Trends in use of primary prophylactic colony stimulating factors and neutropenia-related hospitalization in commercially insured patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in the United States: 2005-2017.

PURPOSE: Describe temporal changes in use of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factor, and neutropenia-related hospitalization, in commercially insured patients. METHODS: Using a large commercial administrative database, we identified annual cohorts of adult patients diagnosed with breast or lung cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma and initiating myelosuppressive chemotherapy during 2005-2017. We described yearly changes in proportions of myelosuppressive chemotherapy by febrile neutropenia risk category (high, intermediate, unclassified) and proportion of prophylactic colony-stimulating factor use and unadjusted incidence of neutropenia-related hospitalization in the first cycle of myelosuppressive chemotherapy. RESULTS: Annual cohorts included 4383-5888 eligible patients during 2005-2017. The proportion of eligible patients aged ≥ 65 years increased from 26.0% in 2005 to 58.2% in 2017. Myelosuppressive chemotherapy use with regimens with high risk for febrile neutropenia increased from 15.1% in 2005 to 31.0% in 2017; and regimens with intermediate risk for febrile neutropenia decreased from 63.7% to 48.1% in 2017. Prophylactic colony-stimulating factor use increased from 41.6% in 2005 to 54.3% in 2017. Crude incidence of neutropenia-related hospitalization for all cancers increased from 2.0% to 3.1%, with a substantial increase in neutropenia-related hospitalization observed among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients (2.8% to 8.5%) during 2005-2017. CONCLUSION: Among adult patients with breast and lung cancer, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, use of regimens with high risk for febrile neutropenia increased, as did the use of prophylactic colony-stimulating factors after 2005. Incidence of neutropenia-related hospitalization increased slightly, particularly among non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients. Further studies are required to understand this increasing trend of neutropenia-related hospitalization, changing patient-level risk factors, and febrile neutropenia management.

Duration of short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for primary prophylaxis and risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization in older patients with cancer.

PURPOSE: Evaluate the relationship between duration of primary prophylactic short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PP-sG-CSF) and risk of neutropenia-related hospitalization (NRH) in older patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: Using the Medicare claims database, we conducted a nested case-control study in a cohort of patients aged ≥66 years with breast, colorectal, lung, ovarian, or prostate cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma who initiated a first cycle of any myelosuppressive chemotherapy January 1, 2008-September 30, 2016, and received PP-sG-CSF. We matched up to four controls to each NRH case by age, cancer type, regimen febrile neutropenia (FN) risk category, and year using incidence density sampling. We used conditional logistic regression adjusted for race, sex, and modified Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) to estimate relative risk of NRH related to duration of PP-sG-CSF categorized as <5 and ≥ 5 days. RESULTS: Of 2148 patients receiving PP-sG-CSF, 108 (5%) experienced NRH in the first cycle. We matched 333 controls to 96 cases. Cases were similar to controls in mean age, tumor type, and intermediate/high-risk regimen, but were more likely to have CCI ≥5 and less likely to use PP-sG-CSF ≥5 days (31% vs. 39%). Adjusted ORs (95% CI) for NRH were 0.69 (0.40-1.19) for ≥5 vs. <5 days of PP-sG-CSF among patients receiving any myelosuppressive chemotherapy, 0.43 (0.21-0.89) for intermediate/high-risk regimen, and 0.42 (0.19-0.89) for any myelosuppressive chemotherapy with all agents given on cycle day one only. CONCLUSIONS: Among older patients with cancer who are receiving PP-sG-CSF, ≥5 days of use was associated with substantial reduction in NRH risk.

Variations in hospitalization and emergency department/observation stays using the oncology care model methodology in Medicare data.

