Cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft for the treatment of polycythemia vera.

Aim: Patients with polycythemia vera (PV), a rare and chronic blood cancer, are at a higher risk for thromboembolic events, progression to myelofibrosis, and leukemic transformation. In 2021, ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft (BESREMi®) was approved in the US to treat adults with PV. The purpose of this study is to estimate the cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft, used as a first- or second-line treatment, for the treatment of patients with PV in the US. Materials & methods: A Markov cohort model was developed from the healthcare system perspective in the United States. Model inputs were informed by the PROUD-PV and CONTINUATION-PV studies and published literature. The model population included both low-risk and high-risk patients with PV. The model compared ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft used either as first- or second-line versus an alternative treatment pathway of first-line hydroxyurea followed by ruxolitinib. Results: Over the modeled lifetime, ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft provided an additional 0.4 higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and 0.4 life-years with an added cost of USD60,175, resulting in a cost per QALY of USD141,783. The model was sensitive to treatment costs, the percentage of patients who discontinue hydroxyurea, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users who switch to monthly dosing, the percentage of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft users as 2nd line treatment, and the treatment response rates. A younger patient age at baseline and a higher percentage of patients with low-risk disease improved the cost-effectiveness of ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft. Conclusion: Ropeginterferon alfa-2b-njft is a cost-effective treatment option for a broad range of patients with PV, including both low- and high-risk patients and patients with and without prior cytoreductive treatment with hydroxyurea.

Ruxolitinib for myelofibrosis in elderly non-transplant patients: healthcare resource utilization and costs.

AIM: This study evaluated real-world healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), direct costs, and overall survival (OS) of patients who were Medicare beneficiaries and were newly diagnosed with myelofibrosis (MF) who filled ≥1 prescription of ruxolitinib versus those who did not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a study of the US Medicare fee-for-service database. Beneficiaries were aged ≥65 years with an MF diagnosis (index) between January 1, 2012 - December 31, 2017. Data were summarized descriptively. OS was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Patients with ≥1 prescription fill of ruxolitinib (n = 2,787) had lower mean rates (per patient per month [PPPM]) versus patients who did not fill a prescription for ruxolitinib (n = 7,262) for hospitalizations (0.16 vs 0.32), length of inpatient stay (0.16 vs 2.44 days), emergency department visits (0.10 vs 0.14), physician office visits (4.68 vs 6.25), skilled nursing facility stays (0.02 vs 0.12), home health/durable medical equipment services (0.32 vs 0.47), and hospice visits (0.30 vs 1.70). Monthly medical costs were numerically lower in patients who had ≥1 fill of ruxolitinib versus those who did not fill a prescription for ruxolitinib ($6,553 vs $12,929), largely driven by inpatient costs ($3,428 vs $6,689). Pharmacy costs were $10,065 and $987 in patients who filled versus did not fill ≥1 prescription for ruxolitinib, respectively; total PPPM all-cause healthcare costs were $16,618 and $13,916, respectively. The median OS was 37.5 and 18.7 months for the cohorts of patients who filled versus did not fill ≥1 prescription for ruxolitinib, respectively (hazard ratio = 0.63, 95% CI = 0.59 - 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Ruxolitinib is associated with reduced HCRU and direct costs of medical care in addition to increased survival, suggesting it to be a cost-effective advance for patients with MF.

Myelofibrosis is a rare bone marrow cancer. People with this disease do not live as long as the general population. They have difficult symptoms, can tire easily, and may have a large spleen that can be uncomfortable. Ruxolitinib is a treatment for myelofibrosis that can improve symptoms and help patients live longer.This study asked how treating patients with ruxolitinib affected three things. (1) How often do they go to a healthcare provider? (2) How much do they spend on their healthcare? (3) How long do they live? The authors looked at Medicare records to answer these questions.The study found that treated patients visited hospitals, doctors' offices, and other services less often. When they did require hospital care, they stayed in the hospital for a shorter amount of time. As a result, treated patients spent about half as much on these services. However, patients treated with ruxolitinib spent more at the pharmacy. Finally, treated patients lived about twice as long as those who were never treated with ruxolitinib. These findings suggest that ruxolitinib is worthwhile for patients with myelofibrosis.

Patterns of Diagnostic Evaluation and Determinants of Treatment in Older Patients With Non-transfusion Dependent Myelodysplastic Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Older patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), particularly those with no or one cytopenia and no transfusion dependence, typically have an indolent course. Approximately, half of these receive the recommended diagnostic evaluation (DE) for MDS. We explored factors determining DE in these patients and its impact on subsequent treatment and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used 2011-2014 Medicare data to identify patients ≥66 years of age diagnosed with MDS. We used Classification and Regression Tree (CART) analysis to identify combinations of factors associated with DE and its impact on subsequent treatment. Variables examined included demographics, comorbidities, nursing home status, and investigative procedures performed. We conducted a logistic regression analysis to identify correlates associated with receipt of DE and treatment. RESULTS: Of 16 851 patients with MDS, 51% underwent DE. patients with MDS with no cytopenia (n = 3908) had the lowest uptake of DE (34.7%). Compared to patients with no cytopenia, those with any cytopenia had nearly 3 times higher odds of receiving DE [adjusted odds ratio (AOR), 2.81: 95% CI, 2.60-3.04] and the odds were higher for men than for women [AOR, 1.39: 95%CI, 1.30-1.48] and for Non-Hispanic Whites [vs. everyone else (AOR, 1.17: 95% CI, 1.06-1.29)]. The CART showed DE as the principal discriminating node, followed by the presence of any cytopenia for receiving MDS treatment. The lowest percentage of treatment was observed in patients without DE, at 14.6%. CONCLUSION: In this select older patients with MDS, we identified disparities in accurate diagnosis by demographic and clinical factors. Receipt of DE influenced subsequent treatment but not survival.

Treatment Patterns, Health Care Resource Utilization, and Cost in Patients with Myelofibrosis in the United States.

BACKGROUND: This study analyses treatment patterns, health care resource utilization (HCRU), and costs in patients with myelofibrosis (MF) and a subgroup treated with ruxolitinib (RUX). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Treatment patterns, all-cause and MF-related HCRU, and costs were analyzed in adults with MF with continuous enrollment in a commercial or the Medicare Advantage health plan in the pre-index period, defined as the 12 months immediately prior to the index date (date of primary or secondary MF diagnosis), and the post-index period, defined as ≥6 months following the index date. In a subgroup analysis, outcomes were analyzed in patients treated with optimal RUX (OPT RUX, ≥30 mg) and suboptimal RUX (SUB RUX, <30 mg) in the pre-index RUX period, defined as the 3 months immediately prior to the index RUX date (first date for an RUX claim), and the post-index RUX period, defined as ≥6 months following the index RUX date. RESULTS: Of 2830 patients with an MF diagnosis, 1191 met eligibility requirements. The median age of patients was 72 years, 54% were male, and comorbidities were frequent. Sixty percent of patients received ≥1 line of therapy (LOT), of which 46% (n = 331) had ≥2 LOTs during the post-index MF period. Costs increased considerably 6-month pre-index to 6-month post-index (all-cause: cause ($24,216 to $48,966) and MF-related ($16,502 to $39,383), driven by inpatient stays and pharmacy costs. In the subgroup analysis, patients treated with RUX (n = 495) experienced significant disease burden and high costs, regardless of dose. A shorter duration of therapy and a higher rate of discontinuation were observed in patients treated with SUB RUX (n = 191) versus OPT RUX (n = 304). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest a significant disease and economic impacts associated with MF patients that persists with RUX therapy, highlighting the need for additional therapeutic options for MF.

Thrombotic events and mortality risk in patients with newly diagnosed polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia.

Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) have increased thrombotic risk. This retrospective, real-world analysis of Medicare patients (age ≥ 65 years) newly diagnosed with high-risk PV or intermediate-/high-risk ET compared mortality risk among those with versus without thrombotic events during the study period. Patients diagnosed with PV or ET with ≥ 1 inpatient or ≥ 2 outpatient claims (January 1, 2010-December 31, 2017; index was date of first qualifying claim) were included. The study included 50,405 Medicare beneficiaries with PV and 124,569 with ET. During follow-up (median [range]: PV, 34.5 [0-97.3] months; ET, 25.5 [0-97.4] months), 14,334 patients (28.4%) with PV and 30,478 (24.5%) with ET experienced thrombotic events (most commonly ischemic stroke [PV, 46.0%; ET, 42.5%]. Mortality risk was increased for patients with versus without post-index thrombosis for both PV (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR; 95% CI], 18.6 [16.1-21.6]; P < 0.001) and ET (aHR [95% CI], 25.2 [23.1-27.5]; P < 0.001). Median survival was shorter for patients who experienced a thrombotic event ≤ 1 year post-index versus those who did not (PV, 5.1 years vs not reached; ET, 3.7 vs 6.7 years; both P < 0.001). These findings highlight the importance of thrombosis risk mitigation in PV and ET management.

A geno-clinical decision model for the diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndromes.

The differential diagnosis of myeloid malignancies is challenging and subject to interobserver variability. We used clinical and next-generation sequencing (NGS) data to develop a machine learning model for the diagnosis of myeloid malignancies independent of bone marrow biopsy data based on a 3-institution, international cohort of patients. The model achieves high performance, with model interpretations indicating that it relies on factors similar to those used by clinicians. In addition, we describe associations between NGS findings and clinically important phenotypes and introduce the use of machine learning algorithms to elucidate clinicogenomic relationships.

Association of Socioeconomic Status with Outcomes of Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Multiple Myeloma.

Autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (AHCT) is standard therapy for eligible patients with multiple myeloma. Health care disparities can influence transplantation outcomes. However, the association of socioeconomic status (SES), a major indicator of health care disparities, with outcomes in patients with myeloma after AHCT has not been previously described. We analyzed 346 consecutive AHCT recipients with myeloma who underwent transplantation between 2003 and 2013 in this retrospective cohort study. Zip code of residence at the time of AHCT was obtained to assess annual household income based on 2010 US census data (median, $49,054; range, $16,546 to $127,313). SES groups were divided into < $45,000 (low; n = 120), $45,000 to $60,000 (middle; n = 116), and > $60,000 (high; n = 110). The low-income cohort had smallest portion of Caucasians (69% versus 89% versus 91%); otherwise, patient, disease, and transplantation characteristics were comparable among cohorts or different without significant patterns found. Median follow-up was 49 months. There was no difference among SES groups in overall survival, progression-free survival, nonrelapse mortality, or relapse in univariate and multivariable analysis. Similarly, SES was not associated with survival in a subset analysis of 303 patients who had survived for 1 year after transplantation.

Randomized phase III trial of pegfilgrastim versus filgrastim after autologus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation.

Nonrandomized trials suggest that pegfilgrastim, a pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, could be used in lieu of filgrastim after autologus peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. This phase III, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial compared the efficacy, costs, and safety of single-dose pegfilgrastim (single 6 mg dose) versus daily filgrastim (5 microg/kg/day) for this indication. Seventy-eight patients, matched for age, sex, underlying disease, stage, and CD34/kg transplant dose were enrolled. Cytokines were started on day +1 posttransplant and continued to an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) of 5x10(9)/L for 3 days or 10x10(9)/L for 1 day. The median time to neutrophil engraftment (ANC >1.5x10(9)/L for 3 days or 5x10(9)/L for 1 day) was the same in both groups (12 days). No differences in platelet engraftment (11 versus 13 days), number of platelet transfusions (5 versus 4), percent with positive cultures for bacterial pathogens (23% versus 15%), days of fever (1 versus 2), deaths prior to engraftment (1 versus 1), or duration of hospital stay (19 versus 19 days) were seen between the pegfilgrastim and filgrastim groups, respectively. Using the average wholesale price for doses used in this trial, there was a per-patient savings of $961 for the pegfilgrastim group (P < .001). This phase III study failed to demonstrate a difference in time to neutrophil engraftment or any clinical sequelae between pegfilgrastim and filgrastim when given post-APBSCT, with pegfilgrastim achieving a cost savings over filgrastim.