Timing of Chemoradiation in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: Comparative Analysis Between County and Managed Care Health Care Models.

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a primary brain malignancy with significant morbidity and mortality. The current standard of treatment for GBM is surgery followed by radiotherapy and temozolomide. Despite an established treatment protocol, there exists heterogeneity in outcomes due to patients not receiving all treatments. We analyzed patients in different health care models to investigate this heterogeneity. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed at 2 hospitals in San Bernardino County, California, for patients with newly diagnosed GBM from 2004 to 2019. Patients younger than 18 years of age, with history of low-grade glioma, who had undergone prior treatment, and those lost to follow-up were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients were included in our study. Chemotherapy was started at 41 ± 30 and 77 ± 68 days in the health maintenance organization (HMO) and county model, respectively (P = 0.050); radiation therapy was started at 46 ± 34 and 85 ± 76 days in the HMO and county models, respectively (P = 0.036). In individuals who underwent both chemotherapy and radiation therapy (XRT), the difference in time to XRT was no longer significant (P = 0.060). Recurrence time was 309 ± 263 and 212 ± 180 days in the HMO and county groups, respectively (P = 0.379). The time to death was 412 ± 285 and 343 ± 304 days for HMO and county models, respectively (P = 0.334). CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates a statistically significant difference in time to adjuvant therapies between patients within a county hospital and a managed health care organization. This information has the potential to inform future policies and care coordination for patients within the county model.

Comparison of Lumbar Fusion for Back Pain and Opioid Use at County and Managed Care Hospitals.

CONTEXT: Opioids may be prescribed for the short-term management of acute-onset back pain in the setting of trauma or for long-term management of chronic back pain. More than 50% of regular opioid users report taking them for back pain. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether surgical intervention reduces opioid requirements by patients taking opioids for back pain and whether there is a difference between county and managed care hospitals in this postoperative reduction of opioid requirement. METHODS: A retrospective medical record review of 118 patients who underwent elective lumbar fusion at 4 hospitals (2 county hospitals and 2 managed care hospitals) was conducted. Opioid requirements before and after surgical intervention and at the 30-day outpatient follow-up were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty medical records were included in the study. An overall decrease in opioid use was found in the postoperative follow-up phase after lumbar fusion in both the county and managed care hospitals. This reduction was statistically significant at 3 of 4 hospitals (P<0.01). When the data were pooled by facility type, the significance remained for county facilities (P<.01) but not managed care facilities (P=.18). Moreover, there was a significant decrease in opioid use during the postoperative inpatient phase for county compared with managed care facilities (P=.0427). The pain rating reported by patients during the hospital stay was significantly higher at county compared with managed care hospitals (P=.0088); however, the difference at discharge was not significant (P=.14). CONCLUSION: Our study indicates that lumbar fusion is associated with a significant decrease in opioid use (P<.05) compared with nonsurgical management. Overall, the difference in decreased opioid use between county and managed care hospitals after lumbar fusion was not significant.