Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Urol Pract ; 11(1): 117-122, 2024 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37914379

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Prostate needle biopsy (PNBx) is essential for prostate cancer diagnosis, yet it is not without risks. We sought to assess patients who underwent PNBx using a claims-based frailty index to study the association between frailty and postbiopsy complications from a large population-based cohort. We hypothesized that increased frailty would be associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: Using Market Scan, we identified all men who underwent PNBx from 2010 to 2015. Individuals were stratified by claims-based frailty index into 2 prespecified categories: not frail, frail. Complications occurring within 30 days from prostate biopsy requiring emergency department, clinic, or hospital evaluations constituted the primary outcome. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses identified patient covariates associated with complications. RESULTS: We identified 193,490 patients who underwent PNBx. The mean age was 57.6 years (SD: 5.0). In all, 5% were prefrail, mildly frail, or moderately to severely frail. The rate of overall complications increased from 11.1% for not frail to 15.5% for frail men. After adjusting for covariates, individuals with any degree of frailty experienced a higher risk of overall complication (odds ratio [OR]: 1.29; P < .001), clinic (OR: 1.26; P < .001) and emergency department visits (OR: 1.32; P = .02), and hospital readmissions (OR: 1.41; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty was associated with a higher risk of complications for patients undergoing PNBx. Frailty assessment should be integrated into shared decision-making to limit the provision of potentially harmful care associated with prostate cancer screening.


Assuntos
Fragilidade , Neoplasias da Próstata , Masculino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Próstata/patologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico , Antígeno Prostático Específico , Biópsia , Seguro Saúde
2.
Urol Oncol ; 41(5): 255.e15-255.e21, 2023 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36456453

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the associations of socioeconomic characteristics with the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). METHODS: We identified adult patients aged 18 to 89 years with Ta, T1, or Tis NMIBC in the NCDB. We then examined the associations of patient and socioeconomic characteristics with the guidelines-based management of high-risk NMIBC using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: 163,949 patients were included in the study cohort, including 64% with Ta, 32% with T1, and 4% with Tis disease. Among those diagnosed with bladder cancer, male (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.21-1.27), uninsured (OR 1.10, 95%CI 1.01-1.19 vs. private), and non-White (OR 1.34, 95%CI 1.28-1.41 for Black; OR 1.10; 95%CI 1.03-1.18 for Other vs. White) patients were more likely to be diagnosed with high-risk disease, as well as patients from lower education level areas. Among those with high-risk NMIBC, patients who were older, non-White, Hispanic, uninsured or insured with Medicaid were less likely to receive guideline recommended intravesical BCG, while those residing in rural and higher education level areas were more likely to receive BCG. When examining non-guidelines based use of radiotherapy for HGT1 disease, older age (OR 1.06; 95% CI 1.04-1.07) and VA/Military insurance (OR 2.73; 95%CI 1.07, 6.98 vs. private) were associated with radiotherapy use. CONCLUSION: There are strong disparities in the prevalence and management of high-risk NMIBC. These observations highlight important targets for future strategies to reduce such healthcare disparities and provide more equitable bladder cancer treatment to patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias não Músculo Invasivas da Bexiga , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária , Adulto , Humanos , Masculino , Prevalência , Vacina BCG/uso terapêutico , Administração Intravesical , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/terapia , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/tratamento farmacológico , Adjuvantes Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Invasividade Neoplásica
3.
Urology ; 168: 27-34, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35809698

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate regional trends of infectious complications following transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy (TRUS-PB) from a national, privately-insured database. MATEREIAL AND METHODS: Using Market Scan, we identified all men who underwent TRUS-PB from 2010 to 2015. Infectious complications (UTI, prostatitis, sepsis) occurring 30 days after the prostate biopsy from emergency room (ER) visits or hospital admissions constituted the primary outcomes. We analyzed unadjusted and adjusted rates of infectious complications from ER visits and hospital admissions per 100 prostate biopsies by state. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify patient covariates associated with infectious complications. RESULTS: During the study interval, we identified 193,490 patients who underwent TRUS-PB. The mean age was 57.6 years (SD: 5.0). Over time the unadjusted national rates of infectious complications remained similar from 0.4 ER visits per 100 prostate biopsies in 2010 -0.2 in 2015 (P = 0.83), and 1.2 hospital admissions per 100 prostate biopsies in 2010 to 1.1 in 2015 (P= 0.58). Connecticut had the lowest unadjusted infectious complication rate per 100 biopsies at 0.64, whereas West Virginia had the highest at 2.34. Multivariable analysis revealed higher Elixhauser status and patient age were associated with higher odds of infectious complications (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: While rates of infectious complications attributable to prostate biopsies remain relatively stable, significant variation exists at the state level regarding this adverse outcome.


Assuntos
Próstata , Neoplasias da Próstata , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Seguro Saúde , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/efeitos adversos , Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos
4.
Urol Pract ; 9(6): 551-558, 2022 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37145811

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We sought to assess the comparative hospital outcomes and costs among a population-based cohort of bladder cancer patients by surgical approach and diversion. METHODS: From a privately insured national database, we identified all bladder cancer patients who underwent open or robotic radical cystectomy and ileal conduit or neobladder from 2010 to 2015. The primary outcomes were length of stay, readmissions, and total health care costs at 90 days from surgery. We used multivariable logistic regression and generalized estimating equations to assess for 90-day readmission and health care costs, respectively. RESULTS: Most patients underwent open radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (56.7%; n = 1,680) followed by open radical cystectomy with neobladder (22.7%; n = 672), robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit (17.4%; n = 516), and robotic radical cystectomy with neobladder (3.1%; n = 93). On multivariable analysis, patients had higher odds of 90-day readmissions for open radical cystectomy and neobladder (OR: 1.36; P = .002) and robotic radical cystectomy with neobladder (OR 1.60; P = .03) relative to open radical cystectomy with ileal conduit. After adjusting for patient covariates, we also found lower adjusted total 90-day health care costs for open radical cystectomy with ileal conduit ($67,915) and open radical cystectomy with neobladder ($67,371) compared to robotic radical cystectomy with ileal conduit ($70,677) and neobladder ($70,818; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our study, neobladder diversion was associated with higher odds of 90-day readmission, while robotic surgery increased total 90-day health care costs.

5.
Eur Urol ; 79(5): 571-585, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33413970

RESUMO

CONTEXT: In response to growing concerns over rising costs and major variation in quality, improving value for patients has been proposed as a fundamentally new strategy for how healthcare should be delivered, measured, and remunerated. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature regarding the implementation and impact of value-based healthcare in urology. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was performed to identify studies that described the implementation of one or more elements of value-based healthcare in urologic settings and in which the associated change in healthcare value had been measured. Twenty-two publications were selected for inclusion. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Reorganization of urologic care around medical conditions was associated with increased use of guidelines-compliant care for men with prostate cancer, and improved outcomes for patients with lower urinary tract symptoms. Measuring outcomes for every patient was associated with improved prostate cancer outcomes, while the measurement of costs using time-driven activity-based costing was associated with reduced resource utilization in a pediatric multidisciplinary clinic. Centralization of urologic cancer care in the UK, Denmark, and Canada was associated with overall improved outcomes, although systems integration in the USA yielded mixed results among urologic cancer patients. No studies have yet examined bundled payments for episodes of care, expanding the geographic reach for centers of excellence, or building enabling information technology platforms. CONCLUSIONS: Few studies have critically assessed the actual or simulated implementation of value-based healthcare in urology, but the available literature suggests promising early results. In order to effectively redesign care, there is a need for further research to both evaluate the potential results of proposed value-based healthcare interventions and measure their effects where already implemented. PATIENT SUMMARY: While few studies have evaluated the implementation of value-based healthcare in urology, the available literature suggests promising early results.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Próstata , Urologia , Criança , Custos e Análise de Custo , Atenção à Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Neoplasias da Próstata/terapia
6.
Eur Urol Focus ; 7(1): 86-94, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31047904

