Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
1.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv ; 96(6): E602-E607, 2020 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32588955

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Following the surge of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, government regulations, and recommendations from professional societies have conditioned the resumption of elective surgical and cardiovascular (CV) procedures on having strategies to prioritize cases because of concerns regarding the availability of sufficient resources and the risk of COVID-19 transmission. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the use of a scoring system for standardized triage of elective CV procedures. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of patients scheduled for elective CV procedures that were prioritized ad hoc to be either performed or deferred when New Jersey state orders limited the performance of elective procedures due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Patients in both groups were scored using our proposed CV medically necessary, time-sensitive (MeNTS) procedure scorecard, designed to stratify procedures based on a composite measure of hospital resource utilization, risk of COVID-19 exposure, and time sensitivity. RESULTS: A total of 109 scheduled elective procedures were either deferred (n = 58) or performed (n = 51). The median and mean cumulative CV MeNTS scores for the group of performed cases were significantly lower than for the deferred group (26 (interquartile range (IQR) 22-31) vs. 33 (IQR 28-39), p < .001, and 26.4 (SE 0.34) vs. 32.9 (SE 0.35), p < .001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The CV MeNTS procedure score was able to stratify elective cases that were either performed or deferred using an ad hoc strategy. Our findings suggest that the CV MeNTS procedure scorecard may be useful for the fair triage of elective CV cases during the time when available capacity may be limited due to the COVID-19 pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Cateterismo Cardíaco/tendências , Doenças Cardiovasculares/terapia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Necessidades e Demandas de Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Pandemias , Triagem/tendências , Cateterismo Cardíaco/efeitos adversos , Doenças Cardiovasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , New Jersey , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Tempo para o Tratamento/tendências
2.
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes ; 1(1): 26-36, 2017 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30225399

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To analyze contemporary trends in the incidence, management, and clinical outcomes of heart failure (HF) complications in patients hospitalized for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in the United States. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using the 2003 through 2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases, all patients with STEMI who were 18 years and older with acute HF were identified. Overall trends in the incidence of HF, coronary intervention, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Of 1,990,002 hospitalizations with a primary diagnosis of STEMI, 471,525 (23.7%) had HF complication (decreasing from 25.4% [95% CI, 25.3%-25.6%] in 2003 to 20.7% [95% CI, 20.5%-20.8%]) in 2010 (P trend<.001). The incidence of cardiogenic shock in patients with HF-complicated STEMI increased from 13.9% (95% CI, 13.6%-14.1%) to 22.6% (95% CI, 22.2%-23.0%) during this period (P trend<.001). From 2003 through 2010, the use of diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention increased in patients with HF-complicated STEMI from 44.3% to 62.1% and from 25.0% to 48.1%, respectively. In-hospital mortality decreased significantly in patients with HF-complicated STEMI (from 18.1% to 15.1%) and in subgroups of those with (from 42.4% to 29.9%) and without (from 14.1% to 10.8%) cardiogenic shock (all P trend<.001). The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) (per year) of death was 0.992 (95% CI, 0.988-0.997; P<.001), which changed significantly after additional adjustment for coronary intervention (AOR [per year], 1.012; 95% CI, 1.008-1.017; P<.001). CONCLUSION: The incidence and in-hospital mortality of HF-complicated STEMI has decreased significantly during recent times along with increased use of percutaneous coronary intervention and diagnostic coronary angiography.

3.
Dis Markers ; 2015: 807861, 2015.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26265794

RESUMO

Biomarkers such as natriuretic peptides (NPs) have evolving clinical utility beyond the scope of heart failure. The role of NPs in the management of valvular heart disease is a growing area of investigation. NPs have much potential in the assessment of asymptomatic patients with hemodynamically significant valvular lesions who have traditionally been excluded from consideration of surgical intervention. NPs also have a role in the risk stratification of these patients as well as in routine surveillance and monitoring. Together with echocardiographic data and functional status, NPs are being incorporated into the management of valvular heart disease. In this review we examine the evidence for the role of natriuretic peptides in assessment of VHD.


Assuntos
Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/sangue , Peptídeos Natriuréticos/sangue , Animais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/metabolismo , Doenças das Valvas Cardíacas/fisiopatologia , Humanos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA