Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 30
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Bases de dados
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
2.
Brain Commun ; 5(2): fcad041, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37006331

RESUMO

Polygenic risk scores aggregate an individual's burden of risk alleles to estimate the overall genetic risk for a specific trait or disease. Polygenic risk scores derived from genome-wide association studies of European populations perform poorly for other ancestral groups. Given the potential for future clinical utility, underperformance of polygenic risk scores in South Asian populations has the potential to reinforce health inequalities. To determine whether European-derived polygenic risk scores underperform at multiple sclerosis prediction in a South Asian-ancestry population compared with a European-ancestry cohort, we used data from two longitudinal genetic cohort studies: Genes & Health (2015-present), a study of ∼50 000 British-Bangladeshi and British-Pakistani individuals, and UK Biobank (2006-present), which is comprised of ∼500 000 predominantly White British individuals. We compared individuals with and without multiple sclerosis in both studies (Genes & Health: N Cases = 42, N Control = 40 490; UK Biobank: N Cases = 2091, N Control = 374 866). Polygenic risk scores were calculated using clumping and thresholding with risk allele effect sizes obtained from the largest multiple sclerosis genome-wide association study to date. Scores were calculated with and without the major histocompatibility complex region, the most influential locus in determining multiple sclerosis risk. Polygenic risk score prediction was evaluated using Nagelkerke's pseudo-R 2 metric adjusted for case ascertainment, age, sex and the first four genetic principal components. We found that, as expected, European-derived polygenic risk scores perform poorly in the Genes & Health cohort, explaining 1.1% (including the major histocompatibility complex) and 1.5% (excluding the major histocompatibility complex) of disease risk. In contrast, multiple sclerosis polygenic risk scores explained 4.8% (including the major histocompatibility complex) and 2.8% (excluding the major histocompatibility complex) of disease risk in European-ancestry UK Biobank participants. These findings suggest that polygenic risk score prediction of multiple sclerosis based on European genome-wide association study results is less accurate in a South Asian population. Genetic studies of ancestrally diverse populations are required to ensure that polygenic risk scores can be useful across ancestries.

4.
JAMA Neurol ; 79(4): 359-369, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35254398

RESUMO

IMPORTANCE: Early features of Parkinson disease (PD) have been described through population-based studies that overrepresent White, affluent groups and may not be generalizable. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between risk factors and prediagnostic presentations of PD in an ethnically diverse UK population with high socioeconomic deprivation but universal access to health care. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A nested case-control study was conducted using electronic health care records on 1 016 277 individuals from primary care practices in East London to extract clinical information recorded between 1990 and February 6, 2018. The data were analyzed between September 3, 2020, and September 3, 2021. Individuals with a diagnosis of PD were compared with controls without PD or other major neurological conditions. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A matched analysis (10 controls matched for each patient with PD according to age and sex) and an unmatched analysis (adjusted for age and sex) were undertaken using multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between risk factors and prediagnostic presentations to primary care with subsequent diagnosis of PD. Three time periods (<2, 2-<5, and 5-10 years before diagnosis) were analyzed separately and together. RESULTS: Of 1 016 277 individuals included in the data set, 5699 were excluded and 1055 patients with PD and 1 009 523 controls were included in the analysis. Patients with PD were older than controls (mean [SD], 72.9 [11.3] vs 40.3 [15.2] years), and more were male (632 [59.9%] vs 516 862 [51.2%]). In the matched analysis (1055 individuals with PD and 10 550 controls), associations were found for tremor (odds ratio [OR], 145.96; 95% CI, 90.55-235.28) and memory symptoms (OR, 8.60; 95% CI, 5.91-12.49) less than 2 years before the PD diagnosis. The associations were also found up to 10 years before PD diagnosis for tremor and 5 years for memory symptoms. Among midlife risk factors, hypertension (OR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.19-1.55) and type 2 diabetes (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.19-1.62) were associated with subsequent diagnosis of PD. Associations with early nonmotor features, including hypotension (OR, 6.84; 95% CI, 3.38-13.85), constipation (OR, 3.29; 95% CI, 2.32-4.66), and depression (OR, 4.69; 95% CI, 2.88-7.63), were also noted. Associations were found for epilepsy (OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.63-3.83) and hearing loss (OR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.06-2.58), which have not previously been well reported. These findings were replicated using data from the UK Biobank. No association with future PD diagnosis was found for ethnicity or deprivation index level. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study provides data suggesting that a range of comorbidities and symptoms are encountered in primary care settings before PD diagnosis in an ethnically diverse and deprived population. Novel temporal associations were observed for epilepsy and hearing loss with subsequent development of PD. The prominence of memory symptoms suggests an excess of cognitive dysfunction in early PD in this population or difficulty in correctly ascertaining symptoms in traditionally underrepresented groups.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Doença de Parkinson , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Humanos , Masculino , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico , Doença de Parkinson/epidemiologia , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores de Risco , Tremor , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
5.
Int J Epidemiol ; 49(6): 2051-2057, 2021 01 23.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32844186

