Biomechanical Assessment of a Novel Sharp-Tipped Screw for 1-Step Minimally Invasive Pedicle Screw Placement Under Navigation.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the pullout force of a novel sharp-tipped screw developed for single-step, minimally invasive pedicle screw placement guided by neuronavigation compared with the pullout force for traditional screws. METHODS: A total of 60 human cadaveric lumbar pedicles were studied. Three different screw insertion techniques were compared: (A) Jamshidi needle and Kirschner wire without tapping; (B) Jamshidi needle and Kirschner wire with tapping; and (C) sharp-tipped screw insertion. Pullout tests were performed at a displacement rate of 10 mm/min recorded at 20 Hz. Mean values of these parameters were compared using paired t tests (left vs right in the same specimen): A vs B, A vs C, and B vs C. Additionally, 3 L1-L5 spine models were used for timing each screw insertion technique for a total of 10 screw insertions for each technique. Insertion times were compared using 1-way analysis of variance. RESULTS: The mean pullout force for insertion technique A was 1462.3 (597.5) N; for technique B, it was 1693.5 (805.0) N; and for technique C, it was 1319.0 (735.7) N. There was no statistically significant difference in pullout force between techniques (P > 0.08). The average insertion time for condition C was significantly less than that for conditions A and B (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The pullout force of the novel sharp-tipped screw placement technique is equivalent to that of traditional techniques. The sharp-tipped screw placement technique appears biomechanically viable and has the advantage of saving time during insertion. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Single-step screw placement using high resolution 3-dimensional navigation has the potential to streamline workflow and reduce operative time.

Neurosurgery Billing and Reimbursement in 2021.

Practicing neurosurgery in 2021 requires a detailed knowledge of the vocabulary and mechanisms for coding and reimbursement, which should include general knowledge at the global level and fluency at the provider level. It is specifically of interest for the neurosurgeon to understand conceptually the nuances of hospital reimbursement. That knowledge is especially germane as more neurosurgeons become hospital employees. Here we provide an overview of the mechanics of coding. We illustrate the formula to generate physician reimbursement through the current relative value unit structure. We also seek to explain hospital-level reimbursement through the diagnosis-related group structure. Finally, we expand about different and ancillary income streams available to neurosurgeons and provide a realistic assessment including the opportunities and challenges of those entities.

Doing More with Less: A Minimally Invasive, Cost-Conscious Approach to Stereoelectroencephalography.

BACKGROUND: Stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) is a commonly used technique for mapping the epileptogenic zone before epilepsy surgery. Many SEEG depth electrode implantation techniques involve the use of extensive technological equipment and shaving of the patient's entire head before electrode implantation. Our goal was to evaluate an SEEG depth electrode implantation technique that used readily available cost-effective neurosurgical equipment, was minimally invasive in nature, and required negligible hair shaving. METHODS: Data on demographic characteristics, operative time, hemorrhagic complications, implantation complications, infection, morbidity, and mortality among patients who underwent this procedure were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Between April 2016 and March 2018, 23 patients underwent implantation of 213 depth electrodes with use of this technique. Mean (SD) operative time was 123 (32) minutes (range, 66-181 minutes). A mean (SD) of 9.3 (1.4) electrodes were placed for each patient (range, 8-13 electrodes). Two of the 213 electrodes (0.9%) were associated with postimplantation asymptomatic hemorrhage. One of the 213 electrodes (0.5%) was placed extradurally or incorrectly. None of the 213 electrodes was associated with symptomatic complications. No patients experienced infectious complications at any point in the preoperative, perioperative, or postoperative stages. CONCLUSIONS: This minimally invasive, cost-effective technique for SEEG depth electrode implantation is a safe, efficient method that uses readily available basic neurosurgical equipment. This technique may be useful in neurosurgery centers with more limited resources. This study suggests that leaving the patient's hair largely intact throughout the procedure does not pose an additional infection risk.

Retrospective Multicenter Assessment of Rod Fracture After Anterior Column Realignment in Minimally Invasive Adult Spinal Deformity Correction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior column realignment (ACR) was developed as a minimally invasive method for treating sagittal imbalance. However, rod fracture (RF) rates associated with ACR are not known. Our objective was to assess the rate of and risk factors for RF following ACR in deformity correction surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective multicenter review of patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) who underwent ACR for deformity correction. ASD was defined as coronal Cobb angle ≥20°, pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis >10°, sagittal vertical axis ≥5 cm, pelvic tilt ≥25°, or thoracic kyphosis ≥60°. Inclusion criteria were ASD, age >18 years, use of ACR, and development of RF or full radiographs obtained at least 1 year after surgery that did not demonstrate RF. RESULTS: Ninety patients were identified, with mean follow-up of 2.3 ± 1.4 years (age, 64.1 ± 9.4; 54 [60%] women). The most common ACR location was L3/4 (42 cases; 47%). Mean fusion length was 7.5 ± 3.6 levels. Four (4.4%) of 90 patients developed RF within 12 months of surgery. RF occurred adjacent to ACR in all cases; RF was not associated with focal correction (P = 0.49), rod material (P = 0.8), degree of correction (P > 0.07), or interbody at L5/S1 (P = 0.06). RF was associated with longer fusion constructs in univariate (P = 0.002) and multivariate (P = 0.03) analyses. CONCLUSIONS: RF occurred in 4.4% of patients with ASD who underwent ACR with a minimum of 1-year follow-up. RF was not associated with focal correction but appears to be associated with global correction and extent of fixation.

A Quantitative Assessment of the Accuracy and Reliability of Robotically Guided Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Technique and Application Accuracy.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and anterior (ALIF), transforaminal (TLIF), or lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) often require percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PSF) to achieve circumferential fusion. Robotic guidance technology may augment workflow to improve screw placement and decrease operative time. OBJECTIVE: To report surgical experience with robotically assisted percutaneous screw placement following LLIF. METHODS: Data from fusions with robotically assisted PSF in prone or lateral decubitus positions was reviewed. A CT-guided robotic guidance arm was used for screw placement (Excelsius GPS™, Globus Medical Inc, Audubon, Pennsylvania). Postoperative CT imaging facilitated screw localization. 3-dimensional and 2-dimensional coordinates of the screw tip and tail were calculated and compared with a target trajectory to calculate targeting errors. Breach was defined as a violation of the lateral or medial pedicle wall. RESULTS: Robotic-guided screw placement was successful in 28/31 patients. In those patients, 116/116 screws were successfully implanted. The breach rate was 3.4% (4/116). Across 17 patients (70 screws), mean 3-D accuracy was 5.0 ± 2.4 mm, mean 2-D accuracy was 2.6 ± 1.1 mm, and mean angular offset was 5.6 ± 4.3° with corresponding intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of 0.775 and 0.693. 3-dimensional accuracy correlated with age (R = 0.306, P = .011) and BMI (R = 0.252, P = .038). Accuracy did not significantly differ among vertebral body levels (P > .22). Mean operative time for MIS-TLIF and percutaneous screws was 277 ± 52 and 183 ± 54 min, respectively. Operative time did not significantly decrease across either group (P > .187). CONCLUSION: The Excelsius GPS™ robotic guidance system allows accurate PSF in most cases with 2 mm 2-D accuracy. Future studies are needed to demonstrate the utility of this novel guidance system and workflow improvement.

Analysis of Cost and 30-Day Outcomes in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Less Invasive, Stand-Alone Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.

BACKGROUND: A comparative evaluation of operative costs between single-level transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and stand-alone lateral transpsoas interbody fusion (LIF) has not yet been done. We analyzed the costs, operative parameters, and early outcomes of single-level stand-alone LIF versus single-level TLIF. METHODS: Ten patients who underwent single-level TLIF and 10 patients who underwent single-level stand-alone LIF were included in the analysis. Total, variable, and fixed costs from perioperative data were available from a single institution. In addition, patient demographics, length of hospital stay, and 30-day outcomes and readmission rates were reviewed. RESULTS: Total cost, variable cost, and fixed costs were significantly lower in the LIF group, and there was no difference in outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Single-level stand-alone LIF may prove to be more cost-effective and provide cost savings with analogous 30-day outcomes compared with single-level TLIF procedures.

Pedicle screw accuracy assessment in ExcelsiusGPS® robotic spine surgery: evaluation of deviation from pre-planned trajectory.

BACKGROUND: The ExcelsiusGPS® (Globus Medical, Inc., Audubon, PA) is a next-generation spine surgery robotic system recently approved for use in the United States. The objective of the current study is to assess pedicle screw accuracy and clinical outcomes among two of the first operative cases utilizing the ExcelsiusGPS® robotic system and describe a novel metric to quantify screw deviation. METHODS: Two patients who underwent lumbar fusion at a single institution with the ExcelsiusGPS® surgical robot were included. Pre-operative trajectory planning was performed from an intra-operative CT scan using the O-arm (Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN). After robotic-assisted screw implantation, a post-operative CT scan was obtained to confirm ideal screw placement and accuracy with the planned trajectory. A novel pedicle screw accuracy algorithm was devised to measure screw tip/tail deviation distance and angular offset on axial and sagittal planes. Screw accuracy was concurrently determined by a blinded neuroradiologist using the traditional Gertzbein-Robbins method. Clinical variables such as symptomatology, operative data, and post-operative follow-up were also collected. RESULTS: Eight pedicle screws were placed in two L4-L5 fusion cases. Mean screw tip deviation was 2.1 mm (range 0.8-5.2 mm), mean tail deviation was 3.2 mm (range 0.9-5.4 mm), and mean angular offset was 2.4 degrees (range 0.7-3.8 degrees). All eight screws were accurately placed based on the Gertzbein-Robbins scale (88% Grade A and 12% Grade B). There were no cases of screw revision or new post-operative deficit. Both patients experienced improvement in Frankel grade and Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score by 6 weeks post-op. CONCLUSION: The ExcelsiusGPS® robot allows for precise execution of an intended pre-planned trajectory and accurate screw placement in the first patients to undergo robotic-assisted fusion with this technology.