Randomized controlled trial on occupational graduated compression clinical and cost-effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Subjects exposed to occupational standing are at risk of developing chronic venous disease. Graduated compression stockings (GCS) counteract venous hypertension. Aim of the present investigation was to assess GCS clinical and cost effectiveness in prolonged standing up workers. METHODS: Randomized controlled trial involving 75 healthy healthcare professionals working in 6 hours standing up shifts without or with GCS (group A and B, respectively). Outcome measures were performed before and after the shift, at baseline (T0), at 1 (T1), 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) months and included lower limb volume, air plethysmography (APG), quality of life, and dedicated cost-effectiveness questionnaires. RESULTS: Seventy-two subjects completed the data collection. Leg volume increased in group A and decreased in B at all assessment points (T0, 1, 6, 12) (P<0.0001). Venous filling index did not change within the 12 months, but, after every shift, its value was lower in B compared to A (P<0.0001). At 12 months, VVSymQ worsened in A and improved in B (P<0.0001) and CIVIQ significantly worsened in A (P<0.0001), while in B it significantly improved (P<0.0001). Perceived disability was higher in A at 12 months (P<0.001) and the cost calculation revealed a saving of 1510 euro per year in B. CONCLUSIONS: GCS counteracted occupational oedema and positively influenced venous filling index, while improving vein specific quality of life measurements in addition to cost savings.

Triage of patients with venous and lymphatic diseases during the COVID-19 pandemic - The Venous and Lymphatic Triage and Acuity Scale (VELTAS) : A consensus document of the International Union of Phlebology (UIP), Australasian College of Phlebology (ACP), American Vein and Lymphatic Society (AVLS), American Venous Forum (AVF), European College of Phlebology (ECoP), European Venous Forum (EVF), Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia (IRSA), Latin American Venous Forum, Pan-American Society of Phlebology and Lymphology and the Venous Association of India (VAI) This consensus document has been co-published in Phlebology [DOI: 10.1177/0268355520930884] and Journal of Vascular Surgery: Venous and Lymphatic Disorders [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2020.05.002]. The publications are identical except for minor stylistic and spelling differences in keeping with each journal's style. The contribution has been published under a Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) global pandemic has resulted in diversion of healthcare resources to the management of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 virus. Elective interventions and surgical procedures in most countries have been postponed and operating room resources have been diverted to manage the pandemic. The Venous and Lymphatic Triage and Acuity Scale was developed to provide an international standard to rationalise and harmonise the management of patients with venous and lymphatic disorders or vascular anomalies. Triage urgency was determined based on clinical assessment of urgency with which a patient would require medical treatment or surgical intervention. Clinical conditions were classified into six categories of: (1) venous thromboembolism (VTE), (2) chronic venous disease, (3) vascular anomalies, (4) venous trauma, (5) venous compression and (6) lymphatic disease. Triage urgency was categorised into four groups and individual conditions were allocated to each class of triage. These included (1) medical emergencies (requiring immediate attendance), example massive pulmonary embolism; (2) urgent (to be seen as soon as possible), example deep vein thrombosis; (3) semi-urgent (to be attended to within 30-90 days), example highly symptomatic chronic venous disease, and (4) discretionary/non-urgent- (to be seen within 6-12 months), example chronic lymphoedema. Venous and Lymphatic Triage and Acuity Scale aims to standardise the triage of patients with venous and lymphatic disease or vascular anomalies by providing an international consensus-based classification of clinical categories and triage urgency. The scale may be used during pandemics such as the current COVID-19 crisis but may also be used as a general framework to classify urgency of the listed conditions.

Comparison Between Duplex Ultrasound and Multigate Quality Doppler Profile Software in the Assessment of Lower Limb Perforating Vein Direction.

OBJECTIVES: The aim was to assess more accurately the net flow of the lower limb perforating veins (PVs). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was an observational prospective study. Two hundred and twenty one limbs with chronic venous disease (C1-6EpAs,pPr) of 193 patients underwent a duplex ultrasound (DUS). All identified PVs were scanned also by means of quality Doppler profile (QDP) multigate analysis in order to determine their net inward and outward flow direction. A comparison between the traditional pulsed wave Doppler analysis and QDP was performed to detect potential discrepancy between the traditional definition of PV incompetence and a net outward flow. RESULTS: The DUS investigation identified 774 PVs. Only 7.7% of the PVs showed an outward flow lasting more than 500 ms. Among the PVs showing a longer than 500 ms outward flow, QDP assessment revealed net outward flow in only 84% of the PVs along the thigh and in 28.6% along the lower leg. Among the PVs showing a shorter than 500 ms outward flow, QDP assessment reported a net outward flow in 2.4% of the PVs along the thigh and in 47.3% of those along the lower leg. The sensitivity of an outward flow lasting more than 500 ms in detecting an actual net outward flow was 13.9% (9-20.1%). The specificity of an outward flow lasting less than 500 ms in detecting a net inward flow was 96.4% (93.2-98.3%). CONCLUSIONS: A lack of overlap exists between the finding of a PV outward flow lasting more than 500 ms and the net outward flow of the same vessel. The traditional definition of PV incompetence is challenged by the reported data and further investigations are required to identify a gold standard assessment.

Clinical Applicability of Assessment of Jugular Flow over the Individual Cardiac Cycle Compared with Current Ultrasound Methodology.

There is growing interest in measuring cerebral venous outflow with ultrasound (US). However, results obtained with the current US Doppler methodology, which uses just a single value of cross-sectional area (CSA) of the vessel, are highly variable and inconclusive. The product of CSA and time-averaged velocity in the case of pulsatile vessels may be a possible source of error, particularly for a pulsatile vein like the internal jugular vein (IJV), where the cardiac pump transmits a sequence of well-established waves along the conduit. We herein propose a novel technique for US IJV flow assessment that accurately accounts for IJV CSA variations during the cardiac cycle. Five subjects were investigated with a high-resolution real-time B-mode video, synchronized with an electrocardiography trace. In this approach, CSA variations representing the pulsatility of the IJV are overlapped with the velocity curve obtained by the usual spectral Doppler trace. The overlap is then phased point by point using the electrocardiography pacemaker. This allows us to experimentally measure the velocity variation in relation to the change in CSA precisely, ultimately enabling calculation of IJV flow. (i) The sequence of CSA variation with respect to the electrocardiography waves corresponds exactly to the jugular venous pulse as measured in physiology. (ii) The methodology permits us to phase the velocity and CSA, which is ultimately what is currently lacking to precisely calculate the flow in the IJV with US. (iii) The time-averaged flow, calculated with the described technique, is very close to that calculated assuming a constant IJV CSA, whereas the time-dependent flow shows differs as much as 40%. (iv) Finally, we tested the accuracy of the technique with a methodology that may allow for universal assessment of the accuracy of each personal US-based evaluation of flow rate.