OBJECTIVE: To assess variations in hospitalizations, emergency department/observational (ED/OB) stays not resulting in hospitalization, reasons for hospitalization, and hospitalization discharge destinations after chemotherapy, information not provided as part of Oncology Care Model (OCM) baseline data. METHODS: OCM methodology was applied to the Medicare 20% sample data to identify 6-month patient episodes triggered by chemotherapy in 2012-2015. Proportions of episodes with hospitalization or ED/OB stays, reasons for hospitalization, and discharge destinations were summarized. RESULTS: Of 485,186 6-month episodes for 255,229 patients in 13,823 practices, 25% of episodes led to ≥1 hospitalization (from 14% in breast cancer to 56% in acute leukemia), and 23% to ED/OB stays (from 18% in breast cancer to 36% in liver cancer). In 2995 practices with ≥20 total episodes, practice-level proportions of episodes with hospitalization ranged from 14% to 31% (20th-80th percentile) and with ED/OB stays from 17% to 29%. For all cancers combined, the most frequent reasons for hospitalization were infection (13%), anemia (7%), dehydration (5%), and congestive heart failure (3%); the most common discharge destinations were home (71%) followed by a skilled nursing facility (13%), death (6%), and hospice (5%). Reasons for hospitalization and discharge destinations varied by cancer type; acute leukemia episodes led to the highest rates of infection and anemia, and central nervous system tumor episodes to the highest proportions of death or hospice discharge. CONCLUSION: The variations in frequency of and reasons for hospitalization, ED/OB stays, and hospitalization discharge destinations across cancer types should be considered when evaluating OCM practice performance.

Trends in the use of primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factors and neutropenia-related hospitalization in elderly cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy in the USA: 1995-2015.

PURPOSE: To assess changes in neutropenia-related hospitalization, myelosuppressive chemotherapy, and primary prophylactic colony-stimulating factor (PP-CSF) use in elderly cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy. METHODS: We identified annual cohorts of patients aged ≥ 66 years with breast cancer, lung cancer, or non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) initiating myelosuppressive chemotherapy during 1995-2015 using Medicare 5% (1994-2008) and 20% (2007-2015) data. We described myelosuppressive chemotherapy changes by febrile neutropenia (FN) risk category (high, intermediate, unclassified), PP-CSF use, and, in the first cycle of myelosuppressive chemotherapy, neutropenia-related hospitalization (ICD-9-CM: 288.0X, first 5 positions). We evaluated hospitalization trends using a logistic regression model with spline curve of calendar year adjusting for baseline characteristics. RESULTS: Annual cohorts included 1451-2114 eligible patients for 1995-2007 and 5272-7603 for 2008-2015. Myelosuppressive chemotherapy use with high/intermediate FN risk increased from 31% in 1995 to 56% in 1999, stabilized through 2008 (range 56-61%), then decreased to 52% in 2015. PP-CSF use increased from 5.5% in 1995 to 52.7% in 2015, mainly due to pegfilgrastim introduction in 2002. Crude neutropenia-related hospitalization incidence decreased from 5.2% in 1995 to 2.7% in 2015; adjusted incidence decreased, on average, by 4.7% yearly before 2010 (p < 0.0001) and was flat from 2010 onward (p = 0.53). CONCLUSIONS: Among elderly patients with breast cancer, lung cancer, or NHL receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy, PP-CSF use increased substantially after 2002. Neutropenia-related hospitalization incidence in the first cycle decreased yearly before 2010 and was flat afterward. Further studies are needed to understand overall decreasing neutropenia-related hospitalization trends and effects of changes in myelosuppressive chemotherapy and FN management.

Changes in the use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusion in patients with cancer amidst regulatory and reimbursement changes.

PURPOSE: Evaluate changes in use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) and red blood cell transfusion in cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy following regulatory and reimbursement actions. METHODS: Calendar year patient cohorts (2005-2013) with breast, colorectal, lung, multiple myeloma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, ovarian, or prostate cancer and receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy were identified within the Marketscan database. Incidence of ESA treatment and transfusion were estimated in each year, as was median number of ESA administrations. Clinical characteristics associated with ESA administration and transfusions were evaluated by using multivariable logistic regression. Additionally, annual new ESA user cohorts within the Oncology Services Comprehensive Electronic Records database (2011-2014) were examined to assess hemoglobin levels at ESA initiation. RESULTS: Across all tumor types, ESA use decreased substantially (breast cancer: 53.7 to 3.2%; lung cancer: 66.0 to 13.3%, non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 39.8 to 3.8%), transfusion use increased (2 to 5.5%, 5.5 to 18.2%, and 4.5 to 9.1%, respectively), and median number of ESA administrations declined. Across all tumor types, proportion of patients initiating an ESA with hemoglobin >10 g/dL was <10% from 2011 onward. In recent years, cancer patients who are older, female, and have chronic kidney disease or moderate or severe liver disease were most likely to receive ESAs. CONCLUSION: Subsequent to important regulatory and reimbursement ESA-related actions, total ESA exposure among cancer patients receiving myelosuppressive chemotherapy declined substantially. Today, fewer patients receive ESA therapy, and among those treated, more are initiated at hemoglobin levels <10 g/dL and are exposed for a shorter duration, consistent with current product labeling.