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the prostate (MRI-prostate) facilitates better detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa). Yet, the national trends of MRI at the time of prostate biopsy and its ability to increase the detection of PCa in a biopsy-naïve population remain unknown. OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the contemporary trends of MRI and prostate biopsy, and whether it improved PCa diagnosis among privately insured patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective cohort study of a large private health insurance database in the USA-the OptumLabs Data Warehouse. We identified all men ≥40 yr of age who underwent index prostate biopsies from 2010 through 2016. INTERVENTION: MRI-prostate at the time of index biopsy. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Utilization of the MRI at the time of biopsy and incident PCa diagnosis constituted the primary outcomes. We enumerated unadjusted and age-specific annual rates of MRI over time to elucidate trends using regression models (trend analysis). Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses identified patient characteristics associated with MRI-prostate, and the association between the use of MRI and PCa diagnosis. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Overall, 119 202 men underwent index prostate biopsies. Unadjusted annual rates of MRI at the time of biopsy significantly increased from 7 per 1000 biopsies in 2010 to 83 per 1000 biopsies in 2016 (p < 0.001 for trend). Age-specific rates increased across all age groups (40-49, 50-59, 60-65, 66-74, and 75+ yr; all p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, black patients had a lower likelihood of MRI compared with white patients (odds ratio [OR]: 0.6; p < 0.01). MRI at the time of biopsy was not associated with a higher likelihood of incident PCa compared with traditional systematic biopsy (OR: 1.0; p = 0.7). The retrospective design and the inability to detect clinically significant PCa (Gleason 7+) constitute the limitations of this study. CONCLUSIONS: While the use of MRI at the time of biopsy rose markedly, it was not associated with a higher detection rate of PCa. Further research is needed to address effective dissemination of MRI and targeted biopsies, and racial disparities. PATIENT SUMMARY: From 2010 to 2016, our study found a significant rise in the utilization of magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate (MRI-prostate) at the time of index biopsy, although only a minority of patients undergo MRI-prostate. The use of MRI-prostate was not associated with a higher likelihood of diagnosing incident prostate cancer.


Assuntos
Biópsia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética/tendências , Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias da Próstata/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Seguro , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Próstata/patologia , Neoplasias da Próstata/diagnóstico por imagem , Estudos Retrospectivos
7.
Eur Urol Focus ; 6(2): 305-312, 2020 03 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30361146

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although robot assistance can facilitate the advantages of minimally invasive surgery, it is unclear whether it offers benefits in settings in which laparoscopic surgery has been established as the standard of care. OBJECTIVE: To examine the comparative effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (RALRN) and laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN) using a nationwide data set. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: 8316 adults who underwent RALRN or LRN for non-urothelial renal cancer from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample from 2010 to 2013. INTERVENTION: RALRN and LRN. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The associations of surgical approach with perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Over the study period, utilization of RALRN increased from 46% to 69%. Compared to LRN, RALRN was associated with lower rates of intraoperative (0.9% vs 1.8%; p<0.001) and postoperative complications (20.4% vs 27.2%; p<0.001), but there were no differences in perioperative blood transfusion (5.6% vs 6.2%; p=0.27) and prolonged hospitalization (7.2% vs 7.1%; p=0.81). RALRN was also significantly associated with higher total hospital costs (median $16 207 vs $15 037; p<0.001). In multivariable analyses, RALRN remained independently associated with a lower risk of intraoperative (odds ratio [OR] 0.50; p=0.001) and postoperative complications (OR 0.72; p<0.001) but not perioperative blood transfusion (OR 1.10; p=0.34), and with a higher risk of prolonged hospitalization (OR 1.29; p=0.007) and higher mean total hospital costs (+$1468; p<0.001). There was no effect modification by hospital volume. CONCLUSIONS: Although RALRN was independently associated with a reduction in perioperative complications compared to LRN, it was associated with prolonged hospitalization and higher total hospital costs. These relationships must be interpreted in light of potential differences in case mix. PATIENT SUMMARY: Although robot-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy was independently associated with a reduction in perioperative complications compared to laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, it was associated with prolonged hospitalization and higher total hospital costs.


Assuntos
Custos Hospitalares , Laparoscopia , Nefrectomia/economia , Nefrectomia/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Urol ; 198(1): 92-99, 2017 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28153509

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Robot-assisted radical prostatectomy has undergone rapid dissemination driven in part by market forces to become the most frequently used surgical approach in the management of prostate cancer. Accordingly, a critical analysis of its volume-outcome relationship has important health policy implications. Therefore, we evaluated the association of hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume with perioperative outcomes, and examined the distribution of hospital procedure volume to contextualize the volume-outcome relationship. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 140,671 men who underwent robot-assisted radical prostatectomy from 2009 to 2011 in NIS (Nationwide Inpatient Sample). The associations of hospital volume with perioperative outcomes and total hospital costs were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression and generalized linear models. RESULTS: In 2011, 70% of hospitals averaged 1 robot-assisted radical prostatectomy per week or less, accounting for 28% of surgeries. Compared to patients treated at the lowest quartile hospitals, those treated at the highest quartile hospitals had significantly lower rates of intraoperative complications (0.6% vs 1.4%), postoperative complications (4.8% vs 13.9%), perioperative blood transfusion (1.5% vs 4.0%), prolonged hospitalization (4.3% vs 13.8%) and mean total hospital costs ($12,647 vs $15,394, all ptrend <0.001). When modeled as a nonlinear continuous variable, increasing hospital volume was independently associated with improved rates of each perioperative end point up to approximately 100 robot-assisted radical prostatectomies per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing hospital robot-assisted radical prostatectomy volume was associated with improved perioperative outcomes up to approximately 100 surgeries per year, beyond which there appeared to be marginal improvement. A substantial proportion of these procedures is performed at low volume hospitals.


Assuntos
Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Prostatectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias da Próstata/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Economia Hospitalar , Custos Hospitalares , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prostatectomia/economia , Neoplasias da Próstata/economia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
9.
J Endourol ; 27(5): 662-6, 2013 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23638674

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical outcomes and cost-effectiveness of endourologic procedures performed in the office using standard fluoroscopy and topical anesthesia. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent primary ureteral stent placement, ureteral stent exchange, or ureteral catheterization with retrograde pyeolography or Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) instillation under fluoroscopic guidance in the office. For an evaluation of potential time savings, we compared this to a cohort of similar procedures performed in the operating room during the same time period. RESULTS: Procedures were attempted in 65 renal units in 38 patients (13 male, 25 female) with a mean age of 62.2 years (range 29.1-95.4 years). Primary ureteral stent placement was successful in 23/24 (95.8%) renal units. Ureteral stent exchange was successful in 19/22 (86.4%) renal units. Ureteral catheterization with retrograde pyelography or BCG instillation was successful in 19/19 (100%) renal units. The total cost savings for the 38 patients in this study, including excess cost from failure in the office, was approximately $91,496, with an average cost savings of $1,551 per procedure. Office-based procedures were associated with a nearly three-fold reduction in total hospital time as a result of reduced periprocedure waiting times. CONCLUSIONS: Ureteral stent placement, ureteral stent exchange, and ureteral catheterization can be performed safely and effectively in the office in both men and women. This avoids general anesthesia and provides significant savings of time and cost for both patients and the health care system.


Assuntos
Stents , Ureter/cirurgia , Doenças Ureterais/diagnóstico por imagem , Doenças Ureterais/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Visita a Consultório Médico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Stents/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Doenças Ureterais/economia , Urografia/economia , Urografia/métodos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA