Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Rand Health Q ; 10(2): 3, 2023 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37200826

RESUMO

The one-year U.S. Equity-First Vaccination Initiative (EVI), launched in April 2021, aimed to reduce racial inequities in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination across five demonstration cities (Baltimore, Chicago, Houston, Newark, and Oakland) and over the longer term strengthen the United States' public health system to achieve more-equitable outcomes. This initiative comprised nearly 100 community-based organizations (CBOs), who led hyper-local work to increase vaccination access and confidence in communities of individuals who identify as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color. In this study, the second of two on the initiative, the authors examine the results of the EVI. They look at the initiative's activities, effects, and challenges, and provide recommendations for how to support and sustain this hyper-local community-led approach and strengthen the public health system in the United States.

2.
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) ; 72(5): 692-698, 2020 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30980467

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The present study was undertaken to investigate whether Latina and African American women with arthritis-related knee pain and primary care providers who treat them believe their treatment decisions would benefit from having more information about the impact of treatment on their quality of life, medical care costs, and work productivity. METHODS: We conducted 4 focus groups of Latina and African American women over age 45 years who had knee pain. We also conducted 2 focus groups with primary care providers who treated Latina and African American women for knee pain. The participants were recruited from the community. They were asked their opinions about a decision tool that presented information on a range of treatment options and their impacts on quality of life, medical care costs, and work productivity. They were asked whether providing this information would help them make better treatment decisions. We analyzed the focus group transcripts using ATLAS.ti. RESULTS: We found that minority women and primary care providers endorsed the use of a decision-making tool that provided information of the impact of treatment on quality of life, medical care costs, and work productivity. Providers felt that patients would benefit from having the additional information but were concerned about its complexity and some patients' ability to comprehend the information. CONCLUSION: Latina and African American women could make more informed treatment decisions for their knee pain using a decision-making tool that provides them with significant information about how various treatment options may impact their quality of life, medical care costs, and workforce productivity.


Assuntos
Artralgia/economia , Artralgia/terapia , Negro ou Afro-Americano/psicologia , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde/etnologia , Hispânico ou Latino/psicologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/economia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/terapia , Médicos de Atenção Primária/psicologia , Qualidade de Vida , Artralgia/etnologia , Artralgia/psicologia , Atitude do Pessoal de Saúde , Comportamento de Escolha , Análise Custo-Benefício , Assistência à Saúde Culturalmente Competente/etnologia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Emprego , Feminino , Grupos Focais , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Osteoartrite do Joelho/etnologia , Osteoartrite do Joelho/psicologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Atenção Primária à Saúde , Fatores Raciais , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA