Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 11(6): 257-266, 2022 Jun 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35333347

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Pediatric international travelers account for nearly half of measles importations in the United States. Over one third of pediatric international travelers depart the United States without the recommended measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccinations: 2 doses for travelers ≥12 months and 1 dose for travelers 6 to <12 months. METHODS: We developed a model to compare 2 strategies among a simulated cohort of international travelers (6 months to <6 years): (1) No pretravel health encounter (PHE): travelers depart with baseline MMR vaccination status; (2) PHE: MMR-eligible travelers are offered vaccination. All pediatric travelers experience a destination-specific risk of measles exposure (mean, 30 exposures/million travelers). If exposed to measles, travelers' age and MMR vaccination status determine the risk of infection (range, 3%-90%). We included costs of medical care, contact tracing, and lost wages from the societal perspective. We varied inputs in sensitivity analyses. Model outcomes included projected measles cases, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios ($/quality-adjusted life year [QALY], cost-effectiveness threshold ≤$100 000/QALY). RESULTS: Compared with no PHE, PHE would avert 57 measles cases at $9.2 million/QALY among infant travelers and 7 measles cases at $15.0 million/QALY among preschool-aged travelers. Clinical benefits of PHE would be greatest for infants but cost-effective only for travelers to destinations with higher risk for measles exposure (ie, ≥160 exposures/million travelers) or if more US-acquired cases resulted from an infected traveler, such as in communities with limited MMR coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Pretravel MMR vaccination provides the greatest clinical benefit for infant travelers and can be cost-effective before travel to destinations with high risk for measles exposure or from communities with low MMR vaccination coverage.


Assuntos
Sarampo , Caxumba , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão) , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Análise Custo-Benefício , Humanos , Lactente , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola , Caxumba/prevenção & controle , Rubéola (Sarampo Alemão)/prevenção & controle , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação
2.
Vaccine ; 39(48): 7082-7090, 2021 11 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34756769

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Rotavirus is a common cause of severe acute gastroenteritis among young children. Estimation of the economic burden would provide informed decision about investment on prevention strategies (e.g., vaccine and/or behavior change), which has been a potential policy discussion in Bangladesh for several years. METHODS: We estimated the societal costs of children <5 years for hospitalization from rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) and incidences of catastrophic health expenditure. A total of 360 children with stool specimens positive for rotavirus were included in this study from 6 tertiary hospitals (3 public and 3 private). We interviewed the caregiver of the patient and hospital staff to collect cost from patient and health facility perspectives. We estimated the economic cost considering 2015 as the reference year. RESULTS: The total societal per-patient costs to treat RVGE in the public hospital were 126 USD (95% CI: 116-136) and total household costs were 161 USD (95% CI: 145-177) in private facilities. Direct costs constituted 38.1% of total household costs. The out-of-pocket payments for RVGE hospitalization was 23% of monthly income and 76% of households faced catastrophic healthcare expenditures due to this expense. The estimated total annual household treatment cost for the country was 10 million USD. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial economic burden of RVGE in Bangladesh was observed in this study. Any prevention of RVGE through cost-effective vaccination or/and behavioural change would contribute to substantial economic benefits to Bangladesh.


Assuntos
Infecções por Rotavirus , Vacinas contra Rotavirus , Rotavirus , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Estresse Financeiro , Hospitalização , Hospitais , Humanos , Lactente , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/prevenção & controle
3.
Pediatrics ; 147(4)2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33712549

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Between December 31, 2018, and April 26, 2019, 72 confirmed cases of measles were identified in Clark County. Our objective was to estimate the economic burden of the measles outbreak from a societal perspective, including public health response costs as well as direct medical costs and productivity losses of affected individuals. METHODS: To estimate costs related to this outbreak from the societal perspective, 3 types of costs were collected or estimated: public health response (labor, material, and contractor costs used to contain the outbreak), direct medical (third party or patient out-of-pocket treatment costs of infected individuals), and productivity losses (costs of lost productivity due to illness, home isolation, quarantine, or informal caregiving). RESULTS: The overall societal cost of the 2019 Clark County measles outbreak was ∼$3.4 million ($47 479 per case or $814 per contact). The majority of the costs (∼$2.3 million) were incurred by the public health response to the outbreak, followed by productivity losses (∼$1.0 million) and direct medical costs (∼$76 000). CONCLUSIONS: Recent increases in incident measles cases in the United States and across the globe underscore the need to more fully understand the societal cost of measles cases and outbreaks and economic consequences of undervaccination. Our estimates can provide valuable inputs for policy makers and public health stakeholders as they consider budget determinations and the substantial value associated with increasing vaccine coverage and outbreak preparedness as well as the protection of society against vaccine-preventable diseases, such as measles, which are readily preventable with high vaccination coverage.


Assuntos
Surtos de Doenças/economia , Sarampo/economia , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Humanos , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Sarampo , Saúde Pública/economia , Quarentena/economia , Washington/epidemiologia
4.
Clin Infect Dis ; 71(6): 1568-1576, 2020 09 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31967305

RESUMO

Despite the elimination of measles in the United States (US) in the year 2000, cases continue to occur, with measles outbreaks having occurred in various jurisdictions in the US in 2018 and 2019. Understanding the cost associated with measles outbreaks can inform cost-of-illness and cost-effectiveness studies of measles and measles prevention. We performed a literature review and identified 10 published studies from 2001 through 2018 that presented cost estimates from 11 measles outbreaks. The median total cost per measles outbreak was $152 308 (range, $9862-$1 063 936); the median cost per case was $32 805 (range, $7396-$76 154) and the median cost per contact was $223 (range, $81-$746). There were limited data on direct and indirect costs associated with measles. These findings highlight how costly measles outbreaks can be, the value of this information for public health department budgeting, and the importance of more broadly documenting the cost of measles outbreaks.


Assuntos
Sarampo , Análise Custo-Benefício , Surtos de Doenças , Humanos , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Vacina contra Sarampo , Saúde Pública , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Vacinação
5.
Clin Infect Dis ; 69(2): 306-315, 2019 07 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30312374

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Measles importations and the subsequent spread from US travelers returning from abroad are responsible for most measles cases in the United States. Increasing measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination among departing US travelers could reduce the clinical impact and costs of measles in the United States. METHODS: We designed a decision tree to evaluate MMR vaccination at a pretravel health encounter (PHE), compared with no encounter. We derived input parameters from Global TravEpiNet data and literature. We quantified Riskexposure to measles while traveling and the average number of US-acquired cases and contacts due to a measles importation. In sensitivity analyses, we examined the impact of destination-specific Riskexposure, including hot spots with active measles outbreaks; the percentage of previously-unvaccinated travelers; and the percentage of travelers returning to US communities with heterogeneous MMR coverage. RESULTS: The no-encounter strategy projected 22 imported and 66 US-acquired measles cases, costing $14.8M per 10M travelers. The PHE strategy projected 15 imported and 35 US-acquired cases at $190.3M per 10M travelers. PHE was not cost effective for all international travelers (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio [ICER] $4.6M/measles case averted), but offered better value (ICER <$100 000/measles case averted) or was even cost saving for travelers to hot spots, especially if travelers were previously unvaccinated or returning to US communities with heterogeneous MMR coverage. CONCLUSIONS: PHEs that improve MMR vaccination among US international travelers could reduce measles cases, but are costly. The best value is for travelers with a high likelihood of measles exposure, especially if the travelers are previously unvaccinated or will return to US communities with heterogeneous MMR coverage.


Assuntos
Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/economia , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/economia , Sarampo/economia , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Doença Relacionada a Viagens , Adulto , Doenças Transmissíveis Importadas/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Vacina contra Sarampo-Caxumba-Rubéola/administração & dosagem , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
6.
Vaccine ; 36(51): 7805-7810, 2018 12 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28941622

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Rotavirus vaccines have significantly decreased the burden of diarrheal diseases in countries that have introduced them into their immunization programs. In some studies, there has been a small association between rotavirus vaccines and intussusception in post-marketing surveillance, highlighting the importance of tracking incidence before and after vaccine introduction. The objective of this study was to describe the epidemiology of intussusception among Bangladeshi children pre-vaccine introduction. METHODS: We conducted active, hospital-based surveillance for intussusception at 7 tertiary care hospitals with pediatric surgical facilities during July 2012 to September 2016. Hospitalized children under 2years of age were identified according to Brighton Collaboration level 1 criteria for intussusception. The frequency and proportion of intussusception among overall surgical admissions, as well as the demographic and clinical information of the cases is described. RESULTS: Overall 153 cases of intussusception among children <2years-old were identified at participating sites over the enrolment period, confirmed by Level 1 Brighton criteria. These cases represented 2% of all surgical admissions under 2years of age. One hundred twelve cases (73%) were male; the median age was 7months; and the median duration of hospitalization was 7days. One hundred forty-six (95%) children with intussusception required surgery, and 11 (7%) died. CONCLUSIONS: Confirmed cases of intussusception represented nearly 2% of pediatric surgical admissions at tertiary referral centers in Bangladesh during the study period and 7% of children with intussusception died. Given the high burden of rotavirus disease in Bangladesh, vaccine introduction is warranted, however, further studies after introduction of rotavirus vaccine are necessary to determine any association between vaccine and intussusception in this setting.


Assuntos
Monitoramento Epidemiológico , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Intussuscepção/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/efeitos adversos , Bangladesh/epidemiologia , Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Vacinas contra Rotavirus/administração & dosagem , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Vacinação/efeitos adversos
7.
Am J Epidemiol ; 185(7): 562-569, 2017 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28338902

RESUMO

We assessed the status of measles elimination in the United States using outbreak notification data. Measles transmissibility was assessed by estimation of the reproduction number, R, the average number of secondary cases per infection, using 4 methods; elimination requires maintaining R at <1. Method 1 estimates R as 1 minus the proportion of cases that are imported. Methods 2 and 3 estimate R by fitting a model of the spread of infection to data on the sizes and generations of chains of transmission, respectively. Method 4 assesses transmissibility before public health interventions, by estimating R for the case with the earliest symptom onset in each cluster (Rindex). During 2001-2014, R and Rindex estimates obtained using methods 1-4 were 0.72 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.68, 0.76), 0.66 (95% CI: 0.62, 0.70), 0.45 (95% CI: 0.40, 0.49), and 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57, 0.69), respectively. Year-to-year variability in the values of R and Rindex and an increase in transmissibility in recent years were noted with all methods. Elimination of endemic measles transmission is maintained in the United States. A suggested increase in measles transmissibility since elimination warrants continued monitoring and emphasizes the importance of high measles vaccination coverage throughout the population.


Assuntos
Erradicação de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Sarampo/prevenção & controle , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Surtos de Doenças/prevenção & controle , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Programas de Imunização , Lactente , Sarampo/epidemiologia , Sarampo/transmissão , Vacina contra Sarampo/uso terapêutico , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
8.
J Travel Med ; 23(5)2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27296584

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: During 8-20 April 2012, an outbreak of gastrointestinal illness occurred among guests and employees of a resort hotel in St. Thomas, US Virgin Islands. We describe outbreak characteristics, and estimate indirect (non-medical) costs to travellers. METHODS: Employees who met the case definition were interviewed and provided stool samples. Samples were tested for norovirus by real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction. Guests were asked to complete a survey aimed to identify and characterize cases, and to estimate quality adjusted vacation days (QAVD) lost. RESULTS: Overall, 66 persons (20 employees and 46 guests) met the probable case definition. The first reported illness onset occurred in a hotel employee on 8 April, while the first reported onset in a guest occurred on 13 April. An employee suffered a public diarrhoea incident on 13 April in the central kitchen, followed by illness onset in the next day among employees that assisted with the clean-up. On 15 April, after 10 guests reported ill, the hotel implemented an outbreak response protocol instructing ill employees to take a 3-day leave, and obtain medical clearance prior to resuming work. Ill guests were advised to self-isolate, and rapid cleaning of public areas and guest rooms where suspected contamination occurred was implemented. We estimated that 65 QAVDs were lost by 43 guests (1.5 days/guest). Using an approximate cost of $450 per vacation day, we estimated indirect illness cost at $675 per guest case. Seven (64%) of 11 cases' stool specimens were positive for norovirus genotype GII.4 Den Haag. CONCLUSIONS: A norovirus outbreak in a resort hotel resulted in substantial indirect costs and loss of vacation days to ill travellers. We recommend outbreak control measures including exclusion of ill employees, until ≥48-72 h after resolution of symptoms, self-isolation of ill guests and appropriate cleaning in hotel-associated norovirus outbreaks.


Assuntos
Infecções por Caliciviridae/epidemiologia , Diarreia/epidemiologia , Surtos de Doenças/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Viagem , Infecções por Caliciviridae/diagnóstico , Diarreia/diagnóstico , Feminino , Gastroenterite/diagnóstico , Humanos , Norovirus/isolamento & purificação , Ilhas Virgens Americanas
9.
J Infect Dis ; 207(7): 1058-65, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23300161

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteritis remains an important cause of morbidity in the United States. The burden of norovirus gastroenteritis in ambulatory US patients is not well understood. METHODS: Cause-specified and cause-unspecified gastroenteritis emergency department (ED) and outpatient visits during July 2001-June 2009 were extracted from MarketScan insurance claim databases. By using cause-specified encounters, time-series regression models were fitted to predict the number of unspecified gastroenteritis visits due to specific pathogens other than norovirus. Model residuals were used to estimate norovirus visits. MarketScan rates were extrapolated to the US population to estimate national ambulatory visits. RESULTS: During 2001-2009, the estimated annual mean rates of norovirus-associated ED and outpatient visits were 14 and 57 cases per 10 000 persons, respectively, across all ages. Rates for ages 0-4, 5-17, 18-64, and ≥65 years were 38, 10, 12, and 15 ED visits per 10 000 persons, respectively, and 233, 85, 35, and 54 outpatient visits per 10 000 persons, respectively. Norovirus was estimated to cause 13% of all gastroenteritis-associated ambulatory visits, with ~50% of such visits occurring during November-February. Nationally, norovirus contributed to approximately 400 000 ED visits and 1.7 million office visits annually, resulting in $284 million in healthcare charges. CONCLUSIONS: Norovirus is a substantial cause of gastroenteritis in the ambulatory setting.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Infecções por Caliciviridae/epidemiologia , Gastroenterite/epidemiologia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Norovirus/patogenicidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Instituições de Assistência Ambulatorial/economia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Gastroenterite/virologia , Humanos , Incidência , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Regressão , Rotavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Rotavirus/epidemiologia , Infecções por Rotavirus/virologia , Estações do Ano , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA