Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
Nutrients ; 16(11)2024 May 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38892535

RESUMO

Rice bean [Vigna umbellata (Thunb.) Ohwi and Ohashi], an annual legume in the genus Vigna, is a promising crop suitable for cultivation in a changing climate to ensure food security. It is also a medicinal plant widely used in traditional Chinese medicine; however, little is known about the medicinal compounds in rice bean. In this study, we assessed the diuretic effect of rice bean extracts on mice as well as its relationship with the contents of eight secondary metabolites in seeds. Mice gavaged with rice bean extracts from yellow and black seeds had higher urinary output (5.44-5.47 g) and water intake (5.8-6.3 g) values than mice gavaged with rice bean extracts from red seeds. Correlation analyses revealed significant negative correlations between urine output and gallic acid (R = -0.70) and genistein (R = -0.75) concentrations, suggesting that these two polyphenols negatively regulate diuresis. There were no obvious relationships between mice diuresis-related indices (urine output, water intake, and weight loss) and rutin or catechin contents, although the concentrations of both of these polyphenols in rice bean seeds were higher than the concentrations of the other six secondary metabolites. Our study findings may be useful for future research on the diuretic effects of rice bean, but they should be confirmed on the basis of systematic medical trials.


Assuntos
Diuréticos , Polifenóis , Sementes , Animais , Camundongos , Diuréticos/farmacologia , Sementes/química , Polifenóis/farmacologia , Polifenóis/análise , Masculino , Extratos Vegetais/farmacologia , Vigna/química , Ácido Gálico/farmacologia , Genisteína/farmacologia , Catequina/farmacologia , Catequina/análise , Rutina/farmacologia , Rutina/análise , Diurese/efeitos dos fármacos
2.
Vaccines (Basel) ; 9(5)2021 May 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34066844

RESUMO

In China, there are two categories of vaccines available from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and associated public health agencies. Extended Program of Immunization (EPI) vaccines are government-funded and non-EPI vaccines are voluntary and paid for out-of-pocket. The government plans to transition some non-EPI vaccines to EPI in the coming years, which may burden public health system capacity, particularly in terms of budget, workforce, supply chains, and information systems. Our study explored vaccinator and caregiver perspectives on introducing non-EPI vaccines into routine immunization and perceived facilitators and barriers affecting this transition. We conducted a qualitative study from a realist perspective, analysing semi-structured interviews with 26 vaccination providers and 160 caregivers in three provinces, selected to represent regional socioeconomic disparities across Eastern, Central, and Western China. Data were analysed thematically, using deductive and inductive coding. Most participants were positive about adding vaccines to the national schedule. Candidate EPI vaccines most frequently recommended by participants were varicella, mumps vaccine, and hand-foot-mouth disease. Providers generally considered existing workspaces, cold-chain equipment, and funding sufficient, but described frontline staffing and vaccine information systems as requiring improvement. This is the first qualitative study to explore interest, barriers, and facilitators related to adding vaccines to China's national schedule from provider and caregiver perspectives. Findings can inform government efforts to introduce additional vaccines, by including efforts to retain and recruit vaccine programme staff and implement whole-process data management and health information systems that allow unified nationwide data collection and sharing.

3.
Ophthalmology ; 126(12): e95, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31759508
4.
Ophthalmology ; 126(10): 1358-1365, 2019 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31146962