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Smoking and childhood and adolescent high body-mass index (BMI) are leading lifestyle-related risk factors of global premature morbidity and mortality, and have been associated with an increased risk of developing multiple sclerosis (MS). This study aims to estimate and project the proportion of MS incidence that could be prevented with elimination of these risk factors. METHODS: Prevalence estimates of high BMI during childhood/adolescence and smoking in early adulthood, and relative risks of MS, were obtained from published literature. A time-lag of 10 years was assumed between smoking in early adulthood and MS incidence, and a time-lag of 20 years was assumed between childhood/adolescent high BMI and MS incidence. The MS population attributable fractions (PAFs) of smoking and high BMI were estimated as individual and combined risk factors, by age, country and sex in 2015, 2025 and 2035 where feasible. RESULTS: The combined estimated PAFs for smoking and high BMI in 2015 were 14, 11, 12 and 12% for the UK, USA, Russia and Australia in a conservative estimate, and 21, 20, 19 and 16% in an independent estimate, respectively. Estimates for smoking are declining over time, whereas estimates for high early life BMI are rising. The PAF for high early life BMI is highest in the USA and is estimated to increase to 14% by 2035. CONCLUSIONS: Assuming causality, there is the potential to substantially reduce MS incidence with the elimination of lifestyle-related modifiable risk factors, which are the target of global public health prevention strategies.


Assuntos
Esclerose Múltipla , Adolescente , Adulto , Austrália/epidemiologia , Índice de Massa Corporal , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Federação Russa , Fumar/epidemiologia
6.
Neurol Ther ; 9(2): 359-374, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32989721

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Since 2010, 27 mixed-treatment comparisons (MTCs) of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for multiple sclerosis have been published. However, there has been continued evolution in the field of MTCs. Additionally, limitations in methodological approach and reporting transparency, even in the most recent publications, makes interpretation and comparison of existing studies difficult. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are twofold: (1) to estimate the efficacy and safety of DMTs at European Commission-approved doses compared with placebo in adults with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) using MTC, and (2) to identify and address methodological challenges when performing MTC in RRMS, thereby creating a baseline for comparisons with future treatments. METHODS: Searches were completed in 14 databases, including MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CDSR and DARE, from inception to June 2018 to identify published or unpublished prospective, randomised controlled trials of all European Union-approved DMTs or DMTs expected to be approved in the near future in RRMS or rapidly-evolving severe RRMS. No language or date restrictions were applied. Studies were included in the MTC if they were judged to have sufficiently similar characteristics, based on the following: patient age; proportion of male participants; Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score; duration of disease; number of relapses prior to enrolment and proportion of previously treated patients. Background information from the included studies, as well as effect size and confidence intervals (where relevant) of defined outcomes were extracted. Reporting of the MTC was consistent with the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) network meta-analysis guidelines. RESULTS: In total, 33 studies were included in the MTC. Annualised relapse rate (ARR 28 trials) was significantly reduced in all treatments compared with placebo. Alemtuzumab had the highest probability (63%) of being the most effective treatment in terms of ARR compared with placebo (rate ratio [RR] 0.28, 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.21-0.38), followed by natalizumab (30% probability; RR 0.32, 95% CrI 0.23-0.43). The risk of 3- and 6-month confirmed disability progression (CDP3M, 13 trials; CDP6M, 14 trials) were similar; CDP6M was significantly reduced for alemtuzumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.365; 95% CrI 0.165-0.725), ocrelizumab (HR 0.405, 95% CrI 0.188-0.853) and natalizumab (HR 0.459, 95% CrI 0.252-0.840) relative to placebo. There were no significant differences in the odds of serious adverse events (SAEs, 6 trials) between any treatment and placebo. The results of the MTC were limited by the lack of studies reporting direct comparisons between the included treatments and by heterogeneous reporting of key outcome data. CONCLUSIONS: Meta-analyses confirmed the benefit of all DMTs in terms of relapse rate compared with placebo with a comparable rate of SAEs for the DMTs that could be included in the network. The rigor and transparency of reporting in this study provide a benchmark for comparisons with future new agents.

