026 379) por AVG. Conclusiones La administración de calcio a todas las gestantes a partir de la semana 14 de gestación es una alternativa dominante frente a la no intervención, que permite ganar 200 años de vida, al tiempo que disminuye costos del orden de COP$ 5 933 millones por 100 000 gestantes.(AU)

Objectives To estimate the cost-effectiveness of administering calcium (1200 mg per day) starting in week 14 of pregnancy to all pregnant women compared to not supplying it to reduce the incidence of preeclampsia. Methods A decision tree was built in TreeAge® with outcome measured in life years gained (LYG) associated with the reduction in maternal deaths. Costs were included from the perspective of the health system in Colombia and expressed in Colombian pesos in 2014 (COP). The discount rate was 0 %. We performed sensitivity univariate and probabilistic analyses for costs and effectiveness. Results Compared to no intervention, calcium supplement is a dominant alternative. If the incidence of preeclampsia is lower than 51.7 per 1 000 pregnant women or the cost per tablet of calcium of 600 mg is greater than COP $507.85, calcium supplement is no longer a cost-effective alternative in Colombia for a threshold of COP $ 45 026 379 (3 times the Colombian per capita GDP of 2013 per LYG). Conclusions Supplying calcium to all pregnant women from week 14 of gestation is a dominant alternative compared to no intervention, which saves 200 LYG, while it decreases costs to the order of COP$5 933 million per 100.000 pregnant women.(AU)

[Cost effectiveness of calcium supplement in reducing preeclampsia-related maternal mortality in Colombia]. / Costo efectividad del suplemento de calcio para reducir la mortalidad materna asociada a preeclampsia en Colombia.

Objectives To estimate the cost-effectiveness of administering calcium (1200 mg per day) starting in week 14 of pregnancy to all pregnant women compared to not supplying it to reduce the incidence of preeclampsia. Methods A decision tree was built in TreeAge® with outcome measured in life years gained (LYG) associated with the reduction in maternal deaths. Costs were included from the perspective of the health system in Colombia and expressed in Colombian pesos in 2014 (COP). The discount rate was 0 %. We performed sensitivity univariate and probabilistic analyses for costs and effectiveness. Results Compared to no intervention, calcium supplement is a dominant alternative. If the incidence of preeclampsia is lower than 51.7 per 1 000 pregnant women or the cost per tablet of calcium of 600 mg is greater than COP $507.85, calcium supplement is no longer a cost-effective alternative in Colombia for a threshold of COP $ 45 026 379 (3 times the Colombian per capita GDP of 2013 per LYG). Conclusions Supplying calcium to all pregnant women from week 14 of gestation is a dominant alternative compared to no intervention, which saves 200 LYG, while it decreases costs to the order of COP$5 933 million per 100.000 pregnant women.

[THE CASE OF ENTERAL NUTRITIONAL SUPPORT TUBE IN COLOMBIA: INSTITUTIONAL COORDINATION PROBLEMS]. / EL CASO DEL SOPORTE NUTRICIONAL ENTERAL POR SONDA EN COLOMBIA: PROBLEMAS DE COORDINACIÓN INSTITUCIONAL.

INTRODUCTION: this paper examines the case of prescription enteral nutritional support tube in Colombia, analyzed from the perspective of the Social Security System in Health, and explained as the result of a problem of institutional coordination. The role and incentives of different actors are identified and shown how the interaction of these discourages the use of enteral nutrition in cases where it is necessary, with corresponding clinical effect for the patient and increased cost for the system. METHODS: analysis of the effects it may have in clinical practice the problem of institutional coordination of regulators in the country, analyze their origin and the incentives and interests of the various stakeholders, prior synthesis of the relevant literature review. The search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, Medline, and Embase ScienceDirect. CONCLUSIONS: the current situation of enteral nutritional support in Colombia is the result of a suboptimal equilibrium, resulting from a problem of institutional coordination that can only be solved when the agents to look beyond their local incentives, and nutritional support is a key component of hospital care and constitutes a means to the end: the health of the population served.

Introducción: el presente artículo estudia el caso de la prescripción del soporte nutricional enteral por sonda en Colombia, analizada desde el marco del Sistema de Seguridad Social en Salud, y lo explica como resultado de un problema de coordinación institucional. Para ello se identifican el papel y los incentivos de los distintos agentes y se muestra cómo la interacción de los mismos desincentiva el uso de la nutrición enteral, en casos en los que esta es necesaria, con su correspondiente efecto clínico para el paciente y el aumento de costes para el sistema. Métodos: análisis de los efectos que puede tener en la práctica clínica el problema de la coordinación institucional de los entes reguladores del país. Analiza su origen y los incentivos e intereses de los distintos agentes involucrados, previa síntesis de la revisión bibliográfica pertinente. Se realizó la búsqueda en las siguientes bases de datos: PubMed, Medline, ScienceDirect y Embase. Conclusiones: la situación actual del soporte nutricional enteral en Colombia es un equilibrio subóptimo, resultado de un problema de coordinación institucional que solo puede ser resuelto cuando los agentes miren más allá de sus incentivos locales, ya que el soporte nutricional es un componente fundamental de la atención hospitalaria y se constituye en un medio para lograr el objetivo de la salud de la población atendida.

[18FDG-PET/CT cost-effectiveness compared to CT at the end of treatment in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma patients]. / Costo-efectividad de 18FDG-PET/CT vs CT al final del tratamiento en pacientes pediátricos con Linfoma Hodgkin.

OBJECTIVE: Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. METHODS: A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. RESULTS: Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). CONCLUSION: If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.

ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer treatment after progression on trastuzumab: a cost-effectiveness analysis for a developing country.

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer (BC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are significant causes of deaths amongst women worldwide, including developing countries. The cost of treatment in the latter is even more of an issue than in higher income countries. ErbB2 overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis and the goal for targeted therapy. This study was aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness in Colombia of ErbB2+ MBC treatment after progression on trastuzumab. METHODS: A decision analytic model was constructed for evaluating such treatment in a hypothetical cohort of ErbB2+MBC patients who progressed after a first scheme involving trastuzumab. The alternatives compared were lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C), and trastuzumab+a chemotherapy agent (capecitabine, vinorelbine or a taxane). Markov models were used for calculating progression-free time and the associated costs. Effectiveness estimators for such therapy were identified from primary studies; all direct medical costs based on national fees-guidelines were included. Sensitivity was analyzed and acceptability curves estimated. A 3 % discount rate and third-payer perspective were used within a 5-year horizon. RESULTS: L+C dominated its comparators. Its cost-effectiveness ratio was COP $49,725,045 per progression-free year. The factors most influencing the results were the alternatives' hazard ratios and the cost of trastuzumab. CONCLUSION: Lapatinib was cost-effective compared to its alternatives for treating MBC after progression on trastuzumab using a Colombian decision analytic model.

Costo-efectividad de 18FDG-PET/CT vs CT al final del tratamiento en pacientes pediátricos con Linfoma Hodgkin / 18FDG-PET/CT cost-effectiveness compared to CT at the end of treatment in pediatric Hodgkin's lymphoma patients

Objetivo Estimar la costo-efectividad de 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes menores de 18 años con Linfoma Hodgkin (LH). Métodos Se construyó un árbol de decisión donde se comparó el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la detección de lesión residual. El resultado se midió en Años de Vida Ganados (AVG). Se calculó la razón de costo-efectividad incremental. Se utilizó como umbral 3 veces el PIB per cápita por año AVG. Valores expresados en pesos colombianos de 2010 (1 US dólar = $ 1 897,89) Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad univariados, bivariados y probabilísticos. Resultados Suponiendo un diferencial en AVG entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos de 13 meses, el costo de un AVG adicional con 18FDG-PET/CT comparado con CT seguido de 18FDG-PET/CT como prueba confirmatoria de un caso positivo en la evaluación al final del tratamiento en pacientes pediátricos con LH fue $ 34 508 590. Conclusión Si el diferencial de esperanza de vida entre verdaderos positivos y falsos negativos es de al menos un 1,03 años, el uso de 18FDG-PET/CT en la evaluación al final del tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con LH, es una estrategia costo-efectiva para Colombia.

