[Evaluation of the pharmacoeconomic efficacy of prestance in the treatment of hypertensive patients on the basis of the results of the POTENTIAL program]. / Otsenka farmakoekonomicheskoi effektivnosti preparata prestans pri lechenii bol'nykh arterial'noi gipertoniei na osnove rezul'tatov programmy POTENTsIAL.

AIM: To pharmacoeconomically estimate the use of a fixed-dose combination of perindopril and amlodipine in the treatment of hypertensive patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A pharmacoeconomic study was conducted on the basis of the Russian postmarketing observational open program POTENTIAL, which included the estimation of direct and indirect costs associated with the addition of a fixed-dose combination of perindopril and amlodipine to conventional therapy for hypertension in patients who had not achieved adequate blood pressure (BP) control. Cost-difference, cost-effectiveness, and budget-impact analyses were carried out. RESULTS: The addition of prestance to conventional therapy for hypertension can reduce total costs by 5.-5.8 times, direct costs required to achieve 1% of patients with adequate BP control by 20.5-42.1 times, and direct costs to improve a patient's status by one visual analogue scale score by 1.03-2.11 times. Within a 5-year horizon, the administration of prestance can decrease the cost of therapy for high BP and related strokes by 1.39-1.46 times. CONCLUSION: Due its high efficacy, prestance (amlodipine + perindopril) is a pharmacoeconomically preferred alternative only to the conventional therapy for hypertension even if the least costly generics are used, in both the short and medium term.

[Clinical and Economic Efficacy of Ivabradine in Patients Suffered Myocardial Infarction].

OBJECTIVE: to assess the clinical and cost-effectiveness of the addition to the treatment of patients with coronary artery disease, myocardial infarction (MI). If current blocker ivabradine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: as a basis for pharmacoeconomic research results of the program are taken battleships, in which 1226 patients with MI less than 12 months ago, for 16 weeks received ivabradine in addition to standard therapy. When conducting pharmacoeconomic calculations take into account the direct medical and non-medical costs of treating patients with drugs; the call ambulance crews (CAC); on the patients stay in the hospital at admission. To determine the cost of use of ivabradine used data on daily dosages of the drug presented in the program battleships. In this case, using the retail price of drugs taken from the resource pharmindex.ru (date accessed 6/23/14). When calculating the cost of hospitalization and emergency calls using the values specified in the decree of october 18, 2013 No932 "About the state guarantees the free provision of medical care to citizens for 2014 and the planning period of 2015 and 2016.". RESULTS: according to a study LINCOR adding ivabradine to standard therapy resulted in a significant reduction in the frequency of angina attacks, the need for treatment for CACs and hospitalization. Average total cost of a full 16-week course of therapy with a patient ivabradine 1.87 times lower than with the standard therapy alone. The most obvious benefits to health care institutions: the total cost of emergency calls and hospitalization when added to treatment with ivabradine reduced 20,027.79 to 1,630.45 rubles, le 12.3 times. CONCLUSION: despite the increase in direct costs due to the cost of the drug, the addition to the standard therapy of ivabradine in patients with myocardial infarction, pharmaco is more effective than using only standard therapy, due to a significant reduction in the need for emergency calls and hospitalization.