Unplanned 30-Day ER Visit Rate and Factors Associated With ER Visits After Ambulatory Sinus Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Emergency room (ER) visits after surgery can be inconvenient and costly to the patient and the healthcare system. Estimates of the 30-day ER visit rate following ambulatory sinus procedures and their risk factors are largely unknown in the literature. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate following ambulatory sinus procedures and the causes and risk factors associated with ER visits. METHODS: This is a retrospective, cohort study using data from the State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases (SASD) and the State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD) for California, New York, and Florida in 2019. We identified adult (18 years old) patients with chronic rhinosinusitis who underwent ambulatory sinus procedures from the SASD. Cases were linked to the SEDD to identify ER visits occurring within 30 days after the procedure. Logistic regression models were used to identify patient- and procedure-related risk factors associated with the 30-day postoperative ER visit. RESULTS: Among the 23 239 patients, the 30-day postoperative ER visit rate was 3.9%. The most common reason for ER visit was bleeding (32.7%). A total of 56.9% of the ER visits occurred within the first week. In the multivariate analysis, factors associated with ER visits included Medicare (odds ratio [OR] 1.29 [1.09-1.52], P = .003), Medicaid (OR 2.06 [1.69-2.51], P < .001), self-pay/no insurance (OR 1.44 [1.03-2.00], P = .031), chronic kidney disease/end-stage renal disease (OR 1.63 [1.06-2.51], P = .027), chronic pain/opioid use (OR 2.70 [1.02-7.11], P = .045), and a disposition other than home (OR 12.61 [8.34-19.06], P < .001). CONCLUSION: The most common reason for ER visit after ambulatory sinus procedures was bleeding. An increased ER visit rate was associated with certain demographic factors and medical comorbidities but not with procedure characteristics. This information can help us identify the patient populations who are at higher risk for ER visits to improve their postoperative recovery.

Geographic Distribution of Otolaryngology Advance Practice Providers and Physicians.

OBJECTIVES: Advanced practice providers (APPs), namely physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs), play an increasing role in meeting growing demands for otolaryngologic services, particularly in rural communities. This study analyzes the geographic distribution of otolaryngology providers, which is essential to addressing future demands. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data for 2017. METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology codes were used to identify APPs providing 10 common otolaryngologic services. Geographic distribution was evaluated by calculating densities of APPs and otolaryngologists per 100,000 persons in urban versus rural counties as defined by the National Center for Health Statistics Urban-Rural Classification Scheme. RESULTS: We identified cohorts of 8573 otolaryngologists, 1148 NPs, and 895 PAs. There were significantly higher population-controlled densities of otolaryngologists and APPs in urban counties as compared with rural counties. The majority of otolaryngologists (92.1%) and APPs (83.3%) were in urban counties. However, the proportion of APPs (16.7%) in rural counties was significantly higher than the proportion of otolaryngologists (7.9%) in rural counties (P < .01). A significant majority of rural counties (72.2%) had zero identified providers, and a greater proportion of rural counties (5.0%) were served exclusively by APPs as compared with urban counties (3.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Although otolaryngologists and APPs mostly practiced in urban counties, a relatively higher proportion of APPs practiced in rural counties when compared with otolaryngology physicians. The majority of rural counties did not have any otolaryngologic providers. Given the expected shortages of otolaryngology physicians, APPs may play a critical role in addressing these gaps in access.

Advanced Practice Providers Utilization Trends in Otolaryngology From 2012 to 2017 in the Medicare Population.

OBJECTIVE: Nurse practitioners and physician assistants form a growing advanced practice provider (APP) group. We aim to analyze the trends and types of services provided by APPs in otolaryngology. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data: Physician and Other Supplier Public Use Files, 2012-2017. METHODS: The Medicare database was searched for 13 commonly used otolaryngology-specific Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes, and 10 evaluation and management (E/M) codes were evaluated by provider type. Changes in code utilization were compared between physicians and APPs over time. RESULTS: From 2012 to 2017, there was a 51% increase in the number of otolaryngology APPs, compared to a 2.2% increase in physician providers. APPs increased their share of new and established patient visits from 4% to 7%d 11% to 15%, respectively. There was not a significant difference over time in number of patient visits performed annually per provider according to provider type. The increase in number of APP vs physician providers was significantly greater for every procedure except for balloon sinus dilation and tympanostomy tube placement. CONCLUSION: Due to increasing numbers, APPs are accounting for more patient visits and procedures over time. The physician workforce and the numbers of procedures performed per physician have remained relatively stable from 2012 to 2017. Increasing complexity of patients seen and a broader range of procedures offered by work-experienced or postgraduate-trained APPs may further improve access to health care in the face of possible physician shortages.

Emerging Trends in Nasal Surgery: What Is the Impact of a Bioabsorbable Nasal Implant?

BACKGROUND: A bioabsorbable nasal valve implant (NVI) was introduced in 2016 as a minimally invasive solution to nasal valve collapse. Historically the introduction of less invasive procedures performable in-office has resulted in an increase in volume. Our objective is to evaluate this trend as it relates to nasal vestibular repair, and its impact on healthcare utilization. METHODS: We interrogated the Medicare Part B national database for nasal vestibular repair (CPT code: 30465), Unlisted nasal procedure (30999) and septoplasty (30520) from 2010 to 2017. Septoplasty was used as a surrogate for overall nasal procedural rate. Linear regression modeling was used to examine the changes in reported vestibular repair rate adjusting for septoplasty rate. RESULTS: In the Medicare population, the rate of septoplasty was stable from 2010 to 2017, increasing from 26,962 to 30,194 at an annual rate of 1.5%. Coding for unlisted nasal procedure increased from 272 to 333 at an adjusted annual rate of 1.1% over this time period. Coding for nasal vestibular repair increased from 2026 to 5331 over this interval at an adjusted annual rate of 0.9% from 2010 to 2016 but significantly increased to 5% between 2016 to 2017 (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The reported volume of nasal vestibular repair increased significantly in the year following Food and Drug Administration approval of NVIs. In the absence of a corresponding increase in septoplasty, this temporal relationship suggests that the introduction of NVIs impacted the utilization of this procedural code. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A Laryngoscope, 2020.