Chiropractic and a new taxonomy of primary care activities.

OBJECTIVE: To specify the procedural and cognitive content of primary care and to discuss potential chiropractic primary care roles. DATA COLLECTION: Data were collected through use of two expert panels and a consensus process to create a list of primary care activities. The first panel was an interdisciplinary mix of physicians, mainly allopathic ones; most of the members of the second panel were chiropractors. Each panel rated primary care activities across a number of dimensions, such as importance for good health, frequency in a typical office-based practice, necessity for medical doctor involvement in the activity, competence of the majority of chiropractic physicians, and interest among chiropractors in performing the activity. RESULTS: There was no real difference between the panels in terms of taxonomy scope or importance of the activities for good health. Many of the activities are performed more frequently in a typical medical office than in a typical chiropractic office. With respect to a set of primary care activities that occur daily in medical offices, chiropractors are able to make diagnoses in 92% of the activities and to make therapeutic contributions in more than 50% of the activities. Medical doctor involvement was perceived as required more frequently by the chiropractic panel than by the interdisciplinary panel. Moreover, chiropractors' interests and self-assessments of competence showed some limits with regard to their assumption of total care for some frequently occurring primary care activities. CONCLUSIONS: The most important finding of this activity is the overriding sense of agreement between allopathic and chiropractic physicians in terms of the scope of primary care activities, suggesting that there is opportunity for chiropractors and medical doctors to work together on patient care and organizational strategy. However, the levels of self-assessed competence and interest on the part of chiropractors for many frequently occurring primary care activities reveal some important limits for assumption of total primary care.

Lessons learned from the National Medicare & You Education Program.

In fall 1998 CMS implemented the National Medicare Education Program (NMEP) to educate beneficiaries about their Medicare program benefits; health plan choices; supplemental health insurance; beneficiary rights, responsibilities, and protections; and health behaviors. CMS has been monitoring the implementation of the NMEP in six case study sites as well as monitoring each of the information channels for communicating with beneficiaries. This article describes select findings from the case studies, and highlights from assessment activities related to the Medicare & You handbook, the toll-free 1-800-MEDICARE Helpline, Internet, and Regional Education About Choices in Health (REACH).

How ready are health plans for Medicare?

CONTEXT: The Medicare program is encouraging its beneficiaries to enroll in capitated health plans. OBJECTIVE: To determine how prepared these plans are to handle chronically ill and frail elderly persons. DESIGN: Telephone survey of 28 health plans that together serve about one fourth of all enrollees of the Medicare Risk program. MEASURES: The degree of readiness (high, intermediate, or low) of health plans in seven domains that experts believe are important to the management of an elderly population. RESULTS: None of the 28 health plans had high readiness scores for all seven domains. The two domains for which the plans were most prepared were risk assessment and member self-care. The plans were least prepared for the domains of cooperative team care and geriatric consultations. CONCLUSIONS: Many plans do not offer the programs that experts believe are important for Medicare enrollees. They may hesitate to adopt strategies that lack data on effectiveness.

Rural applications of telemedicine.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the status of telemedicine in rural America, the characteristics of health care facilities using telemedicine technologies to serve rural patients, the volume and scope of services delivered, the costs associated with this care, and the funding sources. METHODS: A screening survey was mailed to all 2472 nonfederal U.S. hospitals located outside metropolitan areas. Nonrespondents were interviewed by telephone. Those who reported some form of telemedicine capability, and all the telemedicine affiliates they named, became the sample for a detailed follow-up survey (N = 558) in January 1996. RESULTS: Ninety-six per cent of all rural hospitals responded to the screener survey, and 89% of the 558 identified telemedicine facilities responded to the detailed follow-up survey (total respondents = 499). In this cross-sectional study, two thirds of the telemedicine respondents (340) were using only teleradiology. Of the 159 telemedicine programs pursuing other clinical applications, 67% had been using telemedicine for 2 years or less. Telemedicine facilities have tried many clinical specialty applications, the most common being radiology, cardiology, and orthopedics. At this early stage of technology diffusion, reported utilization of the telemedicine systems for both clinical and nonclinical applications was very low, and the unit costs of equipment acquisition and operating expenses were corresponding high. Programs most commonly used hospital financial resources and federal grants and contracts for support. Telemedicine networks planned to grow from an average of nine facilities to an average of 13 facilities during 1996. CONCLUSIONS: Investment has been rapid in telemedicine, and the installed base reported in this survey was large, sophisticated, and growing rapidly. Nonclinical uses of the technology (e.g., meetings, training sessions, continuing medical education) were more common than clinical consultations, although the volumes of both were quite low. Investment and expansion to new sites were occurring in the absence of a favorable payor reimbursement environment and in spite of low volume at most operating sites, demonstrating optimism about the future of telemedicine and the potential for nonclinical applications.

Hospital wage and price controls: lessons from the Economic Stabilization Program.

The Clinton Administration has implied that short-run failures to control health care costs may cause a reexamination of wage and price controls as elements of comprehensive health care reform. The most recent imposition of mandatory wage and price controls was the Economic Stabilization Program (ESP) of the early 1970s. We analyze trends in hospitals' economic behavior and utilization before, during, and after ESP. We also review the relevant literature to estimate ESP's impact, considering other factors that influence hospital behavior. Noting important changes in the hospital industry since the 1970s, we conclude that ESP had limited effect and that similar controls would have little effect today.

Lessons for states in inpatient ratesetting under the Boren Amendment.

Encouraged by a 1990 Supreme Court decision, Medicaid providers have challenged State inpatient ratesetting methodologies under the Boren Amendment. Procedurally, State assurances to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) that payment rates meet the Amendment's requirements must be supported by findings based on a reasonably principled analysis. Substantively, rates may fall within a zone of reasonableness, but courts have differed in interpreting and applying the Amendment's terms. Although some courts have found special studies and written findings unnecessary, States that undertake economic analyses to support their findings are more likely to withstand judicial scrutiny. Several applicable economic analyses are proposed.

Medicare use in the last ninety days of life.

The introduction of Medicare's prospective payment system (PPS) has led to changes in the way hospitals are being used. This article examines concomitant changes in the use of Medicare-covered services during the last 90 days of life, using data on more than 34,000 Medicare beneficiaries who died during the years 1982-1986. We focus on questions pertaining to changes in practice patterns that include location of death, hospital utilization, use of other covered services, and spending. We find that use of hospitals and other health services by Medicare beneficiaries during the last 90 days of life changed markedly over this period, which included the introduction of PPS in late 1983. The percentage of deaths occurring in hospitals decreased sharply from 1982 to 1986, especially in PPS states relative to waivered states; this effect seems primarily due to reductions in length of stay rather than reduced admission rates, which did not change significantly. Use of home care, durable medical equipment (DME), and physicians' office services also increased sharply during the last 90 days of life, but with no consistent evidence that the introduction of PPS was associated with these changes or with the level or mix of Medicare expenditures for these patients. Medicare spending in this period of life rose at the same rate as medical care price inflation, and about 75 percent of reimbursements continued to be hospital payments, despite the utilization changes.

Medicare's prospective payment system: a critical appraisal.

Implementation of the Medicare prospective payment system (PPS) for hospital payment has produced major changes in the hospital industry and in the way hospital services are used by physicians and their patients. The substantial published literature that examines these changes is reviewed in this article. This literature suggests that most of the intended effects of PPS on costs and intensity of care have been realized. But the literature fails to answer fundamental questions about the effectiveness and equity of administered pricing as a policy tool for cost containment. The literature offers some hope that the worst fears about the effects of PPS on quality of care and the health of the hospital industry have not materialized. But because of data lags, the studies done to date seem to tell us more about the effects of the early, more generous period of PPS than about the opportunity costs of reducing hospital cost inflation.

Effects of state prospective reimbursement programs on hospital mortality.

Prospective reimbursement (PR) programs were implemented in a number of states in the 1970s to reduce the rate of inflation in hospital costs. The associated savings have prompted concern about whether hospital administrators have been able to economize in ways that do not compromise patient care. This study examined the effects of PR on hospital mortality in 15 states. A quasi-experimental design was used to compare the 10-year trend in standardized mortality rates in hospitals in these states with those in a national sample of hospitals not receiving PR. Although the introduction of PR was associated with higher mortality on all patient groups studied, there was no indication that the level of cost saving in states under PR was correlated with patterns of mortality rates. We conclude that policymakers must be concerned that PR may be compromising the quality of patient care in hospitals, and that more definitive research is needed to improve understanding of the implied trade-off between cost containment and patient outcomes.

Medicare elective surgery outcomes and state prospective reimbursement programs.

This article examines the relationship between the introduction of State prospective reimbursement (PR) programs and mortality rates for elective surgery. We study 15 such programs using a sample of about 40 percent of U.S. hospitals. We examine mortality data for 1974 to 1983 for these hospitals, selecting a 20-percent sample of all Medicare admissions for eight elective procedures. Indirect standardization (age, sex, procedure) was used to define mortality outcomes, and regression procedures were used to estimate PR effects that controlled for hospital, community, and other regulatory influences. Introduction of PR is found to be occasionally and inconsistently associated with increases in relative mortality.

Impact of the New York Long-Term Home Health Care Program.

The Long-Term Home Health Care Program (LTHHCP), also known as the Nursing Homes Without Walls, is an innovative, comprehensive Medicaid program in New York State that provides nursing home level of care to patients at home. This paper evaluates the performance of the first nine LTHHCP sites over the first 2 years of operation. Across all sites there is clear evidence that the program has been extremely successful in reducing levels of nursing home utilization. In the five upstate sites, considerable cost savings have also been achieved while improving patient survival. In the four New York City sites, patient outcomes have also been favorable, but health care costs for clients have been higher than would have been the case had clients not enrolled in the LTHHCP. Across the entire state, results could have been better if enrollment had been targeted to subsets of the eligible patient groups for whom the LTHHCP is most cost effective.

Resource requirements for teaching continuity in primary care: contrasts between a graduate and an undergraduate program.

Two similar primary care training programs for family practice residents and for medical students are compared to find differences and similarities in costs and the use of certain nonmonetary resources. Both programs emphasize long-term continuity, and trainees in both programs average two half-days per week at ambulatory care practice sites. Comparisons of the resource requirements of teaching high-continuity primary care curriculum segments between graduate and undergraduate programs will help determine where scarce medical teaching resources can be most beneficially used. It is hypothesized that there would be lower faculty costs, higher auxiliary staff and space requirements, and larger patient panel requirements for the residency program than for the undergraduate program. Extent of these differences could not be predicted. In the residency program, faculty costs were one quarter of total expenses and in the undergraduate program they were half of the program expenses. The residency recouped 81 percent of expenses from practice revenues while the undergraduate program recouped only 59 percent. The residency program averaged 814 visits per trainee during one year; the undergraduate program had only 268 visits per student.