8.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 41: 102024, 2020 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32143179

RESUMO

AIMS: To examine the association between socioeconomic status (SES) and disease-modifying therapy (DMT) prescribing patterns in people with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (pwRRMS). METHODS: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among pwRRMS treated with a DMT in the neuroinflammation service at The Royal London Hospital (Barts Health NHS Trust). Study data were collected between July and September 2017. SES was determined by patient income and education extracted from the English Index of Multiple Deprivation. Based on their efficacy, DMTs were categorized as moderate efficacy (Glatiramer Acetate and Beta-Interferons), high efficacy (Cladribine, Fingolimod and Dimethyl Fumarate) and very-high efficacy therapies (Natalizumab and Alemtuzumab). Multinomial logistic regressions were performed for univariate and multivariate models to assess differences between SES and DMT prescribing patterns. RESULTS: Treatment consisted of moderate efficacy (n = 76, 12%), high efficacy (n = 325, 51.3%) and very-high efficacy therapies (n = 232, 36.7%). Medians for income and education deciles were 4 (IQR 3-7) and 6 (IQR 4-8), respectively. After multinomial logistic regression analysis, patient income was not associated with increased odds of being treated with high efficacy (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.82-1.04; p = 0.177) or very-high efficacy DMTs (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.85-1.06; p = 0.371). Similarly, patient education was not associated with being treated with high efficacy (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.80-1.03; p = 0.139) or very-high efficacy therapies (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.04; p = 0.188). CONCLUSIONS: SES was not predictive of DMT prescribing patterns in pwRRMS. Whilst this appears reassuring within this universal health care setting, the same methodology needs to be applied to other MS services for comparison. Data could then be further interrogated to explore potential socioeconomic inequities in DMT prescribing patterns across the UK.


Assuntos
Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Esclerose Múltipla Recidivante-Remitente/tratamento farmacológico , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Classe Social , Adulto , Escolaridade , Feminino , Humanos , Renda , Masculino , Reino Unido
9.
Ann Neurol ; 87(4): 599-608, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31975487

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Epidemiological research in multiple sclerosis (MS) has mainly been performed in socioeconomically and ethnically limited populations; influences on MS risk have not been studied in prospectively collected non-White populations. We set out to study the influence of previously described MS risk factors in an ethnically diverse population. METHODS: A nested case-control study was created using primary care records of >1 million individuals, >50% of whom identify as Black, Asian, and Minority Ethnic (BAME). MS cases were compared to an age- and sex-matched control cohort (1:4), and to a large unmatched cohort. Odds ratios (ORs) of disease were determined according to exposure of interest, and a multivariate model including all exposures was created. Potential pairwise interactions were considered where both indicated a significant effect. RESULTS: A total of 1,344 confirmed MS cases were included. MS OR in blacks aged <40 years was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.81-1.62) compared to whites. MS odds in BAME current (OR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.24-2.31) and ex-smokers (OR = 2.83, 95% CI = 2.14-3.72) were considerably higher than in Whites (OR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.88-1.34; OR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.19-1.74, respectively). Prior infectious mononucleosis was associated with increased odds of MS in Blacks (OR = 4.94, 95% CI = 1.23-17.89). An increase in MS odds was seen in the least-deprived quintile (OR = 2.46, 95% CI = 1.40-4.24), but no effect across deprived quintiles was seen. INTERPRETATION: This cohort provides novel data on factors potentially driving MS susceptibility in a diverse population, one-third of whom live in poverty. Environmental exposures have differential risk across ethnicity. ANN NEUROL 2020;87:599-608.


Assuntos
Povo Asiático/estatística & dados numéricos , População Negra/estatística & dados numéricos , Status Econômico/estatística & dados numéricos , Esclerose Múltipla/etnologia , Classe Social , População Branca/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Inglaterra/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Mononucleose Infecciosa/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/epidemiologia , Obesidade/epidemiologia , Razão de Chances , Sobrepeso/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco , Fumar/epidemiologia
11.
Mult Scler ; 25(5): 627-636, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30351211

RESUMO

Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) has become increasingly multifaceted and comprises not only a variety of disease-modifying drugs with different mechanism of action but also a wide range of symptomatic therapies. Today, it is not possible for the family physician or even many general neurologists to master the current treatment algorithm, and this calls for the establishment of multidisciplinary MS Care Units. The core of the MS Care Unit would, in addition to MS neurologists and nurses, typically comprise neuropsychologists, clinical psychologists, physiotherapists, occupational therapists and secretaries, and will work together with a group of different specialists on formalized diagnostic workup procedures, protocols for initiation and follow-up of disease-modifying therapies. It is obvious that the terms of performance of different MS Care Units will vary across regions and need to be balanced with clinical practice according to local conditions. Although the main objective for establishment of MS Care Units will be to offer the single MS patient seamless and correct management of the disease to increase patient satisfaction and quality of life, it may even be cost-effective for the society by maintaining the working ability and reducing the costs of home help and custodial care by keeping people with MS resourceful.


Assuntos
Atenção à Saúde , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Assistência ao Paciente , Qualidade de Vida , Análise Custo-Benefício/estatística & dados numéricos , Atenção à Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Gerenciamento Clínico , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/reabilitação
12.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 27: 247-253, 2019 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30419510

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Whilst there is a broad selection of drugs licensed as disease modifying treatments (DMTs) for people with relapsing multiple sclerosis (pwRMS), access to DMTs remains restricted, particularly for people with progressive MS (pwPMS). Cladribine has shown efficacy at all stages of MS. Following withdrawal from the market of oral cladribine in 2011, partly due to issues associated with lymphopenia, and following a thorough risk assessment, we started using subcutaneously injected cladribine (Litak®) to treat both pwRMS and pwPMS. Here, we report on the real life safety and tolerability of this treatment option. METHODS: Cladribine was offered to (i) pwRMS as a choice despite fulfilling NHS England (NHSE) criteria for licensed DMTs, and (ii) pwRMS and pwPMS not eligible for NHSE approved DMTs. To avoid lymphocyte depletion lower than 0.5 × 109/l (WHO grade 2) cladribine was administered using a personalised dosing scheme (30-40 mg in week 1; and another 0-30 mg in week 5 pending total lymphocyte count at week 4). Anti-viral prophylaxis was given from day 1 for 60 days. Patients approaching week 48 were given a second treatment cycle. Data collection included side effects, relapses, change in disability and MRI indices. RESULTS: Seventy-one pwMS (40 female, 31 male; 36 RMS, 35 PMS,) received at least one treatment cycle. Mean age for starting cladribine was 44 years (range 22-72 years), median EDSS was 5 (range 1-8.5). Maximum follow-up was 28 months. 35/71 pwMS were followed up for at least 20 weeks. These patients had a median EDSS of 5.0 (range 1.0-7.5) at baseline and 5.5 (range 1.0-8.0) after a mean follow-up of 11 months (range 5-28). Cladribine was well tolerated with very few treatment-related adverse events observed. Personalised dosing led to grade 1-2 lymphopenia in 50% of cases. A single patient developed transient grade 3 lymphopenia. No cases of varicella or other infections were observed. Four/17 people with relapsing MS, experienced a total of six relapses during a mean follow-up of 13 months (range 5-28 months). In people with PMS (n = 18) median EDSS was 5.5 (2.0-7.5) at baseline and 6.0 (2.5-7.5) after a median of 10 months (range 5-18). In pwPMS MRI showed that 25% had active scans at baseline, and 0% at follow-up. CONCLUSION: Personalised dosing of cladribine avoided severe lymphopenia in all but one patients and was very well tolerated across a large spectrum of disease severity. Our data suggests cladribine may offer benefit people with relapsing and progressive MS alike. The personalised protocol used appears safe, however warrants controlled studies to more definitively assess efficacy and safety, particularly in groups of pwMS who are not eligible for licensed DMT including oral cladribine (Mavenclad®).


