Longitudinal assessment of real-world patient adherence: a 12-month electronic patient-reported outcomes follow-up of women with early breast cancer undergoing treatment.

BACKGROUND: Electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) assess patients' health status and quality of life, improving patient care and treatment effects, yet little is known about their use and adherence in routine patient care. AIMS: We evaluated the adherence of invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) patients to ePROs follow-up and whether specific patient characteristics are related to longitudinal non-adherence. METHODS: Since November 2016, the Breast Center at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin has implemented an ongoing prospective PRO routine program, requiring patients to complete ePROs assessments and consent to email-based follow-up in the first 12 months after therapy starts. Frequencies and summary statistics are presented. Multiple logistic regression models were performed to determine an association between patient characteristics and non-adherence. RESULTS: Out of 578 patients, 239 patients (41.3%, 95%CI: 37.3-45.5%) completed baseline assessment and all five ePROs follow-up during the first 12 months after therapy. On average, above 70% of those patients responded to the ePROs follow-up assessment. Adherence to the ePROs follow-up was higher during the COVID-19 pandemic than in the time periods before (47.4% (111/234) vs. 33.6% (71/211)). Factors associated with longitudinal non-adherence were younger age, a higher number of comorbidities, no chemotherapy, and a low physical functioning score in the EORTC QLQ-C30 at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: The study reveals moderate adherence to 12-month ePROs follow-up assessments in invasive early breast cancer and DCIS patients, with response rates ranging from 60 to 80%. Emphasizing the benefits for young patients and those with high disease burdens might further increase adherence.

Associations among navigational support and health care utilization and costs in patients with advanced cancer: An analysis based on administrative health insurance data.

BACKGROUND: Fragmented and complex healthcare systems make it difficult to provide continuity of care for patients with advanced cancer near the end of life. Nurse-based cross-sectoral navigation support has the potential to increase patients' quality of life. The objective of this paper was to evaluate associations between navigation support and health care utilization, and the associated costs of care. METHODS: The evaluation is based on claims data from 37 statutory health insurance funds. Non-randomized recruitment of the intervention group (IG) took place between 2018 and 2019 in four German hospitals. The comparison group (CG) was defined ex post. It comprises nonparticipating clients of the involved health insurance funds matched on age, gender, and diagnosis in a 1:4 ratio to the IG. Healthcare resource utilization was compared using incident rate ratios (IRRs) based on negative binomial regression models. Linear mixed models were performed to compare differences in lengths of hospital stays and costs between groups. RESULTS: A total of 717 patients were included (IG: 149, CG: 568). IG patients showed shorter average lengths of hospital stays (IG: 11 days [95% CI: 10, 13] vs. CG: 15 days [95% CI: 14, 16], p < 0.001). In the IG, 21% fewer medications were prescribed and there were on average 15% fewer outpatient doctor contacts per month. Average billed costs in the IG were 23% lower than in the CG (IG: 6754 EUR [95% CI: 5702, 8000] vs. CG: 8816 EUR [95% CI: 8153, 9533], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The intervention was associated with decreased costs mainly as a result of a non-intended navigation effect. The social care nurses had navigated patients within the hospital early, needs-oriented and effectively but interpreted their function less cross-sectorally. Linkage of hospital-based navigators with the outpatient care sector needs further exploration.

Assessment of high-risk human papillomavirus infections and associated cervical dysplasia in HIV-positive pregnant women in Germany: a prospective cross-sectional two-centre study.

PURPOSE: Invasive cervical cancer (ICC) is associated in nearly 100% with persistent high-risk Human Papillomavirus (HR-HPV) infection. ICC is still one of the leading causes for cancer mortality in women worldwide. The immunosuppressive influence of Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and the immunocompromised period of pregnancy due to tolerance induction against the hemiallogeneic fetus, are generally risk factors for acquisition and persistence of HR-HPV infections and their progression to precancerous lesions and HPV-associated carcinoma. METHODS: Overall, 81 pregnant women living with HIV (WLWH) were included. A medical history questionnaire was used to record clinical and HIV data. Participants received cervicovaginal cytological smear, colposcopy and HPV testing. HPV test was performed using BSGP5+/6+ PCR with Luminex read-out. The HR-HPV genotypes 16, 18, 31, 33, 45, 52, 58 were additionally grouped together as high-high-risk HPV (HHR-HPV) for the purpose of risk-adapted analysis. RESULTS: HR-HPV prevalence was 45.7%. Multiple HPV infections were detected in 27.2% of participants, of whom all had at least one HR-HPV genotype included. HR-HPV16 and HR-HPV52 were the most prevalent genotypes and found when high squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) was detected by cytology. HIV viral load of ≥ 50 copies/ml was associated with higher prevalence of HR-HPV infections. Whereas, CD4 T cells < 350/µl showed association with occurrence of multiple HPV infections. Time since HIV diagnosis seemed to impact HPV prevalence. CONCLUSION: Pregnant WLWH require particularly attentive and extended HPV-, colposcopical- and cytological screening, whereby clinical and HIV-related risk factors should be taken into account.

The Charité external cephalic version for leading twin breech without regional anesthesia and tocolysis. A prospective study on feasibility, sonographic assessment and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of external cephalic version (ECV) for the leading twin (twin A) in breech presentation in dichorionic and diamniotic twin pregnancies without the use of regional anesthetics and tocolysis and to characterize the sonographic parameters, maternal and neonatal outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study performed in the Charité University Hospital outpatient obstetric department in Berlin, Germany. A total of 23 women from the 35th completed week of pregnancy with confirmed dichorionic-diamniotic twin pregnancy were recruited. ECVs were performed by the lead consultant for the breech and ECV clinic. Ethical approval provided by the Charité Ethics Commission (EA2/241/18). Demographic data were recorded. Fetal sonographic parameters were assessed. The success rate of ECV, duration of the ECV, gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery for both fetuses, maternal and neonatal outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: Our main finding showed that ECV for twin A breech in dichorionic-diamniotic twins is successful in 56% (10/18) of cases without the need for regional anesthesia and without tocolysis. There is a significant increase in the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate for both twins of 95% (19/20) vs 12.5% (2/16) (p < 0.001). There is also a significant reduction in blood loss at delivery of 300 ml vs 500 ml (p = 0.034) in successful cases. CONCLUSIONS: We show that ECV for twin A in breech is feasible and in 56% (10/18) successful without regional anesthesia and tocolysis. The option of ECV for twin A breech should be offered to women.