Is Response Assessment of Breast Cancer Bone Metastases Better with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride Metabolic Flux Than with Measurement of 18F-Fluoride PET/CT SUV?

Our purpose was to establish whether noninvasive measurement of changes in 18F-fluoride metabolic flux to bone mineral (Ki) by PET/CT can provide incremental value in response assessment of bone metastases in breast cancer compared with SUVmax and SUVmeanMethods: Twelve breast cancer patients starting endocrine treatment for de novo or progressive bone metastases were included. Static 18F-fluoride PET/CT scans were acquired 60 min after injection, before and 8 wk after commencing treatment. Venous blood samples were taken at 55 and 85 min after injection to measure plasma 18F-fluoride activity concentrations, and Ki in individual bone metastases was calculated using a previously validated method. Percentage changes in Ki, SUVmax, and SUVmean were calculated from the same index lesions (≤5 lesions) from each patient. Clinical response up to 24 wk, assessed in consensus by 2 experienced oncologists masked to PET imaging findings, was used as a reference standard. Results: Of the 4 patients with clinically progressive disease (PD), mean Ki significantly increased (>25%) in all, SUVmax in 3, and SUVmean in 2. Of the 8 non-PD patients, Ki decreased or remained stable in 7, SUVmax in 5, and SUVmean in 6. A significant mean percentage increase from baseline for Ki, compared with SUVmax and SUVmean, occurred in the 4 patients with PD (89.7% vs. 41.8% and 43.5%, respectively; P < 0.001). Conclusion: After 8 wk of endocrine treatment for bone-predominant metastatic breast cancer, Ki more reliably differentiated PD from non-PD than did SUVmax and SUVmean, probably because measurement of SUV underestimates fluoride clearance by not considering changes in input function.

Impact of iterative reconstructions on objective and subjective emphysema assessment with computed tomography: a prospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the impact of iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms on pulmonary emphysema assessment as compared to filtered back projection (FBP). METHODS: One hundred ten unenhanced chest CT examinations were obtained on two different scanners. Image reconstructions from a single acquisition were done with different levels of IR and compared with FBP on the basis of the emphysema index (EI), lung volume and voxel densities. Objective emphysema assessment was performed with 3D software provided by each manufacturer. Subjective assessment of emphysema was performed as a blinded evaluation. Quantitative and subjective values were compared using repeated ANOVA analysis, Bland-Altman analysis and Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W). RESULTS: Lung volumes are stable on both units, throughout all IR levels (P ≥ 0.057). EI significantly decreases on both units with the use of any level of IR (P < 0.001). The highest levels of IR are responsible for a decrease of 33-36 % of EI. Significant differences in minimal lung density are found between the different algorithms (P < 0.003). Intra- and inter-reader concordance for emphysema characterisation is generally good (W ≥ 0.77 and W ≥ 0.86, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both commercially available IR algorithms used in this study significantly changed EI but did not alter visual assessment compared to standard FBP reconstruction at identical radiation exposure. KEY POINTS: • Objective quantification of pulmonary emphysema is sensitive to iterative reconstructions • Subjective evaluation of pulmonary emphysema is not influenced by iterative reconstructions • Consistency in reconstruction algorithms is of paramount importance for pulmonary emphysema monitoring.