Objective Estimating the cost-effectiveness of 18FDG-PET/CT (positron emission tomography) compared to computer tomography (CT) followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case at the end of treatment in Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) patients under 18 years-old. Methods A decision tree was built for comparing 18FDG-PET/CT to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case in detecting residual lesions; outcome was measured in life years gained (LYG). The cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated; the threshold was 3 times the per capita GDP per LYG. Values were expressed in Colombian pesos for 2010 (1 US dollar=$ 1,897.89) and submitted to deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Results Assuming a difference of 13 months in true positives' life expectancy compared to that for false negatives, the cost of an additional LYG with 18FDG-PET/CT compared to CT followed by 18FDG-PET/CT as a confirmatory test for a positive case when evaluating the end of pediatric HL patients' treatment was $ 34,508,590 (COP). Conclusion If differential life-expectancy between true positives and false negatives is at least 1.03 years, then using 18FDG-PET/CT for evaluating the end of HL pediatric patients' therapy is a cost-effective strategy for Colombia.

ErbB2+ metastatic breast cancer treatment after progression on trastuzumab: a cost-effectiveness analysis for a developing country / Tratamientos para cáncer de seno metastásico ErbB2+ en progresión Post-Trastuzumab: Análisis de costo-efectividad para un país en vía de desarrollo

Objective Breast cancer (BC) and metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are significant causes of deaths amongst women worldwide, including developing countries. The cost of treatment in the latter is even more of an issue than in higher income countries. ErbB2 overexpression is a marker of poor prognosis and the goal for targeted therapy. This study was aimed at evaluating the cost-effectiveness in Colombia of ErbB2+ MBC treatment after progression on trastuzumab. Methods A decision analytic model was constructed for evaluating such treatment in a hypothetical cohort of ErbB2+MBC patients who progressed after a first scheme involving trastuzumab. The alternatives compared were lapatinib+capecitabine (L+C), and trastuzumab+a chemotherapy agent (capecitabine, vinorelbine or a taxane). Markov models were used for calculating progression-free time and the associated costs. Effectiveness estimators for such therapy were identified from primary studies; all direct medical costs based on national fees-guidelines were included. Sensitivity was analyzed and acceptability curves estimated. A 3 % discount rate and third-payer perspective were used within a 5-year horizon. Results L+C dominated its comparators. Its cost-effectiveness ratio was COP $49,725,045 per progression-free year. The factors most influencing the results were the alternatives' hazard ratios and the cost of trastuzumab. Conclusion Lapatinib was cost-effective compared to its alternatives for treating MBC after progression on trastuzumab using a Colombian decision analytic model.

Objetivo El cáncer de seno (CS) y cáncer de seno metastásico (CSM) son importantes causas de muerte entre las mujeres a nivel mundial y en países en vía de desarrollo. En estos últimos los costos de los tratamientos son aún más preocupantes que en países de alto ingreso. La sobreexpresión de ErbB2 es marcador de pobre pronóstico y objetivo de terapias dirigidas. Se evaluó la costo-efectividad de los tratamientos de CSM ErbB2+ en progresión post-trastuzumab en Colombia. Métodos Se desarrolló un modelo analístico de decisiones para evaluar los tratamientos en una cohorte hipotética de CSM ErbB2+ que progresaron después de un primer esquema con trastuzumab. Las alternativas comparadas fueron: lapatinib+capecitabina (L+C), y trastuzumab más un agente quimioterápico (capecitabina, vinorelbinao un taxano). Se usaron modelos de Markov para calcular el tiempo libre de progresión y los costos asociados. Estimaciones de efectividad fueron identificadas de estudios primarios. Se incluyeron todos los costos médicos directos basados en los manuales tarifarios nacionales. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad y curvas de aceptabilidad. Se descontaron costos y resultados a una tasa anual de 3 %, la perspectiva de análisis fue del tercer pagador y el horizonte de 5 años. Resultados L+C domina a sus comparadores con un razón de costo-efectividad de COP $49 725 045 por año libre de progresión. Los factores que más influencian los resultados son los hazard ratios de las alternativas y el costo de trastuzumab. Conclusión Lapatinib es costo-efectivo comparado con sus alternativas para el tratamiento del CSM después de la progresión con trastuzumab en el escenario colombiano.

Costo efectividad de diferentes estrategias diagnósticas para detección de toxoplasmosis congénita en el recién nacido / Cost effectiveness of various diagnostic strategies for detecting congenital toxoplasmosis in newborns

Objetivo: Estimar la costo-efectividad para Colombia del diagnóstico de toxoplasmosis congénita en el recién nacido de madre con historia de infección durante el embarazo. Métodos. Se construyó un árbol de decisión en TreeAge ® con desenlace casos correctamente identificados. Las alternativas del modelo fueron: i) Western Blot (WB); ii) IgM e IgA, con confirmación por WB; iii) IgG, IgM e IgA con confirmación por WB y seguimiento con IgG. La perspectiva es la del sistema de salud con cifras expresadas en pesos colombianos de 2010 sin descuento. Resultados: La estrategia de menor costo y efectividad fue la i). La estrategia ii) es más cara y más efectiva que la i), y la estrategia iii) es más cara y efectiva que las anteriores. El costo de detectar un caso adicional correctamente con la estrategia ii) en lugar de la i) es de $6.189.871. Este resultado es sensible al costo de la prueba de Western Blot y su sensibilidad, así como a la prevalencia de la toxoplasmosis congénita. El costo de detectar un caso adicional correctamente con la estrategia iii) en lugar de la ii) es de $65.529.979, resultado que es sensible a la prevalencia de la toxoplasmosis congénita, la sensibilidad de la prueba conjunta de IgM e IgA y la sensibilidad del Western Blot. Según el análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico, si la disponibilidad a pagar (DAP) por caso detectado adicional es inferior a $6,7 millones de pesos, es más probable que la estrategia costo-efectiva sea la i); quedando entre $6,7 millones de pesos y $74 millones de pesos la ii), y la iii) por encima de $74 millones de pesos. Conclusiones: La alternativa costo-efectiva para Colombia dependerá de la disponibilidad a pagar (DAP) por caso adicional detectado de toxoplasmosis congénita. La DAP debería tomar en cuenta la efectividad del tratamiento y los costos evitados por las secuelas de la infección.

Objectives: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness in Colombia of strategies for congenital toxoplasmosis detection in newborns of mothers with a history of infection. Methods: We built a decision tree in TreeAge ®, with correctly identified outcome cases and considering 3 diagnostic strategies: A) Western Blot (WB); B) IgM and IgA, with WB confirmation; and C) IgG, IgM and IgA, with WB confirmation and IgG monitoring. The perspective is that of the Colombian health system. Prices are expressed in Colombian pesos (COP, 2010) with no discount. Results: The least expensive and least efficient strategy was option A. Option B had a higher cost and higher effectiveness, and option C was the most expensive and effective strategy. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio (ICER) of strategy B versus A was COP 6,189,871. This ICER is sensitive to the cost and sensitivity of the WB and to the prevalence of congenital toxoplasmosis. The ICER for strategy C versus B was COP 65,529,979, which was sensitive to the prevalence of congenital toxoplasmosis, the sensitivity of the joint IgM and IgA test and the sensitivity of the WB. According to the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, if the willingness to pay (WTP) for each additional detected case of congenital toxoplasmosis is lower than COP 6.7 million, option A is more likely to be cost-effective. If the WTP is between COP 6.7 million and COP 74 million, option B is more likely to be cost-effective, and if the WTP is above COP 74 million, then option is more likely to be cost-effective. Conclusions: The cost-effective alternative for Colombia depends on the willingness to pay for additional cases of detected congenital toxoplasmosis. WTP should take into account treatment effectiveness and the costs of the infection sequelae.

