Veterinary echocardiographers' preferences for left atrial size assessment in cats: the BENEFIT project.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Veterinary echocardiographers' preferences for left atrial (LA) size assessment in cats have not been systematically investigated. The primary aim of this prospective exploratory study was to investigate echocardiographers' preferences concerning LA size assessment in cats. A secondary aim was to investigate echocardiographers' preferences for assessing LA size in subgroups based on geographic, demographic, and professional profiles. ANIMALS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: An online survey instrument was designed, verified, and distributed globally to veterinary echocardiographers. RESULTS: A total of 655 veterinary echocardiographers from six continents and 54 countries, working in specialty practice (56%) and in general practice (38%), provided data. Linear two-dimensional (2D) technique was favored by most echocardiographers (n = 612) for LA size assessment. Most commonly, respondents combined linear 2D with subjective assessment (n = 227), while 209 used linear 2D-based methods alone. Most echocardiographers using linear 2D-based methods preferred the right parasternal short-axis view and to index the LA to the aorta (Ao). Approximately 10% of the respondents obtained LA dimensions from a right parasternal long-axis four-chamber view. Approximately one-third of echocardiographers that made linear measurements from 2D echocardiograms shared the same preferences regarding cat position, acquisition view, indexing method and time point identification for the LA measurement. The responses were comparably homogeneous across geographic location, level of training, years performing echocardiography, and type of practice. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Most veterinary echocardiographers assessed LA size in cats using linear 2D echocardiography from a right parasternal short-axis view, and indexed LA to Ao. Respondents' preferences were similar over geographic, demographic, and professional backgrounds.

Veterinary echocardiographers' preferences for left atrial size assessment in dogs: the BENEFIT project.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Veterinary echocardiographers' preferences for left atrial (LA) size assessment in dogs have never been systematically investigated. The primary aim of this international survey study was to investigate echocardiographers' preferences for LA size assessment in dogs. The secondary aim was to investigate echocardiographers' preferences for assessing LA size in subgroups based on geographic, demographic, and professional profiles. ANIMALS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: An online survey instrument was designed, verified, and distributed globally to the veterinary echocardiographers. RESULTS: A total of 670 echocardiographers from 54 countries on six continents completed the survey. Most echocardiographers (n = 621) used linear two-dimensional (2D)-based methods to assess LA size, 379 used subjective assessment, and 151 used M-mode-based methods. Most commonly, echocardiographers combined linear 2D-based methods with subjective assessment (n = 222), whereas 191 used linear 2D-based methods alone. Most echocardiographers (n = 436) using linear 2D-based methods preferred the right parasternal short-axis view and indexed the LA to the aorta. Approximately 30% (n = 191) of the echocardiographers who performed linear measurements from 2D echocardiograms shared the same preferences regarding dog position, acquisition view, indexing method, and identification of the time-point used for the measurement. The responses were comparably homogeneous across geographic location, training level, years of performing echocardiography, and type of practice. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Most veterinary echocardiographers assessed LA size in dogs using linear 2D echocardiography from a right parasternal short-axis view, and by indexing the LA to the aorta. The respondents' preferences were similar across geographic, demographic, and professional backgrounds.

Quantitative assessment of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic and two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in normal canine hearts.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of two- and three-dimensional (2D, 3D) transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), 2D transesophageal echocardiography, and computed tomography angiography (CTA) compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) in normal dogs and to assess repeatability of 2D and 3D TTE for the assessment of left ventricular (LV) and left atrial (LA) dimensions. ANIMALS: The study was performed on six healthy dogs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Transthoracic echocardiography, transesophageal echocardiography, CTA, and CMR were performed on each dog. Right ventricular (RV) and LV volumes (in systole and diastole), ejection fraction (EF), and LA and right atrial (RA) volumes were assessed. Repeatability and intrarater and interrater measurements of variability were quantified by average coefficient of variation (CV) for 2D and 3D TTE. RESULTS: No clinically relevant differences in LV volume were detected between CMR and all modalities. Importantly, 3D TTE had the lowest CV (6.45%), correlated with (rs = 0.62, p = 0.01), and had the highest overlap in distribution with CMR (OVL >80%). Left ventricular EF and LA size via CTA compared best with CMR and RV and RA volumes were best estimated by 3D TTE. Assessment of LV and LA volumes via 3D TTE had moderate repeatability (15-21%) compared with LV M-mode measurements and 2D LA-to-aortic ratio (<10%), respectively. For LV size, interrater CV for 3D TTE (19.4%) was lower than 2D TTE (23.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Measurements of LV, RV, and RA volumes via 3D TTE and LA volume and LV EF assessed by CTA compared best with CMR. Three-dimensional echocardiography had lower interrater and intrarater CV compared with 2D TTE.

Removing barriers and improving choices: a case study in reproductive health services and managed care.

Managed care contains inherent structural features that can create obstacles to time-sensitive, confidential reproductive health services. Such structural impediments often exacerbate the sociocultural barriers that have historically affected low-income women--the population that has been targeted for mandatory enrollment in Medicaid managed care plans in many states. This article recommends public policy strategies to overcome and prevent multiple barriers that were identified in a New York-based study in 1995, which focused on access to reproductive health services in managed care settings. This article also includes updated evidence supporting the study's findings and its relevance to other states.

A structured literature review for risk assessment: EMF and human health risk.

The volume of publications on any given topic makes it difficult to select an appropriate subset of publications for review by an expert panel. This paper proposes a method for selecting a subset using a protocol that attempts to order publications based upon good research methods. The protocol was followed by graduate students with no expert knowledge of the area they were reviewing. They reduced 11730 articles on the topic of EMF and Health risk to 68 articles that were reviewed by an expert panel. The interrater reliability was 96% and 94% of the relevant articles were captured by this process.