A Point-of-Care Algorithm to Guide Proper Device Selection for Ambulatory Electrocardiography.

In the outpatient setting, ambulatory electrocardiography is the most frequently used diagnostic modality for the evaluation of patients in whom cardiac arrhythmias or conduction abnormalities are suspected. Proper selection of the device type and monitoring duration is critical for optimizing diagnostic yield and cost-effective resource utilization. However, despite guidance from major professional societies, the lack of systematic guidance for proper test selection in many institutions results in the need for repeat testing, which leads to not only increased resource utilization and cost of care, but also suboptimal patient care. To address this unmet need at our own institution, we formed a multidisciplinary panel to develop a concise, yet comprehensive algorithm, incorporating the most common indications for ambulatory electrocardiography, to efficiently guide clinicians to the most appropriate test option for a given clinical scenario, with the goal of maximizing diagnostic yield and optimizing resource utilization. The algorithm was designed as a single-page, color-coded flowchart to be utilized both as a rapid reference guide in printed form, and a decision support tool embedded within the electronic medical records system at the point of order entry. We believe that systematic adoption of this algorithm will optimize diagnostic efficiency, resource utilization, and importantly, patient care and satisfaction.

A Pilot Study and Ecological Model of Smoking Cues to Inform Mobile Health Strategies for Quitting Among Low-Income Smokers.

One crucial factor that leads to disparities in smoking cessation between groups with higher and lower socioeconomic status is more prevalent socioenvironmental smoking cues in low-income communities. Little is known about how these cues influence socioeconomically disadvantaged smokers in real-world scenarios and how to design interventions, especially mobile phone-based interventions, to counteract the impacts of various types of smoking cues. We interviewed 15 current smokers living in low-income communities and scanned their neighborhoods to explore smoking-related experiences and identify multilevel cues that may trigger them to smoke. Findings suggest four major types of smoking cues influence low-income smokers-internal, habitual, social, and environmental. We propose an ecological model of smoking cues to inform the design of mobile health (mHealth) interventions for smoking cessation. We suggest that user-triggered strategies will be most useful to address internal cues; server-triggered strategies will be most suitable in changing perceived social norms of smoking and routine smoking activities to address social and habitual cues; and context-triggered strategies will be most effective for counteracting environmental cues. The pros and cons of each approach are discussed regarding their cost-effectiveness, the potential to provide personalized assistance, and scale.

A study of the decision outcomes and financial costs of multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in oncology.

BACKGROUND: The benefits of multidisciplinary working in oncology are now accepted as the norm and widely accepted as being pivotal to the delivery of optimal cancer care. Central to this are the multidisciplinary meetings (MDMs) and we have evaluated decision outcomes and financial costs of these. METHODS: We reviewed the electronic patient records of 551 newly referred patients, discussed at 14 tumour site-specific MDMs for adult solid tumours and lymphoma (paediatric oncology and acute leukaemia were excluded) over a 1-month period, a total of 52 MDMs were studied. In addition, the records of a further 81 patients from 10 different MDMs were reviewed where the treating consultant had clearly recorded their opinion of how the patient should be managed and this was compared with the final MDM's consensus view. We also costed the MDMs utilising two different methodologies. RESULTS: The mean age of the 551 patients in the study was 62 years. In all, 536 (97.3%) patients were treatment naive before MDM discussion and 15 (2.7%) had prior treatment. Median time to treatment after the MDM was 16 days. In 535 (97.1%) cases, the MDM discussions were clearly documented, 16 (2.9%) were not clearly documented. In total, 319 (57.9%) patients were discussed once, and 232 (42.1%) were re-discussed (one to six occasions). In 62 (12.7%) patients, there were delays in MDM discussion, 30 (48.4%) were related to radiology, 26 (41.9%) to histopathology and 6 (9.7%) a combination of both. Adherence to the MDM management plan decision occurred 503 times (91.3%) with 48 (8.7%) deviations. In the smaller cohort of 81 patients, the consultant management plan and MDM consensus was compatible 71 (87.6%) times. On four occasions, there were major alterations in management while six were minor. The cost per month of our MDMs ranged from £2192 to £10 050 (median £5136) with total cost of £80 850 per month and the cost per new patient discussed was £415. CONCLUSION: Adherence to MDM decisions by health-care professionals occurs in the majority of patients. MDMs are costly, which may have relevance in the currently challenged health-care financial environment. There is a need to improve MDM efficiency without losing the considerable benefits associated with regular MDMs.

Pain-related pharmacotherapy, healthcare resource use and costs in spinal cord injury patients prescribed pregabalin.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis. OBJECTIVES: To describe comorbidities, pain-related pharmacotherapy, healthcare resource use and costs among patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) newly prescribed pregabalin. SETTING: United Kingdom (UK). METHODS: Using The Health Improvement Network database, SCI patients newly prescribed (index event) pregabalin (N=72; average age 48 years; 53% female) were selected. Study measures were evaluated during both the 9-months pre-index and follow-up periods. RESULTS: Prevalent comorbidities included musculoskeletal disorders (51.4%), digestive disorders (23.6%) and urogenital disorders (20.8%). Opioids were the most frequently prescribed medications (pre-index, 58.3%; follow-up, 61.1%, P=not significant (NS)) followed by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (43.1 and 45.8%, P=NS). Use of anti-epileptics (other than pregabalin) recommended for SCI neuropathic pain decreased (25.0 vs 12.5%, P=0.0290), whereas sedative/hypnotic use (18.1 vs 26.4%, P=0.034) increased during follow-up. Over 50% of patients had visits to specialists, and at least 1 in every 10 had laboratory/radiology-related visits. There were numerical decreases in proportions of patients with emergency room visits (22.2 vs 13.9%, P=NS) and hospitalizations (16.7 vs 12.5%, P=NS) during follow-up. Medication costs were higher during follow-up (median, £ 561.4 vs £ 889.5, P<0.0001). Costs of outpatient visits were similar during both study periods (£ 1082.1 vs £ 1066.1) as were total medical costs (£ 1689.0 vs £ 2169.4) when costs of pregabalin prescriptions were excluded. Inclusion of pregabalin costs resulted in higher (P<0.0001) total medical costs during follow-up. CONCLUSION: SCI patients had a high comorbidity, medication and healthcare resource use burden in clinical practice. Further research with larger sample sizes and more comprehensive data sources may serve to clarify study findings.

Evaluation of treatment options for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma: assessment of appropriateness, using the validated semi-quantitative RAND corporation/University of California, Los Angeles methodology.

A diverse range of treatment options and interventions are available for the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), allowing clinicians to tailor therapy to best meet their patient's needs and situation. However, choosing from the plethora of options can be problematic. RCC treatment guidelines advise on the most efficacious agents based upon specific clinical trial populations, but these do not always take into account all the patient factors that influence the suitability of treatment options for individual patients. This study used the validated RAND/UCLA (RAND corporation/University of California, Los Angeles) 'appropriateness methodology' to integrate clinical efficacy data with expert opinion concerning the use of specific RCC treatment options for particular patient scenarios, in an attempt to facilitate the widespread implementation of patient-focussed treatment choices. Use of the methodology has allowed us to develop treatment algorithms for patients with locally-advanced RCC and for those with metastatic disease post-nephrectomy or with primary tumour in situ. The algorithms take into account patient-specific characteristics such as tumour histology, prior treatment and known risk factors to advise whether a particular treatment intervention is appropriate, not appropriate or of uncertain appropriateness. Use of this methodology aims to develop a formalised process by which expert opinion can be integrated with clinical data and used as an additional source of information that can provide further guidance concerning difficult treatment decisions when data are absent or sparse.

Accuracy of estimating resting oxygen uptake and implications for hemodynamic assessment.

The Fick principle (cardiac output [Q(c)] = oxygen uptake [Vo(2)]/arteriovenous oxygen difference) can be used to calculate Q(c), with VO(2) frequently estimated by derived equations. To compare the accuracy of measured versus estimated VO(2), data were analyzed from 2 studies in which VO(2) at rest was measured using the Douglas bag technique. One study comprised adults with diabetes, and the other was an exercise study of healthy adults. VO(2) at rest was estimated as VO(2) (ml/min) = 125 ml/min/m(2) × body surface area (m(2)), with sensitivity analyses evaluating 2 other commonly used equations. Mean absolute difference (milliliters per minute) and ordinary least products regression were used to assess agreement between measured and estimated VO(2). Overall, mean measured versus estimated VO(2) differed significantly (307.2 ± 75.2 vs 259.9 ± 36.7 ml/min, p <0.0001), with a mean absolute difference of 52.9 ± 43.2 ml/min (p <0.0001); 20% of the estimates differed by >25% from the measured VO(2). Mean absolute difference increased from 36.7 ml/min in the lowest body mass index group (<25 kg/m(2)) to 91.7 ml/min in the highest group (≥40 kg/m(2)) (p for trend = 0.001) and was significantly higher in men than in women (65.6 vs 33.9 ml/min, p = 0.001); error was similar by median-split age (p = 0.65) and race (p = 0.34). Similar results were obtained when evaluating each of the other 2 estimating equations. Estimation of VO(2) at rest is inaccurate, especially in men and with increasing adiposity. In conclusion, when clinical hemodynamic assessment is performed, VO(2) should be measured, not estimated.

Assessment of cardiac structure and function in patients without and with peripheral oedema during rosiglitazone treatment.