The cost-effectiveness of open or thoracoscopic thymectomy compared to medical treatment in managing Myasthenia gravis without thymomas.

OBJECTIVE: Assessing the cost-effectiveness of open or thoracoscopic thymectomy compared to medical therapy in managing myasthenia gravis not associated with thymoma. METHODS: A Markov model was designed for evaluating three strategies' cost-effectiveness. Transition probabilities were taken from the pertinent literature; the costs were estimated from official tariff manuals. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated and probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis was used for clinical variables, costs and the model's assumptions. RESULTS: Thoracoscopic thymectomy was the most effective and least costly strategy and dominated the other two alternatives. The cost per life year gained was Col $ 1 129 531 without discount and Col $ 805 179 with discount. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the main variables affecting the results were the effects' discount rate, the cost of a myasthenic crisis and the probability of complete remission. Thoracoscopy thymectomy was the most cost-effective strategy for different thresholds of willingness to pay in probabilistic analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracoscopic thymectomy is a cost-effective strategy in the treatment of MG without thymoma.

Cost-effectiveness of iso- versus low-osmolality contrast media in outpatients with high risk of contrast medium-induced nephropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Contrast media can cause acute renal failure by direct toxic effects on the tubular cells and kidney ischemia. Diabetics and hospitalized patients have a greater risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy than the general population. OBJECTIVE: The cost effectiveness of iso and low-osmolality contrast media was assessed in high risk outpatients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis was based on a systematic literature review comparing the nephrotoxic effects of iso- to low-osmolality contrast media. Only direct costs were considered; these were obtained from the official tariff manual. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, efficiency curves and acceptability curves were calculated. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed for costs and effects, as well as probabilistic analyses. Zero and 3% discounts were applied to results. The cost-effectiveness threshold was equal to the per capita GDP per life-year gained. RESULTS: Alternatives with Iopamidol and Iodixanol are preferable to the others, because both reduce risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and are less costly. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the Iodixanol alternative compared to the Iopamidol alternative is US$ 14,660 per additional life year gained; this is more than twice the threshold. CONCLUSION: The low-osmolality contrast medium, Iopamidol, appears to be cost-effective when compared with Iohexol or other low-osmolality contrast media (Iopromide, Iobitridol, Iomeprol, Iopentol and Ioxilan) in contrast-induced nephropathy, high-risk outpatients. The choice of the iso-osmolality contrast medium, Iodixanol, depends on its cost per vial and on the willingness to pay.

Cost-effectiveness of iso- versus low-osmolality contrast media in outpatients with high risk of contrast medium-induced nephropathy / Costo-efectividad de medios de contraste isoosmolales e hiposmolales en pacientes con alto riesgo de nefropatía inducida por medio de contraste

Introduction. Contrast media can cause acute renal failure by direct toxic effects on the tubular cells and kidney ischemia. Diabetics and hospitalized patients have a greater risk of developing contrast-induced nephropathy than the general population. Objective. The cost effectiveness of iso and low-osmolality contrast media was assessed in high risk outpatients. Materials and methods. The analysis was based on a systematic literature review comparing the nephrotoxic effects of iso- to low-osmolality contrast media. Only direct costs were considered; these were obtained from the official tariff manual. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios, efficiency curves and acceptability curves were calculated. Univariate sensitivity analyses were performed for costs and effects, as well as probabilistic analyses. Zero and 3% discounts were applied to results. The cost-effectiveness threshold was equal to the per capita GDP per life-year gained. Results. Alternatives with Iopamidol and Iodixanol are preferable to the others, because both reduce risk of contrast-induced nephropathy and are less costly. The incremental cost-effectiveness of the Iodixanol alternative compared to the Iopamidol alternative is US$ 14,660 per additional life year gained; this is more than twice the threshold. Conclusion. The low-osmolality contrast medium, Iopamidol, appears to be cost-effective when compared with Iohexol or other low-osmolality contrast media (Iopromide, Iobitridol, Iomeprol, Iopentol and Ioxilan) in contrast-induced nephropathy, high-risk outpatients. The choice of the iso-osmolality contrast medium, Iodixanol, depends on its cost per vial and on the willingness to pay.

Introducción. Los medios de contraste pueden provocar falla renal aguda por toxicidad directa sobre las células tubulares e isquemia medular renal. Los pacientes diabéticos y los hospitalizados presentan mayor riesgo de desarrollar nefropatía inducida por medios de contraste que la población general. Objetivo. Establecer el costo-efectividad de los medios de contraste isosmolales e hiposmolales en pacientes con alto riesgo. Materiales and métodos. El análisis se basó en una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica, comparando los efectos nefrotóxicos de los medios isosmolales e hipoosmolales. Se consideraron sólo los costos directos, obtenidos del manual tarifario. Se calcularon las tasas del incremento del costo-efectividad, las curvas de eficiencia y de aceptabilidad. Se hicieron análisis univariados de sensibilidad para costos y efectos, así como probabilísticos. Se aplicaron tasas de descuento de 0 y 3 % a los resultados. Se usó como umbral de costo-efectividad por año de vida ganado, el producto interno bruto per cápita. Resultados. Las alternativas con Iopamidol y Iodixanol dominan a las demás porque reducen el riesgo de nefropatía inducida por contraste a un menor costo. La razón del incremento del costo-efectividad del iodixanol comparado con el iopamidol es de US$ 14.660 por año de vida ganado que más que duplica el umbral. Conclusión. El medio de baja osmolalidad, iopamidol, parece ser costo-efectivo comparado con iohexol u otros medios hiposmolares (iopromide, iobitridol, iomeprol, iopentol y ioxilan), en pacientes con alto riesgo de nefropatía inducida por contraste. La elección del medio hiposmolar, depende de la disponibilidad a pagar o del costo por ampolleta.

Salud, Estado y mercado: el sistema colombiano actual visto desde la economía: [editoriales] / Healthcare, the state and free market: the current Colombian system from an economic viewpoint: [editorial]

Muchas de las discusiones sobre el actual sistema colombiano de salud y sus problemas parten de una mirada simplista de la economía y de su aplicación en este campo. Por un lado, se arguye que el mercado funciona mejor que el Estado, y que debe evitarse la intervención estatal; por otro lado, se argumenta que la salud es un bien público o un derecho, y, por tanto, los requerimientos de cada paciente deben ser provistos por el Estado, sin consideraciones de otro tipo. Si bien estas son las posiciones de los extremos del espectro, es necesario entender los puntos fuertes y débiles de cada una de ellas si se quiere entender las particularidades, las fortalezas y los problemas de nuestro sistema...

Costo-efectividad del uso de resonancia magnética y radiografía convencional en pacientes con pie diabético / The cost-effectiveness of using magnetic resonance plus conventional radiography in diabetic-foot patients

Objetivo Analizar, desde la perspectiva del pagador, la costo efectividad de la adición de resonancia magnética a la radiografía convencional en pacientes con pie diabético y signos de infección, en Colombia. Métodos Mediante un modelo de Markov, se identificó la relación de costo-efectividad de la adición de resonancia magnética a la radiografía convencional en pacientes con pie diabético y signos de infección en Colombia. La perspectiva es la del pagador. Los costos se valoraron en pesos colombianos de 2008, la efectividad se mide en años de vida ajustados por discapacidad, AVAD y el umbral de costo efectividad fue el PIB per cápita colombiano de 2008, $ 10 761 691. Resultados Usar resonancia magnética además de radiografía convencional en estos pacientes tiene un indicador de costo efectividad incremental por AVAD de $ 1 532 778 y de $ 1 741 311 sin y con descuento respectivamente. Los resultados son robustos a pruebas de sensibilidad. Conclusiones La resonancia magnética unida a la radiografía convencional en la evaluación del pie diabético con signos de infección es costo-efectiva para Colombia.

