Clinical recommendations for posttransplant assessment of anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies: A Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk consensus document.

Although anti-HLA (Human Leukocyte Antigen) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are commonly measured in clinical practice and their relationship with transplant outcome is well established, clinical recommendations for anti-HLA antibody assessment are sparse. Supported by a careful and critical review of the current literature performed by the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 working group, this consensus report provides clinical practice recommendations in kidney, heart, lung, and liver transplantation based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The recommendations address 3 major clinical problems in transplantation and include guidance regarding posttransplant DSA assessment and application to diagnostics, prognostics, and therapeutics: (1) the clinical implications of positive posttransplant DSA detection according to DSA status (ie, preformed or de novo), (2) the relevance of posttransplant DSA assessment for precision diagnosis of antibody-mediated rejection and for treatment management, and (3) the relevance of posttransplant DSA for allograft prognosis and risk stratification. This consensus report also highlights gaps in current knowledge and provides directions for clinical investigations and trials in the future that will further refine the clinical utility of posttransplant DSA assessment, leading to improved transplant management and patient care.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report.

The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.

Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of risk (STAR) 2019 Working Group Meeting Report.

The purpose of the STAR 2019 Working Group was to build on findings from the initial STAR report to further clarify the expectations, limitations, perceptions, and utility of alloimmune assays that are currently in use or in development for risk assessment in the setting of organ transplantation. The goal was to determine the precision and clinical feasibility/utility of such assays in evaluating both memory and primary alloimmune risks. The process included a critical review of biologically driven, state-of-the-art, clinical diagnostics literature by experts in the field and an open public forum in a face-to-face meeting to promote broader engagement of the American Society of Transplantation and American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics membership. This report summarizes the literature review and the workshop discussions. Specifically, it highlights (1) available assays to evaluate the attributes of HLA antibodies and their utility both as clinical diagnostics and as research tools to evaluate the effector mechanisms driving rejection; (2) potential assays to assess the presence of alloimmune T and B cell memory; and (3) progress in the development of HLA molecular mismatch computational scores as a potential prognostic biomarker for primary alloimmunity and its application in research trial design.

Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) 2017 Working Group Meeting Report.

The presence of preexisting (memory) or de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSAs) is a known barrier to successful long-term organ transplantation. Yet, despite the fact that laboratory tools and our understanding of histocompatibility have advanced significantly in recent years, the criteria to define presence of a DSA and assign a level of risk for a given DSA vary markedly between centers. A collaborative effort between the American Society for Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics and the American Society of Transplantation provided the logistical support for generating a dedicated multidisciplinary working group, which included experts in histocompatibility as well as kidney, liver, heart, and lung transplantation. The goals were to perform a critical review of biologically driven, state-of-the-art, clinical diagnostics literature and to provide clinical practice recommendations based on expert assessment of quality and strength of evidence. The results of the Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk (STAR) meeting are summarized here, providing recommendations on the definition and utilization of HLA diagnostic testing, and a framework for clinical assessment of risk for a memory or a primary alloimmune response. The definitions, recommendations, risk framework, and highlighted gaps in knowledge are intended to spur research that will inform the next STAR Working Group meeting in 2019.

Racial differences in the development of de-novo donor-specific antibodies and treated antibody-mediated rejection after heart transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in outcomes after heart transplantation, black recipients have worse survival compared with non-black recipients. The source of such disparate outcomes remains largely unknown. We hypothesize that a propensity to generate de-novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) and subsequent antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) may account for racial differences in sub-optimal outcomes after heart transplant. In this study we aimed to determine the role of dnDSA and AMR in racial disparities in post-transplant outcomes. METHODS: This study was a single-center, retrospective analysis of 137 heart transplant recipients (81% male, 48% black) discharged from Emory University Hospital. Patients were classified as black vs non-black for the purpose of our analysis. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate the association between race and selected outcomes. The primary outcome was the development of dnDSA. Secondary outcomes included treated AMR and a composite of all-cause graft dysfunction or death. RESULTS: After 3.7 years of follow-up, 39 (28.5%) patients developed dnDSA and 19 (13.8%) were treated for AMR. In multivariable models, black race was associated with a higher risk of developing dnDSA (hazard ratio [HR] 3.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.54 to 8.65, p = 0.003) and a higher risk of treated AMR (HR 4.86, 95% CI 1.26 to 18.72, p = 0.021) compared with non-black race. Black race was also associated with a higher risk of all-cause graft dysfunction or death in univariate analyses (HR 2.10, 95% CI 1.02 to 4.30, p = 0.044). However, in a multivariable model incorporating dnDSA, black race was no longer a significant risk factor. Only dnDSA development was significantly associated with all-cause graft dysfunction or death (HR 4.85, 95% CI 1.89 to 12.44, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Black transplant recipients are at higher risk for the development of dnDSA and treated AMR, which may account for racial disparities in outcomes after heart transplantation.

Allocating Deceased Donor Kidneys to Candidates with High Panel-Reactive Antibodies.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In December of 2014, the Organ Procurement and Transplant Network implemented a new Kidney Allocation System (KAS) for deceased donor transplant, with increased priority for highly sensitized candidates (calculated panel-reactive antibody [cPRA] >99%). We used a modified version of the new KAS to address issues of access and equity for these candidates. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: In a simulation, 10,988 deceased donor kidneys transplanted into waitlisted recipients in 2010 were instead allocated to candidates with cPRA≥80% (n=18,004). Each candidate's unacceptable donor HLA antigens had been entered into the allocation system by the transplant center. In simulated match runs, kidneys were allocated sequentially to adult ABO identical or permissible candidates with cPRA 100%, 99%, 98%, etc. to 80%. Allocations were restricted to donor/recipient pairs with negative virtual crossmatches. RESULTS: The simulation indicated that 2111 of 10,988 kidneys (19.2%) would have been allocated to patients with cPRA 100% versus 74 of 10,988 (0.7%) that were actually transplanted. Of cPRA 100% candidates, 74% were predicted to be compatible with an average of six deceased donors; the remaining 26% seemed to be incompatible with every deceased donor organ that entered the system. Of kidneys actually allocated to cPRA 100% candidates in 2010, 66% (49 of 74) were six-antigen HLA matched/zero-antigen mismatched (HLA-A, -B, and -DR) with their recipients versus only 11% (237 of 2111) in the simulation. The simulation predicted that 10,356 of 14,433 (72%) candidates with cPRA 90%-100% could be allocated an organ compared with 7.3% who actually underwent transplant. CONCLUSIONS: Data in this simulation are consistent with early results of the new KAS; specifically, nearly 20% of deceased donor kidneys were (virtually) compatible with cPRA 100% candidates. Although most of these candidates were predicted to be compatible with multiple donors, approximately one-quarter are unlikely to receive a single offer.

Flow cytometric assessment of HLA alloantibodies.

Antibodies against HLA molecules are formed in response to exposure to foreign HLA molecules, which can occur as a result of blood transfusion, pregnancy, or transplant. Blood components, particularly those containing cellular elements, are the most common cause of HLA antibodies. This unit describes technical aspects of the flow cytometric crossmatch (FCXM), flow cytometric microparticle assays, and cell-based flow cytometric screening assays. The collective goal for these assays is to clearly identify the presence of HLA antibody, determine the titer of antibody, and elucidate the specificities (i.e., HLA antigens) to which they will react. Knowledge of this information is critical for organ allocation and accurate assessment of the immunological risk for a patient at the time of transplantation. In addition, the identification of HLA antibodies in blood components may be useful in planning appropriate transfusion support strategies for selected patients.