BACKGROUND: Thiazolidinediones cause peripheral oedema, the aetiology of which remains poorly understood. METHODS: In a sub-study of a 6-month trial comparing rosiglitazone (Rsg) versus placebo, we compared those with versus without oedema among the 74 subjects treated with Rsg with respect to peak oxygen consumption indexed to fat-free mass (VO(2peak-FFM) ), cardiac MRI and markers of plasma volume expansion. RESULTS: Almost half (49%) of the Rsg-treated patients developed oedema. Baseline VO(2peak-FFM) was not different between those with versus without oedema (25.8 versus 28.2 ml/kg/min; p = 0.22) and declined 5% in the oedema group (Δ -1.3 ml/min/kg; p = 0.005) with no change in those without oedema. Stroke volume increased in both groups (Δ 8.7 and 8.8 ml; p < 0.001 for each); end-diastolic volume increased only in those with oedema (+13.1 ml; p = 0.001). No other cardiac function changes were observed. In both groups, weight increased (3.6 and 2.2 kg) and haematocrit decreased (-3.2% and -2.1%; p < 0.001 for each). In those with oedema, albumin decreased (-0.2 g/dl) and brain natriuretic peptide increased (11.9 pg/ml; p < 0.03 for each). CONCLUSIONS: Oedema was associated with a small decline in VO(2peak FFM), no adverse effects on cardiac function, and changes in selected measures suggesting that volume expansion underpins Rsg oedema.

Costs of managing adverse events in the treatment of first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma: bevacizumab in combination with interferon-alpha2a compared with sunitinib.

BACKGROUND: Bevacizumab plus interferon-alpha2a (IFN) prolongs progression-free survival to >10 months, which is comparable with sunitinib as first-line treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The two regimens have different tolerability profiles; therefore, costs for managing adverse events may be an important factor in selecting therapy. METHODS: Costs of managing adverse events affecting patients with metastatic RCC eligible for treatment with bevacizumab plus IFN or sunitinib were evaluated using a linear decision analytical model. Management costs were calculated from the published incidence of adverse events and health-care costs for treating adverse events in the United Kingdom, Germany, France and Italy. RESULTS: Adverse event management costs were higher for sunitinib than for bevacizumab plus IFN. The average cost per patient for the management of grade 3-4 adverse events was markedly lower with bevacizumab plus IFN compared with sunitinib in the United Kingdom (euro1475 vs euro804), Germany (euro1785 vs euro1367), France (euro2590 vs euro1618) and Italy (euro891 vs euro402). The main cost drivers were lymphopaenia, neutropaenia, thrombocytopaenia, leucopaenia and fatigue/asthaenia for sunitinib; and proteinuria, fatigue/asthaenia, bleeding, anaemia and gastrointestinal perforation for bevacizumab plus IFN. CONCLUSION: The costs of managing adverse events are lower for bevacizumab plus IFN than for sunitinib. The potential for cost savings should be considered when selecting treatments for RCC.

The cost effectiveness of tamoxifen in the prevention of breast cancer.

In the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT), women considered to be at high risk for developing breast cancer who received tamoxifen experienced 49% and 50% reductions in the risk of developing invasive and noninvasive breast cancer, respectively, compared with women receiving placebo. Although the BCPT addressed the clinical benefits of tamoxifen, this study sought to assess its cost effectiveness in the prevention of breast cancer in women at increased risk for developing the disease. Women were considered to be at an increased risk if they were: 1) 60 years of age or older, 2) age 35 to 59 years with a history of lobular carcinoma in situ, or 3) age 35 to 59 years with additional risk factors that made their 5-year predicted breast cancer risk at least as great as that of women 60 years of age. A decision-analysis model was used to estimate the incremental cost effectiveness of using tamoxifen compared with no intervention as preventive therapy in age-group defined cohorts of women who were at high risk for developing breast cancer. The analysis used data on the benefits and risks of tamoxifen as observed in the BCPT. In a subgroup analysis, tamoxifen's cost effectiveness was also evaluated in women who had had a hysterectomy, because of evidence that suggested an increased risk of endometrial cancer in women receiving tamoxifen. Under conservative assumptions from a base-case analysis, the incremental cost effectiveness of tamoxifen is $41,372 per life-year gained for women age 35 to 49 years, whereas for women age 50 to 59 years and 60 to 69 years, these values are $68,349 and $74,981, respectively. For women with a previous hysterectomy, tamoxifen's cost effectiveness is $46,060 per life-year gained. A strategy of using tamoxifen in high-risk women to prevent breast cancer in high-risk women may be cost effective, particularly in the 35-to-49 year-old age group and in those of any age who have had a hysterectomy.

Effects of altering the time of administration and the time frame of quality of life assessments in clinical trials: an example using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a large anti-emetic trial.

Previous studies conducted by our group suggested that the ability to demonstrate an impact of emesis control on quality of life might depend upon when an quality of life instrument was administered in relation to chemotherapy and on the time frame of the questionnaire. This study was conducted to address this issue. Six hundred and fifty patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy in a randomized trial comparing a variety of anti-emetic regimens were allocated to four different modes of administration (days 4 and 8; 3 and 7 day time frames) of the QLQ-C30. Patients who completed the questionnaire at the time of maximal impact of chemotherapy (day 3) were more likely to report deterioration in quality of life. Patients who completed questionnaires at day 8 were more likely to report deterioration in quality of life if their questionnaire had a 7 day time frame rather than a 3 day time frame. Patients receiving more effective anti-emetic therapy had better quality of life. It was concluded that better anti-emetic control improves quality of life after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. In studying quality of life in situations where the impact of treatment waxes and wanes, careful attention needs to be paid to scheduling the administration of questionnaires and to their time frame.