Objective Performing a cost-effectiveness analysis of adding magnetic resonance to conventional radiography in patients suffering from diabetic foot and signs of infection from the payer's point of view. Material and methods The cost effectiveness (from the payer's point of view) of conventional radiography plus magnetic resonance was calculated for patients having diabetic foot and signs of infection by means of a Markov model. Costs were measured in 2008 Colombian pesos and effectiveness in terms of disability adjusted life years (DALY). The cost-effectiveness threshold was the Colombian 2008 per capita GDP, $ 10,761,691. Results Using magnetic resonance in addition to conventional radiography in this population had a $ 1,532,778 and $ 1,741,311 incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, without and with discount, respectively; the results were robust to sensitivity analysis. Conclusions Using magnetic resonance in addition to conventional radiography in patients suffering from diabetic foot and signs of infection was cost-effective for Colombia.

[The cost-effectiveness of using magnetic resonance plus conventional radiography in diabetic-foot patients]. / Costo-efectividad del uso de resonancia magnética y radiografía convencional en pacientes con pie diabético.

OBJECTIVE: Performing a cost-effectiveness analysis of adding magnetic resonance to conventional radiography in patients suffering from diabetic foot and signs of infection from the payer's point of view. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The cost effectiveness (from the payer's point of view) of conventional radiography plus magnetic resonance was calculated for patients having diabetic foot and signs of infection by means of a Markov model. Costs were measured in 2008 Colombian pesos and effectiveness in terms of disability adjusted life years (DALY). The cost-effectiveness threshold was the Colombian 2008 per capita GDP, $ 10,761,691. RESULTS: Using magnetic resonance in addition to conventional radiography in this population had a $ 1,532,778 and $ 1,741,311 incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, without and with discount, respectively; the results were robust to sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Using magnetic resonance in addition to conventional radiography in patients suffering from diabetic foot and signs of infection was cost-effective for Colombia.

The cost-effectiveness of open or thoracoscopic thymectomy compared to medical treatment in managing Myasthenia gravis without thymomas / Costo efectividad de timectomía abierta y toracoscópica frente al tratamiento médico, en el manejo de Miastenia gravis sin timoma

Objective Assessing the cost-effectiveness of open or thoracoscopic thymectomy compared to medical therapy in managing myasthenia gravis not associated with thymoma. Methods A Markov model was designed for evaluating three strategies' cost-effectiveness. Transition probabilities were taken from the pertinent literature; the costs were estimated from official tariff manuals. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated and probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analysis was used for clinical variables, costs and the model's assumptions. Results Thoracoscopic thymectomy was the most effective and least costly strategy and dominated the other two alternatives. The cost per life year gained was Col § 1 129 531 without discount and Col § 805 179 with discount. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the main variables affecting the results were the effects' discount rate, the cost of a myasthenic crisis and the probability of complete remission. Thoracoscopy thymectomy was the most cost-effective strategy for different thresholds of willingness to pay in probabilistic analysis. Conclusions Thoracoscopic thymectomy is a cost-effective strategy in the treatment of MG without thymoma.

Objetivo Evaluar la costo efectividad de las timectomía abierta y toracoscópica frente a la terapia mé,dica en el manejo de miastenia gravis sin timoma. Mé,todo Se construyó un modelo de Markov para evaluar la costo efectividad de las 3 estrategias. Las probabilidades de transición se obtuvieron de la literatura. Los costos se estimaron a partir de las tarifas oficiales. Se calculó la costo-efectividad incremental. Se realizaron análisis de sensibilidad probabilísticos y determinísticos para las variables clínicas, los costos supuestos del modelo. Resultados La timectomía toracoscópica es la estrategia más efectiva y menos costosa, y domina a las otras dos alternativas. El costo por año de vida ganado fue de § 1 129 531 y § 805 179 pesos colombianos, con y sin descuento. El análisis de sensibilidad univariado mostró que las principales variables que afectan los resultados son la tasa de descuento, el costo de una crisis miasté,nica y la probabilidad de remisión completa. En el análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico, la timectomía toracoscópica es la estrategia costo-efectiva para los diferentes umbrales de disponibilidad a pagar. Conclusiones La timectomía toracoscópica es una estrategia costo-efectiva en el tratamiento de miastenia gravis sin timoma.