Examining the equity and diversity characteristics of academic general surgeons hired in Canada.

BACKGROUND: Job competition and underemployment among surgeons emphasize the importance of equitable hiring practices. The purpose of this study was to describe some of the demographic characteristics of academic general surgeons and to evaluate the gender and visible minority (VM) status of those recently hired. METHODS: Demographic information about academic general surgeons across Canada including gender, VM status, practice location and graduate degree status was collected. Location of residency was collected for recently hired general surgeons (hired between 2013 and 2020). Descriptive statistics were performed on the demographic characteristics at each institution. Pearson correlation coefficients and hypothesis testing were used to determine the correlation between various metrics and gender and VM status. RESULTS: A total of 393 general surgeons from 30 academic hospitals affiliated with 14 universities were included. The percentage of female general surgeons ranged from 0% to 47.4% and the percentage of VM general surgeons ranged from 0% to 66.7% at the hospitals. This heterogeneity did not correlate with city population (gender: r = 0.06, p = 0.77; VM: r = 0.04, p = 0.83). The percentage of VM general surgeons at each hospital did not correlate with the percentage of VM population in the city (r = 0.13, p = 0.49). Only 34 of 120 recently hired academic general surgeons (28.3%) did not have a graduate degree. The percentage of recently hired academic general surgeons who did not have a graduate degree was approximately 1.5 times higher among male hirees than female hirees. With respect to academic promotion, the percentage of female full professors ranged from 0% to 40.0% and did not correlate with the percentage of female general surgeons at each institution (r = 0.11, p = 0.70). The percentage of VM full professors ranged from 0% to 44.4% and was moderately correlated with the percentage of VM surgeons at each institution (r = 0.40, p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: The academic general surgery workforce appears to be somewhat diverse. However, there was substantial heterogeneity in diversity between hospitals, leaving room for improvement. We must be willing to examine our hiring processes and be transparent about them to build an equitable surgical workforce.

Assessment of laparoscopic skills: comparing the reliability of global rating and entrustability tools.

Background: Competence by design (CBD) residency programs increasingly depend on tools that provide reliable assessments, require minimal rater training, and measure progression through the CBD milestones. To assess intraoperative skills, global rating scales and entrustability ratings are commonly used but may require extensive training. The Competency Continuum (CC) is a CBD framework that may be used as an assessment tool to assess laparoscopic skills. The study aimed to compare the CC to two other assessment tools: the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills (GOALS) and the Zwisch scale. Methods: Four expert surgeons rated thirty laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos. Two raters used the GOALS scale while the remaining two raters used both the Zwisch scale and CC. Each rater received scale-specific training. Descriptive statistics, inter-rater reliabilities (IRR), and Pearson's correlations were calculated for each scale. Results: Significant positive correlations between GOALS and Zwisch (r = 0.75, p < 0.001), CC and GOALS (r = 0.79, p < 0.001), and CC and Zwisch (r = 0.90, p < 0.001) were found. The CC had an inter-rater reliability of 0.74 whereas the GOALS and Zwisch scales had inter-rater reliabilities of 0.44 and 0.43, respectively. Compared to GOALS and Zwisch scales, the CC had the highest inter-rater reliability and required minimal rater training to achieve reliable scores. Conclusion: The CC may be a reliable tool to assess intraoperative laparoscopic skills and provide trainees with formative feedback relevant to the CBD milestones. Further research should collect further validity evidence for the use of the CC as an independent assessment tool.

Contexte: Les programmes de résidence structurés autour de la compétence par conception (CPC) dépendent de plus en plus d'outils qui fournissent des évaluations fiables, nécessitent une formation minimale des évaluateurs et mesurent la progression dans les étapes de la CPC. Pour évaluer les compétences peropératoires, les échelles d'évaluation globale et de confiance sont couramment utilisées mais peuvent nécessiter une formation approfondie. Le Continuum des compétences (CC) est un cadre de la CPC qui peut être utilisé comme outil d'évaluation des compétences laparoscopiques. L'étude visait à comparer le CC à deux autres outils d'évaluation : l'évaluation globale opératoire des compétences laparoscopiques (GOALS) et l'échelle de Zwisch. Méthodes: Quatre chirurgiens experts ont évalué trente vidéos de cholécystectomie laparoscopique. Deux évaluateurs ont utilisé l'échelle GOALS tandis que les deux autres ont utilisé l'échelle Zwisch et le CC. Chacun d'eux avait reçu une formation spécifique à l'échelle utilisée. Des statistiques descriptives, la fiabilité inter-évaluateurs (FIÉ) et des corrélations de Pearson ont été calculées pour chaque échelle. Résultats: Des corrélations positives significatives ont été trouvées entre les échelles GOALS et Zwisch (r=0.75, p<0.001), CC et GOALS (r=0.79, p<0.001), et CC et Zwisch (r=0.90, p<0.001). Le CC avait une fiabilité inter-évaluateurs de 0,74 tandis que les échelles GOALS et Zwisch avaient des fiabilités inter-évaluateurs de 0,44 et 0,43, respectivement. Par rapport aux échelles GOALS et Zwisch, le CC avait la fiabilité inter-évaluateurs la plus élevée et ne nécessitait qu'une formation minimale des évaluateurs pour obtenir des scores fiables. Conclusion: Le CC constituerait un outil fiable pour évaluer les compétences laparoscopiques peropératoires et pour fournir aux stagiaires une rétroaction formatrice pertinente pour les étapes de la CPC. Des recherches supplémentaires devraient être entreprises pour recueillir plus de preuves de validité pour l'utilisation du CC comme outil d'évaluation indépendant.