Assuntos
Cladribina/administração & dosagem , Guias como Assunto , Fatores Imunológicos/administração & dosagem , Esclerose Múltipla/tratamento farmacológico , Programas Nacionais de Saúde , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Medicina de Precisão , Adulto , Idoso , Cladribina/efeitos adversos , Cladribina/economia , Inglaterra , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/efeitos adversos , Fatores Imunológicos/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Uso Off-Label , Adulto Jovem
13.
Brain Behav ; 9(1): e01169, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30536750

RESUMO

Social capital (SC) is a broad term that encompasses the many resources derived from social connections. The contemporary study of SC in public health has deep roots in the related fields of sociology, economics, and politics. Its multidisciplinary nature and the varying potential ways it could affect individuals have resulted in different but overlapping models to approach SC in the health field. There are currently no standardized measures of SC, and even more challenging its impact on health outcomes seems to vary according to the level of analysis. Despite the accumulating evidence that supports a protective effect of SC on mental and physical health, and mortality, not enough attention has been paid to the potential drawbacks of SC. The role of SC in neurological disease is just beginning to be explored. Concerted efforts are needed to ensure that empirical evidence on SC could be properly translated into interventions for health-promoting purposes. In this paper, we review the current state of scientific knowledge on the subject of SC, with a focus on its application in the field of neurology.


Assuntos
Neurologia/organização & administração , Saúde Pública/economia , Capital Social , Humanos , Rede Social , Fatores Socioeconômicos
14.
Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin ; 4(2): 2055217318783767, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30090639

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A considerable number of people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) live in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), where lack of resource adversely affects access to effective disease-modifying treatment. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this commentary is to propose a useful cost-effective disease-modifying treatment option for pwMS in LMIC with potential high efficacy and high convenience to the pwMS and treating physician.Viewpoint: We propose using generic 2-chloro-2'-deoxyadenosine (cladribine), a small molecule licensed for treatment of people with hairy cell leukaemia, as a solution of this significant equity imbalance. Cladribine has been shown in phase II and III trials to be a highly effective disease-modifying treatment for pwMS, and its adverse effect profile is comparable with any DMT currently licensed in high-income economies where an oral preparation has recently been licensed by the European Medicines Agency. CONCLUSION: Our viewpoint takes into account experience we have gathered over the past three years in the use of generic cladribine to treat pwMS. Whilst here we focus on MS, there is significant potential for use of cladribine in other conditions that could benefit from its mechanism of action.

17.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 19: 153-160, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29241142

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patient engagement is vital in multiple sclerosis (MS) in order to optimise outcomes for patients, society and healthcare systems. It is essential to involve all stakeholders in potential solutions, working in a multidisciplinary way to ensure that people with MS (PwMS) are included in shared decision-making and disease management. To start this process, a collaborative, open environment between PwMS and healthcare professionals (HCPs) is required so that similarities and disparities in the perception of key areas in patient care and unmet needs can be identified. With this patient-centred approach in mind, in 2016 the MS in the 21st Century Steering Group formed a unique collaboration to include PwMS in the Steering Group to provide a platform for the patient voice. METHODS: The MS in the 21st Century initiative set out to foster engagement through a series of open-forum joint workshops. The aims of these workshops were: to identify similarities and disparities in the perception and prioritisation in three key areas (unmet needs, the treatment burden in MS, and factors that impact patient engagement), and to provide practical advice on how the gaps in perception and understanding in these key areas could be bridged. RESULTS: Combined practical advice and direction are provided here as eight actions: 1. Improve communication to raise the quality of HCP-patient interaction and optimise the limited time available for consultations. 2. Heighten the awareness of 'hidden' disease symptoms and how these can be managed. 3. Improve the dialogue surrounding the benefit versus risk issues of therapies to help patients become fully informed and active participants in their healthcare decisions. 4. Provide accurate, lucid information in an easily accessible format from reliable sources. 5. Encourage HCPs and multidisciplinary teams to acquire and share new knowledge and information among their teams and with PwMS. 6. Foster greater understanding and awareness of challenges faced by PwMS and HCPs in treating MS. 7. Collaborate to develop local education, communication and patient-engagement initiatives. 8. Motivate PwMS to become advocates for self-management in MS care. CONCLUSION: Our study of PwMS and HCPs in the MS in the 21st Century initiative has highlighted eight practical actions. These actions identify how differences and gaps in unmet needs, treatment burden, and patient engagement between PwMS and HCPs can be bridged to improve MS disease management. Of particular interest now are patient-centred educational resources that can be used during time-limited consultations to enhance understanding of disease and improve communication. Actively bridging these gaps in a joint approach enables PwMS to take part in shared decision-making; with improved communication and reliable information, patients can make informed decisions with their HCPs, as part of their own personalised disease management.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Tomada de Decisões , Gerenciamento Clínico , Educação , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Avaliação das Necessidades , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Participação do Paciente , Relações Profissional-Paciente , Adulto , Humanos
18.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 17: 172-176, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055452

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: In multiple sclerosis (MS) upper limb neurological impairments, are an important driver of disability and handicap. The gold standard for assessing upper limb function is the 9-hole peg test (9HPT). One disadvantage of the current plastic version is its price, which prevents its widespread use as a self-monitoring tool by the MS community. OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an affordable cardboard version of 9HPT for patients to self-monitor upper limb function at home. The aim is not to replace the plastic version, which would stay the gold standard in MS centers. METHODS: We enrolled 177 volunteers, 68 healthy controls and 109 people with MS (pwMS) at varying stages of their disease. Volunteers performed two trials of the 9HPT with their dominant hand and two with their non-dominant hand using both plastic 9HPT and cardboard 9HPT. The primary comparison parameter was the time needed to perform the task. RESULTS: The mean score for the cardboard 9HPT was 24.58 (SEM 1.54s) seconds compared to 26.03 (SEM 1.44s) seconds for the plastic 9HPT (p = 0.007). However, the two versions of the tests correlated very strongly, r = 0.96 (p < 0.001). The coefficient of variation, repeat-repeat testing, showed less variability with the cardboard version than in the plastic one with 10% and 14%, respectively. Two-thirds of pwMS preferred using the cardboard version. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that the cardboard version is at least equivalent to the plastic version of the test with arguably better design attributes making it the preferred option for self-monitoring.


Assuntos
Avaliação da Deficiência , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Extremidade Superior/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Conservação dos Recursos Naturais , Análise Custo-Benefício , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Lateralidade Funcional , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos dos Movimentos/fisiopatologia , Papel , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Autogestão , Adulto Jovem
19.
Health Technol Assess ; 21(31): 1-50, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28639937

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Transverse myelitis (TM) is an immune-mediated disorder of the spinal cord that affects adults and children and that causes motor, sensory and autonomic dysfunction. There is a prolonged recovery phase, which may continue for many years. Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an uncommon relapsing inflammatory central nervous system condition in which TM can be the first presenting symptom. As TM and NMO affect many patients in the prime of their working life, the disorder can impose a significant demand on health resources. There are currently no robust controlled trials in children or adults to inform the optimal treatment of TM. However, treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is being effectively used in the management of a range of neurological conditions. Although other interventions such as plasma exchange (PLEX) in addition to intravenous (IV) methylprednisolone therapy can be beneficial in TM, PLEX is costly and technically challenging to deliver in the acute setting. IVIG is more readily accessible and less costly. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether additional and early treatment with IVIG is of extra benefit in TM compared with standard therapy with IV steroids. DESIGN: A multicentre, single-blind, parallel-group randomised controlled trial of IVIG compared with standard therapy for the treatment of TM in adults and children. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged ≥ 1 year diagnosed with either acute first-onset TM or first presentation of NMO. Target recruitment was 170 participants (85 participants per arm). INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomised 1 : 1 to treatment with IV methylprednisolone only or treatment with IV methylprednisolone plus 2 g/kg of IVIG in divided doses within 5 days of the first commencement of steroid therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure - American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale at 6 months post randomisation, with a good outcome defined by a two-grade change. Secondary and tertiary outcome measures - ASIA motor and sensory scales, Expanded Disability Status Scale, health outcome, quality of life, Client Service Receipt Inventory and International Spinal Cord Injury Pain, Bladder and Bowel Basic Data Sets. RESULTS: In total, 26 participants were screened and two were randomised into the study. With the limited sample size, treatment effect could not be determined. However, we identified barriers to accrual that included strict inclusion criteria, the short enrolment window, challenges associated with the use of the ASIA Impairment Scale as an outcome measure and estimation of the incidence of TM. CONCLUSIONS: The study did not reach the end point and the effect of IVIG in TM/NMO could not be determined. Investigators should be aware of the potential challenges associated with carrying out a rare disease trial with a short enrolment window. The study question is one that still necessitates investigation. Preliminary work to ameliorate the effect of the barriers encountered in this study is vital. TRIAL REGISTRATION: EudraCT 2014-002335-34, ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02398994 and Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12127581. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 21, No. 31. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. Funding was also received from Biotest AG, Germany (supply of IVIG) and the Transverse Myelitis Society (excess research cost to facilitate study initiation).


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/uso terapêutico , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/economia , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/uso terapêutico , Metilprednisolona/uso terapêutico , Mielite Transversa/tratamento farmacológico , Adolescente , Anti-Inflamatórios/administração & dosagem , Anti-Inflamatórios/efeitos adversos , Criança , Análise Custo-Benefício , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Alemanha , Humanos , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/administração & dosagem , Imunoglobulinas Intravenosas/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Metilprednisolona/administração & dosagem , Metilprednisolona/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Qualidade de Vida , Projetos de Pesquisa , Método Simples-Cego
20.
Mult Scler Relat Disord ; 9 Suppl 1: S5-S48, 2016 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27640924

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: We present international consensus recommendations for improving diagnosis, management and treatment access in multiple sclerosis (MS). Our vision is that these will be used widely among those committed to creating a better future for people with MS and their families. METHODS: Structured discussions and literature searches conducted in 2015 examined the personal and economic impact of MS, current practice in diagnosis, treatment and management, definitions of disease activity and barriers to accessing disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). RESULTS: Delays often occur before a person with symptoms suggestive of MS sees a neurologist. Campaigns to raise awareness of MS are needed, as are initiatives to improve access to MS healthcare professionals and services. We recommend a clear treatment goal: to maximize neurological reserve, cognitive function and physical function by reducing disease activity. Treatment should start early, with DMT and lifestyle measures. All parameters that predict relapses and disability progression should be included in the definition of disease activity and monitored regularly when practical. On suboptimal control of disease activity, switching to a DMT with a different mechanism of action should be considered. A shared decision-making process that embodies dialogue and considers all appropriate DMTs should be implemented. Monitoring data should be recorded formally in registries to generate real-world evidence. In many jurisdictions, access to DMTs is limited. To improve treatment access the relevant bodies should consider all costs to all parties when conducting economic evaluations and encourage the continuing investigation, development and use of cost-effective therapeutic strategies and alternative financing models. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus findings of an international author group recommend a therapeutic strategy based on proactive monitoring and shared decision-making in MS. Early diagnosis and improved treatment access are also key components.


Assuntos
Encéfalo/fisiopatologia , Esclerose Múltipla/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Esclerose Múltipla/diagnóstico , Esclerose Múltipla/economia , Esclerose Múltipla/terapia , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA