RESUMO
The historical approach to assessing health risks of environmental chemicals has been to evaluate them one at a time. In fact, we are exposed every day to a wide variety of chemicals and are increasingly aware of potential health implications. Although considerable progress has been made in the science underlying risk assessments for real-world exposures, implementation has lagged because many practitioners are unaware of methods and tools available to support these analyses. To address this issue, the US Environmental Protection Agency developed a toolbox of cumulative risk resources for contaminated sites, as part of a resource document that was published in 2007. This paper highlights information for nearly 80 resources from the toolbox and provides selected updates, with practical notes for cumulative risk applications. Resources are organized according to the main elements of the assessment process: (1) planning, scoping, and problem formulation; (2) environmental fate and transport; (3) exposure analysis extending to human factors; (4) toxicity analysis; and (5) risk and uncertainty characterization, including presentation of results. In addition to providing online access, plans for the toolbox include addressing nonchemical stressors and applications beyond contaminated sites and further strengthening resource accessibility to support evolving analyses for cumulative risk and sustainable communities.
RESUMO
One of the initial steps in remediating contaminated environments is to assess the human and ecological health risk associated with exposure to contaminants in a specific medium. Presented here are the results of a five-year study investigating the toxicity of simple and complex mixtures. A series of model compounds and simple mixtures including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), pentachlorophenol (PCP), and halogenated aliphatic hydrocarbons (HAHs) were analyzed. Mixture toxicity was studied using microbial genotoxicity assays and cytotoxicity assays with renal and neural cells. The majority of binary mixtures described here induced additive responses. A limited number of samples were identified where binary mixtures induced inhibitory effects. For example, benzo(a)pyrene (BAP) alone induced 30% renal cell death, whereas an equimolar dose of chrysene and BAP only produced 1.6% cellular death. In none of the mixtures tested did the mixture toxicity results deviate from the predicted results by an order of magnitude. The results from testing binary mixtures in this study indicate that the results did not deviate significantly from additivity. Complex mixture results were more difficult to interpret. The toxicity of complex mixtures could not be accurately predicted based on chemical analysis. This could be due to chemical interactions or due to the presence of unidentified chemicals, such as alkyl PAHs or high molecular weight PAHs that are not included in the standard risk assessment procedure. Even though the results from these in vitro studies indicate that additive assumptions will generally be appropriate for binary mixtures similar to the ones tested here, the risk associated with complex mixtures remains a challenge to predict. Before the results of toxicity testing can be used to adjust risk assessment calculations, it is important to fully appreciate the chemical composition and to understand the mechanism of observed chemical interactions in animals chronically exposed to low doses of chemical mixtures. This research was supported by ATSDR Grant no. ATU684505 and NIEHS SBRP Grant no. P42 ES04917.