Self-Assessment in General Surgery Applicants: An Insight Into Interview Performance.

INTRODUCTION: Selecting medical students for residency is a competitive process, with a narrow range of scores separating middle-ranked applicants. Self-assessment is a fundamental skill for any competent physician with a demonstrated correlation to diagnostic ability, examination scores, and technical skills, but has yet to be investigated in residency selection. The objective of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-assessment and interview performance as a potential adjunct to discriminate between applicants. METHODS: At the University of Ottawa in 2020, 55 applicants completed a 9-station interview circuit assessing different characteristics or skills important for a career in general surgery, followed by a self-assessment questionnaire evaluating their perceived performance at each station. Pearson's correlation was used to determine the relationship between self-assessment scores (SASs) and interviewer scores (ISs). RESULTS: There was a negative correlation between SASs and ISs for all interview stations. High performers underestimated their interview performance, and low performers overestimated their performance. Seven of the nine stations reached statistical significance (r = 0.60-0.73, P < 0.001). There was significant variability in the SAS of middle-ranked applicants, with a range three times greater than the range of ISs and demonstrating distinct self-assessment skills in candidates with very similar scores. CONCLUSIONS: Although we strive to select applicants who will succeed in residency to become competent physicians, self-assessment skills may be a useful adjunct during the interview process to assist in discriminating between applicants with similar scores.

The Inter-Rater Reliability of Technical Skills Assessment and Retention of Rater Training.

BACKGROUND: The inter-rater reliability (IRR) of laparoscopic skills assessment is usually determined in the context of motivated raters from a single subspecialty practice group with significant experience using similar tools. The purpose of this study was to determine the IRR among attending surgeons of different experience and practices, the extent of rater training that is necessary to achieve good IRR, and if rater training is retained over periods of nonuse. METHODS: In Part 1, 5 surgeons of different practice backgrounds assessed 3 laparoscopic cholecystectomy videos using the Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Skills instrument. In Part 2, 2 of the surgeons assessed a total of 33 videos over 5 scoring sessions distributed across 6 months. They participated in 2 different training sessions, and retention was tested in the other 3 sessions. IRR was calculated for Parts 1 and 2 with an intraclass correlation (ICC) in a 2-way random-effects model. RESULTS: The ICC for Part 1 was poor (ICC = 0.26). In Part 2, the ICC was highest after each training session (scoring #1 ICC = 0.76, scoring #3 ICC = 0.74). The ICC was not retained 1.5 months after the brief video-based training session (scoring #2 ICC = -0.17). The ICC was retained 2.5 months after the in-depth discussion training session (scoring #4 ICC = 0.70), but not 4.5 months later (scoring #5 ICC = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Good IRR is not implicit among surgeons with varying backgrounds and experience. Good IRR can be achieved with different types of rater training, but the impact of rater training is lost in periods of nonuse. This suggests the need for further study of the IRR of technical skills assessment when performed by the wide variety of surgeon raters as is commonly encountered in the environment of postgraduate resident assessment.

Branches From the "SEAD": Sustained and Feasible Expansion of the Surgical Exploration and Discovery Program.

PROBLEM: A predicted shortage of surgeons and attrition among surgical residents has highlighted the need to attract well-suited medical students to surgical specialties. Literature suggests that early exposure may increase interest by addressing misconceptions and allowing students more time to make an informed career decision. APPROACH: The Surgical Exploration and Discovery (SEAD) program was created in 2012 with the goal of providing medical students with comprehensive and multifaceted exposure to surgical specialties to develop their knowledge and skills, and in turn positively influence their interest in pursuing a surgical career. The purpose of this innovation report is to describe the challenges, successes, and evolution of the SEAD program. OUTCOMES: Since its inception, SEAD has expanded to include 5 North American institutions and has educated nearly 400 participants in 5 y. Through a replication strategy, SEAD has maintained its basic curriculum, while accommodating the constraints and innovative approaches unique to each institution. Short-term results have demonstrated improved knowledge of curricular objectives, student perception of significant value of the program, and the generation of interest in a career in surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Future directions include the evaluation of long-term impact on pursuing a career in surgery and continuing further expansion using the current replication model, while maintaining a high-quality surgical education program.