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To compare United States and international drug pricing for commonly prescribed intravitreal and topical ophthalmic medications. DESIGN: Cross-sectional observational study. METHODS: For 25 commonly used ophthalmic medications (3 intravitreal, 22 topical), we obtained 2017 third quarter United States average wholesale price (AWP), drug acquisition cost, or consumer pricing through United States government health insurance plans (Veterans Affairs [VA], Medicaid, Medicare Part B, and Medicare Part D) and commercial drug plans (CVS Caremark and Navitus Health Solutions), online pricing without insurance through a large United States warehouse retailer (Costco), and international drug pricing through government-sponsored health plans in Italy, Spain, Turkey, Canada, and Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Drug acquisition costs and consumer pricing of ophthalmic drugs through various payment systems. All prices were converted to United States dollars. RESULTS: For intravitreal medications in the United States, aflibercept and ranibizumab were priced similarly to each other and were more expensive than dexamethasone implants. Pricing of aflibercept and ranibizumab through government health insurance plans in Italy, Spain, Turkey, Canada, and Japan were less expensive by as much as 84.3% compared with the United States. For topical medications in the United States, pricing varied significantly both across different classes of medications and also between nonbranded and branded medications. Drug acquisition costs through the VA and Medicaid were inexpensive on average, but pricing through a hospital-employee drug insurance plan offered the smallest range (between $2.35 and $60.00). In all 5 non-United States countries studied, each topical medication with the exceptions of cyclosporine emulsion and difluprednate was less than $100, and 94.4% of topical medications in these countries had a nonbranded or branded option that was less than $50. CONCLUSIONS: In the United States, for topical more than intravitreal medications, significant price variation exists across both different drug pricing systems and different medications. Price differentials between nonbranded and branded medications can be significant. Internationally, topical medications exhibited a more limited and lower price range compared with drug pricing in the United States.


Assuntos
Inibidores da Angiogênese/economia , Anti-Inflamatórios/economia , Custos de Medicamentos , Oftalmopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Custos e Análise de Custo , Estudos Transversais , Dexametasona , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Ranibizumab , Receptores de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Proteínas Recombinantes de Fusão , Estados Unidos
5.
Health Serv Res ; 52(4): 1409-1426, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27471114

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To calculate the associations between Medicare payment and service volume for complex and noncomplex cataract surgeries. DATA SOURCES: The 2005-2009 CMS Part B National Summary Data Files, CMS Part B Carrier Summary Data Files, and the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. STUDY DESIGN: Conducting a retrospective, longitudinal analysis using a fixed-effects model of Medicare Part B carriers representing all 50 states and the District of Columbia from 2005 to 2009, we calculated the Medicare payment-service volume elasticities for noncomplex (CPT 66984) and complex (CPT 66982) cataract surgeries. DATA EXTRACTION: Service volume data were extracted from the CMS Part B National Summary and Carrier Summary Data Files. Payment data were extracted from the Medicare Physician Fee Schedule. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: From 2005 to 2009, the proportion of total cataract services billed as complex increased from 3.2 to 6.7 percent. Every 1 percent decrease in Medicare payment was associated with a nonsignificant change in noncomplex cataract service volume (elasticity = 0.15, 95 percent CI [-0.09, 0.38]) but a statistically significant increase in complex cataract service volume (elasticity = -1.12, 95 percent CI [-1.60, -0.63]). CONCLUSIONS: Reduced Medicare payment was associated with a significant increase in complex cataract service volume but not in noncomplex cataract service volume, resulting in a shift toward performing a greater proportion of complex cataract surgeries from 2005 to 2009.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata/economia , Extração de Catarata/tendências , Tabela de Remuneração de Serviços , Medicare Part B/economia , Mecanismo de Reembolso/tendências , Humanos , Análise de Regressão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
6.
Ophthalmology ; 122(8): 1609-14, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26050540

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To calculate the relationship between Medicare payment and service volume for the 3 highest-volume retina procedures: intravitreal injection (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 67028), laser treatment for retinal edema (CPT code 67210), and laser treatment for proliferative retinopathy (CPT code 67228). DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal database study. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred percent dataset of all retina procedures performed on Medicare Part B beneficiaries within the United States from 2005 through 2009. METHODS: Fixed-effects regression model using Medicare Part B carrier data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, controlling for time-invariant carrier-specific characteristics, national trends in service volume, Medicare beneficiary population, number of ophthalmologists, and income per capita. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Medicare payment-service volume elasticities, defined as the percent change in service volume per 1% change in Medicare payment, for intravitreal injection, laser treatment for retinal edema, and laser treatment for proliferative retinopathy. RESULTS: For all 3 retina procedures, the regression coefficients representing the Medicare payment-service volume elasticity were nonsignificant: intravitreal injection elasticity, -0.75 (95% confidence interval [CI], -1.62 to 0.13; P = 0.09); laser treatment for retinal edema elasticity, 0.14 (95% CI, -0.38 to 0.65; P = 0.59); and laser treatment for proliferative retinopathy elasticity, 0.05 (95% CI, -0.26 to 0.35; P = 0.77). CONCLUSIONS: This study found no evidence suggesting that there is an association between Medicare payment and service volume for the 3 highest-volume retina procedures from 2005 through 2009.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Injeções Intravítreas/estatística & dados numéricos , Fotocoagulação a Laser/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part B/economia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Inibidores da Angiogênese/economia , Current Procedural Terminology , Feminino , Seguimentos , Gastos em Saúde , Humanos , Degeneração Macular/tratamento farmacológico , Edema Macular/cirurgia , Masculino , Neovascularização Retiniana/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
7.
Ophthalmology ; 122(5): 1049-55, 2015 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25624173

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To calculate the association between Medicare payment and service volume for 6 commonly performed glaucoma procedures. DESIGN: Retrospective, longitudinal database study. SUBJECTS: A 100% dataset of all glaucoma procedures performed on Medicare Part B beneficiaries within the United States from 2005 to 2009. METHODS: Fixed-effects regression model using Medicare Part B carrier data for all 50 states and the District of Columbia, controlling for time-invariant carrier-specific characteristics, national trends in glaucoma service volume, Medicare beneficiary population, number of ophthalmologists, and income per capita. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Payment-volume elasticities, defined as the percent change in service volume per 1% change in Medicare payment, for laser trabeculoplasty (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] code 65855), trabeculectomy without previous surgery (CPT code 66170), trabeculectomy with previous surgery (CPT code 66172), aqueous shunt to reservoir (CPT code 66180), laser iridotomy (CPT code 66761), and scleral reinforcement with graft (CPT code 67255). RESULTS: The payment-volume elasticity was nonsignificant for 4 of 6 procedures studied: laser trabeculoplasty (elasticity, -0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1.31 to 0.77; P = 0.61), trabeculectomy without previous surgery (elasticity, -0.42; 95% CI, -0.85 to 0.01; P = 0.053), trabeculectomy with previous surgery (elasticity, -0.28; 95% CI, -0.83 to 0.28; P = 0.32), and aqueous shunt to reservoir (elasticity, -0.47; 95% CI, -3.32 to 2.37; P = 0.74). Two procedures yielded significant associations between Medicare payment and service volume. For laser iridotomy, the payment-volume elasticity was -1.06 (95% CI, -1.39 to -0.72; P < 0.001): for every 1% decrease in CPT code 66761 payment, laser iridotomy service volume increased by 1.06%. For scleral reinforcement with graft, the payment-volume elasticity was -2.92 (95% CI, -5.72 to -0.12; P = 0.041): for every 1% decrease in CPT code 67255 payment, scleral reinforcement with graft service volume increased by 2.92%. CONCLUSIONS: This study calculated the association between Medicare payment and service volume for 6 commonly performed glaucoma procedures and found varying magnitudes of payment-volume elasticities, suggesting that the volume response to changes in Medicare payments, if present, is not uniform across all Medicare procedures.


Assuntos
Cirurgia Filtrante/estatística & dados numéricos , Glaucoma/cirurgia , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Medicare Part B/economia , Oftalmologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Idoso , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Seguimentos , Implantes para Drenagem de Glaucoma/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Humanos , Iridectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Fotocoagulação a Laser/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Trabeculectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA