Comparison of direct surgical cost and outcomes for unstable elbow injuries: internal joint stabilizer versus external fixation.

Background: Unstable elbow injuries sometimes require External fixation (ExF) or an Internal Joint Stabilizer (IJS) to maintain joint reduction. No studies have compared the clinical outcomes and surgical costs of these 2 treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to determine whether clinical outcome and surgical encounter total direct costs (SETDCs) differ between ExF and IJS for unstable elbow injuries. Methods: This retrospective study identified adult patients (aged ≥ 18 years) with unstable elbow injures treated by either an IJS or ExF between 2010 and 2019 at a single tertiary academic center. Patients postoperatively completed 3 patient-reported outcome measures (the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand, the Mayo Elbow Performance score, and EQ-5D-DL). Postoperative range of motion was measured in all patients, and complications tallied. SETDCs were determined and compared between the 2 groups. Results: A total of 23 patients were identified, with 12 in each group. Clinical and radiographic follow-up for the IJS group averaged 24 months and 6 months, respectively, and for the ExF group, 78 months and 5 months, respectively. The 2 groups had similar final range of motion, the Mayo Elbow Performance score, and 5Q-5D-5L scores; ExF patients had better the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores. IJS patients had fewer complications and were less likely to require additional surgery. The SETDCs were similar between the 2 groups, but the relative contributors to cost differed significantly between the groups. Conclusions: Patients treated with an ExF or IJS had similar clinical outcomes, but complications and second surgeries were more likely in ExF patients. The overall SETDC was also similar for ExF and IJS, but relative contributions of the cost subcategories differed.

Comparison of Patient-Reported Outcomes and Functional Assessment Using a Marker-Less Image Capture System in End-Stage Knee Arthritis.

BACKGROUND: Patient self-assessment of knee function in end-stage osteoarthritis (OA) and following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) has become standard for defining disability. The relationship of PROMs to functional performance requires a continued investigation. The purpose of this study was to determine correlations between patient demographics, PROMs, and functional performances using a marker-less image capture system (MICS). METHODS: Patients indicated for elective TKA completed the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR) and an office-based functional assessment using a MICS. Patient age, body mass index (BMI), and gender were collected. A total of 112 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 65.0 (±9.7) years, mean BMI was 32.5 (±6.6) kg/m2, and mean KOOS-JR was 14.5 (±5.7). The relationships between patient characteristics, KOOS-JR, MICS Alignment (coronal), MICS Mobility (flexion), and composite Total Joint scores were described using Spearman's correlation coefficients. RESULTS: BMI was weakly correlated with KOOS-JR (ρ = -0.22, P = .024), whereas age was not. Age and BMI were not correlated with performance scores. There were weak to no correlations between KOOS-JR and MICS Alignment (ρ = -0.01, P = .951), Mobility (ρ = 0.33, P < .001), and Total Joint scores (ρ = 0.06, P = .504). CONCLUSION: This study found no strong correlation between KOOS-JR and functional performance using a validated MICS for patients with end-stage knee OA. Further study is warranted in determining the relationship between PROMs and performance to optimize outcomes of patients undergoing nonoperative or surgical interventions for knee OA. The use of high-fidelity functional assessment tools that can be integrated into clinical workflow, such as the MICS used in this study, should permit PROM/functional performance comparisons in large populations.

Obtaining Imaging Cost and Quality Information in Femoroacetabular Impingement: The Patient Experience.

Background: Recent changes in healthcare have placed increased emphasis on price transparency, quality measures, and improving the patient experience. However, limited information is available for patient cost of obtaining a hip MRI and factors associated with cost variability. For a patient with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI), this study sought to report (1) the availability of pricing and quality information for a hip magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the state of Iowa, (2) the time investment required to obtain pricing and quality information, and (3) factors that influence hip MRI cost, quality and the time investment required for patients to obtain cost and quality information. Methods: Within the state of Iowa, 126 unique hospital institutions and 30 active, private orthopaedic practices were identified. All 156 providers were contacted via telephone using a standardized script of a hypothetical 25-year-old adult male patient with FAI requesting a quote for a hip MRI. Cost of the MRI and its components, availability of payment discounts, and MRI magnet tesla (T) were requested. A final bundled cost (FBC) was calculated for each MRI provider with all available services and discounts applied. The total amount of time needed to obtain a quote from each location was recorded. Results: One hundred and thirty-six of the 156 institutions contacted provided hip MRI services (87%). Median call duration was 9.1 minutes (Range 2.3-25.6). Median FBC was $2,114.00 (Range $484.75-4,463.00) across all providers. Hospital median FBC was $2,261.70 (Range $909.62-4,463.00) versus $1,225.13 (Range $484.75-2,218.40) for independent imaging centers (P<0.0001). No difference in median cost was observed between nine available 3.0 T machines and eighty-nine 1.5 T machines (P=0.2655). Conclusions: MRI cost varies widely across the state of Iowa and within individual metropolitan areas. Hip MRIs cost less at independent imaging centers compared to hospital locations. The amount of time required to obtain quality and cost data for a hip MRI presents a substantial time burden for patients with FAI. Surgeons, healthcare systems, and policy makers should be cognizant of the large price differences for a hip MRI and the time burden placed on patients with FAI to obtain this information.Level of Evidence: IV.

Subsequent Pain or Injury After Foot and Ankle Surgery in Patients Receiving Workers' Compensation.

BACKGROUND: Workers' compensation (WC) has been associated with poor outcomes following a variety of injuries and surgeries, but rates of subsequent pain or injury (SPI) following surgery have not been studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the rates, locations, and risk factors of SPI in WC patients and non-WC patients who underwent the same surgeries. METHODS: With institutional review board approval, records from foot or ankle surgery performed by author P.P. from 2009 to 2015 were obtained. A retrospective chart review was performed on all WC and non-WC patients with at least 1 Current Procedural Terminology code of interest. SPI was defined as a new injury at a different anatomical location occurring 2 months to 2 years after the index surgery. Chi-square and 2-tailed t tests were used to compare risk factors and rates of SPI in both groups. RESULTS: The WC population had higher rates of SPI than the non-WC population. Specifically, 13 of 56 WC patients (23.2%) vs 12 of 165 non-WC patients (7.3%) reported SPI (P = .001). The hip, knee, and contralateral foot and ankle were common areas of SPI in both groups. Legal representation and increased age were risk factors for SPI in the WC population. Specifically, 10 of 13 WC patients with SPI had legal representation vs 16 of 43 WC patients without SPI (P = .02). Female sex was a risk factor for SPI in the non-WC population. CONCLUSIONS: WC patients had higher rates of subsequent pain or injury than non-WC patients. Legal representation was a risk factor for SPI in the WC population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, comparative series.

Trends in Hip Arthroscopic Labral Repair: An American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Database Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the trends in labral repair in American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II candidates performing hip arthroscopy. METHODS: Candidates who performed arthroscopic hip surgery between 2011 and 2015 during their American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II board collection period were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes (29860, 29861, 29862, 29863, 29914, 29915, 29916). The proportion of hip arthroscopy cases including labral repair (Current Procedural Terminology code 29916) were calculated for each year and analyzed by fellowship training experience. Trends in labral repair utilization were calculated using univariate and regression analyses, with significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,606 hip labral repair cases were performed, with a 35% increase in utilization between 2011 and 2015. Overall, labral repair was performed in 64.8% (1,606/2,480) of hip arthroscopy cases, with a significant increase between 2011 and 2015 (47.4% vs 79.2%; P < .001). Of the hip arthroscopy cases including labral repair, 80.4% (1,291/1,606) were performed by candidates with sports medicine fellowship training. The proportion of hip arthroscopy cases including labral repair was highest for surgeons with sports medicine fellowship training compared with those without sports medicine fellowship training (66.1% vs 59.8%; P = .007). Candidates with sports medicine training performing at least 1 labral repair each year increased from 68% to 89% over the study period (P = .0007). The average number of labral repairs per candidate increased significantly over the duration of the study period (P = .0072). CONCLUSIONS: Labral repair utilization during hip arthroscopy procedures nearly doubled from 2011 to 2015 for American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery Part II candidates, reflecting a significant change in practice. Current data suggest that nearly 80% of hip arthroscopy procedures include labral repair. These trends may reflect the current practice patterns at academic institutions with sports medicine fellowships.

Perioperative nutrition assessment in musculoskeletal trauma patients: Dietitian evaluation is superior to serum chemistries or modified screening questionnaire for risk stratification.

INTRODUCTION: Malnutrition is a potentially modifiable risk factor associated with increased hospital charges, major wound complication, and fracture non-union after orthopaedic surgery. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between three nutrition screening tools and postoperative complications in patients undergoing acute fracture fixation. METHODS: Patients aged 18 or older undergoing acute operative fracture fixation at a Level I academic trauma center were screened upon admission using a malnutrition screening questionnaire (MSQ), and classified as low-, moderate- or high risk. Patients at moderate-to-high risk were assessed for clinical malnutrition by dietitian. Serum albumin, transferrin, total lymphocyte count, and 25(OH) Vitamin D were measured preoperatively. Primary outcome measures included twelve-month postoperative surgical and medical complications obtained by retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Of 373 patients, 17% were moderate-to-high risk of malnutrition by MSQ. Clinical malnutrition was diagnosed by dietitian in 4.3% of patients assessed. Nearly half of all subjects had deficiency in one or more serum biomarkers. Cost of biomarker assays was $624 per patient. Medical or surgical complications occurred in 19% of patients. Dietitian diagnosed malnutrition (clinical malnutrition) was the strongest predictor of complication (OR 3.49, p = 0.017). Hypoalbuminemia was also associated with increased complication risk (OR 1.79, p = 0.045). MSQ score was not correlated with postoperative complication. CONCLUSIONS: Among the examined malnutrition screening tools, clinical malnutrition had the strongest association with postoperative complication. Hypoalbuminemia was associated with increased odds of complication, however there was a large false positive rate with all tested serum chemistries and high associated hospital charges compared to dietitian assessment. MSQ was a poor predictor of malnutrition and clinical outcome. Dietetic assessment is advised for orthopaedic trauma patients.

Might Doctors Really "Know Best"?: Utilizing Surgeon Intuition to Strengthen Preoperative Surgical Risk Assessment.

Background: Many clinical factors are known to increase an individual patient's risk of perioperative complications and hospital readmission. Several novel risk calculators have been created to predict the risk of postoperative complications for specific procedures that rely entirely on objective measurements. Our goal was to determine if surgeon intuition (an estimate of the percent likelihood of minor and major medical and surgical complications and 30-day readmission) could provide an additional source of data in the preoperative setting that may enhance the prediction of complications after surgery. Methods: We targeted the operative practices of three subspecialized orthopedic surgeons over a 6-month period (February 1 to July 31, 2015). We administered surveys to attending surgeons and assisting residents or nurse practitioners prior to each operation. Surgeons were asked to predict each patient's likelihood, on a scale from <1-100, for experiencing a complication. Following the procedure, we analyzed each patient's electronic medical record to determine any adverse events and readmissions. We then looked at levels of association between predictor variables and complications. Analysis of maximum likelihood estimates for complication outcome was performed comparing objective variables and surgeon prediction. Results: A total of 417 surveys in 270 patients were available for analysis. Defining the predicted likelihood of minor medical complications as <10% (low), 10-40% (intermediate), and >40% (high), provided discrimination of postoperative complications for a single observer in the first three month. These cutoff ranges showed inter-observer consistency and a trend towards intra-observer consistency. The only three variables predictive of minor medical complications were ASA class (OR=3.63, 95%CI=1.76-7.52, p=0.0005; comparing >2 vs ≤2), age (ß=0.034±0.012, p=0.0032) and surgeon prediction when comparing high to low risk (ß=0.034±0.008 (0.018-0.049), p<0.0001). Conclusions: Quantitative surgeon preoperative risk assessment was able to accurately discriminate between low- and high-risk groups of minor medical complications. We did not find a similar association between major complications and readmissions.Level of Evidence: IV.

Opioid Demand Before and After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Surgeons and health care systems have received a call to action in an effort to curtail the current opioid epidemic. PURPOSE: To (1) define the natural history of opioid demand after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR), (2) consider how filling preoperative opioid prescriptions affects opioid demand after ACLR, and (3) evaluate the effect of additional procedures during ACLR and patient age on postoperative opioid demand. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: ACLRs performed in the Humana database between 2007 and 2014 were identified using Current Procedural Terminology code 29888. Patients were considered preoperative opioid users if they had filled an opioid prescription in the 3 months preceding surgery. Patients were defined as "chronic" opioid users if they had filled a prescription preoperatively at 1 to 3 months from surgery. Further categorization was performed by identifying patients who only underwent ACLR with no other procedures, those who underwent ACLR with meniscus repair, those who underwent ACLR with meniscectomy, and those who underwent ACLR with microfracture. Categorization by age was also performed. The relative risk (RR) of postoperative opioid use was calculated, and 95% CIs were determined. RESULTS: Over the course of the study period, 4946 ACLRs were performed. At 3 months after their procedure, 7.24% of patients were still filling opioid prescriptions. At 9 and 12 months postoperatively, 4.97% and 4.71% of patients, respectively, were still filling opioid prescriptions. Nearly 35% of patients (1716/4946) were filling opioid pain prescriptions in the 3 months before ACLR. Those filling preoperative opioid prescriptions were 5.35 (95% CI, 4.15-6.90) times more likely to be filling opioid prescriptions at 3 months after ACLR than nonusers (15.38% vs 2.88%, respectively). Those filling opioid prescriptions chronically before surgery were at a 10.50 (95% CI, 7.53-14.64) times increased risk of filling postoperative opioid prescriptions at 5 months. At 5 months postoperatively, patients undergoing ACLR with microfracture had a 1.96 (95% CI, 1.34-2.87) increased risk of filling opioid prescriptions compared with ACLR alone, 2.38 (95% CI, 1.48-3.82) increased risk compared with ACLR with meniscus repair, and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.04-2.19) increased risk compared with ACLR with meniscectomy. Patients younger than 25 years of age had an increased risk of filling opioid prescriptions after ACLR at all time points of the study. CONCLUSION: Opioid demand after ACLR dropped significantly in the vast majority of patients by the third postoperative month. Surprisingly, 35% of patients undergoing ACLR were observed to be using opioid medication preoperatively, and this study found preoperative opioid use to be a strong predictor of postoperative opioid demand with a 5- to 7-fold increased risk in this patient population. Patients who were filling opioid prescriptions 1 to 3 months from their surgical date were at the highest risk for postoperative opioid utilization. Patients undergoing ACLR with microfracture were at an increased risk of filling opioid prescriptions. Patients less than 25 years of age were at an elevated risk of filling opioid prescriptions at all time points postoperatively.